Two Tamil Nadu Ministers quit on strong court remarks
Tamil Nadu Forest Minister K. Ponmudy and Electricity, Prohibition and Excise Minister V. Senthilbalaji resigned on Sunday (April 27, 2025) night after courts made strong remarks against them.
This is the second time Mr. Senthilbalaji stepped down as a Minister, as the Supreme Court made it clear that he had to make a choice between his ministerial post and freedom. He continued as a Minister without portfolio after his arrest in June 2023 by the Enforcement Directorate in a money laundering case, but resigned from the Cabinet on February 12, 2024. He was reinstated after the Supreme Court granted him bail in the case on September 26, 2024.
A Supreme Court Bench took objection to Mr. Senthilbalaji's induction into the Cabinet, and Justices A.S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan on April 23 said that his continuation as a Minister placed him in a position of influence with regard to witnesses, and he could derail the trial.
Justice Oka remarked that the Bench would even record in its order that it had been a 'mistake' to grant him bail and observed that he had been given bail not on the merits of the case but because the court stood up for the fundamental right to personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.
For Mr. Ponmudy, the Madras High Court directed its Registry to take up a suo motu writ petition for a derogatory speech by him against Saivites, Vaishnavites and women in general. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh issued the direction after observing that the Minister had prima facie misused the liberty granted to him by the Supreme Court which had stayed his conviction as well as sentence in a corruption case.
Following this, the first Bench of the Madras High Court granted time till June 5 for the Tamil Nadu government as well as Mr. Ponmudy, in his individual capacity, to respond to a public interest litigation petition filed by an advocate to disqualify the Minister from holding any constitutional post due to his recent derogatory speech.
A Raj Bhavan release said Chief Minister M.K. Stalin has recommended Governor R.N. Ravi to accept their resignation. The Chief Minister also recommended the induction of former Minister Mano Thangaraj into the Cabinet. The swearing-in will be held on April 28.
The Hindu's Editorials
The Hindu's Daily Quiz
Rana Sangha was the king of which Rajput clan?
Bhati
Mewar
Kachwaha
Rathore
To know the answer and to play the full quiz, click here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC deadline nears, illegal buildings in protected Aravalis face bulldozers
Gurgaon: Just a month-and-a-half to go for a Supreme Court-ordered deadline, the forest department and Faridabad administration on Wednesday started a 15-day demolition drive to remove all illegal construction and encroachments from protected Aravali land in the district. Officials said around a dozen banquet halls, boundary walls, gates and farmhouses that were built in Anangpur village of Faridabad were razed on Wednesday. This area is protected under Section 4 (special orders) of the Punjab Land Preservation Act (PLPA), which bars construction and any non-forest activities in forests. "We have started the demolition drive. We appeal to people to remove illegal encroachment themselves," a senior forest official said. Haryana govt ordered the demolition drive after the Supreme Court gave the state a three-month extension to clear protected Aravalis of illegal construction. SC, in July 2022, had ruled that all Aravali land under PLPA (special orders) should be treated as forest, with provisions of the Forest (Conservation) Act applicable there, and any illegal construction should be demolished. Despite clear directives, Haryana over the years did not complete the task, having razed some 30 structures in four villages of Faridabad since the 2022 ruling. The apex court will take up the case next on Sept 8. The 15-day time frame was given to the Faridabad administration after a meeting chaired by chief secretary Anurag Rastogi on June 7. "All unauthorised constructions, including boundary walls — whether built before or after the 2021 survey—must be demolished within 15 days. The Municipal Corporation of Faridabad will oversee the removal of debris, with all costs to be borne by the property owners," read a document on minutes of the meeting. The Faridabad district magistrate will have to submit an action-taken report to the chief secretary, who also said the DM will be held accountable for any delay. Rastogi will hold another review meeting on June 27. On Wednesday, environmentalists said Faridabad was not the only Haryana district where protected Aravali forests have been encroached on. "Although demolition has begun in four villages of Faridabad after nearly three years, the order actually applies to special orders of Section 4 PLPA on all of Haryana, not just these villages. So far, no other districts have initiated the drive," said Sunil Harsana, an ecologist and wildlife expert. After SC's 2022 order, Haryana forest department had carried out a survey to identify illegal construction and found that 6,973 structures – most of them banquet halls and residential settlements – were built over protected PLPA land in four villages of Faridabad. A majority of these were in Anangpur (5,948) and the remaining in Ankhir, Lakkarpur, and Mewla Maharajpur. No such survey has been organised in Gurgaon. But activists allege that illegal construction is rampant in the Aravalis of Sohna, Raisina and Gwalpahari in the city, all of which are also protected by PLPA's special orders.
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Delhi Confidential: Matching Barricades
After the new Parliament building was inaugurated in 2023, the Parliament House complex has seen a range of new features — from landscaping to relocation of statues to new uniforms for staff. Soon, visitors to the complex would get to see 'aesthetically pleasing' barricades in place of the usual ones placed by the security. The CPWD has designed the barricades to match the look of the new building, in the same red sandstone colour and cast iron design mimicking the jaalis inside. The triangular Parliament building will be displayed at the centre of it. Now that the government has announced that there is no special session to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Emergency declaration, the BJP is considering a plan to conduct mock parliament sessions across the country. Party sources said there is a suggestion that mock sessions showing how Parliament passed the 42nd amendment of the Constitution — during the Emergency to centralise power and curtail judiciary — should be conducted in every district. The controversial remarks made during the debate, including the one made by Congress leader C M Stephen daring the courts to defy Parliament (he had said 'I don't know whether they (courts) will have the temerity to defy this Parliament. If they do it, we have our machinery) will be played in the mock parliament sessions.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC prods govt to nix FYJC quotas in minority colleges
Mumbai: Bombay HC Wednesday asked the state to consider removing a clause in its May 6 GR that introduced social quotas (such as SC/ST/OBC/SEBC) for FYJC admissions in minority institutions. "It can be a bona fide mistake. Issue a corrigendum. If not, we are here," said Justices Makarand Karnik & Nitin Borkar, while hearing two petitions challenging the clause. The institutions learnt about it only after their seat matrices were put up on the admission portal. The colleges argued that social quotas do not apply to minority institutions in terms of Article 15 (5) of the Constitution. As govt pleader Neha Bhide said the GR was meant to bring uniformity in FYJC admissions, Justice Karnik questioned: "Why do you bring in minority institutions?" The judges said a similar GR was withdrawn in 2019. Bhide said the "clause can be removed". The judges asked her to take instructions and inform them Thursday. "Every time you do not need orders from us. You can do it yourself," said Justice Karnik. Govt pleader Neha Bhide informed Bombay high court on Wednesday that withdrawing the May 6 government resolution (GR) on FYJC admissions was not possible, but "clause 11 can be removed". Clause 11 of the GR mentions that social and parallel reservations will apply to vacancies after filling minority seats in minority institutions. To this, Justice Makarand Karnik said: "Solve the problem." And Bhide replied: "I will come with a solution. " Justices Karnik and Nitin Borkar asked Bhide to di-scuss with the state advocate general and senior officials. The judges were hearing two petitions challenging the contentious clause. The first petition was filed by Solapur's Shri APD Jain Pathashala, a trust that runs Walchand College of Arts and Science and Hirachand Nemchand College of Commerce. The second was a joint petition by south Mumbai colleges, including St Xavier's, KC, HR, Jai Hind and Maharashtra College, along with the Maharashtra Association of Minority Educational Institutions. On being informed by advocate S C Naidu, for the Solapur colleges, that finalisation of merit list is scheduled for Wednesday, the judges on Tuesday had directed that it will be subject to the outcome of the petitions. Senior advocate Milind Sathe, for the Mumbai colleges, argued that social reservations do not apply to minority institutions. About the GR, Bhide said: "For the first time, FYJC admissions are taken up online for the entire state." The petitioners said their right under Article 30 to establish and administer educational institutions has been reiterated in SC and HC judgments "which have held that minority educational institutions are not subject to any social reservations".
