
Pentagon tightens its purse as F-35 fighter jet takes fire on several fronts in Israel-Iran conflict
Iran's state-affiliated
Nour News
on Monday reported that its air defence forces had brought down another Israeli F-35 stealth jet, the third such claim since fighting began last week. According to the
Tehran Times
, the jet was downed near Tabriz in western
Iran
, and the pilot was captured after ejecting.
A statement attributed to Iran's Army, known as Artesh, read: 'Of the two others, one pilot is believed liquidated, and another too captured by Iranian forces.'
Iranian state broadcaster
Press TV
declared, 'Iran has earned the distinction of being the first country in the world to successfully shoot down fifth-generation fighter jets by targeting two stealth F-35 fighters belonging to the Zionist regime.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Subaru Is Back & Better Than Ever With Its Incredible New 2025 Lineup
PopularSearches | Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
ET has not been independently able to verify this news.
The
Israeli Defence Forces
(IDF) dismissed the story outright. Col. Avichay Adraee, its Arabic-language spokesperson, said: 'Fake Iranian media. This news being spread by Iranian media is completely baseless.'
Live Events
While no evidence has been provided by Iranian authorities, images said to show the downed aircraft have begun circulating online, though their authenticity remains unclear.
Nevertheless, regardless of what has been proven so far, the rumors were enough to push
Pentagon
to make some budgetary cuts to
Lockheed Martin
's F-35 program.
Israel-Iran War: Fighting intensifies as Nuclear talks collapse
The airspace clash comes as Israeli strikes continue to pound Iranian cities. On Saturday, Iran launched another wave of missiles into Israeli territory, injuring civilians in the Haifa region. In turn, Israel said it had hit Tehran directly, targeting military installations and key nuclear sites.
'Every site, every target of the ayatollah regime will be hit,' said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He added that the strikes had delivered a 'real blow' to Iran's nuclear programme and claimed support from U.S. President Donald Trump.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian warned, 'The continuation of the Zionist aggression will be met with a more severe and powerful response from the Iranian armed forces.'
The fallout has already disrupted diplomacy. A new round of nuclear talks between the U.S. and Iran, scheduled for Sunday, was cancelled. Tehran blamed Israel's attacks and Washington's support. 'We cannot negotiate while under military assault,' said Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.
Also Read:
Blind radar, blistering speed: How Israeli jets crippled Iran's air defence in 48 hours, something Russia couldn't do in 3 years
Israel-Iran: High-profile losses on both sides
The cost in human life has been mounting. Iran's UN ambassador reported that 78 people were killed and over 300 wounded in Israel's first wave of strikes. Among the dead were senior Iranian commanders, including Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) head Hossein Salami and top general Mohammad Bagheri.
Meanwhile, Iran says it has killed at least three Israelis and injured 76 more with its retaliatory drone and missile attacks. Tel Aviv's Ramat Gan district was hit hard, with eyewitnesses describing chaos and destruction.
'We just heard a very big explosion, everything was shaking, smoke, dust, everything was all over the place,' said Chen Gabizon, a resident who fled to a shelter.
Iran's Revolutionary Guards say they struck dozens of targets across Israel, including military facilities and high-rise buildings. The Israeli army said it had destroyed underground missile sites in Iran's Khorramabad and an oil refinery in Kangan.
Also Read:
Sea shield activated: How Israel's navy used India-developed missile tech to stop Iran's drones
Lockheed Martin's F-35 programme faces budget blow
As Iran claims success in downing America's most advanced fighter jet,
Lockheed
Martin faces a different kind of hit: the Pentagon is ordering fewer F-35s.
According to Bloomberg, the U.S. Department of Defense has cut its request to Congress for the Air Force's F-35A fighter jets by 50%, dropping the number from 48 to just 24 for the 2026 fiscal year. The total ask is now $3.5 billion for the aircraft and $531 million for supplies.
This reduction, if approved, would mark a significant shift for the world's largest operator of the F-35. It also adds pressure to a programme already under scrutiny. The fighter's maintenance issues and high costs have triggered questions over its long-term viability.
As of now, Lockheed Martin has not yet acknowledged the information.
Problems pile up for the F-35
The F-35's mission-capable rate in 2025 dropped to just 51.5%, according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office. That's well below the Air Force's 75% target. The main reasons? Parts shortages and complex maintenance routines.
Elon Musk has publicly criticised the aircraft, calling it 'expensive and complex' and warning that it's becoming 'obsolete' in a world of drone warfare.
Lockheed had hoped to rebound with its upgraded 'fifth-generation plus' variant. It even secured a December 2024 deal worth $11.8 billion for Lot 18, which included 48 F-35As for the U.S. Air Force.
Now, the delay of Lot 19—and competition from Boeing's sixth-generation F-47—suggests that even Lockheed's dominance in stealth aviation is being tested.
Also Read:
'It's basically Hitler's nuclear team': Netanyahu compares Iran's scientists to Nazis amid calls to target Khamenei
Washington eyes other assets
The Pentagon's budget plans for 2026 reflect a broader shift. A total of $205 billion has been proposed for procurement, with $24.8 billion earmarked for aircraft alone. But nearly a quarter of that spending hinges on whether President Trump's reconciliation bill passes Congress.
Among the proposed allocations:
$4.7 billion for Northrop Grumman's B-21 Raider
$2.5 billion for 21 F-15EX jets
$2.8 billion for 15 Boeing KC-46A tankers
$387.1 million for the hypersonic Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW)
Two versions of the budget have been submitted—one with reconciliation funds, one without—signalling deep uncertainty. Congress may still push to restore the F-35 orders. But for now, Lockheed's grip appears weaker.
Also Read:
Iran is no pushover: Israel is learning the hard way
F-35B: Stealth fighter that lands like a helicopter
The F-35 Lightning II is one of the most widely deployed fighter jets of its generation. Built as a multirole stealth aircraft, it is designed for air superiority, deep strike, electronic warfare, and surveillance.
There are three core variants. The F-35A is designed for conventional takeoff and landing. The F-35B is made for short takeoffs and vertical landings. The F-35C is used from aircraft carriers with catapult systems.
The jet recently involved in an emergency landing in India was an F-35B. This version is specifically built for operations from platforms like HMS Prince of Wales, which do not have assisted launch systems. It can take off from short decks and land vertically—much like a helicopter. This makes it suitable for forward bases and maritime missions.
Also Read:
'This is how World War III begins': As missiles rain on Tel Aviv, analysts say the next strike could drag the world in
What makes the F-35 different
The F-35's edge lies in its stealth design, sensor fusion, and ability to act as an airborne communication hub. Its systems allow pilots to track and engage targets before they are even seen visually.
One of its signature features is a helmet-mounted display. This allows the pilot to 'see through' the aircraft using live feeds from the jet's sensors. Pilots can lock targets simply by turning their heads.
The jet also uses real-time data links to coordinate with other aircraft, ground stations, and naval assets. This turns the F-35 into a flying node in a much larger networked force.
Another key asset is its ability to deploy long-range air-to-air weapons like the MBDA Meteor. These missiles are capable of hitting targets far beyond visual range. Combined with the aircraft's radar and infrared sensors, it gives the pilot a complete picture of the battlespace.
Beyond the battlefield, world leaders are warning of a wider fallout. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan urged regional powers to prevent a 'devastating war', following a call with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
Iran has warned Britain, France and the U.S. not to intervene militarily on Israel's behalf. The message from Tehran is simple: any interference will be met with force.
As more nations begin grounding flights and sealing airspace, the sense of escalation is growing.
What began as covert strikes and proxy tension has now turned into direct confrontation. The skies over Iran and Israel are thick with drones, missiles—and claims that even the world's most advanced jet is no longer untouchable.
Also Read:
Has the stealthy F-35 met its match? Iran claims capture of Israeli pilots amid reports of third jet shoot-down
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump's three excruciating choices on Iran
DONALD TRUMP promised to end the wars in the Middle East. Instead America's president finds himself supervising a new one. No matter: he thinks the conflict between Israel and Iran, now in its fourth day, will be simple to stop. 'We can easily get a deal done,' he wrote in a social-media post on June 15th. A few hours later he implied that peace between the two countries, bitter foes since 1979, was merely a matter of convincing them to trade more. His breezy optimism is easy to dismiss, out of place with a war that has rained air strikes on Tehran and missile barrages on Tel Aviv. But Mr Trump will nonetheless have a big say in when and how that war ends. In the coming days he will have to make several decisions that will either restrain or embolden Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister. Mr Netanyahu started the war, but he is relying on Mr Trump to end it; how the president plans to do so, though, is anyone's guess. The first decision is whether to demand a diplomatic solution. Before the war America was trying to negotiate a new nuclear pact with Iran, to replace the one Mr Trump abandoned in 2018. A sixth round of talks had been scheduled for this weekend. Unsurprisingly, it was cancelled. Still, Mr Trump continues to urge negotiations. Iran's nuclear project is the ostensible focus of Israel's war effort; an agreement to restrict it would be a key part of a ceasefire. But Mr Trump will face a string of obstacles. More on the war between Israel and Iran: For a start, neither warring party is ready to make such a deal. Israel has spent years planning this war. It will not want to stop fighting after a few days, with many of its goals unmet. And while Iran says it is willing to accept a mutual ceasefire, it is not yet prepared to make major concessions on its nuclear programme. America will want it to forswear uranium enrichment and dismantle many of its nuclear facilities, things it has resisted doing for decades. Perhaps Iran will be more willing to capitulate as the damage mounts. The regime wants to survive. But it does not trust America in general, and Mr Trump in particular: he ditched the nuclear pact in 2018, assassinated Iran's top commander in 2020 and allowed Israel to start a war. The German foreign minister has offered, alongside Britain and France, to negotiate with the Iranians. But America would still have to play a central role in the talks. No one else could assure both Israel and Iran that an agreement would stick. If it is serious about a deal, it will need to be a more competent negotiator this time around. Steve Witkoff, the president's Middle East envoy, managed just five meetings with Iran in two months, while juggling a portfolio that also included the wars in Gaza and Ukraine. He also scorned help from American allies (a European diplomat says he received more detailed readouts on the talks from Iran than from America). If Mr Trump is not serious about diplomacy, his second choice is whether America should join the war. Satellite imagery suggests that Israel has destroyed the so-called 'pilot-fuel enrichment plant' at Natanz, an above-ground facility where Iran enriched uranium to 60%, a small step below weapons-grade. But it has yet to damage the enrichment facility at Fordow, which is dug into the side of a mountain, too deep for Israeli ordnance to reach. Israel could damage the entrances and ventilation shafts, in effect entombing the facility for a time. It would rather enlist help from America, which has specialised bombs capable of burrowing deep underground. It has asked Mr Trump to join strikes on Fordow (he has not yet agreed). In the most optimistic scenario those sorties would both cripple the facility and spook Iran into submitting to a deal. Reality is rarely so tidy, however. Iran may fear that strikes on Fordow are merely the opening act in a broader campaign to topple the regime. That could lead it to retaliate against America or its allies in the region. Iran has so far refrained from such actions, fearing they would draw America into the war; if America was already involved, though, Iran may feel it had nothing to lose. Some of Mr Trump's supporters in Washington, and some analysts in Israel, suspect Mr Netanyahu has such a scenario in mind. When the war began, after all, Israel said it only needed America's permission. Now it wants America to join a limited military campaign—one that could easily morph into something bigger. The prime minister seems increasingly fixated on toppling Iran's regime. In a statement addressed to the people of Iran on June 13th he urged them to 'stand up' against their rulers. Two days later, in an interview with Fox News, he was asked if regime change was Israel's goal. 'It could certainly be the result, because the Iran regime is very weak,' Mr Netanyahu replied. Several of Mr Trump's advisers have urged him not to approve American strikes, fearing it would become an open-ended campaign. That points to Mr Trump's third choice. Israeli leaders like to say that their country defends itself by itself. But it relies on America to protect it against Iranian ballistic missiles, to share intelligence and to resupply its army. If Mr Trump stays out of the war, and if he declines to pursue serious diplomacy—or if his efforts are aimless and futile, a hallmark of his administration—he will have to decide how much continued support to give Israel. He could urge Israel to end the war anyway. Or he could allow it to continue, much as he has done in Gaza since March, when Israel abandoned a ceasefire there. Israel could probably continue its strikes in Iran for weeks, especially if Iran runs short of the ballistic missiles it uses to counter-attack. Would it eventually declare victory? Or would it keep bombing and hope it could destabilise the regime? And if Iran could no longer effectively strike back at Israel, would it widen the war to neighbouring countries? The longer the war goes on, the more unpredictable it becomes. 'There's no end game for Israel unless it draws in the US or unless the regime falls,' says a Western diplomat. 'Both are big gambles.' Eventually the only plausible way out may be a deal. But getting one will require diplomatic savvy from Mr Trump and flexibility from both Israel and Iran—things that none of them are known for. Sign up to the Middle East Dispatch, a weekly newsletter that keeps you in the loop on a fascinating, complex and consequential part of the world. Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.

Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran Israel war LIVE: Loud blasts heard near Iran's Natanz nuclear facility, report says
Iran Israel war news live updates: As the conflict between Iran and Israel continues to escalate, both sides have warned each other of the "largest attacks" yet to come. Meanwhile, the death toll in Iran and Israel continues to climb as a result of the exchange of missile and drone attacks. In Iran, at least 224 people have been killed and more than 1,200 wounded. ...Read More Meanwhile, in Israel, at least 24 people have been killed and 592 others have been wounded due to Iran's retaliatory attacks. Earlier, the Israeli Air Force bombed the office of Iran's state broadcaster IRIB in Tehran. The strike was captured during a live show at the IRIB offices in the Iranian capital. The attack on the state broadcaster came after Israeli defence minister Israel Katz stated that Tel Aviv will make "Iranian propaganda" disappear. 'The Iranian propaganda and incitement mouthpiece is on its way to disappear," Katz was quoted as saying. Katz also warned Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, saying that Israel will "strike everywhere" against the "Iranian director". Key updates Donald Trump has warned US citizens and asked them to leave Tehran in light of Israel vowing to launch massive attacks against Iran. During the G7 summit he also offered his support for Israel. Iranian air defences thwarted an Israeli attack on a gas field shared between Iran and Qatar Israeli PM Netanyahu called for Iranians to stand up against the 'weak regime' of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei and stated that Israel was on their side.


Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Why Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon are clashing with Trump over Iran-Israel conflict
President Donald Trump on Monday took a dig at MAGA allies Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon over their criticism of the United States' involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict. This comes as the 78-year-old warned people in Tehran to 'evacuate immediately' as tensions between the countries increased overnight. Since the conflict began, Carlson and Bannon have been critical of Washington's involvement. On the War Room podcast earlier on Monday, Carlson said that he actually does 'really love Trump'. Read More: Netanyahu says Iran 'wants to kill' Trump, was behind assassination attempts 'He is a deeply humane, kind person, and I am saying this because I am really afraid that my country is going to be further weakened by this. I think we are going to see the end of American empire. Other nations would like to see that, and this is a perfect way to scuttle the U.S.S. America on the shoals of Iran. But it is also going to end Trump's presidency,' he said. Trump retaliated during the G7 summit. 'I don't know what Tucker Carlson is saying. Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen," he said. Only hours later, Trump slammed the former Fox News host on Truth Social. "Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that,' IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!' the president wrote. Read More: UK citizen stranded in Jerusalem describes city after Iran attack: 'Ghost town' President Trump has cut short his G7 trip and is returning to Washington on Monday, the White House confirmed. 'President Trump will return to Washington tonight so he can attend to many important matters,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. She added that he made the decision due to the situation in the Middle East. 'President Trump had a great day at the G7, even signing a major trade deal with the United Kingdom and Prime Minister Keir Starmer,' Leavitt wrote. 'Much was accomplished, but because of what's going on in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with Heads of State.'