logo
Google DeepMind CEO Predicts AI-Powered Humanity Will 'Colonise The Galaxy' Starting 2030

Google DeepMind CEO Predicts AI-Powered Humanity Will 'Colonise The Galaxy' Starting 2030

NDTV13 hours ago

Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis predicts human galaxy colonisation.
AI will significantly enhance human productivity and exploration of the universe, he claims.
Hassabis envisions a future with radical abundance and solutions to major global issues.
Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis has claimed that humans will be able to 'colonise the galaxy', starting 2030, with artificial intelligence (AI) being the driving force behind this revolution. The 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry winner said AI tools will turbocharge human productivity and lead us to far and away lands in the universe.
Mr Hassabis said the 'golden era' was only five years away, with AI models set to bring about a renaissance in human existence.
"If everything goes well, then we should be in an era of radical abundance, a kind of golden era. AGI can solve what I call root-node problems in the world, curing terrible diseases, much healthier and longer lifespans, finding new energy sources," said Mr Hassabis in an interview with WIRED, referring to human-level AI, popularly known as Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).
"If that all happens, then it should be an era of maximum human flourishing, where we travel to the stars and colonise the galaxy. I think that will begin to happen in 2030," he added.
Quizzed if the abundance will still lead to unequal distribution as is the condition today, Mr Hassabis said AI will make "things feel like a non-zero-sum game".
AGI's future
While AGI may help humanity unlock new frontiers, Mr Hassabis has previously talked about society not being ready for it and that the technology and its perils keep him up at night.
"It's a sort of like probability distribution. But it's [AGI] coming, either way it's coming very soon and I'm not sure society's quite ready for that yet. And we need to think that through and also think about these issues that I talked about earlier, to do with the controllability of these systems and also the access to these systems and ensuring that all goes well," said Mr Hassabis.
He has also called for the establishment of a UN-like umbrella organisation to oversee AGI's development.
"I would advocate for a kind of CERN for AGI, and by that, I mean a kind of international research-focused high-end collaboration on the frontiers of AGI development to try and make that as safe as possible," he added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AGI Denialist: Rise of a denialist who indicates that we are becoming humanity-denialists
AGI Denialist: Rise of a denialist who indicates that we are becoming humanity-denialists

Time of India

time5 hours ago

  • Time of India

AGI Denialist: Rise of a denialist who indicates that we are becoming humanity-denialists

A nomad interested in twisting the kaleidoscope of science and looking for new patterns As I often write blogs where I audaciously refer to the illusory beast called Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), I get to meet a lot of disgruntled humans, and I now sense an opportunity here to go down in the history by being the first to classify them and list their key morphological features! We already have one set of humans similarly named, i.e., Climate Change Denialists (and I am often on their side), so I just propose an extrapolation of the same and offer you a guide to identify this new group, AGI Denialists (AGID), and here is a guide to recognise them. AGID, like all other human groups come in a spectrum from mild to rabid but have certain common morphological features directly or inversely proportional to the intensity of denial they will express. My observation suggests that the scale of denial is most directly linked with age, i.e., older the more intense. The second most powerful force is the vocation and level of success, with two groups having very distinct presence amongst the denialists, i.e., the artists and the non-engineering professionals. If the person is an artist, regardless of the level, denialism is almost always on the highest scale, while in non-engineering professional such as a doctor or a lawyer, the scale of denial will be directly proportional to the level of success. And, last but not the least is exposure to AI, as this has a very curious effect that often produces the most rabid variety, and it is a bit counterintuitive to understand. If I convert my classification into a typical case of rabid AGID, it will be a middle-aged male with high level of professional = social success and, most interestingly, he will have used AI, i.e., the narrow artificial intelligence and hence 'he knows'. Though artist group also produces rabidity of a fine order, the above-cited is always in the other league. Most of the artists give up arguing and give you a hurt look of 'you-won't-understand' but the above-cited will carry on arguing with you till the you admit your defeat. If we look at the overall response to the AI and AGI debate, we have three sets of responses, i.e., ignore, accept or deny. The ignore group is the largest, closely followed by the denier and on the fringe we have some of us who accept that AGI is here and here to stay. If you are a human reader of the above 435 words, armed with human intelligence and on the verge of boredom, you are now bound to ask , 'So What?'. And that is really the main reason why I am writing this piece. As I have already stated in my previous piece on AGI, human response to the rise of AGI is very much like how we respond to an impending doom of a very special nature. Such a response is reserved for threats that we know that we cannot mitigate (eg. diagnosis of an incurable and fatal disease). The fact that AGI is getting responded-thus means that deep within the collective psyche, we are recognising it as a threat, and the one that is uncontrollable. The rising presence of denialists is a clear indicator that we are all fearing the rise of AGI and need to find a psychological closure. The variation in response is nothing but a product of the psychological bent of mind each of us have. Be it ignoring, accepting or denying, all three options are imaginary narratives we all have built because we have a collective realisation that we humans have no control over how AGI will evolve. I don't know how much of this fear borne from watching sci-fi movies, but my own guess is that we humans have a accepted deep within that the brave new world has no moral compass other than profiteering. This clearly indicates that we have lost faith on individual morality to prevail upon boundless selfishness. We now live in a world where we can easily believe that for a few billion dollars of profit, a human CEO of company can and will make a vaccine that can harm billions of humans. And what is even more tragic is that we also believe that we have no way to counter this phenomenon other than fabricating a comfortable narrative to find our own peace. If we look real close, the presence of not just AGID but all types of denialists is indicator of something really deep. While AGI or climate change will have a range of people with different opinions, there is one collective denial that has arrived and settled like a dark cloud. We all are now Humanity/Morality-Denialists. We have lost faith in our own values and have given up against the market forces. We have started believing that human civilisation is a rudder-less ship and we have no hope to find the rudder. It is this denialism that is bigger than any that humanity has ever confronted in the history, and if we don't counter it, we are a doom race. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.

Google Deepmind CEO says he will pay ‘thousands of dollars' to get rid of THIS! Would you do the same?
Google Deepmind CEO says he will pay ‘thousands of dollars' to get rid of THIS! Would you do the same?

Mint

time7 hours ago

  • Mint

Google Deepmind CEO says he will pay ‘thousands of dollars' to get rid of THIS! Would you do the same?

Artificial intelligence pioneer and Google Deepmind CEO Demis Hassabis has said that he would pay 'thousands of dollars' to get rid of his daily emails as he gets too overwhelmed by them. Speaking at the South by Southwest (SXSW) festival on Monday, June 2, the Nobel laureate said his team at Google Deepmind is working on an AI-powered mechanism that will address this exact issue and take over the tedious task of managing email inboxes. 'I would love to get rid of my email. I would pay thousands of dollars per month to get rid of that,' Hassabis said. The new system will be aimed at helping users managing their email inboxes, sorting through mails automatically and replying to regular messages. The tool will also ensure that the important messages do not go unnoticed. 'The thing I really want – and we're working on – is can we have a next-generation email?,' Hassabis said. He revealed that the new AI tool by Google will not only manage and filter emails but also send replies that match the user's writing style. The tool is currently under development. Demis Hassabis also said on Monday that greater international cooperation around AI regulation was needed but "difficult" to achieve 'in today's geopolitical context'. At a time when AI is being integrated across all industries, its uses have raised major ethical questions, from the spread of misinformation to its impact on employment, or the loss of technological control. Speaking at the SXSW festival on Monday, Hassabis, who has won a Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his research on AI, also addressed the challenges that artificial general intelligence (AGI) -- a technology that could match and even surpass human capability -- would bring. "The most important thing is it's got to be some form of international cooperation because the technology is across all borders. It's going to get applied to all countries," Hassabis said. "Many, many countries are involved in researching or building data centres or hosting these technologies. So I think for anything to be meaningful, there has to be some sort of international cooperation or collaboration and unfortunately that's looking quite difficult in today's geopolitical context," he said.

Google DeepMind CEO Predicts AI Will Help Humans Colonise The Galaxy Starting 2030
Google DeepMind CEO Predicts AI Will Help Humans Colonise The Galaxy Starting 2030

News18

time9 hours ago

  • News18

Google DeepMind CEO Predicts AI Will Help Humans Colonise The Galaxy Starting 2030

Last Updated: Google DeepMind CEO and Nobel laureate Demis Hassabis said that starting 2030 humans will be able to colonise the galaxy and artificial intelligence will power this revolution. 2024 Nobel Prize winner and Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis told a news outlet recently that humans will be able to 'colonise the galaxy" starting 2030 and the revolution will be powered by artificial intelligence (AI). The Nobel chemistry laureate told WIRED that AI will lead humanity to far into the universe while turbocharging human productivity. Hassabis, who was jointly awarded the Nobel Prize with David Baker 'for computational protein design", said the 'golden era' was only five years away and that AI models set to bring about a renaissance in human existence. 'If everything goes well, then we should be in an era of radical abundance, a kind of golden era. AGI can solve what I call root-node problems in the world, curing terrible diseases, much healthier and longer lifespans, finding new energy sources," Hassabis was quoted as saying in an interview with WIRED. AGI, or Artificial General Intelligence, refers to an AI system with human-like cognitive abilities, capable of understanding, learning, and applying knowledge across a wide range of tasks. 'If that all happens, then it should be an era of maximum human flourishing, where we travel to the stars and colonise the galaxy. I think that will begin to happen in 2030," he said. When asked whether abundance through AI would still result in unequal distribution, Demis Hassabis said the technology could make the world feel 'like a non-zero-sum game." Although AGI has the potential to open vast new frontiers for humanity, Hassabis has previously expressed concern that society may not be prepared for its impact and admitted that the risks and consequences of such powerful technology often keep him up at night. 'It's a sort of like probability distribution. But it's coming, either way it's coming very soon and I'm not sure society's quite ready for that yet. And we need to think that through and also think about these issues that I talked about earlier, to do with the controllability of these systems and also the access to these systems and ensuring that all goes well," he said. He has also advocated for creating a UN-style global body to oversee the development and governance of AGI. 'I would advocate for a kind of CERN for AGI, and by that, I mean a kind of international research-focused high-end collaboration on the frontiers of AGI development to try and make that as safe as possible," he further added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store