125 Jets, B-2 Bombers And A Decoy Plan: Inside Trump's 'Operation Midnight Hammer' Against Iran
Last Updated:
Operation Midnight Hammer, which involved 125 aircraft and several B-2 bombers, also included a deception plan that likely gave the US Army a strategic advantage against Iran
Operation Midnight Hammer: The world witnessed US intervention in the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict on Sunday, as strikes were carried out on Tehran's key nuclear sites under the codename 'Operation Midnight Hammer'.
But the operation, which involved 125 aircraft and several B-2 bombers, also included a deception plan that likely gave the US Army a strategic advantage during its strikes on Iran.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, said the American forces used several B-2 Spirit stealth bombers during the operation to destroy Iran's buried network of nuclear research facilities.
'At midnight Friday into Saturday morning, a large B2 strike package comprised of bombers launched from the continental US," he said during a press briefing at the White House.
How US Deceived Iranian Intelligence
Caine said that, to maintain a tactical surprise, part of the main strike package was directed westward into the Pacific as a 'decoy"—a deception effort known only to an 'extremely small number of planners and key leaders in Washington and in Tampa."
Here's a detailed explanation of Washington's 'decoy" plan against Iran:
Deception Strategy: A portion of the strike package was directed westward into the Pacific Ocean as a decoy, creating the illusion of a different operational focus. This move helped preserve tactical surprise.
Final Approach and Coordination: Upon entering Iranian airspace, the B-2s linked up with escort and support aircraft in a precisely timed and complex manoeuvre, requiring exact synchronisation across multiple platforms in a narrow corridor of airspace.
Further detailing the operation, Caine noted that this level of tight integration with minimal communication highlights the 'unmatched coordination capabilities of the U.S. joint force."
He further issued a stern warning to Iran, saying: 'Our forces remain on high alert, and are fully postured to respond to any Iranian retaliation or proxy attacks which would be an incredibly poor choice. We will defend ourselves. The safety of our service members and civilians remains our highest priority."
Meanwhile, US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth called Washington's 'Operation Midnight Hammer' against Iran an 'overwhelming success", adding that they 'devastated" Iranian nuclear facilities at multiple locations.
First Published:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
40 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Several countries ready to supply nuclear warheads to Iran': Top Putin aide amid US strikes on Tehran
Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has said that several countries are poised to directly provide Iran with their nuclear warheads amid US strikes on Iran's three nuclear sites, Isfahan, Natanz and Fordow and added that it is US President Donald Trump who has 'pushed America into another war'. The deputy chairman of the Security Council of Russia, Medvedev, outlined his views in a series of posts on X on what the Trump administration's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities accomplished for the US. 'The enrichment of nuclear material and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons will continue,' said Medvedev. 2. The enrichment of nuclear material — and, now we can say it outright, the future production of nuclear weapons — will continue. 3. A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads. — Dmitry Medvedev (@MedvedevRussiaE) June 22, 2025 Medvedev, who is a top aide of Russian President Vladimir Putin, wrote 'A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads.' But the Russian leader refrained from providing details of the specific countries that might pitch in and support Iran. Moscow has historically supported Iran's nuclear program. Earlier, Putin had offered to help mediate a peace talk between Israel and Iran in order to resolve the growing conflict. The Kremlin also offered to help negotiate a suitable nuclear deal between the US and Iran. Moscow's efforts were rejected by Trump, who while taking a potshot at Russia had said, 'They should first take care of their own conflict.' When the former US President Barack Obama's administration signed a nuclear deal with Iran in 2015, which is also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, Russia was involved in the process. The deal had lifted economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for a limit on Iran's nuclear program. But Trump withdrew from the deal in 2018 during his first tenure. The US struck three nuclear sites of Iran late on Saturday and the mission involved more than 125 aircrafts which included B-2 Stealth Bombers, according to Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
How Israel Became A Nuclear Power, How Many Bombs Does It Have?
Israel-Iran War: Despite never officially confirming its nuclear arsenal, Israel has long been believed to possess nuclear weapons. The secrecy surrounding its programme makes any estimate uncertain. But experts believe there is enough evidence to draw some broad conclusions. Israel remains one of the world's unofficial nuclear states. It has not signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), nor has it ever publicly declared or denied having nuclear weapons. According to estimates by the Federation of American Scientists and the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Israel today likely holds around 90 nuclear warheads. However, former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell once suggested, in a leaked email, that Israel might possess as many as 200 bombs – each one potentially aimed at Iran. Israel's nuclear journey began soon after its independence. In 1952, the newly formed government created the Israel Atomic Energy Commission to spearhead nuclear research. Around 1958, construction reportedly began at the secretive facility near Dimona in the Negev desert. By the mid-1960s, whispers within intelligence circles suggested that Israel was making significant progress. By 1967, just after the Six-Day War, it is believed that Israel had developed the capacity to build nuclear explosives. What makes Israel's programme particularly enigmatic is how discreetly it was built. Despite imposing strict controls on nuclear materials, many Western suppliers allegedly provided Israel with technology and components without fully enforcing NPT safeguards. This assistance, direct or indirect, helped Israel quietly amass the rare isotopes and technical know-how needed for bomb development. Why Israel built nukes? It viewed nuclear weapons as an insurance policy in a volatile region. Its leadership feared that if Iran ever acquired a nuclear bomb, Israel's very existence could be threatened. That mentality has intensified as recent events, missile exchanges, airstrikes and a growing Iran-Israel standoff, have elevated both countries to the edge of open conflict. The wide range of estimates, between 90 and 200 warheads, reflects uncertainty. The lower number comes from technical assessments of Israel's capacity – plutonium production rates, missile delivery systems and storage facilities. The higher end comes from diplomatic notes like Colin Powell's statement, suggesting Israel may have stockpiled more weapons than outside observers can verify. Israel's nuclear programme remains cloaked in silence, supported by decades of official ambiguity. Current estimates are just that, estimates. But whether it holds a few dozen or several hundred nuclear bombs, Israel clearly has enough firepower to shape its national security policy for decades to come. And in a region increasingly defined by missile tests, nuclear rhetoric and high-speed airstrikes, that arsenal carries a heavy geopolitical weight.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"Why Wouldn't There Be Regime Change?" Trump's 'MIGA' Message For Iran
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump on Sunday questioned the possibility of regime change in Iran following US military strikes against key Iranian military sites over the weekend. "It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" Trump wrote on his social media platform. A day after the US. sent 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs crashing into the mountain above Iran's Fordow nuclear site, Tehran vowed to defend itself at all costs. Iran and Israel continued to trade volleys of missile attacks, with an explosion in western Iran claiming the lives of half a dozen military personnel, according to an Iranian media outlet. Earlier, Iran fired missiles that wounded scores of people and flattened buildings in Tel Aviv. The US State Department ordered employees' family members to leave Lebanon and advised citizens elsewhere in the region to keep a low profile or restrict travel. An advisory from the US Department of Homeland Security warned of a "heightened threat environment in the United States." Law enforcement in major US cities stepped up patrols and deployed additional resources to religious, cultural and diplomatic sites. Tehran has so far not followed through on its threats of retaliation against the United States - either by targeting US bases or trying to choke off global oil supplies - but that may not hold. Speaking in Istanbul, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said his country would consider all possible responses. There would be no return to diplomacy until it had retaliated, he said. "The US showed they have no respect for international law. They only understand the language of threat and force," he said. Trump, in a televised address, called the strikes "a spectacular military success" and boasted that Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities had been "completely and totally obliterated." But his own officials gave more nuanced assessments and - with the exception of satellite photographs appearing to show craters on the mountain above Iran's subterranean plant at Fordow - there has been no public accounting of the damage. The UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported after the US strikes. In a step towards what is widely seen as Iran's most effective threat to hurt the West, its parliament approved a move to close the Strait of Hormuz. Nearly a quarter of global oil shipments pass through the narrow waters that Iran shares with Oman and the United Arab Emirates. Iran's Press TV said closing the strait would require approval from the Supreme National Security Council, a body led by an appointee of Khamenei. Attempting to choke off Gulf oil by closing the strait could send global oil prices skyrocketing, derail the world economy and invite almost certain conflict with the US Navy's massive Fifth Fleet, based in the Gulf and tasked with keeping the strait open. Security experts have long warned that a weakened Iran could also find other unconventional ways to strike back, such as bombings or cyberattacks. DIVERGING WAR AIMS Israeli officials, who began the hostilities with a surprise attack on Iran on June 13, have increasingly spoken of their ambition to topple the hardline Shi'ite Muslim clerical establishment that has ruled Iran since 1979. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Israeli reporters that Israel was very close to meeting its goals of removing the threats of ballistic missiles and the nuclear program in Iran. US officials, many of whom witnessed Republican President George W. Bush's popularity collapse following his disastrous intervention in Iraq in 2003, have stressed that they were not working to overthrow Iran's government. "This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told reporters at the Pentagon. "The president authorised a precision operation to neutralise the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear programme." (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
