US Secretary of State Rubio seeks probe into Harvard's possible sanctions breach
WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is seeking an investigation into whether Harvard University violated federal sanctions by participating in a health insurance conference in China, according to a New York Times report published on Wednesday (Jun 11).
Citing sources familiar with the matter and documents reviewed by the newspaper, the report said the conference may have included officials from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a Chinese state-run group that has been blacklisted by the United States.
The New York Times reported that Harvard has launched an internal review of its role in the event. Rubio signed off on a recommendation to the Treasury Department last month to open an investigation, according to the report.
Reuters has not independently verified the report.
A spokesperson for the Treasury Department said it takes 'any allegations of sanctions violations extremely seriously' but declined to comment on possible or pending investigations. A State Department spokesperson also declined to comment.
Harvard declined to respond to a Reuters request for comment and did not comment to the New York Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
38 minutes ago
- CNA
Commentary: How China beat Trump before the trade battle even started
LONDON: In the cult film The Princess Bride, the hero Westley tricks a villain, Vizzini, into killing himself in a battle of wits. Vizzini has to choose between two cups of wine, one of which Westley says is poisoned. In fact, Westley's cup is also poisoned, but he survives: he had spent years building up immunity to the toxin. Through long and careful preparation, Westley won the battle of wits long before it had begun. Substitute Xi Jinping for Westley and Donald Trump for Vizzini, and this week's US-China trade talks in London make a lot more sense. They didn't end in the US lying dead on the ground, but not far off. The sides agreed on a comically vague framework of co-operation, with the US asking for a handshake to seal the deal – an activity at which Donald Trump, as it happens, is famously poor. THE CLEAR WINNER Nor is he much good at negotiating. Beijing is the clear winner in these early skirmishes. Trump has now lifted most of the extraordinarily punitive tariffs he has imposed on China since his inauguration. What he got back this time was China vaguely promising to lift the restrictions on rare earth exports it imposed on April 4, as plaintively requested by his chief economic adviser Kevin Hassett. As I wrote recently, China's decision in April to cut off exports of certain rare earth minerals is a much more surgical strike than previous ineffectual scattergun restrictions. The restrictions of the early 2010s were undermined by the expansion of mineral production outside China and through smuggling by its notoriously lawless miners and processors. The latest round of restrictions focuses on the less common 'heavy' rare earth elements such as dysprosium, which has no large rival producers outside China and whose price shot higher after the controls were announced. Since the 2010s, Beijing has clamped down heavily on wildcat rare earth production and smuggling. Production is dominated by a small number of tightly state-controlled companies, and the latest controls are imposed via 'dual-use' export licensing for products used in defence manufacturing. This makes it much easier for the authorities to control the supply chain. The Chinese state certainly has its own issues with judgment and co-ordination. Its rare earth controls are threatening economies Beijing is trying to pull out of the US orbit. European car manufacturers have complained volubly. CLEARING A LOW BAR Alienating all buyers of rare earths is politically risky, but China is at least differentiating somewhat between European companies and American ones. Suppliers to Volkswagen, which has more than 30 plants in China, were among the first to receive a licence to buy rare earths. Beijing is managing to clear the low bar of exceeding the Trump administration's competence by some distance. US weapons, although formidable, are harder to target precisely. Just as the UK was wrongly convinced that its trade deficit with the EU gave it the superpower Brexit weapon of access to the British consumer, Trump thought prohibitive tariffs on Chinese imports would bring Beijing to heel. There's no doubt China is vulnerable, having maintained dependence on overseas demand by clinging to its traditional export-oriented growth model. But Trump's untargeted tariffs meant US companies risked losing key industrial inputs, as well as shelves potentially emptying of consumer goods. As for the US's own attempts to use export controls to crimp China's economy, its tools have proved too easily circumvented. Joe Biden's administration used restrictions on US technology and outward investment to slow China's technological development in semiconductors and other sectors, and leaned on allies to do the same. It didn't really work. China rapidly developed its own chip technology. Similarly, it's unlikely that Trump's recent restrictions on the export of chip software will allow the US to regain ground lost to China. Trump's attempt to fight on China's own ground of controlling critical physical inputs by restricting exports of ethane, a gas used in the chemical industry, is more likely to damage his country's companies and those of allies. The US still has some extremely powerful weapons, such as restricting access to the global dollar payment system, but their use on a large scale is untested. The triumph of the serenely calculating Westley over the bombastically ignorant Vizzini is a truly great moment in cinema. If Trump wants to win the next round, he is going to have to assess the ordnance at his disposal and deploy it far more accurately. History does not suggest this is a likely outcome.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
The most dangerous occupation in Washington these days is being an expert.
The Eisenhower Executive Office Building where many of the dismissed members of the National Security Council worked. PHOTO: HAIYUN JIANG/NYTIMES The most dangerous occupation in Washington these days is being an expert. Across West Executive Avenue from the White House, the offices that once buzzed with specialists at the National Security Council are now half vacant. Their dismissal reflects an administration not especially interested in the policy options developed by the specialists – many drawn from the State Department or the CIA – who stayed deep into the night pressure-testing alternatives to immediate and long-simmering crises. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
Top Africa official in US government to leave in July, State Dept says
Top Africa official in US government to leave in July, State Dept says The U.S. State Department's top official for Africa, Troy Fitrell, will retire in mid-July, a State Department spokesperson said on Thursday, adding the Africa bureau's number two, Jonathan Pratt, will step into the role. The change in leadership at the State Department's Africa bureau will come as President Donald Trump's administration is seeking to shift its strategy in the region to focus on trade rather than assistance. "After a long and distinguished career, the Department of State's Bureau of African Affairs Senior Bureau Official Ambassador Troy Fitrell is retiring in mid-July as planned," the State Department spokesperson said. "The Bureau of African Affairs Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary Jonathan Pratt will step into the senior bureau official role after Ambassador Fitrell's departure." Troy Fitrell, previously U.S. Ambassador to Guinea, has been running the Bureau of African Affairs in the absence of an officially nominated assistant secretary of State under Trump. The senior bureau official position serves in an acting capacity when an assistant secretary, a Senate-confirmed position, is yet to be named. Pratt, who previously served as U.S. Ambassador to Djibouti from 2021-2023, will also bring experience in the region to the role. He also previously held assignments in Republic of the Congo, Sudan and Angola, among other postings, according to the State Department website. Fitrell will leave his post on July 15, one source with direct knowledge of the decision told Reuters earlier on Thursday. Fitrell shared his plans to leave by that date over an email, a second source said. Reuters did not review the email. Fitrell did not respond to a request for comment. He told reporters last month he had tasked U.S. ambassadors on the continent to find commercial opportunities for U.S. companies, as the Trump administration has focused on trade with the region. The U.S. is keen to counter both Chinese and Russian influence on the continent, particularly over minerals and trade. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
