What are US troops doing in Los Angeles?
WASHINGTON, - U.S. President Donald Trump's administration has said it is going to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles to help protect federal property and personnel during the ongoing protests in the city.
Here is everything we know about the U.S. troops that are being deployed to Los Angeles:
WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF TROOPS SENT TO LA?
National guard troops usually belong to individual states and personnel in many cases are trained to help with emergencies that those states have to deal with, such as natural disasters.
Since they are the reserve force of the U.S. military, National Guard troops are usually part time, meaning that they have other jobs as well.
U.S. Marines on the other hand are active duty troops - it is a full time job.
Marines are trained for conflicts around the world - from the Middle East to Africa - and are used for rapid global deployments in case of emergencies, such as threats to U.S. embassies.
All those troops will come under a task force, known as Task Force 51.
HOW CAN TROOPS LEGALLY BE DEPLOYED WITHIN THE UNITED STATES?
Trump cited Title 10 of the U.S. Code, a federal law that outlines the role of the U.S. Armed Forces, in his June 7 order to call members of the California National Guard into federal service.
A provision of Title 10 - Section 12406- allows the president to deploy National Guard units into federal service if the U.S. is invaded, there is a "rebellion or danger of rebellion" or the president is "unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States."
The president also has the authority to deploy active duty troops, like the Marines, within the United States in limited cases.
WHERE ARE THE TROOPS COMING FROM?
Many of the 4,000 National Guard troops are coming from the California National Guard. So far, 2,100 soldiers from the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, a unit of the California National Guard, are on the ground.
The Marines being deployed are from the 2nd Battalion, 7th Marines, 1st Marine Division. They are based out of Twentynine Palms, close to Los Angeles.
WHAT CAN TROOPS DO AND WHAT CAN THEY NOT DO?
Both National Guard troops and Marines will be carrying out the same tasks, according to U.S. Army Major General Scott Sherman, who is commanding the troops.
They are tasked with protecting federal property and federal personnel. This means that they will accompany ICE agents on raids, officials have said.
The troops are authorized to detain people who pose a threat to federal personnel or property, but only until police can arrest them. Military officials are not allowed to carry out arrests themselves.
The Posse Comitatus Act, generally forbids the U.S. military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement.
Trump could take a more far-reaching step by invoking the Insurrection Act, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement.
WHAT TRAINING WILL THE TROOPS RECEIVE?
Troops receive varying levels of training in dealing with riots and crowd control.
Since National Guard troops are used domestically in many cases, they receive extensive training when it comes to crowd control and civil unrest.
While Marines may receive a basic level of crowd control training, it is not their expertise in domestic situations. The 700 Marines will receive two days of training focused on civil disturbance, crowd control and protection of facilities, before they are deployed to the streets of Los Angeles.
The Marines will also have added "legal and law enforcement expertise," the military said.
WHAT WILL TROOPS BE ARMED WITH?
National Guard troops have been seen carrying shields, batons and rifles, along with regular protective equipment.
The Marines will also be armed with riot shields and batons, and Sherman said they will not have ammunition in their rifles, but they will carry it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Rubio warns Iran against targeting U.S. over Israeli strikes
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned Iran late Thursday (June 12, 2025) not to respond to Israeli strikes by hitting American bases, saying Washington was not involved. Israel strikes Iran LIVE: Military official says nuclear targets hit; explosions heard across Tehran "We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region," Rubio said in a statement. "Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel." Israel announced strikes on Iran, where loud explosions were heard, hours after U.S. President Donald Trump publicly said they should not do so. Mr. Trump had said that Israel would ruin chances for a peacefully negotiated solution, which he said was close. A sixth round of talks over Tehran's nuclear program had been scheduled between the United States and Iran on Sunday in Oman. "Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense," Rubio said, without offering support or criticism of the strikes by the close US ally. "President Trump and the administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners," he said.
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why US judge ruled Trump's deployment of National Guard in California was illegal
A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order Thursday directing President Donald Trump to return control of the National Guard to California. The order, which takes effect at noon Friday, said the deployment of the Guard was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded Trump's statutory authority. The White House had no immediate comment on the ruling, but the federal government immediately filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit court. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said Trump overstepped his bounds in ordering the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard members to Los Angeles after protests erupted over the immigration crackdown. It was not immediately clear how that would change the situation on the ground. ALSO READ| What is 'No Kings' protest? Movement planned against Trump during Army's 250th anniversary parade California Gov. Gavin Newsom sued to block the Guard's deployment against his wishes. California later filed an emergency motion asking the judge to block the Guard from assisting with immigration raids. He argued that the troops were originally deployed to protect federal buildings and wanted the court to block the troops from helping protect immigration agents during the raids, saying that involving the Guard would only escalate tensions and promote civil unrest. The Trump administration called the lawsuit a 'crass political stunt endangering American lives' in its official response Wednesday. In a broad ruling, the judge determined Trump had not properly called the Guard up in the first place. Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, speaking in an interview with The Associated Press and one other media outlet, said that as of Wednesday about 500 of the Guard troops have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations. Photos of Guard soldiers providing security for the agents have already been circulated by immigration officials. Sherman is commander of Task Force 51, which is overseeing the Guard troops and Marines sent to Los Angeles. ALSO READ| No US involvement in Israel's attack on Iran, claim officials Typically the authority to call up the National Guard lies with governors, but there are limited circumstances under which the president can deploy those troops. Trump federalized members of the California National Guard under an authority known as Title 10. The lawsuit argued that Title 10 requires, among other things, that the president go through governors when issuing orders to the National Guard. Brett Shumate, an attorney for the federal government, said Trump complied with the statute by informing the general in charge of the troops of his decision and would have the authority to call in the Guard even if he had not. In a brief filed ahead of the Thursday hearing, the Justice Department said Trump's orders were not subject to judicial review. 'Courts did not interfere when President Eisenhower deployed the military to protect school desegregation. Courts did not interfere when President Nixon deployed the military to deliver the mail in the midst of a postal strike. And courts should not interfere here either,' the department said. 'Our position is this is not subject to judicial review,' Shumate told the judge. Breyer, who at one point waved a copy of the constitution, said he disagreed. 'We're talking about the president exercising his authority, and the president is of course limited in that authority. That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George,' he said. The protests over immigration raids in Los Angeles intensified after Trump called up the Guard and have since spread to other cities, including Boston, Chicago and Seattle. Federal immigration agents have been arresting people at Home Depot parking lots and other businesses, sparking fear in immigrant communities, after the Trump administration said it wanted to dramatically increase arrests under its immigration crackdown. ALSO READ| Trump's DC birthday parade could be canceled amid 'No Kings' protest Trump has described Los Angeles in dire terms that Bass and Newsom say are nowhere close to the truth. The Marines have not yet been spotted in Los Angeles, and Guard troops have had limited engagement with protesters. Dozens of mayors from across the Los Angeles region banded together Wednesday to demand the raids stop and the troops leave.
Mint
31 minutes ago
- Mint
Israel strikes Iran over its nuclear program
Israel launched a wide-ranging attack on Iran's nuclear program overnight, striking dozens of targets in an operation that pushes the region into a new conflict with uncertain consequences. An Israeli military official said the attack targeted Iran's nuclear program and other military sites, as well as Iranian military commanders and nuclear scientists. Dozens of planes wrapped up the first wave of the attack before dawn Friday, Israel said. 'We struck at the heart of Iran's nuclear enrichment program. We struck at the heart of Iran's nuclear weaponization program. We targeted Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz. We targeted Iran's leading nuclear scientists working on the Iranian bomb. We also struck at the heart of Iran's ballistic missile program,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Iranian state TV reported explosions and showed smoke rising in the capital, Tehran. The strike came hours after U.S. and Israeli officials had warned one was imminent and cut short a U.S.-led effort to resolve the standoff over Iran's nuclear program diplomatically. Iran has warned it would respond to any attack by striking Israel and potentially American bases in the region. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz declared a state of emergency and warned his population that Iran was expected to retaliate for the attack by firing missiles and drones at Israel. President Trump said on social media that he remains committed to finding a diplomatic solution but that Iran must give up the possibility of developing a nuclear weapon. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. wasn't involved in the strikes, noting that Israel advised the Trump administration it would take action for its own self-defense. He also warned Iran not to attack U.S. interests or personnel in the Middle East. The attack comes just days before U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff was to meet his Iranian counterparts in Iran for a sixth round of nuclear talks. The U.S. has said Iran must give up the ability to enrich uranium needed to build a bomb. Iran has refused, leaving the talks at an impasse. The Israeli military official said Iran had been secretly working to build a nuclear weapon in recent months. Israel's move to try to resolve the issue militarily is a gamble. Iran has dispersed its nuclear sites across the country and has buried them deep underground. Any military strike would require a sustained effort and several rounds of fighting before either the regime agrees to give up its nuclear program or is toppled, former Israeli officials and security experts said. Western and Israeli officials have said military action could set back an Iranian nuclear program at least a year, but there is considerable uncertainty over the estimate. Meanwhile, Iran is expected to respond with attacks of its own that could send the conflict spiraling. The two exchanged direct blows last year for the first time, with Iran firing hundreds of missiles and drones at Israel. Israel responded with strikes that damaged Iran's missile program and took out much of its air defense, leaving it more vulnerable to an attack on its nuclear program. 'If a conflict is imposed on us,' Iranian Defense Minister Amir Aziz Nasirzadeh said Wednesday, 'all U.S. bases are within our reach, and we will boldly target them in host countries.' An attack also could spur Iran to build a nuclear weapon. Tehran will also likely stop cooperating with international inspectors, leaving its program more opaque to the U.S. and its allies. Advocates of a strike said Israel had a limited window of opportunity to exploit the damage it has done to Iran's air defenses and to allies such as the Lebanese militia Hezbollah, which might previously have joined a retaliatory strike on Israel. Netanyahu raised the possibility of strikes with Trump in a phone conversation Monday, according to two U.S. officials. Soon after, the U.S. began moving some diplomats and military dependents out of the Middle East. Write to Dov Lieber at and Alexander Ward at
