How Ohio State is making AI part of every major
Ohio State University wants to make all its undergrads "bilingual" — fluent in their respective majors and in artificial intelligence.
Why it matters: AI is expected to reshape nearly every industry. By weaving it into general education requirements starting this fall, OSU aims to prepare graduates for a rapidly evolving digital world.
This is a unique, massive undertaking involving more than 45,000 undergraduate students.
The big picture: Other schools have created specialized AI programs and degrees.
But Ohio State is taking a more generalized approach as a flagship public university. That's an important step toward making AI literacy more accessible, Hironao Okahana of the American Council on Education tells Axios.
How it works: The basics of AI, including " ethical considerations," will be part of the required Launch Seminar course and first year Success Series workshops for freshmen.
Additional workshops and an Unlocking Generative AI course will be available to everyone. In the latter, students will "gain essential skills to interact effectively with AI, craft prompts that inspire creativity and explore AI's impact on society," according to a press release.
The intrigue: The conversation is quickly shifting. Academia initially focused on "catching" AI users and curbing dishonesty, but things have changed as bots like ChatGPT have become more mainstream.
What they're saying: As with any emerging technology, from calculators to computers, educators must learn to adapt, OSU vice president and provost Ravi Bellamkonda tells Axios.
"If you can use an AI tool, what should the exam be?" is now the question, he says. "We don't want to sacrifice students' deep understanding of their subjects, but the way we teach will fundamentally change."
What's next: The coming months at Ohio State will include lots of training and streamlining of campus resources to help faculty embed AI into their existing coursework.
Partnerships with AI companies, so students can access their software, are pending.
There are also plans to hire new AI experts, perhaps a tall order, given surging demand for them.
The bottom line: A scientist by trade, Bellamkonda admits he is "always skeptical when there's so much hype around something."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
37 minutes ago
- Business Insider
OpenAI CPO says the company's engineers only get faster as ChatGPT gets better at coding
For OpenAI, improving the programming capabilities of its AI is a self-reinforcing loop — as ChatGPT gets better at coding, its engineers get faster too. That's according to Kevin Weil, the chief product officer of OpenAI, who was recently asked by podcaster Azeem Azhar why the company had focused so much on AI coding tools from a "commercial perspective." "It's really important to us because if we can speed up coding, if we can make, you know, every engineer more effective, we also make ourselves more effective," Weil said in the interview. "And so we can build even faster." The AI company has also demonstrated a willingness to make acquisitions to bolster its efforts. Earlier this year, OpenAI acquired Windsurf, a startup that produced a popular AI coding tool, for a reported $3 billion. Weil said OpenAI is particularly focused on programming for a number of reasons, including that it's a relatively concrete task, which makes it easier to determine improvement in model performance as opposed to something more subjective, like writing. "It's also a relatively gradable task — you can tell, like in math or other things, if you get the answer right," the CPO said. Engineers are also evidently well-acquainted with coding processes, which Weil said makes it easier to train the models. "It's also something that our engineers are familiar with," he said. "So, it's a problem space that they understand and have good intuition for." OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment by Business Insider prior to publication. The market for AI coding tools itself is big, Weil added, and rife with people who are largely more willing to start experimenting with new technologies before most of the general public. However, concerns persist in the developer community that AI, rather than acting solely as a tool to increase existing programmers' productivity, could one day be used to replace them entirely — particularly when it comes to early-career coders. "It's also a huge market," Weil said, adding, "It's also a market full of early adopters — you know, technologists leaning into this." Add to that a lack of stringent regulation when compared to other industries, Weil said that coding becomes "a really interesting" market to innovate in. "It's also, you know, relatively sort of open and unregulated," the OpenAI CPO said. "It's not like trying to go into health or something where, you know, there are all kinds of other things you have to do."
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Sorcerer raises $3.9M for weather balloons
Sorcerer, a Y Combinator weather balloon startup, has raised a $3.9 million seed round, the company tells Axios exclusively. Why it matters: Better weather data could help companies and governments navigate risk and extreme weather, but current methods are lacking. Zoom in: FCVC led the round, and was joined by Y Combinator, Collab Fund, Transpose Platform, Pioneer Fund, New Legacy and First Order Fund. Angels in the round included Kulveer Taggar and Taro Fukuyama. Sorcerer co-founder and CEO Austin Tindle says the funds will be used to increase the number of balloons to meet the demand of early customers and partners in sectors like weather services, aviation and aerospace. Tindle says Sorcerer is working with the U.S. National Weather Service and the government of El Salvador. How it works: The company has developed a small, super-pressure balloon that can constantly change its altitude between the stratosphere and the surface. The balloons carry sensors, a solar panel and a satellite connection, and collect data about the temperature, wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric pressure and humidity. Other companies have developed similar weather balloons, but Tindle says Sorcerers are significantly smaller and lighter because they only need solar power to change altitude and don't carry a consumable like ballast. Sorcerer says its balloons can last in the skies for months at a time, longer than other weather balloons. The intrigue: Sorcerer is also using its weather data to develop weather AI models that is says can deliver more accurate and higher quality forecasts Catch up quick: The company went through the Y Combinator program in the summer of 2024. The big picture: Many areas of the world outside of the U.S. and Europe lack adequate weather data. Weather data can be crucial to governments to plan for extreme weather events, and key to companies like utilities, insurance firms, and farmers. Better weather forecasting will be increasingly important as weather becomes more extreme with climate change. Follow the money: AI weather prediction is a hot sector, with deep-pocketed players like Nvidia and Google involved in the technology.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Seven Deadly Tells Of AI Writing
There's a new voice creeping across the internet. It sounds confident, insightful, and polished, made of measured meaningless prose delivered with oh so dramatic flourishes. It's in press releases, social media posts, and student essays. This amateurish easy-to-spot style is characterized by a number of tells which, when revealed, will change the way you read content. I call it The TED-talk style. The TED-talk style seeks to create engagement, drama, and snappy punch lines that border on insight but are decidedly not insightful. If you know what to listen for, the tells of GPT writing are everywhere. Through limited personal research, I've found many of these same tics in ChatGPT, Perplexity and Grok. In fairness, any writer could have one or more of these ticks, but there are so many to pick from, you can tell. Here are some examples from a substack post by a well-known marketing influencer with tens of thousands of followers which landed in my inbox Monday. The topic is AI, and it is clearly written by AI. In fairness, only the first ten examples are from his newsletter. Here are the tells. Starting with the most annoying one. Contrastive Rhetorical Framing 'So Amazon isn't just buying content. They're buying credibility.' 'This isn't just about revenue diversification. It's about survival.' 'Quality journalism isn't just surviving the AI revolution—it's becoming the premium product that differentiates good AI from bad AI.' Asking and Answering Rhetorical Questions. This writing tic has traditionally been associated with bad high-school level essays. Why would one begin a thought with a question? A TED talk needs some drama, but that's contrived in a social media post. For comprehension, context is as important as content. ChatGPT can't tell the difference. 'Financial terms? Undisclosed.' 'What changed? The math did.' 'Why? Because human credibility matters.' Dashes Everywhere – For No Reason. ChatGPT favors dashes – over commas. This is the easiest tell – really. 'Amazon can now feed Times articles—plus content from NYT Cooking and The Athletic—directly into Alexa and their AI models.' 'The old model—hire more writers to chase more pageviews to sell more ads—is breaking down in real time.' Other tics to look out for. Triplet Framing. 'Fast, cheap, and out of control.' Clever alliteration to a bosa nova beat. Triples confer rhythm, cleverness and creativity to suggest glib authority. They are often characterized by clever alliteration. It's not necessarily wrong to use triplets but AI uses them compulsively, to wrap up paragraphs with authoritative style. 'Not for advertising. Not for distribution. For AI training.' The Inspirational Pivot. As easy to spot as contrastive framing. Example: 'This isn't just about AI. It's about humanity.' This is a head fake is to elevate tech talk into TED talk. It shifts from the specific to the abstract to create fake profundity. Universal Authority Without Source. Example: 'Studies show that storytelling is 22 times more memorable than facts.' Which studies? From where? This tell launders opinion into truth. In this, Perplexity is better than ChatGPT as it returns attributions. Quotes without attribution. 'AI is the new electricity,' said Musk. Really? I ask the bot. When and where did he say this? When interrogated, ChatGPT admits it is fabricated, and offers to go searching for more quotes. This is the flypaper on which students are often caught. Their critical thinking skills aren't up to challenging the AI. The reasons writers (and student writers) fall victim to these tropes is that they are human. A student can't recognize the traps: if it sounds good, it is good. Professional writers (not me!) can be lazy, which leads to AI slop. You've written two stories, it's time for lunch, you glance at the prose AI put out and you decide, meh, close enough, even though, on examination, it's not. Since its launch more than two years ago, ChatGPT's main flaw was delivering overblown, long-winded, and content-free paragraphs. After the March 2025 update, the number of meaningless sentences finally declined, only to be replaced by this very specific TED-talk rhetorical style, which is infecting every model, because they are continuously trained on one another's content and style. A good TED talk is substantive, fresh, engaging, persuasive and dramatic. Out of context this style is a parody of itself. It is, as author William Faulkner wrote, 'sound and fury, signifying nothing.'
