University of Florida presidential pick rejected by state Board of Governors over past DEI support
The Florida Board of Governors rejected a candidate's bid to lead the University of Florida over his past statements and actions heading other major universities.
A spokesperson for the State University System of Florida confirmed with Fox News Digital that the board voted 10 to 6 against the confirmation of Dr. Santa Ono as president of the University of Florida.
The Board of Governors serves as the governing body for the state's 12 public universities.
Ono, an immunologist, was the only finalist that the UF Board of Trustees considered. According to the Chronicle of Higher Education, Ono pledged to end diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in his opening statement before his unanimous confirmation vote last month.
"I support fully the decision to end DEI," Ono said, adding, "I'm here to ensure DEI never returns to the University of Florida. Science will lead, not ideology. I want to come to Florida, not to slow reform, but to accelerate it. Public universities exist to educate, not indoctrinate."
Elite Schools Organize Group To Oppose Trump Administration As Battle For Higher Education Funding Escalates
Read On The Fox News App
However, despite Ono's efforts to distance himself from DEI, the leading candidate for the position faced tough questioning from the Board over his past leadership. Ono was grilled about his views on antisemitism, past support of DEI programs, and the rampant anti-Israel demonstrations that occurred during his nearly three years as president of the University of Michigan.
Chris Rufo, the conservative reformer from the Manhattan Institute and trustee at the New College of Florida, was one of Ono's major critics.
Florida Educators File Federal Lawsuit Challenging State Law Upending Dei Policies
Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., praised the Board of Governors' decision to block Ono's confirmation. Steube penned a letter calling for the Board to reject Ono's bid in order for the officials to "find a suitable replacement who truly represents Florida values."
Another critic of Ono was Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., citing a "concerning record from his time at the University of Michigan, where he allowed an illegal, pro-terrorist encampment to take over the campus for nearly a month, putting Jewish students in danger and failing to uphold even the most basic standards of leadership."
Stefanik Looks Back To Fiery Exchanges With College Leaders In Senate Confirmation Hearing: 'Watershed Moment'
The Board of Governor's decision came amid the push by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to reshape education in the Sunshine State by combating woke ideology.Original article source: University of Florida presidential pick rejected by state Board of Governors over past DEI support
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House aide calls Los Angeles anti-ICE protests an 'insurrection'
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senior White House aide Stephen Miller on Saturday condemned protests in downtown Los Angeles against federal immigration raids as an "insurrection" against the United States. Helmeted police in riot gear engaged in a tense confrontation with protesters on Friday night after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents conducted enforcement operations in the city and arrested at least 44 people on immigration violations. "An insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States," Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, wrote on X. Miller, an immigration hardliner, was responding to video footage on X showing a large number of people protesting in downtown Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) said it had not made any arrests related to the demonstration. FBI deputy director Dan Bongino posted on X that they were reviewing evidence from the protests. "We are working with the U.S. Attorney's Office to ensure the perpetrators are brought to justice," Bongino said. "The Right to assemble and protest does not include a license to attack law enforcement officers, or to impede and obstruct our lawful immigration operations." President Donald Trump has pledged to deport record numbers of people in the country illegally and lock down the U.S.-Mexico border, with the White House setting a goal for ICE to arrest at least 3,000 migrants per day. But the sweeping immigration crackdown has also included people legally residing in the country, including some with permanent residence, and has led to legal challenges. Television news footage earlier on Friday showed caravans of unmarked military-style vehicles and vans loaded with uniformed federal agents streaming through Los Angeles streets as part of the immigration enforcement operation. "Forty-four people (were arrested) on immigration charges," Yasmeen Pitts O'Keefe, a spokesperson for Homeland Security Investigations told Reuters on Saturday. The LAPD did not take part in the immigration enforcement. It was deployed to quell civil unrest after crowds protesting the deportation raids spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the walls of a federal court building and gathered outside a nearby jail where some of the detainees were reportedly being held. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass in a statement condemned the immigration raids. "I am deeply angered by what has taken place," Bass said. "These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city. We will not stand for this." (Reporting By Lucia Mutikani; editing by Diane Craft)
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is arming Gazan militias and clans an effective tactic?
Relying on a tribal militia or clan in Gaza may work in the short term. However, in the long term it is unlikely to achieve success. On June 5 reports confirmed that Israel has been arming and apparently supporting or working with an armed militias in Gaza. Some reports refer to this group as a 'gang.' Other reports describe the leader of the group, Yasser Abu Shabab, as a member of a large clan in southern Gaza. There may be more clans being activated or encouraged than just the one linked to Yasser Abu Shabab. Shabab is not his real name and his name is a nomme de guerre, meaning the full details about this group continue to be shrouded in some mystery. As the details are shrouded in some fog, it is hard to know if these groups will become an effective anti-Hamas movement. If the groups aregangs that are more well-known for looting and crimes in the past, rather than achieving much, then they will likely not be embraced by the average people. If the groups are made up of clans or even men with links to Bedouin tribes, then it's possible that it will be hard for them to make inroads among other Gazans. It's worth asking whether the new militias in Gaza may be effective and whether history tells us that arming militias is an effective tactic. First, let's look at what we know about Gaza. It's worth noting that Gaza's population is divided into different groups. There are people who came to Gaza as refugees in 1949 1949, fleeing areas in the Negev that became part of Israel. These people likely make up more than half the population of Gaza. Then there are the people in Gaza who trace their heritage to people who lived in Gaza for hundreds of years before 1948. Those people could be called the original Gazans. They are very different than those called 'refugees.' The refugees moved to camps such as Khan Younis, Rafah, Maghazai, Deir al-Balah, Jabaliya, Nuseirat and Shati. The camps became the backbone of the Palestinian political and armed movements. They also became a hotbed of Hamas activity in the 1980s and 1990s, and thus a hotbed of terrorist activity. The Gaza Gazans, who predate 1948, are less inclined toward Hamas. This means that any attempt by the armed militias, gangs or clans will face hurdles in terms of penetrating Gazan society. This is because groups that have roots in one area, may not be popular in others, or they may even alienate people. Back in the 1980s, Gazan families and clans were often involved in violence against one another. This kind of family violence is also common to Arab villages in Israel, where there has been an unprecedented level of gun violence in recent years. This kind of violence means people are often divided and it is hard to unify them, either militarily or politically. What does history tell us about the challenge that militaries or countries have in recruiting or arming tribes, mercenaries, militias or other types of paramilitary groups? In antiquity, it was not uncommon for tribes to play a role as auxiliaries alongside normal military formations. In addition, it was common that when countries were at war they would often bring along a cavalcade of smaller allies. For instance, when Hannibal was fighting Rome, he had to recruit people from Italy because the actual number of Carthaginians in his army began to decline over time. By the 15th and 16th century, mercenaries played a major role in fighting amongst the Italian city states. This was the era of Machiavelli, who wrote that mercenaries were often 'disunited, ambitious, [and] undisciplined.' However, mercenaries continued to be used by European states. The British employed Hessian mercenaries and others during the Revolutionary War. These groups generally did not prove effective. In addition, the British and other colonial powers often relied on alliances with tribes to help during wartime or to keep the peace on the frontier. For instance, at the battle of Isandlwana, the British army fighting the Zulus included a number of local native troops. The native troops of the Natal Native Contingent, for instance, included tribes that had fought the Zulus. Henan Cortes, during his conquest of the Aztec empire, allied with groups that had been suppressed by the Aztecs in the past. In the modern times, many countries have sought to work with tribes and militias. For instance, Lawrence of Arabia worked with tribes that were in revolt against the Ottoman Empire. During the Vietnam war, the US often worked with Montagnard fighters who opposed the Communists. The US also worked with the Hmong people in Laos. Later, during the US occupation in Iraq the US relied on a group called the Sons of Iraq or Sahweh, which were Sunni tribal militias. These were concentrated in Anbar province. Rwanda has long backed groups in eastern Congo who are made up of members of the Tutsi minority. What this history tells us is that there is a long tradition of working with tribal militias, clans, gangs or mercenaries. However, historically these groups do not have a lasting ability to achieve results. Usually, they are used as part of a policy and then they are usually abandoned when a war is over. In other cases, they simply fade away. The Sunni 'awakening' groups in Iraq, for instance, were starved of resources after the US left Iraq in 2011. Some of the tribes that supported the US continued to play a role. During the ISIS invasion of Iraq, a number of tribes near Haditha helped hold off the ISIS attack. These included the Jughayfa tribe and the Albu Nimr tribe. ISIS persecuted tribal groups that resisted. Key Sunni tribes such as the Shammar opposed ISIS and similar extremists. However, most of these tribes are not able to operate on a national level, they can only help secure certain areas. The use of tribes and militias usually enable states to carve out areas of influence in states they are intervening in. When there is a chaotic state on the border or a weak state, countries will often seek to arm local groups to help protect their borders. This can backfire because the groups may end up going on rampages and massacring people, or they may escalate a war in a neighboring country. The Vietnam War, for instance, destabilized Cambodia and Laos and this led to great suffering over the years. Minority groups who were exploited as allies often were betrayed. In other situations states will try to co-opt or even work with drug cartels, which is how Mexico's former PRI appeared to have run the country in the 1980s and 1990s. When this broke down the country fell into a brutal cycle of violence as the cartels had become more powerful than some state governments. Relying on a tribal militia or clan in Gaza may work in the short term. However, in the long term it is unlikely to achieve success. The theory that Israeli soldiers' lives will be saved via this alliance is not necessarily proven by history. Usually, when states think they can provide guns to tribes or militias as a short-term fix, they find out later that they are drawn into more complex wars. For instance, the spillover from the Rwandan genocide has led to fighting in eastern Congo for thirty years. Has the use of proxies and tribes and militias there helped Rwanda or Congo or anyone else in the long term? Probably not. The same can be said for Sudan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia or many other states teetering on failure and civil war. A long civil war in Gaza will likely harm Israel in the long term.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sacramento Pride must be safe from all forms of hate, including antisemitism
As a former Sacramento City council member and a longtime advocate for LGBTQ+ equality, I've seen how Pride Month transforms our city each June. It's a celebration of resilience and identity — but it's also a test of our values. Three years ago, I witnessed something unforgettable at Pride events in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. There, in spaces often surrounded by tension, I saw Israelis, Palestinians, Christians, Jews and Muslims marching side by side. Many of them were people who could not safely be 'out' or open about their sexuality or gender identity in their own communities or countries of origin. Pride, in those moments, erased the artificial walls that hold back peace. It became a sanctuary for truth, vulnerability and shared dignity. That vision of solidarity in the face of difference is exactly what we must protect. Yet, this year, as Sacramento prepares to celebrate Pride, I write with deep concern. Since the Hamas attacks on Oct. 7, 2023, queer Jews have faced growing exclusion from Pride events across the country. Participants have been asked to hide Jewish symbols or avoid acknowledging their identities altogether. These aren't isolated misunderstandings — they're symptoms of a growing, troubling erosion of inclusion, even within our own community. And the consequences are real: Two weeks ago, two Israeli embassy staff members were killed outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C., following a peace-focused diplomatic event. That site — a symbol of both Jewish and LGBTQ+identity — was targeted in an act of hate. And now, a man in Boulder, Colo. is facing a federal hate crime charge after injuring 12 people using a makeshift flamethrower at a Jewish community event earlier this week. These violent acts are devastating reminders of what's at stake when fear and exclusion replace solidarity. Pride should never require anyone to hide who they are — not their sexuality, gender, religion or ethnicity. Inclusion that censors identity isn't inclusion, it's discrimination. True Pride embraces complexity and affirms that diversity is not a liability, but a strength. To be clear: Criticism of any government, including Israel's, is entirely legitimate. But demanding that LGBTQ+ Jews disavow their identities or their right to express them as a condition of inclusion is not activism, it's bigotry. It undermines the very foundation of Pride and the LGBTQ+ movement itself. Sacramento must lead differently. During my time on the city council, we worked hard to ensure that Sacramento remained inclusive and just. Sacramento Pride has long reflected those values — uplifting communities, celebrating intersectionality and advocating for everyone pushed to the margins. We must not let that commitment waver. That's why I'm proud to partner with A Wider Bridge, an organization building solidarity between LGBTQ+ and Jewish communities, while creating space for Palestinians, Muslims and people of all backgrounds to engage in authentic dialogue. This work is a reminder that Pride can hold all of us — if we let it. To the organizers of Sacramento Pride: Your leadership matters. Please reaffirm that everyone, including queer Jews, are welcome to fully express who they are. Allow all participants to wave their flags, wear their symbols and share their truths proudly and safely. Listen to the concerns being raised. Vet speakers with care. Build programming that reflects dignity, not division. And to Sacramento's LGBTQ+ community: This is a time for clarity and compassion. We must stand firmly against antisemitism, just as we stand against all forms of hate. Solidarity means standing together, even when it's difficult. Let Sacramento Pride this year be more than a celebration. Let it be a recommitment to each other, to safety and to the radical promise that no one should ever be asked to hide who they are. Steve Hansen is a former Sacramento City council member and a longtime advocate for LGBTQ equality, social justice and inclusive public policy.
