Seven Hertfordshire job seekers scammed out of £200,000 in a month
Seven people have been scammed out of £200,000 after applying for fake jobs.Hertfordshire Police said two people in Cheshunt and Watford each lost £70,000 after they carried out daily tasks through an app after they were targeted by fraudsters posing as reputable recruiters. All the cases happened in June and were reported to Action Fraud, the force said. Residents in Broxbourne, Hatfield, Hemel Hempstead, Hitchin and St Albans also lost large sums of cash.
'Proceed with caution'
A police spokesman said the victims were contacted on WhatsApp or text message by someone claiming to be from an online recruitment company. They were asked to use an app called "app optimisation" or "data optimiser". They were told they needed to complete a number of tasks and would be paid for each task, but were then told they would only get the money if they matched the amount they earned. Elaine Crate, the force's senior Beacon Fraud Hub manager, said: "If you receive an exciting job opportunity sent directly to you via WhatsApp, text message, social media platform or email, proceed with caution, particularly if you have been actively looking for a job, as scammers often target individuals who are job hunting."Legitimate recruitment agencies will never ask prospective candidates to pay any fees. "If you are asked to deposit money at any stage, this should be an immediate red flag."The force urged people to check the company that is trying to offer them a job and if "payments sound too good to be true".
Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Psychologist who misled court about qualifications may have gone beyond remit in seven other cases
A psychologist who was found to have misled the family court about his qualifications had previously given expert evidence in at least seven other cases in which he may have been acting outside his remit. Graham Flatman, an educational psychologist based in Kent, was suspended for six months by the regulator for taking work as a 'clinical psychologist' and carrying out an assessment he was not qualified to make. Now an investigation by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ) has identified a string of further cases in which he may have acted beyond his remit. Flatman is only trained to assess the educational needs of children and young people up to the age of 25 who have learning difficulties – whereas clinical psychologists can examine people of all ages for a wide range of disorders. In 2018 he wrote a wide-ranging report on a vulnerable mother as part of family court proceedings. She later complained to the regulator. The Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) said Flatman 'misled [the woman] and the court' and that his 'misconduct brought the profession into disrepute and had the potential to harm [the mother]'. At a disciplinary hearing in April last year, Flatman said he had been instructed as a psychologist with relevant experience. He said he had never been specifically instructed as an educational psychologist in the family courts despite having provided expert evidence in 'around 1,680' family cases. Now TBIJ has examined seven further cases in which he gave expert evidence between 2013 and 2024 and found that in all those cases he may have acted outside his professional remit by assessing people for a range of non-educational issues. The consultant clinical psychologist Miriam Silver, who co-authored the guidance on the use of psychologists in the family courts, said: 'It is deeply concerning that someone who may have been acting outside of their field of competence was able to give evidence in such a potentially huge number of court cases. 'The role of the psychologist as an expert witness is very influential in the family courts, and whilst the judge will weigh up all the evidence to inform their decision and may sometimes disregard our recommendations, generally they give a lot of weight to our opinions.' In one case, Flatman's conclusions led to him being criticised by two court of appeal judges after he failed to conduct the proper legal test to establish if a vulnerable mother could understand proceedings about the future care of her daughter – although they noted the case would have had the same outcome. Flatman's six-month suspension was lifted in October. The panel noted he was no longer working in the courts. However, he remains registered with the HCPC and the watchdog cannot prevent him from making court assessments in the future. In a statement, Flatman said he had worked as an expert witness in family courts since 1997. He did not respond when asked how many assessments he had undertaken on adults in total. 'I have never presented myself as a clinical psychologist,' he said. 'With every report, I accurately included my professional qualifications and experience as an educational psychologist.' Flatman added that he immediately stopped his family court work after the HCPC's findings and took the suspension 'very seriously'. In the case that led to his disciplinary action, Flatman conducted tests on the woman that the panel said went beyond the limits of his skills, knowledge and experience. Flatman told the panel he had been acting as an expert in the family courts since about 1997. It did not examine how many other adults he had assessed during this time but warned that his actions could discredit his evidence in other cases. None of the published judgments of the seven cases identified by TBIJ correctly refer to Flatman as an educational psychologist. Judges instead describe him as a 'very experienced psychologist', 'a child and family psychologist' and a 'psychologist'. Silver said: 'It is incumbent on the expert to be very clear about their qualifications and areas of expertise, and to correct any errors made about their title or scope of knowledge.' The cases uncovered by TBIJ show that Flatman's opinions informed decisions that had a profound impact on the lives of those involved. He produced psychological reports on the ability of three mothers to care for their children, who were all subsequently removed from their care. The HCPC took no further action after his suspension expired as he had taken steps to address his misconduct, which included no longer undertaking expert witness work. Flatman told the regulator he 'fully acknowledged the risk of harm associated with his misconduct' and promised to stay within the traditional scope of an educational psychologist. The HCPC said Flatman had demonstrated a high level of insight and it was 'highly unlikely his conduct would be repeated'.
Sky News
17 minutes ago
- Sky News
Harry Dunn's family file complaint against former police chief after report
The family of Harry Dunn, who died in a collision with US spy Anne Sacoolas, have submitted a formal complaint over the conduct of a former chief constable. The 19-year-old motor-biker died after he was hit in a head-on collision by Sacoolas in 2019, who was exiting the American intelligence base RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire. On Wednesday, an independent report found that officers prioritised the welfare of Sacoolas, who was able to leave the country claiming diplomatic immunity, after officers did not arrest her. Harry's mum, Charlotte Charles, who received an MBE for services to road safety, said the family had been let down "really, really badly." The family have now written to the office of the Northamptonshire Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner, Danielle Stone, to ask whether the contents of the report will be referred to the police watchdog, the IOPC. 2:48 The report criticised former chief constable Nick Adderley for multiple failures, including giving inaccurate public statements about Sacoolas's immunity, claiming she could waive it when in fact only the US government could do so. Mr Adderley, who was sacked last year after lying about his military record, was found to have caused a breakdown in relations with Mr Dunn's family due to his "erroneous" public statements. In the email, seen by Sky News, Radd Seiger, spokesperson for Harry's family, wrote: "Although Mr Adderley has already been dismissed for gross misconduct in relation to unrelated matters, this report provides damning evidence of multiple leadership failures and misconduct directly attributable to him in the handling of this case. "These failures have caused lasting harm to the Dunn family, undermined public trust, and compromised the integrity of the investigation. "Justice was ultimately done despite him, not because of him, and due to the skill and perseverance of the investigation team and the CPS. The story is scarcely believable". Following a long fight for justice by Mr Dunn's family, Sacoolas eventually pleaded guilty to causing death by careless driving via video link at the Old Bailey in December 2022. She later received an eight-month prison sentence, suspended for 12 months. The family is now calling on the government to conduct an inquiry into the case.
BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Scarborough dealer of 'dangerous' synthetic opioid jailed
A North Yorkshire drug dealer has been jailed for 11 years for attempting to distribute a potentially fatal synthetic seized by police from Brian Hollywood, 30, in January were initially thought to be class C Xanax, however further tests discovered they were class A of Spring Bank, Scarborough, previously admitted three counts of possession with intent to supply a class A drug and was jailed at York Crown Court on Tuesday. Det Insp Amber Carey, of North Yorkshire Police, said: "The risk that nitazenes pose is significant and Hollywood demonstrated he has no regard for the potential devastation he could cause when supplying such dangerous substances." Nitazenes are an "extremely potent" synthetic opioid linked to drug deaths all around the UK, the force deaths linked to nitazenes have been recorded in the county in the last two are nitazenes?The officer added: "Drug dealers like Brian Hollywood bring nothing but anguish to our communities."The tenacity and drive to secure justice by the officer in the case, supported by intelligence and neighbourhood policing team officers, demonstrates we will do all we can to clamp down on such offenders and take them off our streets." Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
