US, Boeing reach deal to resolve MAX criminal case
WASHINGTON - The Justice Department said it reached a preliminary agreement with Boeing to settle a long-running criminal probe into deadly 737 MAX crashes, drawing condemnation from some crash victim families.
Under an "agreement in principle," Boeing will pay $1.1-billion and the Department of Justice (DOJ) would dismiss a criminal charge against Boeing over its conduct in the certification of the MAX, DOJ said in a federal filing.
A judge must approve the accord, which would scuttle a criminal trial scheduled for June in Fort Worth, Texas.
The agreement would resolve the case without requiring Boeing to plead guilty to fraud in the certification of the MAX, which was involved in two crashes in 2018 and 2019 that claimed 346 lives.
Family members of some MAX victims slammed the proposed settlement as a giveaway to Boeing.
"The message sent by this action to companies around the country is, don't worry about making your products safe for your customers," said Javier de Luis in a statement released by attorneys for plaintiffs suing Boeing.
"This kind of non-prosecution deal is unprecedented and obviously wrong for the deadliest corporate crime in US history," said Paul Cassell, an attorney representing relatives of victims. "My families will object and hope to convince the court to reject it."
But the DOJ, in its brief, cited other family members who expressed a desire for closure, quoting one who said "the grief resurfaces every time this case is discussed in court or other forums."
Family members of more than 110 crash victims told the government "they either support the Agreement specifically, support the Department's efforts to resolve the case pre-trial more generally or do not oppose the agreement," the filing said.
The DOJ filing called the accord "a fair and just resolution that serves the public interest."
"The Agreement guarantees further accountability and substantial benefits from Boeing immediately, while avoiding the uncertainty and litigation risk presented by proceeding to trial," it said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
20 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Boeing, Boeing Gone?
In the annals of American industrial might, Boeing has long stood as a symbol of engineering excellence and national pride—pioneering jet travel, dominating the skies, and contributing to military superiority. But in recent years, the aerospace giant has found itself grounded—figuratively and literally. A combination of fatal crashes, production faults, regulatory clashes, and executive turmoil have battered the company's reputation and balance sheet. The Alaska Airlines door plug blowout in early 2024 and relentless media scrutiny added further fuel to a narrative of decay. To many, Boeing became a cautionary tale of what happens when engineering takes a back seat to financial priorities. But in markets, especially those as cyclical and sentiment-driven as aerospace, despair often precedes opportunity. Could this be one of those times? Could the market be underestimating Boeing's path to redemption—and the value waiting on the runway? It is certainly a question being considered by Laurium Capital's global research team. Let's look at the wreckage before we consider the recovery. Financially, Boeing is still operating in the red. The company has made annual losses since 2019 and forecasts for 2025 remain negative. For a company once known for predictable profitability, this is sobering. Boeing Defense, Space & Security (BDS), previously a bulwark, has suffered through years of charges tied to troubled contracts such as the KC-46 tanker and Starliner. Though the first quarter of 2025 showed no new charges, margins in this business segment remain fragile. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads And yet, there are signs that Boeing is slowly rebuilding altitude. Most notably, the company is progressing in ramping up production of its workhorse 737 MAX. Production rates are stabilizing around 38 planes per month with a pathway toward 42 by early 2026 and potentially even 47 within the year. This recovery in production volumes is critical, as the 737 MAX remains a key earnings and cash flow driver. Likewise, the 787 Dreamliner, one of the most advanced commercial planes ever built, is expected to see material upticks in production numbers by the end of the year. advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads CEO Kelly Ortberg, appointed to steady the ship, has instilled a focus on execution and engineering discipline. His message at a recent conference which the Laurium global research team attended was one of pragmatism: Boeing isn't rushing to launch a new aircraft but is instead laser-focused on delivering existing programs reliably, clearing certification hurdles, and winning back customer confidence. Importantly, this potential upside is not just about numbers—it's about sentiment. Boeing is still something of a 'momentum stock.' Its share price has historically surged ahead of fundamentals when the market senses an inflection point. The company's history bears this out: rapid climbs in 2017 and 2021 occurred before tangible improvements in earnings. Today, investors may again be positioning ahead of a visible operational turnaround. Risks, of course, remain. Supply chain hiccups could stall the ramp-up. Further FAA scrutiny could introduce delays. And geopolitical flashpoints—especially concerning deliveries to China—could bite. Boeing's past overpromises linger in investor memory. The road to recovery is rarely linear. Still, the building blocks are taking shape. Boeing's enormous backlog—somewhere close to half a trillion dollars—isn't going anywhere. Neither is global demand for fuel-efficient jets in a rapidly ageing fleet environment. Liquidity has improved, management is steadier, and the execution narrative is shifting from apology to progress. For investors with the stomach for turbulence, Boeing might just be preparing for a long-overdue ascent. DM advertisement Don't want to see this? Remove ads For more information on Laurium's Global Active Equity Fund, please visit Laurium Capital is an authorised financial services provider (FSP 34142)
Eyewitness News
21 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Political parties bemoan inadequate protection for whistleblowers
CAPE TOWN - Political parties have bemoaned the inadequate protection for whistleblowers and the failure to reform the laws that will improve this. During an African National Congress (ANC) sponsored debate calling for guaranteed anonymity, job security and legal support for whistleblowers, every speaker referenced the assassination of Babita Deokaran, who was killed outside her house in 2021 for blowing the whistle on corruption at Tembisa Hospital. Parliamentarians said that despite a raft of laws dealing with whistleblowing, they have given rise to a culture of fear among whistleblowers who are punished rather than protected. Parliamentarians have added pressure on the Justice Department to speed up the process of improving its treatment of whistleblowers. The Protected Disclosure Act and Whistleblowing Act are currently under review by the department. The Democratic Alliance (DA)'s Glynnis Breytenbach is calling for the establishment of an independent whistleblower protection agency with prosecutorial referral powers. 'A dedicated, well-funded, autonomous institution must be created to receive disclosures, provide safe channels, investigate threats and offer physical protection.' Rise Mzansi leader Songezo Zibi said employers should be prohibited from disciplining officials who make protected disclosures, and should refund them the cost of litigation if an employee wins the case. 'We must similarly make it impossible for those people to be dismissed until the matter has been closed.' Members of Parliament (MPs) are also calling for an incentive fund that will encourage people to come forward to lift the lid on corruption. ALSO READ: Freedom Under Law echoes calls for protection of investigators, whistleblowers in high-profile cases
Daily Maverick
2 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Guatemalan deportee arrives in US after judge orders Trump to facilitate return
A Guatemalan man who was deported to Mexico despite stating he feared being persecuted there was flown back to the United States on Wednesday after a judge ordered the Trump administration to facilitate his return. Judges have directed U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to help return several migrants to the country because they were wrongly deported, and the man's arrival appeared to mark the first time one of those migrants has been able to come back. U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy in Boston on May 23 ordered the Guatemalan man's return after the Justice Department notified him that its claim that the man had expressly stated he was not afraid of being sent to Mexico was based on erroneous information. That ruling was the latest instance of a judge ordering the Trump administration to facilitate the return of a migrant swept up in the Republican president's efforts to carry out mass deportations as part of his hardline immigration agenda, following a mistake in an individual's case. The government likewise made an error with Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was deported to El Salvador in March despite an order protecting him from removal. He remains there despite a judge ordering the administration to facilitate his return. By contrast, the Guatemalan man, identified in court papers only as O.C.G., was able to return on Wednesday on a commercial flight, said Trina Realmuto, a lawyer at the National Immigration Litigation Alliance who represents him. Unlike Garcia and another man deported to El Salvador who a judge ruled should be returned to the United States, O.C.G. was not being detained abroad. In court papers last week, the administration indicated it was working to place O.C.G. onto a charter flight back to the United States. 'We can now confirm that he is in ICE custody after arriving in California on a commercial flight and is being transported to a detention facility in Arizona,' Realmuto said, referring to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, in a statement called the judge an 'activist' whose ruling gave O.C.G. 'an opportunity to prove why he should be granted asylum to a country that he has had no past connection to.' He returned to the United States as the administration awaits word on whether the U.S. Supreme Court will lift an injunction Murphy issued in a class action lawsuit by O.C.G. and other migrants designed to protect their due process rights. That order bars the administration from swiftly deporting migrants to countries other than their own without first hearing their concerns about their safety. Murphy recently concluded the administration violated his order by seeking to deport a group of migrants to South Sudan. They are currently being held in Djibouti while they undergo screening for any fears of being sent to conflict-ridden South Sudan. According to his lawyers, O.C.G. is a gay man who fled Guatemala in 2024 after facing death threats based on his sexuality. He entered the United States through Mexico in May 2024. Murphy in his ruling said that while an immigration judge in February found O.C.G. deserved protection from being returned to Guatemala, authorities two days later wrongly placed him on a bus to Mexico, where he had previously been raped and kidnapped. After arriving in Mexico, O.C.G. had to choose between waiting months in detention to apply for asylum in Mexico or return to Guatemala. He chose the latter and went into hiding, his lawyers say.
