Charles' visit to Canada to begin with celebration of country's culture and diversity
During their two-day trip, Charles will become only the second monarch, after Queen Elizabeth II, to attend the state opening of Canada's parliament and deliver the speech setting out the government's legislative agenda.
Charles will be delivering the words of the Canadian government, similar to a UK State opening of parliament, but commentators will be looking for any veiled references to US President Donald Trump.
The King will be travelling with his wife less than a month after former Bank of England governor Mark Carney's Liberal Party election victory, fuelled in part by its opposition to the US leader.
Mr Carney's rival, populist Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, was in the lead until Mr Trump took aim at Canada with a trade war and threats to annex the country as the 51st state, comments denounced by the ex-governor.
Mark Carney became Canadian prime minister recently (Yui Mok/PA)
A Buckingham Palace spokesperson commenting about the trip has said: 'The King and Queen are very much looking forward to the programme, mindful that it is a short visit but hopefully an impactful one.'
The visit begins with the King and his wife celebrating the country's cultural heritage and diversity at a community event in the capital Ottawa at Lansdowne Park.
Later that day, the King will hold audiences with Canada's first indigenous Governor General Mary Simon, the King's representative in Canada, Prime Minister Mr Carney and there will be a short ceremony to swear in Camilla as a member of the Canadian Privy Council.
Events will conclude for Charles and Camilla with a short reception for lieutenant governors, from Canada's 10 Canadian provinces, and the territorial commissioners from the three territories.
The centrepiece of the trip falls on Tuesday when the royal couple will attend the state opening of parliament, similar to the UK parliament's opening ceremony but without the formality or royal regalia found in Britain.
The late queen was the first sovereign to deliver the speech at the state opening of the Canadian parliament on October 1957, her first visit to the country as head of state.
Steven Guilbeault, Canada's minister of identity and culture, said: 'His Majesty's delivery of the Speech from the Throne to open the 45th Parliament is a momentous occasion, one that brings Canadians together in celebration of our rich history, our democracy and the institutions that serve us all.
'This visit offers an opportunity to showcase the special relationship between Canada and the Crown, while also highlighting the strength, diversity and unity that define us on the world stage.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
21 minutes ago
- Scotsman
SNP ministers accused of secrecy over £2m Grangemouth carbon capture study
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... SNP ministers have been accused of secrecy after refusing to publish a £2 million study into whether a pipeline that will connect Grangemouth with a key carbon capture project will fall flat. The 'alarming' move comes as Chancellor Rachel Reeves is poised to confirm at her spending review this week whether the Acorn carbon capture project for St Fergus, near Peterhead, will finally receive the funding it needs to get off the ground. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Carbon capture technology is seen as being essential to Scotland and the UK reaching net zero | POOL/AFP via Getty Images The previous Conservative UK government only granted the Acorn project reserve status and ploughed funding into carbon capture and storage projects south of the Border instead. This comes as finance secretary Shona Robison asked Chancellor Rachel Reeves to award funding for the Acorn carbon capture project and to ensure Scotland receives a share of GB Energy funding that matches its contribution to UK clean energy goals, ahead of the UK spending review. She also called on the Chancellor to 'prioritise growth' and to fully fund the employer national insurance increase for Scotland's public services. Ms Robison urged the UK Government to abandon some of its 'damaging policies' such as cuts to welfare support for disabled people, to scrap the two-child benefit cap and to reinstate a universal winter fuel payment, ahead of the review on 11 June. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She said the Scottish Government had not yet been provided with 'clarity' on spending priorities. The delays to the project has been partly blamed for SNP ministers rolling back climate targets, with the Acorn plans initially hoped to be up and running before 2030. But now, the Scottish Government has refused to release the results of a feasibility study into the pipeline, despite confirming the document was completed in March. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad SNP ministers handed over £2m to National Gas last year to assess whether it was possible to turn an old 174-mile gas pipeline that runs from Grangemouth in the Central Belt to St Fergus, Aberdeenshire into 'Europe's largest carbon capture pipeline'. Officials have refused to release details of what the study shows, despite campaigners requesting it under Freedom of Information law. Acting Energy Secretary Gillian Martin during a visit to drone manufacturer Flowcopter in Loanhead, to mark the publication of the Scottish Government's Green Industrial Strategy | Andrew Milligan/PA Wire Concerns have been raised about carbon capture technology, which campaigners warn simply allows oil and gas companies to continue burning fossil fuels. Under the technology, harmful carbon emissions are prevented from being released into the atmosphere and instead trapped and injected into the seabed. Fears have been raised about leakage, with the technology not yet tested at commercial scale. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad During a trip to St Fergus in 2023, then prime minister Rishi Sunak also raised concerns about the technology, warning that it would be a boost 'if we can get it to work'. Now, campaigners have warned that any further public funds for the Acorn project would benefit major oil companies, including Shell, which have made £90 billion profits in recent years and Harbour Energy who recently laid off 250 staff despite paying out almost £1bn to shareholders in the past three years. The UK government has already pledged £22bn to the carbon capture industry, a move which the Public Accounts Committee branded a 'high risk gamble' that could push up household energy bills. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad First Minister John Swinney has vowed to increase the public handout from the Scottish Government for the Acorn project beyond £80m. But that is contingent on the UK government first backing the project - amid doubts the funding could be axed in the spending review amid a perilous economic backdrop. Friends of the Earth Scotland's climate campaigner Alex Lee said: 'The public are again being forced to pay for the oil industry's greenwashing carbon capture plans, and it is deeply alarming that we don't even get to see what our money has unearthed. 'Plans to run a 280km high pressure carbon pipeline through towns and villages are fraught with danger and uncertainty because this has never been done before in Scotland. Have the people who live along the route of this pipeline proposal been informed of the risks and consulted on these proposals? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It is a farce that ministers have been talking up carbon capture for 20 years and only now are they checking whether it would even be feasible to do this. 'When working climate solutions are crying out for funding, there should be no public investment in dodgy scams like carbon capture.' Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves and Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband during a meeting of the National Wealth Fund Taskforce in 11 Downing Street. PIC: Justin Tallis/PA Wire Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said: 'The Greens have always been sceptical about putting too much reliance on untested carbon capture technology, and we are firmly opposed to using it as an excuse for more fossil fuel extraction or burning. 'Even its advocates don't think it will make any impact on our emissions in the near future, so the priority has to be the action we know how to take right now - cutting road and air traffic levels, insulating homes and shifting to clean heating, and supporting communities to change land use. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Climate action isn't rocket science and we don't need to wait for new technologies to get off the drawing board - we just need to do what we know works.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government provided National Gas with a £2m grant to support a study to explore the technical feasibility and viability of repurposing an existing gas pipeline for the transportation of carbon dioxide. 'The conclusions of the study were requested under environmental information regulations. However, for reasons of commercial confidentiality these can't be released. 'The Scottish Government fully supports the deployment of carbon capture and storage (CCS), and we have been advised by the Climate Change Committee that they 'cannot see a route to net zero that does not include CCS'.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A UK government spokesperson said: 'We are delivering first of a kind carbon capture projects in the UK, supporting thousands of jobs across the country, reigniting industrial heartlands and tackling the climate crisis.
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Tim Wilson says Coalition won't revisit ban on working from home as ‘happy workers' are more productive
Shadow industrial relations minister Tim Wilson says work-from-home arrangements should be negotiated between employees and bosses, as 'happy workers tend to be more productive'. Wilson said Dutton's controversial policy to wind back flexible working for public servants – dumped midway through the election campaign in an embarrassing backdown – was a 'heavy solution' that the Coalition wouldn't resurrect in this term. The shadow minister said such working arrangements should be worked out in individual workplaces, based on productivity. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'If employers can find a pathway … and employees can find a pathway, together in partnership for working from home because it works in their best interest, then that would always be the baseline at which I'd approach workplace arrangements,' Wilson told Sky News on Sunday. 'It's not for me to dictate what those terms are.' Dutton's controversial policy to restrict working from home for public servants has been blamed in post-election analysis as a major factor in turning off professional women and young people from voting Liberal. Nationals leader David Littleproud, during the short-lived split between his party and the Liberals, claimed several times 'the work-from-home fiasco hurt us'. Other Liberal members have indicated since the election they were supportive of flexible working arrangements. Andrew Bragg, the shadow minister for productivity, last week said 'we believe in individual choice and back flexibility at work', citing studies showing such arrangements could boost productivity. Wilson, who bucked the nationwide trend and became the only Liberal to win a new seat by reclaiming the seat of Goldstein he lost in 2022 to Zoe Daniel, echoed similar sentiments. He told Sky News that workers should 'have a sense of ownership and responsibility of their workplace arrangements, in partnership with their employers'. 'When it comes to the politics of [Dutton's policy], I think a lot of people looked at it and ... it was probably interpreted, anyway, as a heavy solution to what should be, for the most part, a productivity managed problem between employers and employees.' Wilson said the WFH policy was raised with him 'from time to time' while campaigning for Goldstein, but that equally he had employers who felt they 'no longer had a balanced relationship with their employees and wanted redress'. 'We do know that happy workers tend to be more productive, and there's certainly circumstances where people working from home can be more productive than they might otherwise be,' Wilson said. 'Because of commute times, because of their capacity to balance out their work and family lives, based on what their needs are, but it can vary circumstance to circumstance.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion In a report last week, the Productivity Commission backed flexible working. 'Workers do not need to be in the office full-time to experience the benefits of in-person interactions. As a result, hybrid work (working some days remotely and some days in the office) tends to be beneficial to productivity, or at least is not detrimental to productivity,' the report said. 'Remote work also reduces breaks and sick days, and results in less distractions.' Also on Sunday, shadow finance minister James Paterson said he still believed Australia should boost defence spending to 3% of GDP – a policy outlined by Dutton. Dutton had committed to the figure late in the election campaign, but did not specify how it would be spent. Paterson, speaking on the ABC's Insiders, said the Coalition would provide details 'closer to the next election'. 'There's plenty of good advice out there in open source that suggests areas of investment. One is spending to resolve the recruitment and retention crisis facing the ADF. Another is to make sure that we have the munitions stockpile that we would need to survive a conflict, God forbid, if that should break out,' Paterson said. 'Other things [include] hardening the northern bases, the air and missile defence, drone defence, purchasing our own lethal drones.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reform launches attack on the Bank of England
Reform has launched a blistering attack on the Bank of England for wasting tens of billions of taxpayers' cash on its money-printing programme. Richard Tice, the party's deputy leader, accused Threadneedle Street of prioritising bank profits over the interests of working people as he vowed to order it to stop paying billions of pounds in interest to commercial lenders. In a letter to Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, Mr Tice says the Bank has engaged in 'systemic misuse of taxpayers' money' by paying interest on cash parked at the Bank as well as selling its existing stockpile of government bonds at substantial losses. Reform, which is leading several polls, claims it could save £35bn a year by scrapping interest on central bank reserves, created as part of the Bank's £895bn quantitative easing (QE) programme to boost the economy during the financial crisis and Covid lockdowns. It wants to use this money to help pay for an increase in the tax-free personal allowance to £20,000 and cut corporation tax. Mr Tice said the unwinding of this programme – known as quantitative tightening (QT) – was pushing up borrowing costs and piling pressure on the public finances. 'The Bank of England is unnecessarily wasting tens of billions of pounds of taxpayers' money, whilst enriching City institutions,' the letter says. 'The nation's accounts are already under very severe pressure. QT is also partly responsible for keeping gilt yields higher than they otherwise would be, resulting in even more punitive interest costs, imposing yet more strain on the [public finances].' The remarks put the Bank on a collision course with Reform if the party wins the next election. Mr Bailey has warned that a victory for Reform could lower savings rates or push up borrowing costs for consumers. Commercial banks earn interest on reserves held at the Bank at the base rate. Threadneedle Street made huge profits from QE when interest rates were at record lows of 0.1pc because the returns on the government gilts it bought were far higher than the amount it had to pay in interest on reserves. A total of £123.9bn was generated and sent to the Treasury. However, this rapidly reversed when borrowing costs started to rise, with £85.9bn transferred back from the Treasury to the Bank since the end of 2022. NatWest, Barclays, Lloyds and Santander received more than £9bn in interest on Bank of England reserves in 2023 – a 135pc increase on the previous year, according to the Treasury committee of MPs. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the Government's tax and spending watchdog, expects the cumulative lifetime loss to the taxpayer to total £133.7bn – which is bigger than the annual education budget and more than twice what the UK spends on defence. Reform is not alone in its criticism of QT. Former Bank deputy governors including Sir Paul Tucker and Sir Charlie Bean have also suggested changes to how reserves are remunerated. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, also wrote to Mr Bailey last month to stress that the process of reducing the Bank's stockpile of bonds must provide 'value for money'. However, the Governor has repeatedly warned that ending interest payments on reserves could undermine the Bank's ability to influence the cost of borrowing, while another former policymaker, Gertjan Vlieghe, said such a move would be a 'disaster' akin to a debt default. Mr Tice used the letter to describe the comparison as 'complete nonsense'. He said: 'This money was created out of thin air by the Treasury and Bank of England to lubricate the wheels of the economy at two times of extreme national stress over the last 18 years. 'It did not belong to those City institutions in the first place. It is no coincidence that commercial bank profits have soared as interest rates rose as the Bank of England paid out tens of billions of this voluntary interest. Those institutions cannot believe their luck.' Catherine Mann, a member of the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) that sets interest rates, has also warned that policymakers must pay closer attention to the impact of QT on financial markets and the wider economy now that it is cutting interest rates. She estimated that QT could raise borrowing costs by almost a quarter of a percentage point. Mr Bailey has repeatedly spoken out against changing the way commercial lenders are compensated for parking their cash at the Bank, warning that it could undermine financial and monetary stability if lenders no longer wished to hold extra buffers at the Bank. In a letter to the Treasury select committee in April, Mr Bailey said: 'Remuneration of reserves is a key component of the Bank's approach to ensuring rate control. Any loss of rate control would undermine the MPC's ability to affect the real economy with its interest rate decisions and could cause significant harm to credibility of monetary policy.' However, Mr Tice denied that Reform would be interfering with the Bank's independence, comparing the Bank's choices to 'extraordinary strategic decisions which amount not to monetary policy but to fiscal policy, costing the taxpayer tens of billions of pounds of losses'. He added: 'The role of elected governments and politicians is to protect taxpayer's money and the broader interests of the electorate. It would be negligent of us to ignore this very significant issue and leave it in the hands of unelected people. Our job is to challenge, scrutinise and question'. A Bank of England spokesman said: 'The Governor set out the Bank's views on the matter in a letter to the Treasury Select Committee.'
