
‘I received a £10k Covid fine – one jokey snowball fight has ruined my life'
When Xen Watts organised a snowball fight on Facebook he never imagined it would turn his life upside down.
It was January 2021 – the start of the third and longest Covid lockdown in England, and the 23-year-old Leeds University student created the event out of boredom. It was meant to be an ironic joke, poking fun at how restricted everyone's lives had become.
Unfortunately for him, more than 100 people gathered on a snow-dusted Woodhouse Moor the next day.
Later that week, the police knocked on Watts's door and summoned him to the station for an interview. As evidence, they presented a screenshot showing that he had created the event.
'The officer wrote down the number '3,600' on a piece of paper and slid it across the table,' Watts says.
'He asked me 'Do you know what this means, Mr Watts?', and I said I don't know. He said, 'This is the number of people who have died from Covid-19 since your snowball fight, how do you feel about that?'
Watts was issued with the maximum possible fine of £10,000 – and the threat of a criminal record if he didn't pay.
'I didn't take it seriously. I didn't think I'd done anything wrong, so I didn't pay. I thought that justice would prevail.'
The fixed penalty notice (FPN) saddled Watts with 'crippling debt' but also the stigma of being a Covid rule-breaker. 'Certain friendship groups stopped speaking to me. I stopped going to lectures. My mental health was in a dire state.
'I'm not going to whine. I live in a first-world country with many privileges, but this fine derailed my life and made me hate the system.'
Watts is one of the nearly 120,000 people to be issued FPNs for breaking lockdown rules in England and Wales during the pandemic.
Almost half – 48pc – of these fines were issued to 18- to 24-year-olds, even though they account for just 8pc of the population.
Between March 2020 and July 2021, there were three national lockdowns when attending gatherings, leaving home or failing to wear a face mask could all result in a fine or prosecution.
Non-payment of an FPN is not in itself a criminal offence but if it remains unpaid, the person receiving it may be summoned to court for prosecution for the original offence. A defendant can then receive a criminal record if convicted.
The Covid rules led to over 29,000 people being handed criminal convictions because they either contested or did not pay the fine.
Among those to receive a criminal record were an 18-year-old student who attended a party during a lockdown, a 35-year-old man who hosted family members on New Year's Eve and a 72-year-old woman who travelled back from Kenya without evidence of a negative Covid test.
Criminal convictions can prevent people from working as teachers, social workers or police officers, as the police can pass these details to prospective employers if they are deemed 'relevant' for criminal background checks.
Convictions must also be declared when applying for visas to visit countries like the US and Canada, both of which reserve the right to permanently ban anyone who fails to reveal one.
Ministry of Justice data shows that the 29,000 criminal fines issued by magistrates totalled £26m – more than for any other type of crime since the start of the pandemic, apart from motoring offences and TV licence evasion. A further £8.2m was paid by people who were handed FPNs.
Watts refused to pay the fine for two and a half years despite repeated letters and threats of prosecution, in part out of principle, and because he hoped it might get rescinded. He eventually decided to settle in late 2023 after his debt was transferred to a debt collection agency and bailiffs started making regular visits to his home. As a result, he has avoided getting a criminal record.
He chose to pay the fine in instalments, scraping the money together from bank loans and his work as a DJ and promoter. 'It was so stressful, so horrible,' he says. 'Financially, it's been crippling.'
Covid fines 'sloppily drafted'
Nearly five years on from the first national lockdown, there are still 114 outstanding 'coronavirus offence' cases making their way through the courts, according to the Government.
In June, Robert Buckland, the former Tory justice secretary, called for an amnesty for those handed criminal convictions for breaking Covid rules.
Lord Sumption, a former Supreme Court judge, said that criminalisation for rule breaches during the pandemic was 'ridiculous' and a 'miscarriage of justice'. Sir Keir Starmer has failed to back calls for an amnesty.
Penelope Gibbs, director of the charity Transform Justice, believes the legislation granting police powers to issue Covid fines was 'sloppily drafted, rushed, and poorly scrutinised'.
She adds: 'Some of the fines are incredibly high and difficult to pay. These penalties were disproportionate and a lot of people incurred them without being fully aware of the law.
'If you have vague legal wording and rules that keep changing suddenly, people interpret it in different ways – including the police.'
Official data shows that some police forces were more inclined to issue fines than others. Almost half of the court-issued fines – worth £12.4m – were raised by just five forces: the Metropolitan Police, Greater Manchester, Merseyside, Lancashire and South Wales.
Behaviour could have been changed without a heavy-handed legal approach, according to Ms Gibbs. 'It was a misuse of the law.'
The apparently arbitrary nature of the fines is another injustice that supporters of an amnesty point to. Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak, who were then prime minister and chancellor, each received a £50 fixed penalty notice from the Metropolitan Police for attending a 'gathering' in Downing Street in June 2020. Both paid the fine and apologised, but rejected calls to resign.
Four years after Watts was issued his fine, it's this hypocrisy that rankles most. 'The police took five minutes to decide to issue me with a £10,000 fine. And then Boris gets £50 and a slap on the wrist.
'It makes me feel a complete and utter loss of trust and hope in the system that I used to hold in high regard,' he says.
'I regret that I made that Facebook event, but I'm not ashamed of what I did.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
5 hours ago
- Scotsman
West Lothian Council agrees to outdoor drinking licences for Livingston pubs
Two popular Livingston pubs have won extensions to their licence to allow outdoor drinking. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The agreement of West Lothian Licensing Board will formalise outdoor drinking at one of the oldest pubs, dating back to the 1760s, as well as one from the development of Livingston as a new town in the 1960s. An agent for the Livingston Inn in Livingston Village's Main Street told the Board that the inn was said to have been visited by 'a certain Rabbie Burns.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The pub currently has outdoor tables front and back. The pub applied for licence variation to formalise occasional licences to use a grassed area behind the pub as a beer garden. Police had no objections and the licence was granted with the usual conditions including limits on outdoor music and no serving beyond 9pm. The Livingston Inn applied for licence variation to formalise occasional licences to use a grassed area behind the pub as a beer garden. | Google Maps The Tower Bar in Craigshill was built in 1968. It has recently developed as popular community hub supporting the people of Craigshill since the Covid lockdown. The owners Fiona McLeod and Frank McAlister applied for variations to their existing licence and an extension to beer garden licence with permit to use outside space until 11pm. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad An agent said the application was largely 'a tidy up' of the existing licence. The Tower has recently undergone renovation and provides a popular restaurant as well as community space. However Police Scotland objected to a beer garden licence extending until 11pm fearing noise disturbance for neighbours and the potential for alcohol related disruption. A police licensing sergeant insisted the force: 'considered the premises to be well-run and an asset to the community' Council Safer Neighbourhood Officers had been called in May following complaints about disturbance from a party in the beer garden at the time it was operating on occasional licences. After going into private session councillors proposed that the variations be allowed on the conditions that standard conditions on outdoor space be applied including the 9pm finish to serving in the beer garden and an additional conditions governing the use of amplified music or live performance beyond 7pm. This was accepted by the agent and owners.


Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Nine key questions could decide fate of beef Wellington mushroom 'poisoner'
Erin Patterson has been accused of intentionally poisoning several family members and her eight-day cross-examination in the murder trial has come to an end The world has been gripped by the murder trial of an Australian woman that came after several people died after eating a homemade beef Wellington that is said to have contained poisonous death cap mushrooms. Erin Patterson denies intentionally poisoning three relatives and attempting to kill a fourth by serving them a meal containing toxic death cap mushrooms at her home in Victoria on July 29, 2023. Prosecutors have alleged she deliberately included the poisonous mushrooms in the meal, but her defence insists it was a tragic accident - saying Patterson may have accidentally included mushrooms she had foraged herself. Within a week of the meal, three of the guests had died and the fourth was in hospital. Patterson, 50, was questioned by police shortly after the deaths and she was arrested around a month later. Her alleged victims were her in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, both aged 70, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66. Ian Wilkinson, the uncle of Patterson's estranged husband, also fell seriously ill but survived after weeks of treatment. These are the nine key questions that could determine how the jury vote. Where were the toxic mushrooms from? Both the prosecution and defence have accepted the potentially deadly death cap mushrooms were in the beef wellington. During the initial police investigation, Patterson denied being a forager and her children told cops they had never seen her pick mushrooms. This completely shifted in the witness box as Patterson claimed that was untrue and said she had picked wild mushrooms since the 2020 Covid lockdown. Her lawyer, Colin Mandy SC, asked if she accepted that the beef Wellington pastries she had served to her lunch guests in 2023 contained death caps. "Now I think there was a possibility there were foraged ones in there," she replied. How did the mushrooms get into the dish? Prosecutor Nanette Rogers told the court how Patterson had posted in Facebook groups about using a food dehydrator to reduce the size of mushrooms to use in cooking. Patterson posted that she had been "hiding powdered mushrooms in everything". The jury was also shown a CCTV photo showing Erin Patterson at her local tip on August 2 - days after the fatal meal. Among the things she was seen disposing of was a large black box. When inspected a couple of days later, a staff member found a black Sunbeam dehydrator, Nanette Rogers says. Fingerprints were found on the dehydrator and compared to Ms Patterson's, Dr Rogers says - and they matched. It also tested positive for death cap mushrooms, the jury was told. Did she secretly hate her in-laws? Prosecutors have not identified a "particular" motive in this case but the court heard about issues Patterson faced with her ex-husband Simon's family. The couple were married in 2007 and separated in 2015 but initially had a close relationship even after they split. This changed in 2022 when Simon described himself as "single" on a tax return and affected her ability to claim tax breaks. Patterson asked her in-laws to get involved and they were reluctant to, which led to arguments between them. She posted a series of raging posts on Facebook around that time including: "I'm sick of this s**t. I want nothing to do with them. I thought his parents would want him to do the right thing, but it seems their concern about… not wanting to get involved in their son's personal matters, are overriding that. So f**k them." How was the meal served? The court was told the four guests were handed their meal on a grey plates while Patterson had hers on an orange plate. The suspect has denied these claims and told the court she did not own any grey dishes. She told the court the meal was served up on a mixture of black and white plates. Despite this, footage from a police search of her home appeared to show two grey plates next to the dishwasher. Did she vomit after the meal? Patterson told the court she had bulimia and ate several slices of an orange cake her 70-year-old in-law brought for dessert. She told the court: "I kept cleaning up the kitchen and putting everything away and, um, I had a piece of cake and then I had another piece of cake. And then another." She told the court she ate all of the cake and "felt sick. I felt over-full. So I went to the toilets and brought it up again". Was she genuinely sick? Patterson said she was hit with diarrhoea after the meal and suffered with it for a week. She went to a local hospital and complained of "gastro". Despite this, medical professionals did not believed her symptoms were as bad as what her four guests experienced. The court heard from nurse Cindy Munro who said Patterson "didn't look unwell" when compared to the guests. Doctor Varuna Ruggoo said tests for her liver function came back with normal results. Why did she throw the dehydrator away? The day after Patterson left hospital she went to a rubbish tip and was seen on CCTV throwing the Sunbeam dehydrator out. When asked about the device she claimed she tried to get rid of the dehydrator because she "panicked" after a conversation with her ex-husband a few days earlier. She claimed he asked her: "Is that what you used to poison my parents?" She said: "I was scared of the conversation that might flow about the meal and the dehydrator and I was scared that they [child protection] would blame me for it." Despite this, the ex-husband claimed he did not remember saying that to her. Why did she lie about having cancer? Patterson invited her in-laws for the meal on a false pretence of receiving a cancer diagnosis, as prosecutors said it was highly unusual for Patterson to hold social gatherings. She had told Gail a few weeks earlier that she found a lump on her elbow. At the dinner she suggested she had been diagnosed with ovarian cancer. The mother of two later admitted she never had cancer, but had been worried enough by symptoms to seek tests. She then said she had been dealing with "self-esteem" issues and was embarrassed to tell her family that. How will the jury decide this case? Patterson has held that the other parties in this case, like her ex-husband, medical professionals and Facebook friends, have been wrong in their accounts. Her eight-day cross-examination has come to an end and she still pleads not guilty. Now the case is in the hands of the jury who will return their verdict.


Metro
9 hours ago
- Metro
Hunt for shooter 'posing as police officer' after US politician assassinated
A manhunt is underway after a US politician and her husband have been killed by a shooter 'impersonating a police officer'. Minnesota state representative Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed at their homes, governor Tim Walz confirmed. State senator John Hoffman and his wife were also shot in their home but are expected to survive after surgeries.. Donald Trump confirmed he has been briefed on the shooting, which Walz said appears to be a 'politically motivated assassination'. Walz said an 'unspeakable tragedy has unfolded in Minnesota, adding that the state has lost a 'great leader; and he has lost a 'great friend'. Got a story? Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ Or you can submit your videos and pictures here. For more stories like this, check our news page. Follow on Twitter and Facebook for the latest news updates. You can now also get articles sent straight to your device. Sign up for our daily push alerts here. MORE: Love Island star jailed for 14 years after role in huge drug smuggling ring exposed MORE: Manhunt after woman 'sexually assaulted inside cinema' MORE: Chilling moment creep tries to snatch teenager from busy train station