Move to introduce all island leisure rate rejected
A bid to introduce a leisure rate to replace local authority contributions to regional swimming pool costs has been thrown out.The move would have seen the additional funds ring-fenced and allocated to the island's four local facilities and the National Sports Centre (NSC).Lawrie Hooper MHK had said the measure, which would have seen changes to the rates in Douglas, Onchan and Braddan, would raise £250,000 and make the system "more equitable".But Treasury Minister Alex Allinson said "full rate reform" would instead provide a "fair, modern and equitable way of funding community services and facilities".
An all-island tax would "not solve the problem of how our regional swimming pools are funded, how they are managed, and their operations co-ordinated", he said.
'Lessening the burden'
Hooper argued it was about "making things a little bit fairer and a little bit better" as rate reform would not happen all at once. Although the regional rates for the pools did not raise a lot of money in comparison to the total running costs of the facilities, the measure would have the effect of "lessening the burden" on the Department for Education, Sport and Culture budget.Supporting the proposal, Jason Moorhouse MHK said it would resolve the issue of "imbalance" in the rating system, which saw some ratepayers pay for the pools, but not all, and would "ensure uniform contributions".But Chris Thomas MHK said the only reason that the facilities were paid for by rates was so that local authorities had control of the pools. He said introducing a fee in the east of the island could lead to the NSC being run by a local authority. Similarly, Cabinet Office Minister David Ashford said the measure would "centralise" the funding to the government and "remove that power from the local level".In a vote in Tynwald the measure was rejected by the politicians.
Additional reporting by the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
Man fined £1,000 for putting bins out one day early
A Labour council has been accused of acting like the 'Stasi' after fining a resident £1,000 for putting his bins out a few hours early. Hammersmith and Fulham Council claimed Clyde Strachan had been fly-tipping when he placed rubbish sacks and a food recycling bin outside his home at noon the day before the refuse collection. Now the west London council's 'law enforcement team' - its 'eyes and ears' - has been criticised as 'overzealous' after it refused to give an official warning despite the 37-year-old resident saying he put them out early because he was going away. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, rounded on the local authority. 'Instead of cracking down on genuine anti-social behaviour, the state tries to reassert itself by punishing well-meaning people for tiny infringements. It's the easy thing to do but it's counter-productive and unfair,' he told The Telegraph. 'This huge fine for putting the bins out a few hours early veers into Stasi-like control of people's lives. This man was clearly doing the right thing in the circumstances.' Within two hours of The Telegraph contacting the council, the fine was withdrawn and town hall bosses issued a statement saying Mr Strachan, a lead engineer at a technology company, was 'not a persistent fly-tipper'. The local authority insists that the 'number one priority' for the 72 officers in its enforcement team is keeping 'residents and visitors safe'. However, they issued more than 2,200 fines in 2024. In May, Mr Strachan was leaving his West Kensington home for a few days and decided to help refuse collectors by putting his rubbish out shortly before midday. 'I deliberately put them out of the way on the pavement, tucked to one side against the wall so they weren't in anyone's way,' he said. 'It meant I had put them out about six or seven hours before the evening when I would normally take them there.' When he returned from his trip he discovered an 'environmental enforcement notice' demanding he make contact. 'I spoke on the phone to one of the council officers and said I was willing to receive a warning but felt a £1,000 fine was excessive. 'I said I had put the bins out early as I was not available the next day. It was an honest mistake. I didn't feel as though I needed to grovel, but it felt like that was what he was after.' A week later a £1,000 fixed penalty notice (FPN), with an early £500 option, arrived stating: 'There was one large box, six bags of waste, and one food bin deposited on the pavement and left. It isn't collection day so it shouldn't be there.' The notice said: 'There is no formal right to appeal, however the council will accept representations from you within seven days…' 'It was excessive, completely shocking and quite unbelievably unfair. It feels like an abuse of their powers', Mr Strachan said, adding that he often picks up litter on the street or cleans up if a fox has ransacked bins. Challenging the penalty Mr Strachan challenged the penalty, claiming the 'extreme fine' was not appropriate for a 'minor infringements', adding it was tantamount to 'bullying and coercion.' William Yarwood, of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said the huge fine for such a minor transgression was 'completely disproportionate'. 'This was a clear case of an honest mistake, not fly-tipping - yet overzealous enforcement officers have treated it like a serious offence. Residents expect fair treatment, not to be targeted for trying to do the right thing. 'Councils should focus on real issues, not hammering taxpayers with excessive fines for trivial matters.' Councillor Jose Alfonso, leader of the Tories at the council, said enforcement officers should be restricted to 'working with the police to keep our streets safe - not trying to catch residents out on technicalities'. He said the 'contemptuous and high-handed approach' was 'the hallmark' of the Labour council. 'We thought we were getting a law enforcement team, but it appears we've ended up with a council revenue collection team.' A council spokesman said: 'Mr Strachan asked for a review of the FPN on May 28 when he let us know that the reason he put the rubbish out early was that he had been going on holiday the following day.' The following day, they froze the fine pending a review. 'We have since cancelled the FPN as we agree that Mr Strachan made an honest mistake and is not a persistent fly-tipper' he added, claiming officers respond to 'numerous complaints from local neighbours about fly-tipping and waste on pavements in this neighbourhood' and it acts 'both firmly and fairly when residents ask us to deal with the ugly scourge of fly-tipping.' Council's 'eyes and ears' The council website says the enforcement team was set up in 2021, serves as its 'eyes and ears' and is 'one of the largest' such forces in Britain. It claims 'uniformed staff patrol the borough day and night, seven days a week,' adding that they issued 2,270 fines in 2024, but 'are not the police'. Council taxpayers foot the team's £2.1 million annual bill. A separate web page explains how bags should be put out 'before 6am on your normal collection day, or after 9pm on the evening before.' It adds: 'Putting your bins out on the wrong day or in the wrong way could result in action against you for dumping rubbish.' However, that page does not mention £1,000 fines for fly-tipping. In 2024, the council announced that it was introducing 'hefty new fines for fly-tipping' to 'act as a deterrent'. Fines were increased from £200 to £1,000, with a pledge that money raised will fund clean-up operations and 'enforcing the new rules'.
BBC News
3 days ago
- BBC News
Douglas Council confirms housing workers' temporary compound plan
Plans have been submitted to build a temporary compound for housing contractors on an area of open land in would be built off Ballanard Road and Barrule Road in the Manx capital to support those working on the £40m refurbishment of social housing in month, a group of nearby residents held a meeting to oppose the plans, arguing there should be no building on the community recreation Douglas Council said the site had been chosen to "minimise disruption to residents" and "reduce construction traffic" during the refurbishment work. The "proportionate and necessary" plans would "enhance safety and improve operational efficiency", the council proposals will now be considered by the planning acknowledging the compound would likely occupy part of the playing field for five years, and that some disruption would be "unavoidable", the council said a substantial area of open space would remain publicly accessible throughout. 'Essential investment' The council said the refurbishment work was an "essential investment" for the area and would address long-standing structural issues and modernise the homes of about 700 families. The area is also "already well-served" by a number of green spaces, the council said, adding that efforts to "engage with residents to ensure their voices are heard and their concerns addressed" will some residents raised concerns about the compound plans' likely impact on local wildlife, the council said no trees would be removed to accommodate it said that, due to recent storm damage, consultation with the Department for Environment, Food and Agriculture had resulted in the decision to remove and replace a number of trees in the area. Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.
Daily Mail
4 days ago
- Daily Mail
The Battle of Trafalgar (Tavern)! London pub boasting one of Britain's best beer gardens is under threat from killjoy council
One of Britain's most popular beer gardens is under threat after a council moved to remove its outdoor tables following a series of complaints. The Trafalgar Tavern in Greenwich, south-east London, is often hailed among the nation's most picturesque spots for a pint - showcasing views over the Thames and towards Canary Wharf and the Shard. But the historic Grade II-listed venue's outdoor seating could soon be axed after a local authority issued an enforcement notice. The Trafalgar Tavern's al fresco tables are located on the Thames Path, a narrow walkway running along the banks of the capital's river. Greenwich council has told of receiving complaints about access - and officials suggest the seating restricts movement for pedestrians, wheelchair users and families with pushchairs. The authority added that it was 'important that everyone can use [the path] easily' - and that a 'balance' was needed. But among those now hitting back is the pub's landlord Frank Dowling, who has been in charge since 2001, as well as its manager Vasil Vasilev. Mr Dowling said removing the tables would only create a 'different problem' and could also mean he has to lose some staff. He said: 'If you don't have tables and chairs there, you're going to have tons of people standing around drinking. 'Vertical drinking is not something that works for us. That causes a different problem. 'If we lose the structure, we lose control of the environment. People will just gather there anyway, but without the order that tables and service provide. 'We have unbelievable staff, and we're very proud of them. They're hardworking people - young people, old people. They're very good people.' Manager Mr Vasilev, 41, who has worked at the pub since 2017, said the council had told them the outdoor seating also restricts emergency vehicles from accessing a ramp - which he claims is already inaccessible due to a parking metre blocking it. Mr Vasilev added: 'It would absolutely damage tourism in the area, without any valid reasons whatsoever. 'It's just ridiculous. We are not blocking pedestrian access - there's plenty of room. 'There are three or four metres of access. We are a family-friendly pub - we have large groups of runners, mothers with prams. 'There is plenty of space outside. The reasons [for the enforcement notice] don't make much sense. The Trafalgar Tavern has been widely praised for its London riverside setting 'People like coming here because of what we offer, but we wouldn't be able to offer it anymore [if the enforcement notice went ahead].' Posting about the proposed ban on Facebook, the Trafalgar Tavern claimed Greenwich council was 'demanding' the outdoor seating be removed. The pub suggested the move risked 'threatening a space that's brought joy to locals, tourists and the wider community'. Mr Dowling said the area remained open to the public and was cleaned and jet-washed by staff several times a week. The pub sits on a section of the Thames Path which Mr Dowling says he leased from the Greenwich Foundation, a naval charity that supports the upkeep of historic buildings in the area. The landlord claims that the rent is paid annually to the foundation and that the pub has legal tenure over the space used for outdoor seating. In addition to the lease, Mr Dowling said the pub entered into a formal agreement with Greenwich council in 2005 under a Section 16 arrangement. As part of that deal, the pub allegedly paid for improvement works to the area outside its front door, including resurfacing, landscaping and changes to a public highway. Mr Dowling said the works were paid for entirely by the pub and carried out with council involvement and approval. One local resident told MailOnline: 'It's a great space but I can understand that additional benches have made it horrendously crowded - especially on a sunny day. 'It's a narrow path along there anyway.' The Trafalgar Tavern's owners previously had a bid for a new nearby pub called the Ship Tavern, beside the river and the historic Cutty Sark vessel, rejected last year. A Greenwich council spokesperson said: 'We're really proud of Greenwich Town Centre, a UNESCO World Heritage site visited by millions of people every year. 'Tourists love the vibrant businesses and beautiful scenery, and we do too. 'That's why we're committed to making sure the area is as accessible as possible, for everyone to enjoy. 'Whilst it's not always appropriate to comment on individual cases, we know that The Trafalgar Tavern is a much-loved, historic venue. 'But we have had some complaints about the extended outdoor seating onto the Thames Path and so there needs to be a balance. 'The Thames Path is very narrow, and it's important that everyone can use it easily - including people in wheelchairs, the elderly or people with pushchairs. 'There are planning policies in place that we need to follow, but we're confident we'll find a sensible solution that doesn't stop people enjoying the pub's view, or using the Thames Path.' Representations opposing the notice can be submitted to the council's planning inspectorate until June 12, quoting appeal reference APP/E5330/C/25/3364847.
