
These hidden flight fees can add hundreds to your ticket price
Last month, a group of consumer organisations asked the European Commission to conduct an inquiry into what they alleged are unfair hand luggage charges imposed by budget airlines.
Fees for carry-on bags can be particularly frustrating when it isn't immediately made clear that it's not included in the initial ticket price.
The organisations argued that this makes it difficult for consumers to compare prices or make informed economic decisions.
Hand luggage surcharges are not the only hidden extra travellers have to watch out for, however.
Recently, financial news site Tradingpedia delved into the myriad ancillary fees and taxes charged by European airlines on top of the basic air fare. Here are the airlines that charge the most.
With airfares projected to rise by 2.8 per cent this year, flying abroad is set to become even more expensive.
While low-cost carriers may appear to offer relief, the reality is often more complex, the new report shows.
These surcharges, ranging from seat selection to name-change fees, are not entirely hidden - they are disclosed during the booking process, screen by screen.
But they are rarely included in headline prices or promotional adverts for fares, meaning the true cost of a flight only becomes apparent toward the end of the purchase journey.
The report found that Wizz Air tops the list with airlines' not-so-obvious fees for a flight, charging a total of £207.93 (€245) for several optional, yet sometimes unavoidable fees.
These include €100 for checked baggage, €10 for online booking, and €21.50 for airport or online check-in. That said, it is one of the few in the ranking that doesn't charge extra for carry-on luggage.
Ryanair ranks second, charging its passengers £198.58 (€234) on top of the air fare for the same services. It also charges €25 for hand luggage.
EasyJet has the third-highest fees at £180.48 (€213), followed by Vueling with £151.20 (€179). Vueling has the second-highest checked baggage fee in the ranking, at €85.
Euronews has reached out to all three airlines about their ancillary costs.
British Airways appears to have the lowest additional fees at only £64 (€75). Norwegian has the second-lowest fees at £71.53 (€84) in total, while Jet2 charges £91.50 (€107) on average.
While some of the extra fees and surcharges are avoidable, such as seat selection, in some cases, passengers have no choice but to purchase these 'optional' services.
One of these is the group administration fee – it is €10.50 if you fly with Wizz Air, but with easyJet, group bookings are charged €25 per person.
Ryanair also has a card payment fee, so you may be charged a percentage of the total transaction if you pay via a credit or debit card.
When you fly with an infant (under the age of 2 at the time of the flight), you do not need to purchase a ticket, but there is a mandatory fee.
With Wizz Air, it is €32, while with easyJet it is €31, and Jet2 charges you only €23.50.
Norwegian, on the other hand, offers infant tickets, which cost 10 per cent of the adult fare plus any airport taxes.
Another fee that seems questionably optional is the so-called rescue fee charged by all airlines when the passenger misses the flight.
If you arrive at the airport right before or shortly after takeoff, you can pay the rescue fee, and you will be given a seat on the next flight. Ryanair charges €100 per person, easyJet – €130, while Vueling has a rescue fee starting from €105 for international flights.
Wizz Air's rescue fee is only €80, and Jet2's rescue fee is the cheapest at €32. The other airlines also charge a fee, but do not clearly state how much it is on their websites. In some cases, the passenger is required to cancel the booking and rebook another flight at current prices.
When all these undisclosed fees are added to the airfare, it often makes low-cost airlines as expensive as full-service carriers (as companies that include ancillary service fees in their ticket prices are known).
As the team at Tradingpedia concludes, 'the findings shed light on whether budget airlines are genuinely cost-effective or merely perceived as such.'
Southern Europe is rumbling again. Popular holiday destinations around the Mediterranean, including Crete, Santorini, Sicily and Turkey, have all been affected by earthquakes or volcanic eruptions in the last month.
While the chances of being caught in a natural disaster still remain low, a recent spike in seismic activity has left many travellers questioning whether they should go ahead with their holiday or cancel.
The answer, experts say, depends on the fine print.
Here's what to know before you book – or cancel – your summer holiday.
In short: not usually.
Most basic travel insurance policies do not include coverage for natural disasters like earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, floods or wildfires.
'Travellers must be aware that most travel insurance policies won't cover earthquakes as standard, or any other natural disaster outside of anyone's control,' says Ernesto Suarez, founder of insurance provider Gigasure.
'While AI and data analytics are helping insurers measure the risk of these events happening more accurately, anything outside of an individual's control is very difficult to underwrite.'
But you won't necessarily have to eat the costs. Many insurers offer add-ons that can provide protection if your holiday is disrupted or cancelled by a natural disaster.
'We have a range of different policies that cover unforeseen events that stop you going away, disrupt your holiday or force you to cut short your trip due to natural disasters like earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and wildfires,' says Simon McCulloch, commercial director at Staysure.
'It's important to understand that this typically applies when your trip is directly affected and if your holiday is non-refundable,' he adds.
Suarez says Gigasure's add-on includes coverage for additional accommodation, transport costs, pet sitter fees and a daily allowance for up to 10 extra days abroad.
If an earthquake or eruption disrupts your trip while you're overseas, help may be available, especially if you've purchased extended coverage. But McCulloch advises keeping your priorities in order before worrying about reimbursement.
'In cases where you're already abroad and a natural disaster strikes in your location, the most important thing is to get yourself to safety and follow the advice of local or national authorities,' he says.
Once safe, he recommends reaching out to the airline, tour operator or travel provider you booked your trip with to determine your next steps. 'They will be able to help bring you home early or move you to safe accommodation,' he says.
Those with additional protection may be able to claim for unused parts of their trip or extra costs due to delays.
'Our first priority is always to help support our customers who are currently in the affected area,' says Suarez. 'For those that need it, we extend our policy duration for up to 30 days or until they can return home safely.'
If you're feeling uneasy about a destination but it remains open to tourists, your insurance is unlikely to help.
'Earthquakes and other natural disasters can understandably make travellers nervous about trips they have booked and paid for, though whether you'll be covered by your travel insurance depends on the specific details of your policy and official guidance at the time of travel,' says McCulloch.
'Before any trip, it's worth keeping an eye on updates from [national authorities such as] the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office,' he explains, referencing the UK's ministry of foreign affairs.
'If it hasn't advised against travel (or all but essential travel) to a destination following a seismic event – as was the case recently in Crete – then cancelling your trip purely out of caution is unlikely to be covered by your travel insurance.'
Suarez agrees. 'If someone chooses to cancel their trip because of a recent earthquake, it's unlikely that their travel insurance will cover them.'
Recent tremors in Turkey, the Greek islands and Italy have already caused concern among travellers. In Santorini, one of Greece's most visited destinations, local tourism officials estimate that arrivals could fall by as much as 25 per cent this year.
But many destinations will be as safe as they always are. The best approach to forecasting your summer travel is to stay informed, say McCulloch and Suarez.
Review your policy before travelling, speak to your insurer about what's included and monitor official advisories. If the worst does happen, the right insurance could help you recover your losses or get home safely.
'Natural disasters are unpredictable, but your insurance shouldn't be – as long as you take steps to make sure you're properly informed of the protection it provides,' McCulloch says.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
Cetia develops AI-powered system to sort garments for recycling
Cetia, a European platform focused on the automated sorting and dismantling of garments and footwear, has introduced the Sensor Hub—an AI-powered textile sorting system developed to meet the technical needs of textile recyclers. The organization is now seeking a sorting expert to lead testing during the system's pre-industrial phase. Launched in 2021 through a partnership between Estia—the engineering school of the Bayonne Basque Country Chamber of Commerce—and CETI, the European Center for Innovative Textiles, Cetia aims to play a central role in developing France's textile recycling industry. 'But this goal can't be achieved without large-scale sorting operations,' explained Chloé Salmon-Legagneur, general director of Cetia, in an interview with The Sensor Hub consists of multiple components. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional sensors identify colors, while an X-ray system, developed in partnership with Brustia, detects 'hard points' such as buttons, zippers, and rivets. A hyperspectral camera and an infrared sensor scan the entire width of each garment to determine fiber composition—an advantage over other spectrometers that only analyze a single point, requiring garments to be pre-sorted to remove embroidery or blended materials. The system is powered by an artificial intelligence algorithm developed and trained in-house by Cetia. The next step is to test it under real-world conditions using actual waste streams handled by sorting centers. 'The system needs to be exposed to the kinds of materials currently processed in the field,' explained Salmon-Legagneur. Cetia is now seeking a sorting expert to oversee this trial phase. According to Salmon-Legagneur, there is growing urgency across the sector. 'If we don't move into a pre-industrial development phase now, France risks falling behind on its 2028 targets,' she warned, stressing the need for funding. 'It's unrealistic to expect collection and sorting operators to bear the full cost of industrializing sorting technologies. There's also significant potential in pre-processing—particularly in 'delissage,' or the removal of hard points like buttons and zippers, which is essential for reducing costs at scale.' Headquartered in Hendaye, Cetia is urging recyclers—the intended users of its automated sorting system—to share their technical requirements as early as possible. Doing so will help identify potential constraints upfront and enable the technology to be adjusted accordingly. This transparency is also key to gaining the trust of brands. 'They're ready to collaborate with suppliers to incorporate recycled materials,' said Salmon-Legagneur, 'but they need reassurance that a stable and consistent supply will be available before they commit to reconfiguring their supply chains.' Beyond national and EU-level initiatives and ongoing conversations around France's textile recycling strategy, Salmon-Legagneur emphasized the importance of enabling localized infrastructure for collection, sorting, and recycling. In 2023, France collected 268,161 tons of clothing. Only 22.6% of that total went to recycling. As the country prepares to renegotiate the certification of Refashion—the eco-organization in charge of end-of-life textile management—both public authorities and the apparel industry are working to raise that percentage.


Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
Gucci owner Kering bets on crisis specialist de Meo to lead revival
By stepping aside to let de Meo run a luxury sector giant, Pinault has acknowledged the urgent need to address Kering's problems, including the 75% drop in its value since the summer of 2021, according to Reuters conversations with industry experts and investors. "It's a bold move ... We now have a CEO (de Meo) who is a great professional," said Ariane Hayate, European equity fund manager at Edmond de Rothschild. "There's now a real willingness by Francois-Henri Pinault to take a step back after years of underperformance." Kering confirmed in a statement on Monday it had picked de Meo as CEO and that he would start in his role in September. Pinault, who told analysts he had met de Meo only a few months earlier during the recruitment process, would retain the role of chairman. "I will be fully involved in the strategic orientation of the group as chairman," Pinault said. "But I won't step in and short circuit the new CEO in terms of priorities or key appointments." Kering's share price rose nearly 12%, its best daily performance since 2008. The group's swoop for de Meo also suggests that its problems are bigger than perceived from the outside and go beyond Gucci, said one large European investor on condition of anonymity in discussions relating to individual investments. Despite his lack of experience in the luxury sector, de Meo does bring skills that can help Kering at this critical juncture, industry players say. Having successfully managed a turnaround at Renault, he is likely to accelerate a Kering cost-cutting push that includes store closures, real estate sales and redundancies to reduce its more than 10 billion euros ($11.6 billion) of net debt, according to two industry players and one person who knows him. De Meo will also need to address Kering's planned acquisition of the 70% of fashion brand Valentino that it doesn't already own. Kering bought 30% in 2023 for $1.9 billion and intends to buy the remainder in 2028. The purchase from Qatari-backed luxury fund Mayhoola could cost a further 4 billion euros, Kering's annual report said. Options included in the original deal might force Kering to buy the other 70% as early as next May, company filings show, which could require partial payment in Kering shares, Kering finance chief Armelle Poulou said in April. "Coming from outside the industry, de Meo's learning curve is going to be super steep, but at the negotiating table he could do well," said one person familiar with Valentino, declining to be named owing to the sensitivity of the matter. Mayhoola, which does not have a press office, did not respond to a request for comment sent to its corporate email address. A person close to the fund described de Meo's expected arrival at Kering as good news. De Meo's most pressing challenge, however, is Gucci. The Italian label has struggled since star designer Alessandro Michele left in late 2022 and the company's recent appointment of creative director Demna from Balenciaga disappointed investors. Coming with three decades of automaking experience, de Meo may initially focus on costs, said a Kering adviser who declined to be named, while luxury sector adviser Mario Ortelli said it could be difficult for de Meo to come from a different industry and give an opinion on a creative designer. But the aforementioned cross-sector successes of Polet, Nair, Vigna and Marchionne offer hope for de Meo. Polet, who joined Gucci as CEO in 2004 after a 26-year career at Unilever, is credited with reviving the label after the departure of famed designer Tom Ford. Nair switched from Unilever to Chanel in 2022 and lifted sales to $18.7 billion in 2024 from $15.6 billion in 2021. Other cross-sector success included Ferrari boss Benedetto Vigna, who joined the supercar manufacturer from chipmaker STMicro in 2021 and led a push towards highly profitable personalised offers to clients. Another was the late Sergio Marchionne, architect of the successful Fiat-Chrysler merger and a former boss of de Meo, who joined Fiat from verification company SGS.


Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
France's industry council urges EU preference in public procurement
France's National Industry Council (CNI) is pushing for a new procurement strategy that favors European-made products. In a set of proposals presented to the government on June 13, the council outlined three key measures to accelerate reindustrialization and boost competitiveness across the European Union. Backed by all three council divisions, the proposals build on a report by economist and former Italian prime minister Mario Draghi, outlining strategies to enhance Europe's industrial competitiveness. One key measure recommends giving purchasing priority to products based on their place of origin, rather than the nationality of the supplying company. Industry leaders also call for restricting public tenders to countries outside the EU that do not offer reciprocal market access—a move they say is necessary 'to restore balance.' The council suggests expanding this preference beyond public contracts. It argues that similar criteria should apply to the distribution of EU funding, public subsidies, and regulatory frameworks—particularly those influencing demand for industrial products through standards and compliance measures. Another proposal calls for mandatory origin labeling on all imported products sold within the European Union. The recommendation aligns with a 2025 report by Yves Jégo, president of the Origine France Garantie initiative, advocating for greater product sourcing transparency. French industry leaders have long pushed for legal mechanisms to prioritize domestic suppliers in public procurement. The fashion and luxury sectors, in particular, have consistently raised the issue through their Strategic Committee, urging government support for local manufacturing. While current EU regulations limit the scope for national preference policies, the council aims to reposition its proposals under a broader European framework—one that could gain traction in Brussels and strengthen regional industry without breaching single-market rules.