Wrongly convicted man ‘anxious about losing home' for receiving compensation
A man who served 17 years in prison for a crime he did not commit has said he is 'really anxious' about losing his home as a result of receiving compensation.
Andrew Malkinson, 59, was wrongly convicted of rape in 2004 and chances to free him were repeatedly missed, leading to one of the worst miscarriages of justice in UK legal history.
He received the first payment for the miscarriage of justice he suffered a year and a half after the Court of Appeal finally quashed his conviction but he may now lose access to social housing because the compensation payments are not exempted from the assessment for state support.
Mr Malkinson told the PA news agency on Thursday he fears being forced to leave his home as a result.
He said: 'I am intensely relieved to finally be getting an interim payment. It still hasn't really quite sunk in.
'It is good news and the implications seem endless, and many are good, but I am really anxious about losing my home.
'I got a social housing flat to live in that has been my refuge – you might think it is small but after a prison cell it feels massive.'
He added: 'I understand that in other compensation schemes, payments like this are not counted when they are assessing you for benefits – why should the scheme for people like me who have been effectively kidnapped by the state be any different?
'The Government can fix this, and I hope they do so before I am forced to leave my home, which is just one more thing to worry about.'
Andy will never trust the state again – and who can blame him?
Emily Bolton from the Appeal legal charity
Emily Bolton from the legal charity Appeal, which represented Mr Malkinson in challenging his wrongful conviction, said Mr Malkinson struggled to survive on benefits after he was freed from jail.
Ms Bolton added: 'It is not just that he had to survive on benefits and handouts – many people face that struggle.
'It is that every interaction he has with the state reminds him of his wrongful conviction, even if it is just the DWP (Department for Work and Pensions) demanding he attend a meeting or send in a document.
'Andy will never trust the state again – and who can blame him?'
Lawyer Toby Wilton, who represented Mr Malkinson in his claims for compensation, told BBC Radio's Today programme on Thursday: 'There's another, I think, symptom of successive governments not really having applied their minds to the statutory scheme for miscarriage of justice or as we've seen with the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission), to miscarriages of justice.
'And that is that unlike other compensation payments, for example, payments made to victims of the Grenfell Tower fire, payments under the miscarriage justice scheme are not exempted when it comes to assessment for state support.
'Which means that just by virtue of having received this very happy news from me that he is has been awarded payments, Andy now faces prospects of losing the social housing that he waited a very long time to be given.'
Mr Wilton also criticised the £1 million cap on compensation payouts, which was set by the government in 2008.
He told BBC Radio's Today programme: 'In today's money, it would be broadly twice that, two million.'
He further told the PA news agency: 'It is good news that the Lord Chancellor has agreed Andy is eligible for compensation under the statutory compensation scheme.
'However, unfairness is built into the current scheme, even on top of the arbitrary £1m cap on compensation.'
Two of Mr Malkinson's applications to have his case reviewed by miscarriage of justice body the Criminal Cases Review Commission in 2009 and 2020 were rejected, until the Appeal charity commissioned fresh DNA tests that eventually led to his release.
It later emerged that he could have been freed a decade earlier if the similarities between his case and another wrongful conviction, that of a man called Victor Nealon, had been spotted and acted upon.
Mr Malkinson said: 'It's been a battle getting this far, and I would not have lasted a month without the support of Appeal and of members of the public who helped me out since that day in 2023 at the Court when my conviction was overturned.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
39 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Miliband's latest misstep will pile unnecessary costs upon developers
Ed Miliband's attempt to lead this country was resoundingly rejected at the ballot box in 2015. Given his influence within the present Government, he may have had the last laugh. The Energy Secretary appears to have emerged triumphant in a clash with embattled Chancellor Rachel Reeves, securing the future of a £13 billion funding allocation for insulating properties across Britain, and very possibly triggering further tax rises this autumn. Having secured access to the fruits of your wallet, Mr Miliband has now turned his sights to redefining British architecture. Under plans revealed today, developers will be forced to install solar panels in the 'vast majority' of new houses, and gas boilers will effectively be banned in newbuilds in favour of heat pumps. The Energy Secretary claims that the moves could save households £500 a year on their energy bills, but appears to have neglected to consider the likely effect on development costs. There are few objections to people choosing to install solar panels, or choosing to buy a house with a heat pump. That builders confronted with market demand are not already supplying them suggests, however, that any premium people are willing to pay for these features will not cover the costs of installing them. The last thing Britain's capacity constrained housing market needs is another effort to pile unnecessary costs upon developers. Measures to ease building are drastically needed. Regrettably, Mr Miliband seems to think otherwise.
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
New details about 2023 Titan submersible implosion revealed in Netflix documentary
An upcoming Netflix documentary reveals new details about the June 2023 Titan submersible, which was traveling to the wreck of the Titanic when it imploded, killing all five people aboard. "Titan: The OceanGate Disaster" looks at the warnings that were ignored about the submersible's designs. David Lochridge, the chief submersible pilot, tried to warn the company's CEO about the potential dangers and was fired for doing so. "There was nothing safe on that vehicle at all, hence why I raised my concerns verbally and also put them down on paper as well," Lochridge told the "TODAY" show. "When I raised the concerns and put them down on paper, on my quality inspection report, I was subsequently taken into the boardroom. Over a two-hour 10-minute period, I was dismissed from the company. So I was fired, basically." A part of Lochridge's job was to assist with the build of the submersible and then take the paying customers down to the wreck. OceanGate charged passengers $250,000 apiece to visit the site. Lochridge said he expressed his concerns over the course of the submersible being built. Part of his worries stemmed from the carbon fiber design of the submersible, which he said wasn't safe for deep dives. He also filed a federal whistleblower complaint and lawsuit to try and get the warning out to the public. The underwater vessel disappeared June 18 after officials said it suffered a " catastrophic implosion." OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush, 61, who was piloting the Titan; deep sea explorer Paul-Henri Nargeolet, 77, who was experienced in visiting the Titanic wreck site; British tycoon Hamish Harding, 58; and Pakistani businessman Shahzada Dawood, 48, and his son, Suleman, 19, were killed. OceanGate said in a statement Thursday: "We again offer our deepest condolences to the families of those who died on June 18, 2023, and to all those impacted by the tragedy." The company said it "permanently wound down its operations" after the tragedy and is fully cooperating with investigations being conducted by the Coast Guard and the National Transportation Safety Board.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Convicted nurse Colin Campbell faces wait for appeal ruling
A nurse jailed for murdering four elderly patients has been told he faces a wait to find out the outcome of his appeal against his Campbell, previously known as Colin Norris, was found guilty in 2008 of killing four women and attempting to kill a fifth by injecting them with Ludlam, 80, Bridget Bourke, 88, Irene Crookes, 79, and Ethel Hall, 86, were inpatients on orthopaedic wards where Campbell worked in Leeds in 2002 and developed unexplained denied any wrongdoing and over the past 14 days, the Court of Appeal has heard from both his lawyers and also the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), who opposed the appeal. He unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction in 2009 and applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) in 2011, who said previously that the prosecution had relied on "wholly circumstantial" CCRC referred the case to the Court of Appeal in London four years appeal hearing finished on Friday after closing statements from Michael Mansfield KC, for Campbell, and James Curtis KC, for the Mansfield previously told the court that Campbell's appeal was a "straightforward case" and that the judges "must conclude that these convictions are unsafe".However, Mr Curtis said the court must uphold the convictions, adding that the jury in Campbell's trial were "provided with the necessary relevant facts and issues, from a plethora of highly qualified and clinically experienced witnesses".Lady Justice Macur, sitting with Sir Stephen Irwin and Mr Justice Picken, said after closing submissions: "It will come as no surprise that we are going to reserve judgment."She added: "There may be ancillary matters for which we will call you back. We will know once you have the draft judgment."A judgment is expected in writing at a later date. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
