Not just 'Alligator Alcatraz': DeSantis floats building another immigration detention center
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — Florida officials are pursuing plans to build a second detention center to house immigrants, as part of the state's aggressive push to support the federal government's crackdown on illegal immigration.
Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis said Wednesday he's considering standing up a facility at a Florida National Guard training center known as Camp Blanding, about 30 miles (48 kilometers) southwest of Jacksonville in northeast Florida, in addition to the site under construction at a remote airstrip in the Everglades that state officials have dubbed ' Alligator Alcatraz.'
The construction of that facility in the remote and ecologically sensitive wetland about 45 miles (72 kilometers) west of downtown Miami is alarming environmentalists, as well as human rights advocates who have slammed the plan as cruel and inhumane.
Speaking to reporters at an event in Tampa, DeSantis touted the state's muscular approach to immigration enforcement and its willingness to help President Donald Trump's administration meet its goal of more than doubling its existing 41,000 beds for detaining migrants to at least 100,000 beds.
State officials have said the detention facility, which has been described as temporary, will rely on heavy-duty tents, trailers, and other impermanent buildings, allowing the state to operationalize 5,000 immigration detention beds by early July and free up space in local jails.
'I think the capacity that will be added there will help the overall national mission. It will also relieve some burdens of our state and local (law enforcement),' DeSantis said.
Managing the facility 'via a team of vendors' will cost $245 a bed per day, or approximately $450 million a year, a U.S. official said. The expenses will be incurred by Florida and reimbursed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
In the eyes of DeSantis and other state officials, the remoteness of the Everglades airfield, surrounded by mosquito- and alligator-filled wetlands that are seen as sacred to Native American tribes, makes it an ideal place to detain migrants.
'Clearly, from a security perspective, if someone escapes, you know, there's a lot of alligators,' he said. 'No one's going anywhere.'
Democrats and activists have condemned the plan as a callous, politically motivated spectacle.
'What's happening is very concerning, the level of dehumanization,' said Maria Asuncion Bilbao, Florida campaign coordinator at the immigration advocacy group American Friends Service Committee.
'It's like a theatricalization of cruelty,' she said.
DeSantis is relying on state emergency powers to commandeer the county-owned airstrip and build the compound, over the concerns of county officials, environmentalists and human rights advocates.
Now the state is considering standing up another site at a National Guard training facility in northeast Florida as well.
'We'll probably also do something similar up at Camp Blanding,' DeSantis said, adding that the state's emergency management division is 'working on that.'
___ Kate Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
17 minutes ago
- Politico
Housing fight blows up budget talks
Presented by California Resources Corporation BUDGET BLUES: California's last-minute budget negotiations are all coming down to housing and labor. Many rank-and-file Democrats and their powerful union allies are fuming about wage requirements tucked into a budget bill to fast-track housing construction, arguing they are far too low. Gov. Gavin Newsom has made his approval of the entire budget contingent on legislation that would ease environmental reviews for housing developments. A separate housing streamlining bill, which drew the ire of trades unions, would set minimum pay standards for certain construction projects. (The fate of the budget package does not rest on that second proposal.) The governor applied public pressure to lawmakers this afternoon in response to the resistance, calling the bills 'the most significant housing and infrastructure reforms in decades.' 'This is our moment to build the California Dream for a new generation,' Newsom said in a social media post. 'We're done with the roadblocks and delays — let's get this done.' The bills are reopening a longtime Sacramento housing labor battle. The Trades — whose members filled Senate and Assembly Budget Committee hearing rooms today to register their objections — contend the new standards would undercut higher wages they've achieved through bargaining and past legislation. 'It is frankly insulting that I'm addressing this committee about a budget trailer bill that has a residential minimum wage,' said Chris Hannan, Trades president, during the Assembly hearing. A letter the Trades sent to Newsom and legislative leaders says a fire sprinkler fitter working on residential projects in Los Angeles County earns almost $66 per hour under prevailing wage, comparing that to the $20-$40 minimum wage in the bill. Lawmakers are running out the budget clock. They must pass the spending agreement negotiated by Newsom, Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire by Monday. The eleventh-hour wrangling has injected drama into final budget hearings, usually pro forma affairs filled with self-congratulatory rhetoric. Instead, lawmakers openly expressed their outright disagreement with the housing bill, while Trades supporters unleashed on committee members. 'Make no mistake, this bill was amended this late and connected to the budget with a poison pill to force every member of this Legislature to vote for things that their conscience would never allow them to do otherwise,' Scott Wetch, a Trades lobbyist, told Assembly committee members. 'It's shameful, and it will leave a black mark on this Legislature and anybody who votes for it for the rest of your career.' Democrats complained the wage language is confusing and rushed — the kind of criticism about budget negotiations that usually comes from Republicans, who are almost entirely shut out of talks. 'Don't try to put members in a position where we have to decide between people who can't afford housing and people who can't afford groceries,' said Assemblymember Chris Rogers, a North Coast Democrat. 'And let's actually have real conversations about this, not hide it in the budget.' Los Angeles state Sen. Sasha Renée Pérez called the bill 'incredibly hurtful and inappropriate.' 'The lack of conversation, the lack of transparency is completely inappropriate,' Pérez said. 'And I hope we have larger discussions about huge, huge policies with implications that have so many impacts for so many workers all across the state.' IT'S WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON. This is California Playbook PM, a POLITICO newsletter that serves as an afternoon temperature check on California politics and a look at what our policy reporters are watching. Got tips or suggestions? Shoot an email to lholden@ WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW TODAY THE OTHER BUDGET PROBLEM: Meanwhile, Washington lawmakers are also facing pushback on the federal megabill, which leaders are trying to push through Congress by July 4, our Jordain Carney reports. North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis warned his colleagues during a closed-door meeting today that he would not vote to take up the party's sweeping domestic policy bill without further clarity on Medicaid changes, a person granted anonymity to disclose private discussions said. 'He said he wouldn't vote for a motion to proceed until he got some clarity on what's going to happen with the provider tax,' the person said, referring to a funding mechanism Senate GOP leaders are hoping to curtail that has sent billions of dollars to the Medicaid program in California alone. Tillis wasn't alone. Multiple other Republican senators warned Majority Leader John Thune during the lunch that they were not ready to vote to launch floor debate on the megabill, according to three attendees. But it's Tillis, who is up for reelection next year, who has emerged as a key vote to watch as Thune moves to try and meet the target for final passage of the bill. Thune isn't just facing pushback over health care provisions; a clutch of deficit hawks also still aren't on board with the bill. IN OTHER NEWS MAMDANI IN THE GOLDEN STATE: California leaders weighed in on Zohran Mamdani's victory in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary, with former Sacramento Mayor Darrell Steinberg saying 'voters are looking for hope and inspiration.' 'Experience still matters, but voters are willing to invest in younger candidates who may see our most difficult challenges with fresh eyes,' he told POLITICO. San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, a well-known moderate, said his policy differences with Mamdani 'will be tested by reality.' 'I believe that to deliver these outcomes, we don't need bigger government — we need better government,' he said. 'We need practical policies that work.' Mahan also took the opportunity to invite 'any entrepreneur or company looking to leave New York' to come to San Jose, where they would 'find a warm welcome.' FINEME: California financial regulators fined a cryptocurrency company for the first time today, accusing the firm Coinme of failing to comply with a landmark 2023 state law regulating digital asset markets, our Tyler Katzenberger reports for POLITICO Pro subscribers. Seattle-based crypto exchange firm Coinme agreed in a draft court order to pay the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation a $300,000 penalty after regulators said the company violated the state's Digital Financial Assets Law, which imposes regulations on cryptocurrency kiosks. The penalty includes a $51,700 restitution payment to an elderly Californian. WHAT WE'RE READING TODAY — The U.S. Department of Justice has sued the Orange County Registrar of Voters, accusing the agency of refusing to provide full records of non-citizens on its voter registration rolls and not keeping accurate registration lists. (Orange County Register) — A Los Angeles judge ruled that the California FAIR Plan's smoke-damage policy violates state law. (Los Angeles Times) — The vice mayor of a Southern California city is facing backlash from the Department of Homeland Security after a video in which she appears to call on gang members to organize against recent immigration sweeps. (CNN) AROUND THE STATE — Sacramento Mayor Kevin McCarty wants to prohibit homeless people from sitting or laying down outside City Hall except under specific circumstances. (Sacramento Bee) — The Los Angeles Police Commission said it would allow LAPD to use drones on routine emergency calls instead of restricting their use to only situations deemed dangerous. (Los Angeles Times) — The San Diego Board of Supervisors voted to explore a plan to step up mitigation of cross-border pollution in the Tijuana River. (San Diego Union-Tribune) — compiled by Juliann Ventura
The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
NATO finds leeway on defense spending goal
The Big Story NATO leaders on Wednesday agreed to a major defense spending increase while leaving room for some alliance countries to not hit the new spending goals thanks to very particular wording. © AP 'Allies commit to invest 5% of GDP annually on core defense requirements as well as defense-and security-related spending by 2035 to ensure our individual and collective obligations,' the 32 leaders of the alliance said in a statement that pointedly did not specify 'all allies' had committed to doing so. President Trump since his first term has pressured NATO countries to commit more of their annual GDP to military spending as the United States looks to shift its attention from security priorities in Europe to the Indo-Pacific and Middle East. NATO's biggest-spending member, Washington, since early this year has insisted alliance countries must up their defense dollars from the 2 percent goal set in 2014 to the ambitious 5 percent. But the goal seemed to be a stretch given that nine of the 32 NATO member countries have yet to reach the earlier 2 percent goal. With vague diplomatic language, however, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has claimed he delivered on Trump's spending demands. 'For too long, one ally, the United States, carried too much of the burden of that commitment. And that changes today,' Rutte said at the end of a meeting of NATO leaders Wednesday. To hit the 5 percent goal — which countries have until 2035 to reach — allies agreed to split the spending among different buckets to easier reach targets: A review of spending is set for 2029 to monitor progress and reassess Russia's security threat, given its ongoing war in Ukraine and overt threats to alliance members should they interfere in the conflict. But several countries have made clear they will not be meeting the new targets as they are pressed by economic challenges — issues that could be made worse by Trump's global tariffs. Among the most vocal of those countries is Spain, which before the NATO summit officially announced that it cannot meet the 'unreasonable' goal by 2035. 'Not all allies are bound to the 5 percent target,' according to a statement from the Spanish government ahead of the summit. Read the full report at Welcome to The Hill's Defense & National Security newsletter, I'm Ellen Mitchell — your guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will affect defense and national security now and inthe future: Unpacking the conflicting assessments on Iran strikes As the dust settles on Iranian sites hit by U.S. bombs and missiles over the weekend, there's growing tension over how much the military operation set back Tehran's nuclear program. The Trump administration is blasting assessments from U.S. intelligence agencies about the damage inflicted by strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, while apparently endorsing an Israeli assessment. And Director of … Questions around success of Iran strikes spark fears on Capitol Hill Questions swirling around the success of U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites are raising fears on Capitol Hill that more could be coming. President Trump is insisting Saturday's strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities were an unqualified success, 'obliterating' Tehran's nuclear capabilities and setting back the program for years. Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, amplified that assertion Wednesday, … 50 percent say US strikes on Iran make Americans less safe: Survey Half of registered voters say they think U.S. military strikes on Iran's nuclear program would make Americans less safe, according to a new Quinnipiac University survey conducted in the days after President Trump bombed the Middle Eastern country. The poll, released Wednesday, phrases the question as a hypothetical, asking respondents whether 'U.S. military strikes targeting Iran's nuclear program would make Americans … Mother of Naval Station Norfolk sailor killed seeks Navy accountability WASHINGTON, D.C. (WAVY) — The mother of a sailor who disappeared from Naval Station Norfolk and was found dead in a Norfolk neighborhood is in Washington D.C. Wednesday demanding transparency and accountability from the U.S. Navy. Angelina Resendiz was initially reported missing May 29 and was last seen in her barracks at Naval Station Norfolk around 10 a.m., according to the Navy. The Naval Criminal Investigative Service confirmed … On Our Radar Upcoming things we're watching on our beat: In Other News Branch out with a different read from The Hill: Trump knocks down barriers around personal data, raising alarm The Trump administration is shattering norms around the handling of Americans' personal — and sometimes private — information, dismantling barriers around data in the name of government efficiency and rooting out fraud. Privacy experts say the moves bring the country closer to a surveillance … On Tap Tomorrow Events in and around the defense world: What We're Reading News we've flagged from other outlets: Trending Today Two key stories on The Hill right now: Trump calls for firing of CNN reporter over Iran nuclear damage report President Trump on Wednesday called for the firing of CNN correspondent Natasha Bertrand, who reported on air an internal U.S. intelligence assessment … Read more Winners and losers from the New York City mayoral primary New York State Assembly member Zohran Mamdani stunned the country on Tuesday with his victory over former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who conceded overnight … Read more Opinions in The Hill Op-ed related to defense & national security submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you tomorrow! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here
Fox News
21 minutes ago
- Fox News
Poll: Majority of Republicans back Trump's strikes on Iran; most Americans fear getting dragged into war
The country is, once again, divided along partisan lines, this time over the U.S. joining Israel in military strikes against Iran's nuclear sites, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday. Such was the case on Capitol Hill this week as congressional Democrats railed against the "unconstitutionality" of President Donald Trump ordering attacks on three nuclear sites in Iran, while most Republican lawmakers celebrated his bold move to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear capability. Forty-two percent of voters support the U.S. strikes against Iran, while 51% oppose them, according to the Quinnipiac University poll, conducted between June 22-24 in the days after the U.S. strikes on Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan in Iran. The results were split along party lines, with 81% of Republicans supporting the strikes compared to 75% of Democrats opposing them. Sixty percent of independents opposed the strikes, while 35% supported them. "No ambivalence from Republicans on the U.S. bombing of Iran's nuclear sites. By a large margin, GOP voters give full-throated support to the mission," Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Tim Malloy said in a statement. Half of voters, at 50%, think the strikes would make Americans less safe, while 42% said they would make Americans safer. Results were once again split along party lines. Seventy-six percent of Democrats said striking Iran's nuclear program would make Americans less safe, while 80% of Republicans said it would make Americans safer. According to the poll, nearly 8 in 10 voters are either very concerned, 44%, or somewhat concerned, 34%, about the U.S. getting dragged into war with Iran. Only 22% of voters are not concerned. "American voters, most of whom are not supportive of the country joining in the Israel-Iran conflict, are extremely troubled by the possibility that involvement could metastasize and draw the U.S. into a direct war with Iran," pollster Malloy said. Forty-two percent of voters think the U.S. is too supportive of Israel, while 45% say support for Israel is about right. Only 5% say the U.S. is not supportive enough. The percentage of voters calling the U.S. too supportive of Israel is at an all-time high since Quinnipiac University first posed the question to registered voters in January 2017. The percentage of voters calling the U.S. not supportive enough is an all-time low since then, the poll reveals. Half of voters, 50%, support Israel's military strikes against nuclear and military sites inside Iran, while 40% oppose them. Eighty percent of Republicans support them, while 60% of Democrats do not. The Quinnipiac University Poll included 979 self-identified registered voters nationwide who were surveyed from June 22-24, with a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points. Trump announced the U.S. successfully struck Iran's nuclear sites Saturday night. Israel had launched a series of coordinated attacks on Iran the previous week, which Iran had retaliated against, prompting the countries to exchange strikes. After the U.S. struck Iran, the Islamist country launched retaliatory attacks on a U.S. air base in Qatar. The president indicated a ceasefire between Israel and Iran earlier this week, touting a successful mission to hinder Iran's nuclear sites without engaging the U.S. in an escalatory Middle East conflict.
