Adoptive therapy funding cuts 'cruel', says Somerset father
A father has described government cuts to therapy funding for adopted children as "extremely cruel".Jeremy Wilson, from Somerset, has three adopted children and said if he'd known about the funding, it would have been "so helpful" for their upbringing.The government announced in April that the adoption and special guardianship support fund would be cut by 40% per child, to £3,000.The Department for Education said the decisions it had taken "will ensure the fund is financially sustainable to allow more vulnerable children to access targeted support".
Mr Wilson, who lives near Bridgwater, with his wife Clare, said: "Therapy for adopted children is vitally important."They have suffered so much harm and damage to get to the point of being adopted – some assistance is vital for their wellbeing."I understand the need to balance costs by the government, but at the same time we need to prioritise which services should or shouldn't be cut."I think this is an easy option, the adoptive children are part of a forgotten group."
'Just wrong'
Last year, each eligible child could access £2,500 for specialist assessment and £5,000 for therapy. But the separate funding for specialist assessment has now been axed and the therapy limit has been cut to £3,000 per year.Nearly 20,000 children received support through the scheme last year, up from around 13,000 in 2019/20. Campaigners have said that many of these children rely on therapeutic support to help build secure attachments, increase self confidence, and to identify the necessary support functions needed to be put in place in education and family life.Alison Woodhead, from Adoption UK, said: "These are kids who have been abused or neglected and these things have a lasting impact."The decision to cut this fund is just wrong".A Department for Education spokesperson said: "We know how important this support is to families – and through our Plan for Change, we're committed to ensuring adopted and kinship families continue to receive the help they need to thrive."It said that the fair access limit has been set at £3,000 for 2025-26, in line with the average cost of services for most families, adding that more than half of therapy applications already fell within this limit in 2024-25.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Marco Rubio condemns UK sanctions on Israeli ministers
The US Secretary of State has condemned Sir Keir Starmer for imposing sanctions on two Israeli politicians over their government's war in Gaza. Marco Rubio has criticised Britain and other nations who on Tuesday announced they would break with the US and sanction two far-Right Israeli cabinet ministers. The UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway accused Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich of 'inciting violence against the Palestinian people'. Mr Ben-Gvir hit back on Tuesday night, comparing Sir Keir to Neville Chamberlain, the former British Prime Minister who was accused of effectively appeasing the Nazis. Mr Rubio said the sanctions 'do not advance US- led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war'. He urged the UK 'not to forget who the real enemy is'. Mr Ben-Gvir, who has called for the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza, responded to Mr Rubio's post on X, saying: 'History will judge the Chamberlains of our time.' Thank you, Mr. Secretary of State! The American administration is a moral compass in the face of the confusion of some Western countries that choose to appease terrorist organizations like Hamas. Israel is not afraid — we will continue to fight terrorism! History will judge the… — איתמר בן גביר (@itamarbengvir) June 10, 2025 America's ambassador to the UK said he fully supported Mr Rubio's comments and added that the sanctions 'impede constructive dialogue'. Under the sanctions, Mr Ben-Gvir, Israel's national security minister, and Mr Smotrich, the finance minister, will be banned from entering the UK. All of their financial assets in Britain will also be frozen. Israel faces growing international criticism over the conduct of its war with Hamas. Last week the Prime Minister described its actions in Gaza as 'appalling' as aid groups have accused Israeli of blocking food and medicine from entering the territory despite a growing humanitarian crisis. Foreign Office sources told The Telegraph they hoped sanctioning high-profile members of the Israeli government would make clear that the UK was willing to get tough to allow aid into Gaza and to bring about a ceasefire. The sanctions mark a significant break between No 10 and the White House. Donald Trump has lifted sanctions on Israeli settlers and threatened diplomatic action against the International Criminal Court (ICC) as it seeks to investigate Israel for war crimes. The Foreign Office is understood to have informed the US government that the sanctions were coming on Monday night. However, the State Department was not given a chance to object or veto the decision. In a joint statement, the five countries said Mr Ben Gvir and Mr Smotrich 'have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights.' 'These actions are not acceptable. This is why we have taken action now – to hold those responsible to account,' they added. Gideon Saar, Israel's foreign minister, slammed the sanctions as 'outrageous'. He added: 'I discussed it earlier today with Prime Minister [Benjamin] Netanyahu, and we will hold a special government meeting early next week to decide on our response to this unacceptable decision.' Mr Smotrich once described all the Arab population of the West Bank as 'Nazis'. Last month, he said Gaza should be 'totally destroyed' and its population evacuated. He also said he would not let a 'grain of wheat' into the territory. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, said the pair had used 'horrendous extremist language' and that he would 'encourage the Israeli government to disavow and condemn that language'. He has also described the conduct of the Israeli army as 'monstrous' and condemned the actions of 'extremist' settlers in the West Bank. New Zealand's foreign minister insisted the measures were not directed against the Israeli people or government. 'Rather, the travel bans are targeted at two individuals who are using their leadership positions to actively undermine peace and security and remove prospects for a two-state solution,' Winston Peters said. On Tuesday, the US dropped its support for an independent Palestine. Mike Huckabee, America's ambassador to Israel, said a two-state solution was no longer White House policy. He said: 'Unless there are some significant things that happen that change the culture, there's no room for it.'
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Foreign sec flies to Gibraltar - with hopes of securing a post-Brexit deal with Spain
Foreign Secretary David Lammy is in Gibraltar ahead of a potential post-Brexit deal with Spain. Ever since the UK left the EU, the situation in the British Overseas Territory has been up in the air, with London, Madrid and Gibraltar all engaged in negotiations on a path forward. Spain disputes the UK's ownership of the territory, which is located on the south of the Iberian peninsular opposite North Africa. Known for its strategic importance at the entrance to the Mediterranean, Gibraltar is also home to an RAF base. Mr Lammy arrived in Gibraltar overnight on a ministerial plane. A government spokesperson told Sky News last night: "The foreign secretary is in Gibraltar to meet chief minister Fabian Picardo to discuss the latest on negotiations, as all sides look to conclude an agreement as soon as possible." It is possible a deal could be announced in Brussels at some point in the future. Foreign secretaries visiting Gibraltar is unusual, with the last official visit appearing to have been from Dominic Raab in March 2021. Mr Picardo was in London last week to discuss negotiations with UK ministers. Local media has reported that a deal could be announced "imminently". Earlier on Tuesday, the EU proposed removing Gibraltar from its list of "high risk third countries" when it comes to money laundering. If a deal is announced on Wednesday, it would coincide with the UK government's spending review. Any agreement would be closely scrutinised by eurosceptics in Reform and the Conservative Party, who have criticised Sir Keir Starmer's EU reset deal and the handing over of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. How to deal with border crossings A bespoke agreement on Gibraltar - which was captured by the UK in the early 18th century - was required after Brexit as Spain objected to it being included in the EU wide negotiations. Since the UK left the EU, a reciprocal agreement to not stamp passports has been in place on both sides of border for Gibraltar residents entering Spain and Spaniards travelling the other way. However, all sides have wanted to get a proper deal in place before the EU's new entry/exit system comes into place, which is now slated for October this year - despite it being delayed multiple times. In proposals made in 2021, the EU said it wanted to see Spanish authorities get extensive powers over immigration into Gibraltar from outside the Schengen free movement area, with EU institutions given the power to enforce the relevant laws in the territory. Both the UK and Gibraltar have opposed such an extensive presence, and amended proposals were made. The previous Conservative government and current Labour administration have said they would not agree to any deal that handed Gibraltar over to another state, or one that Gibraltar was not happy with. In September last year, Mr Lammy and Mr Picardo met in London. The foreign secretary said afterwards he "reaffirmed our support to them in all eventualities and reiterated that we will only agree to terms that Gibraltar is content with". Since Labour took power just under a year ago, negotiations have continued. In October, Mr Picardo said proposals had been made that "guarantee the safety and security of the Schengen Area and the integrity of the single market".
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Ballymena protests: It is hard to see where the violence will end - and it could go on for weeks
The ugly, violent side of this Northern Ireland town was on full display once again last night. Angry mobs went on a rampage through the streets of Ballymena for a second evening as riot police from across this country were drafted in to push back against an escalating ambush. Hours of blaring sirens were punctured by the relentless sound of bricks and petrol bombs landing on police vehicles. The main roads became a war zone with fires in the middle of the carriageway, cars ablaze and the crunch of broken glass at our feet as we walked the streets. Masked and hooded young men were blasted with the water cannon as tensions boiled over in a strained, fragile community. This has been rumbling for days and began when a vigil, held for a girl who was the victim of an alleged sex attack was, according to police, hijacked by anti-immigration mobs. Authorities say "racist thugs" used the incident to plot their attacks on foreign people living locally. One family with three children were said to have hidden in their attic on Monday night as yobs ransacked their home. Another man told me how he had to drag his 84-year-old mum from her home of 40 years "kicking and screaming" as it was simply not safe anymore. "I've never seen anything like this," he said. On Tuesday, many displayed posters on their windows in a desperate bid to ensure their house did not become a target. Others draped union jack flags on full display. "British residents," one piece of paper stated. There is a feeling among the crowds here in Ballymena that the police branding them racists has escalated this row further. In a horrifying twist, we got word in the middle of the night that another house had been firebombed. When we arrived at the scene, it was a charred shell. The property was completely gutted. Neighbours described how several hundred "protesters" had gathered outside before hounding the foreign occupants out. One woman was pacing up and down, crying in distress at what happened. Another man, who lived a few doors, down hinted that this community had "had enough" of "people moving in". He lambasted the media and refused to engage any further. As I drove out of Ballymena at 1.30am I witnessed other families dragging suitcases full of their belongings through the streets. They were flanked by riot police, armed with shields, who helped them to safety in a late-night escape. 1:40 It is hard to see where this ends. The talk here is that this unrest is only just beginning. It could go on for weeks - and already there are questions about the pressure that will pile on police who will be desperate to de-escalate this mess.
