Executive whose job was given to someone else while she was off sick with breast cancer wins £1.2m payout
A senior female executive has won more than £1.2 million after her job was given to someone else whilst she was off sick with breast cancer.
Andrea Wainwright was left feeling 'traumatised and broken' when she found out on Linkedin that a colleague had taken over her role, an employment tribunal heard.
The 48-year-old 'fighter' - who was paid more than £80,000 a year - discovered the move by the banking services firm she was employed by just three months after taking time off work to undergo chemotherapy.
When she was well enough to return, she made an official complaint about her treatment and then resigned.
Five years later she won her claim for disability discrimination and unfair dismissal after successfully suing cashpoint firm Cennox.
Ms Wainwright has now been awarded a staggering £1,224,861 in total compensation.
Following her success, Ms Wainwright, from Chelmsford, Essex, told how losing her job following her diagnosis had 'destroyed' her and she had gone through the employment tribunal process on 'principal'.
The tribunal heard she began working for the company - who provide ATM machines - as head of installations in January 2018, after the firm took over her previous employers.
Ms Wainwright was diagnosed with Stage 3 breast cancer in August of that year and, after informing her bosses, took sick leave and started chemotherapy four days later.
The East London hearing was told that senior colleague Shelley Cawthorne temporarily stepped into her role.
In late October Ms Cawthorne told Stephen Garrod, Ms Wainwright's manager, that she had been offered a senior position at a competitor.
The tribunal heard this would have been a 'blow' to the company and so Mr Garrod offered her a permanent position as Head of Installations with a plan to split the role when Ms Wainwright returned.
Ms Cawthorne started her new role on November 1 and a new organisational chart was sent out.
This email was not sent to Ms Wainwright and there was no mention of her in the document.
But she became aware of the appointment three weeks later when she saw a post on LinkedIn inviting viewers to 'Congratulate Shelley for starting a new position as Head of Installations at Cennox', the tribunal heard, and was left 'understandably concerned'.
Ms Wainwright emailed HR Director Jennifer Spencer-Lee to clarify what was happening and what impact it would have for her return.
Ms Spencer-Lee told Ms Wainwright it was 'not expected' to affect her role and that Ms Cawthorne was leading the team 'for now'.
The tribunal found that this email was 'misleading' as it gave the impression Ms Cawthorne's role was temporary.
Ms Wainwright was then informed at a return to work meeting with Mr Garrod and Ms Spencer-Lee in June 2019 that the role was going to be split.
The tribunal heard that Ms Wainwright was unhappy with this and thought she had been demoted because of her cancer diagnosis.
She submitted an 11-page grievance two days after returning to work at the end of July saying she had been lied to by Mr Garrod and Ms Spencer-Lee.
Her complaint was not upheld and then at the end of August she discovered she had been misled, as Ms Cawthorne told her that her appointment as Head of Installations was permanent, not temporary as her bosses had claimed.
When Ms Wainwright's appeal against the decision to reject her grievance was then delayed because the investigator fell ill, she resigned.
In her resignation letter to Ms Spencer-Lee on September 27 she wrote: 'I am very unhappy about the way I have been treated and set out some of the more serious matters.
'I was assured that my role was unchanged but when I returned to work I did not return to my existing role. I was demoted and several key responsibilities were taken away from me.'
The tribunal found that Ms Wainwright had been misled about the changes to her role and discriminated against.
Employment Judge Catrin Lewis found Ms Wainwright 'felt traumatised and broken as a result of discovering...that she had indeed been lied to, which was found to have been an act of discrimination.'
The judge added: 'At that time (she) had been through cancer treatment and was recovering, although she was on continuing medication in respect of the chances of recurrence.
'She had been well enough to return to work and had been described as a fighter.'
Speaking after the tribunal decision, Ms Wainwright said her 25-year-old daughter has lifelong care needs and building a career whilst caring for her daughter had been hard.
'I never did this for money, I did this on principle', she said.
'To lose your job and career just because of a cancer diagnosis really destroys you, at a time when everything is in question, I was fighting for my life and the to have everything else taken away from you is unbelievable.
'I hope the outcome will prevent such blatant discrimination from happening again.
'It will allow me to close the door on a very unpleasant chapter, I am still having to rebuild from scratch.
'I fight for other cancer survivors, the only way to stop this to challenge it.'
Ms Wainwright added that the £1.2 million award will give her some space to recover without the financial pressures she has been experiencing.
'I have had financial pressure from day one', she added.
'Then I hope it will give me the money to invest in my future career once I have had a chance to think about that.
'It has been very disruptive, I am having to start my career from scratch through no fault of my own.
'It has been a very turbulent few years.'
Ms Wainwright has been awarded a total compensation of £1,224,861.94, including a previously announced £40,000 for injury to feelings.
The award also includes almost £400,00 in past loss of earnings, £300,00 for future losses and £130,000 in interest payments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Aluminium producers in the US win from Trump's tariffs
LONDON, June 9 (Reuters) - Century Aluminum, the largest primary aluminium producer in the U.S., and top recycler Matalco will be among the big winners from President Donald Trump's higher tariffs on imports of the metal as domestic prices surge, four industry sources said. However, some sector players are worried that Trump's move from June 4 to hike the tariffs to 50%, from 25%, could push prices so high that demand starts to weaken. Higher revenues for U.S. aluminium producers and recyclers are expected mainly due to the way the market prices the metal key for construction, power and packaging industries. The companies typically charge customers the London Metal Exchange aluminium price plus a physical market premium to cover other costs including freight and taxes. The so-called Midwest premium hit a record 62.5 U.S. cents a lb, or $1,377 a metric ton, on Friday. Since Trump was elected for his second term in November, it has surged nearly 190%. Consultancy Harbor Aluminum said the premium would have to rise to 70 cents a lb, or $1,543 a ton, to fully reflect the 50% tariff. Century (CENX.O), opens new tab, in which London-listed miner Glencore (GLEN.L), opens new tab is the top shareholder with a stake of more than 40%, declined to comment beyond a statement it issued last week, in which it welcomed the 50% tariff. Century produced 690,000 metric tons of aluminium last year. Miner Rio Tinto (RIO.L), opens new tab, ( opens new tab, which owns a 50% stake in Matalco, declined to comment, speaking on behalf of the U.S. company, which produced 528,000 tons of recycled or secondary aluminium last year. U.S. imports of scrap aluminium remain free of tariffs, but aluminium recycling needs primary metal to maintain properties of alloys used to make industrial goods. Alcoa (AA.N), opens new tab, one of the world's largest aluminium producers, said its U.S. smelters would also benefit from the tariffs, and that its active production capacity in the United States totalled 291,000 tons. Alcoa's global aluminium output was 2.215 million tons last year. Constellium, which has a capacity to recycle 360,000 tons of aluminium annually in the United States, said it supported the original 25% tariff because it helped address unfair trading practices by non-market economies. "However, we are concerned that increasing the tariff beyond this level could have unintended consequences - potentially disrupting the aluminum supply chain and impacting demand," it added. Higher aluminium costs are likely to be passed on to consumers, which analysts expect will eventually hit demand. With its local primary aluminium industry in decline for years, the U.S. relies on imports of large amounts of unwrought aluminium and alloys - more than 3.9 million tons last year, according to U.S. government data. The U.S. produced more than four million tons of aluminium last year, most of it recycled material, according U.S. Geological Survey. Industry sources expect U.S. scrap aluminium imports to climb as recycling companies take advantage of high premiums to ramp up production. Already U.S. scrap aluminium imports have started to rise. Data from information provider Trade Data Monitor shows U.S. scrap aluminium imports rose more than 30% to 201,968 tons in the first quarter of this year from the same period in 2024. Traders said the high Midwest premium would allow recyclers to bid more for scrap than buyers outside the United States, as they can sell aluminium locally at a higher price. LME aluminium is trading around $2,500 a ton, while the duty-paid premium in Europe has dropped more than 50% to $170 a ton since January on expectations some global producers will divert primary metal to Europe to avoid U.S. tariffs.
BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
When does the first summer transfer window close?
The first summer transfer window of 2025 will close on Tuesday, 10 June at 19:00 summer has been split into two windows this year, with the first having opened on Sunday, 1 early window allowed teams participating in the Club World Cup the chance to sign players before the tournament begins on 15 second window will open on Monday, 16 June, before closing on Monday, 1 September at 19:00 BST for Premier League, EFL and Scottish Premiership rules state a transfer window cannot last more than 16 weeks in a calendar year, hence the split this City and Chelsea are the two Premier League clubs competing at the Club World Cup, but any team can participate in the early Madrid made use of the window to sign Trent Alexander-Arnold from Liverpool before they compete at the Club World article is the latest from BBC Sport's Ask Me Anything team. What is Ask Me Anything? Ask Me Anything is a service dedicated to answering your want to reward your time by telling you things you do not know and reminding you of things you team will find out everything you need to know and be able to call upon a network of contacts including our experts and will be answering your questions from the heart of the BBC Sport newsroom, and going behind the scenes at some of the world's biggest sporting coverage will span the BBC Sport website, app, social media and YouTube accounts, plus BBC TV and radio. More questions answered... Summer transfer window - your questions answeredWhen are the 2025-26 Premier League fixtures released?Why are 1bn euro release clauses becoming more common?
The Guardian
20 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Nato chief warns of Russian threat and calls for ‘quantum leap' in collective defence
Russia will remain an imminent threat to Nato even if there is peace in Ukraine and the western alliance has to dramatically increase its air defences and tank and weapon numbers as a result, the head of the organisation will say on Monday. Mark Rutte, who is visiting the UK and meeting the prime minister, Keir Starmer, is expected to outline why it is necessary for allies to agree a dramatic increase in military spending to 5% of GDP at a summit in The Hague later this month. At a speech at the Chatham House thinktank in London on Monday afternoon, the Nato secretary general will argue the alliance needs 'a quantum leap in our collective defence' and 'more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full'. Critically, Rutte is expected to say 'the fact is, danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends', reflecting a belief that the Kremlin will not demilitarise even it agrees to a ceasefire and eventually a peace with Kyiv. Military planners believe that Russia will seek to retain an active and experienced army in excess of 600,000-strong and maintain elevated levels of defence spending of about 6.5% of the country's GDP, so threatening Nato's eastern flank. Rutte will first visit Sheffield Forgemasters, a nationalised steelmaker owned by the Ministry of Defence which makes complex components for nuclear submarines, before meeting Starmer and then giving his speech. The secretary general, a former Dutch prime minister, has been pushing a proposal for Nato members to agree to lift core defence spending to 3.5% of GDP by about 2035, with a further 1.5% on cyber and other related military infrastructure. Britain is expected to sign up to the plan, to be formally confirmed at the summit, as part of an effort to maintain the support of the US president, Donald Trump, who pressed for the new 5% target once he was elected president for the second time. Justifying the need for extra spending, Rutte is expected to say that Nato needs 'a 400% increase in air and missile defence' as part of a wider rearmament to maintain credible deterrence and defence. 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,' Rutte is expected to say, according to remarks trailed by Nato ahead of the speech, due to begin at 3.45pm London time (1645 GMT). There will also have to be wider restocking of weapons, run down initially during the long period of post-old ar peace and second, because so much has been donated to Ukraine to help it fend off the full-scale Russian invasion over the past three years. 'Our militaries also need thousands more armoured vehicles and tanks, millions more artillery shells, and we must double our enabling capabilities, such as logistics, supply, transportation, and medical support,' Rutte will add. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Britain has promised to increase defence spending from the current 2.33% of GDP to 2.5% by 2027 and to 3% in the early 2030s. But a week ago, Starmer acknowledged that discussions about Nato's future military needs were also taking place. 'There are discussions about what the contribution should be going into the Nato conference in two or three weeks' time,' the prime minister said as he unveiled the UK's strategic defence review, as part of a wider conversation about 'what sort of Nato will be capable of being as effective in the future'. Rutte is expected to welcome the UK's strategic defence review which he will say will 'enhance Nato's collective defence'. The document said Britain faced 'a new era of threat' and that in order to deter Russia the UK had to become, in the words of Starmer, 'battle-ready'. Last week, one of the three members of the defence review team, the foreign policy expert Fiona Hill, said the UK needed to recognise that Russia considered itself at war with Britain and that the US under Trump was no longer a reliable ally. 'We're in pretty big trouble,' Hill said in an interview with the Guardian.
