Amid 'Overreach' Row, Supreme Court Dismisses Petition On High Court's Powers
New Delhi:
The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed a plea which sought the power of the top court under Article 142 of the Constitution to be granted to the high courts.
Article 142 empowers the top court to pass 'any decree or order necessary for doing complete justice in any case or matter pending before it' within the country.
A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan wondered how could it allow such a plea and said, "How can we grant such prayer? It requires an amendment to the Constitution. You go to Parliament. Prayer made in this petition is completely misconceived. Power conferred under Article 142 of the Constitution is only on this court and not the high courts. Therefore, we cannot allow high court to exercise power of this court under Article 142."
The top court was hearing the plea filed by NGO Abhinav Bharat Congress.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC prods govt to nix FYJC quotas in minority colleges
Mumbai: Bombay HC Wednesday asked the state to consider removing a clause in its May 6 GR that introduced social quotas (such as SC/ST/OBC/SEBC) for FYJC admissions in minority institutions. "It can be a bona fide mistake. Issue a corrigendum. If not, we are here," said Justices Makarand Karnik & Nitin Borkar, while hearing two petitions challenging the clause. The institutions learnt about it only after their seat matrices were put up on the admission portal. The colleges argued that social quotas do not apply to minority institutions in terms of Article 15 (5) of the Constitution. As govt pleader Neha Bhide said the GR was meant to bring uniformity in FYJC admissions, Justice Karnik questioned: "Why do you bring in minority institutions?" The judges said a similar GR was withdrawn in 2019. Bhide said the "clause can be removed". The judges asked her to take instructions and inform them Thursday. "Every time you do not need orders from us. You can do it yourself," said Justice Karnik. Govt pleader Neha Bhide informed Bombay high court on Wednesday that withdrawing the May 6 government resolution (GR) on FYJC admissions was not possible, but "clause 11 can be removed". Clause 11 of the GR mentions that social and parallel reservations will apply to vacancies after filling minority seats in minority institutions. To this, Justice Makarand Karnik said: "Solve the problem." And Bhide replied: "I will come with a solution. " Justices Karnik and Nitin Borkar asked Bhide to di-scuss with the state advocate general and senior officials. The judges were hearing two petitions challenging the contentious clause. The first petition was filed by Solapur's Shri APD Jain Pathashala, a trust that runs Walchand College of Arts and Science and Hirachand Nemchand College of Commerce. The second was a joint petition by south Mumbai colleges, including St Xavier's, KC, HR, Jai Hind and Maharashtra College, along with the Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institutions. On being informed by advocate S C Naidu, for the Solapur colleges, that finalisation of merit list is scheduled for Wednesday, the judges on Tuesday had directed that it will be subject to the outcome of the petitions. Senior advocate Milind Sathe, for the Mumbai colleges, argued that social reservations do not apply to minority institutions. About the GR, Bhide said: "For the first time, FYJC admissions are taken up online for the entire state." The petitioners said their right under Article 30 to establish and administer educational institutions has been reiterated in SC and HC judgments "which have held that minority educational institutions are not subject to any social reservations".
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Centre eyes quota for women ahead of 2029 elections
The Union government intends to roll out 33% reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies—to be based on a fresh delimitation exercise—in time for the 2029 general elections, said three people aware of the details on Wednesday. The delimitation exercise is also likely to consider the demand from the southern states to ensure their proportionate representation in Parliament is not reduced, the people added. Also Read: Stick to pre-2010 7% quota on OBC students: Court Last week, the Union government said that the long-delayed census will be carried out in two phases before March 1 2027, announcing a crucial exercise that will enumerate caste for the first time since independence and likely become the basis for delimitation . However, given that the delimitation commission, which decides the new contours of the Lok Sabha and of Lok Sabha constituencies, will be formed after that, and will then have to work out the details, it was always assumed —especially before the surprise announcement of the much-delayed census—that the expansion of the Lok Sabha and the reservation of 33% of the seats for women would happen only in time for the 2034 national elections. Also Read: Panel drafts report on quota in J&K, to submit in next cabinet meeting The 2029 timeline is an aggressive one, and this is the first time it is being mentioned. Government officials are banking on digitisation to speed up the process of releasing the population numbers in time for the delimitation process which itself typically takes between two to three years to finalise, given the widespread consultation process. Also Read: State govt restores old in-house quota rule for Class 11 admissions after widespread opposition To be sure, the bigger challenge for the delimitation commission will be to address the concerns of the southern states which have demanded that population not be the sole criteria for deciding representation because that would effectively be punishing them for getting their population under control, the key national imperative in the 1970s and 1980s. The Women's reservation bill or the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, 2023 that was passed in Parliament in September 2023, stipulates setting aside one third or 33% of the total seats in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies for women. A provision in the Constitution (128th Amendment) Bill also states that political reservation for women can come into effect only after the delimitation exercise is carried out. The delimitation process is frozen until after the first census conducted after the year 2026. 'We intend to roll out women's reservation by 2029. The process of conducting the census will begin soon and we are confident that it will be completed in three years. That will then be followed with a fresh delimitation process...,' said one of the three people cited in the first instance, a senior government functionary who spoke on condition of anonymity. His reference is likely to the publication of census data because the entire field exercise including information collection, house-listing and population enumeration will be completed by March 1, 2027. To a question on whether the government will accept the demand of the southern states to increase their Lok Sabha seats, the functionary said, the government has already assured the states that their concerns will be addressed. In February, while speaking at a party event in Coimbatore, union home minister Amit Shah said the southern states would not lose a single seat to delimitation. In a 2019 analysis first published in Hindustan Times Carnegie Endowment's scholars Milan Vaishnaw and Jamie Hinton wrote that extrapolated for 2026's estimated population, the Lok Sabha would have to become a 848-member House, with Uttar Pradesh alone accounting for 143 (up from the current 80), and Bihar 79 (up from 40). In contrast, Tamil Nadu would see its numbers increase from 39 to 49, and Kerala would see its numbers stay at 20, lowering their proportionate representation in the Lok Sabha. Several opposition parties such as the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and the Congress have pointed out that should the delimitation exercise be based solely on population, it will reduce the representation of southern states in Parliament. Following the government's announcement of the Census, Tamil Nadu chief minister, MK Stalin, in a post on X, said, 'The Indian Constitution mandates that delimitation must follow the first census after 2026. The BJP has now delayed the census to 2027, making their plan clear to reduce Tamil Nadu's parliamentary representation. I had warned about this. It is now unfolding… We need clear answers from the Union government.' He also demanded that the 1971 census-based delimitation framework should be in place for another 30 years beyond 2026. 'Census data will pave the way for beginning the process of delimitation. A delimitation commission will be set up by Parliament, which will then draw up the formula for carving out the new constituencies and based on discussions with stakeholders,' said a second functionary, also speaking on condition of anonymity.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Sudha Murty conferred with Justice K.S. Hegde Charitable Foundation Award
Author, philanthropist, and Member of Rajya Sabha, Sudha Murty was on Wednesday conferred with the Justice K.S. Hegde Charitable Foundation Award 2025 for her contributions to literature and social service. The award ceremony was held on the Nitte Meenakshi Institute of Technology campus in Bengaluru. N. Vinaya Hegde, president, Nitte Education Trust and Chancellor, Nitte Deemed to be University, praised Ms. Murty's service and commitment to rural development, drawing inspiration from K.S. Hegde's legacy. N. Santosh Hegde, former Supreme Court judge and Karnataka Lokayukta, lauded Ms. Murty's work in empowering women and youth. In her acceptance speech, Ms. Murty highlighted the impermanence of material wealth, stressing the enduring impact of social contributions. 'Only the sacrifices we make for society will truly last,' she said. The foundation, established in honour of K.S. Hegde, former Supreme Court judge and Speaker of the Lok Sabha, recognises individuals annually on June 11 for societal contributions.
