Flats plan paused due to lack of affordable rentals
A decision on whether 164 flats can be built at a former factory site has been delayed by councillors after the developer said no affordable rentals could be included.
Plans for the 18-storey scheme at Sayner Lane in Hunslet were deferred by Leeds City Council's planning panel.
The group was told discount homes worth £5.7m could be provided under local planning policy, but developer Countrylarge Ltd said it was not financially viable.
The hearing was also told a contribution to green spaces would also be reduced, from almost £207,000 to £31,800.
David Blackburn, Green Party member for Farnley and Wortley, said the city was facing a shortage of affordable homes.
He said: "We have got a crisis in certain sectors of the housing market and this does nothing to address that."
The meeting was told the project would be subject to a "late-stage review", with an affordable housing contribution required if there was an excess profit.
The district valuation service confirmed the scheme could only be delivered with no affordable homes, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
Concerns were also raised the development could cause traffic problems because just three parking spaces were included.
Dan Cohen, Conservative member for Alwoodley, told the meeting: "I think this is hugely problematic. For me, three is just too few."
The plans would see 67 one-bed, 80 two-bedroom and 17-three bedroom apartments built at the site, a former glass factory.
Councillors unanimously voted to defer the planning application at the meeting at Leeds Civic Hall.
The developer is to be asked to revisit the green space contribution and consider design changes to allow for affordable housing.
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Leeds City Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
The UK Spending Review's Choices
UK Spending Review 2025 By Dr Linda Yueh, London Business School Former French Prime Minister Pierre Mendès-France once said, 'To govern is to choose.' The government in its UK Spending Review has made choices as to how it will spend and invest in hopes of raising economic growth. As evident in Mendès-France's observation, there are trade-offs in making those choices. The additional challenge with setting out a three-year spending plan and a four-year investment plan is that the global economic environment is highly uncertain with the return of the Trump administration that has quickly announced, then paused, a wide swathe of tariffs and other policies. Given the challenging global economy, strengthening domestic growth drivers is even more important. The focus on investment in this Spending Review makes that apparent as the UK's growth has lagged behind other major economies due in part to its lower rates of business investment. So, the Chancellor's additional fiscal rule that allows the government to borrow to invest means that investment will grow to about £113 billion. Unlike the day-to-day spending, government investment is less impacted by any downgrades to economic growth since it does not need to be balanced by taxes which fall when the economy slows. That greater certainty around investment is not just helpful, but necessary since firms need to be assured before they will invest. The revamping of the Treasury's 'green book', which assesses where investments should go around the country, will also place the investment in parts of the UK that could boost their ability to catch up to London and the southeast. Wales, Northern Ireland and parts of the north of England will receive investments in technology, defence, and other areas. This is 'low hanging' fruit in the sense that bringing up the level of productivity everywhere to the highest level found within a country can raise growth. There are other challenges of course, particularly around planning and energy costs. But, the focus on investment is one strand of the Spending Review that has shown a choice by the government that has the potential to generate returns to growth. The allocation of day-to-day spending is also aligned to growth, but those choices are driven by other factors. Health and defence received more funding than other departments. Given the pressures on the NHS since COVID-19, it was not surprising that more funding was needed. Improving health services could also help reduce the economic inactivity rate, which has stubbornly not returned to pre-COVID levels unlike other major economies. Increasing the employment rate would be positive for growth. Due to the wars that have erupted over the past few years, the government has pledged to increase defence spending to 2.6 percent of GDP by 2027, which would make the UK the second largest spender on security after only the United States. Funding this spending by cutting international aid was a choice that has been under criticism. Although the driver was not growth, defence spending can produce technologies that raise productivity and therefore boost GDP. A well-known example is GPS. It was a Cold War era project of the U.S. Department of Defense that has since powered SatNav and self-driving cars. Education, Net Zero and Energy as well as Science and Technology have also received better allocations. Investing in renewables and research as well as people are aligned to the government's long-term growth aims. But, these choices mean less public spending for other government departments, which could impact the quality of public services in the Justice Department, for instance. The government has emphasised that it will invest in the use of technology, including £2 billion for AI, to make the delivery of public services more efficient. As many organisations know, the potential to do more with less is possible, but transformation programmes are challenging and takes time. For example, the Home Office set out a decade or so ago to digitalise the passport process, which is now much more efficient. Doing so is also positive for economic growth since productivity is defined as output per worker or output per hour. It may be challenging to see the fruits of this for some time, but it is another choice that should support growth in the longer term. And that's the challenge for the Spending Review. The choices to support growth are likely to be judged some time down the line, while the choices around day-to-day spending will have a more immediate impact. To govern is to choose. But, those choices are not judged on the same time horizon. To complicate matters, during times of high uncertainty, the implementation of policy can be thrown off course. This Spending Review has certainly highlighted the challenges of choosing under uncertainty. Linda Yueh is Adjunct Professor of Economics at the London Business School; Fellow in Economics at St Edmund Hall, Oxford University; and the author of The Great Crashes and The Great Economists.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Premier League 'under strain' despite record £6.3 bn revenues
The combined revenue of Premier League clubs rose to a record £6.3 billion ($8.5 billion, 7.5 billion euros) in the 2023/24 season, but fan unrest and worsening competitive balance are cause for concern, according to financial experts Deloitte. The rise in income for England's 20 top-flight clubs was fuelled by commercial income surpassing £2 billion for the first time and a rise in matchday revenue beyond £900 million. English clubs continue to enjoy a huge financial advantage over their European rivals. Spain's La Liga, the second highest revenue-generating league, earned just over half that amount at 3.8 billion euros, almost 50 percent of which came from Real Madrid and Barcelona. However, fan protests have become a common sight at Premier League stadiums over rising ticket prices and the squeezing out of local supporters to make way for more tourists willing to spend more for a special matchday experience. "There can be no doubt that the system in English football is under strain," said Tim Bridge, the lead partner in the Deloitte Sports Business Group. "Repeated reports of fan unrest at ticket price and accessibility demonstrate the challenge in the modern era of balancing commercial growth with the historic essence of a football club's role and position in society: as a community asset." There is also uncertainty over the implications of an incoming independent regulator for England's top five leagues. And for the past two seasons, all three promoted clubs from the Championship have been immediately relegated back to the second tier. "The financial implications of the 'yo-yo effect' on clubs, their spending, and overall competitiveness are major factors to address in order to continue attracting high levels of investment across the system," added Bridge in Deloitte's Annual Review of Football Finance. Total revenue of European clubs rose by eight percent in the 2023/24 campaign to 38 billion euros, boosted by increased commercial revenue and stadium developments. The women's game also continues to grow commercially, particularly in England's Women's Super League (WSL). Collective revenues in the WSL rose 34 percent to £65 million in 2023/24 and are projected to reach £100 million in the upcoming season. kca/nf Sign in to access your portfolio
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Tesco Sales Rise as Market Share Increases Despite Tough Competition
U.K. grocer Tesco TSCO 2.60%increase; green up pointing triangle maintained its full-year expectations after sales climbed in its fiscal first quarter, when it continued to gain market share despite fierce competition in the sector. The supermarket chain on Thursday posted 16.38 billion pounds ($22.19 billion) in group sales excluding value-added tax and fuel for the 13 weeks ended May 24, rising 4.6% on a like-for-like basis.
