National Republicans fear Gavin Newsom's podcast could help him in 2028
Gavin Newsom is not just in Republicans' ears. He's getting in their heads.
Three episodes into the California governor's new podcast, Alex Conant, the Republican strategist who served as communications director on Marco Rubio's 2016 presidential campaign, called Newsom a 'skilled communicator' and a 'very, very talented politician.'
David Kochel, the longtime Iowa Republican strategist, said 'the operative class is definitely watching him because he's doing something very different.' When asked if Newsom could give Republicans problems, Steve Bannon, the MAGA flamethrower who appeared recently on Newsom's show, said simply, 'Hell, yes.'
Added Fergus Cullen, former chair of the New Hampshire Republican Party: 'A very talented politician.'
Newsom, a likely presidential contender, infuriated progressives by hosting conservatives on his podcast in recent weeks and breaking with his party on trans athletes in women's sports. But while the left casts him as a shape-shifter, national Republicans see a candidate honing his skill.
Their concern came to a head this week when the conservative commentator Megyn Kelly warned GOP-ers to stop joining the California governor's show.
'I don't like to see it, because my own feeling is this guy's in training for 2028,' Kelly said on her own podcast with the influential Trump ally and Turning Point USA leader Charlie Kirk. 'The better he will get, the better he'll do, the more he'll understand how to appeal to people who are more right-wing or independently minded but on the right.'
It may be an overreaction. In California, Republicans who know Newsom best met his forays into red terrain with eyerolls about a politician they saw desperately in search of a rebranding.
'The more people get to know Gavin the less they seem to like him, so I think this is all for the good,' said Matt Fleming, a former California Republican Party communications director. 'I don't think that buddying up and flattering Charlie Kirk or Steve Bannon is going to make him the moderate that he wants to pretend to be.'
Or as Lanhee Chen, a Republican who ran for state controller and has advised multiple Republican presidential campaigns, put it in a text message: 'Frankly I don't know that any Republicans really take Newsom seriously anyway.'
But if Newsom's podcast isn't suddenly winning over the MAGA base, even some of his GOP critics are warning of his tactical skill.
After Kirk appeared on Newsom's show, he wrote in an op-ed for Fox News that Newsom is 'charming and friendly in-person,' 'savvy with politics' and 'wants to be president more than any living person (and possibly every dead person, too).'
The headline on the piece advised Republicans to 'beware.'
Newsom's amicable interviews with Trump allies have been widely reviled on the left. Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear rebuked him as legislators in Sacramento cycled through shock and anger. Former Rep. Katie Porter, who is now running for California governor, said welcoming Bannon on the show was a mistake.
But judging by the amount of attention he's drawing from Republicans nationally, Newsom has succeeded in inserting himself deeper into the conservative world's consciousness.
This is not the first time California's governor has sought to forge inroads in redder parts of the country. He purchased ads in Texas and Florida excoriating the states' Republican governors on abortion rights in 2022 and followed up by channeling millions of dollars into a PAC intended to play in GOP-controlled states. He debated Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in a potential 2028 preview.
But the podcast takes a less confrontational approach. Newsom, who regularly consumes conservative media, has framed it as an attempt to understand the still-dominant MAGA movement after Democrats absorbed losses across the ballot in 2024, modernize the party's methods of communicating with voters, and reach more young people. Democrats have struggled to break through in a podcast landscape dominated by conservative personalities like Joe Rogan, while Trump and other Republicans have aggressively courted those audiences.
'He understands that Democrats are way behind in the new media communications wars,' Newsom spokesperson Anthony York said. 'We can't just talk to ourselves in these media bubbles.'
That has been widely interpreted as Newsom laying the groundwork for a presidential run, expanding his national visibility and seeking to plant a flag as demoralized Democrats reassess their message and strategy (the governor, whose final term ends in 2026, has for years swatted down questions about his interest in the White House).
One downside is that the gambit could bolster a frequent criticism that he is more focused on his national brand than on addressing California's myriad problems. That is certainly how Republicans will portray it.
'He's going to be judged by voters based on the job he does as governor, not his ability to ham it up with people with whom he disagrees,' Jon Fleischman, a conservative activist and former California Republican Party official, said in a text message. 'It's almost like he's anxious for his time as governor to be over.'
Jessica Millan Patterson, who just concluded her tenure as California Republican Party chair, said, 'I don't know who is giving him advice, but this is such a bad look.' She added, 'I love it. He should continue.'
Newsom has run circles around Republicans in heavily Democratic California, crushing a recall attempt in 2021 and winning reelection a year later by nearly 20 percentage points. His approval rating has ticked up after sagging, now floating above water in the latest Public Policy Institute of California survey. And while that's almost entirely because Democrats like what he's doing, 43 percent of independents in the poll rated him favorably, too, a slight uptick from October.
Speaking to reporters in Washington on Thursday, David McIntosh, president of the conservative group Club for Growth, said that while he sees 'most Democrats not getting the key takeaways' from the last election, 'I was sort of impressed that Newsom did and started shifting his positions on things.'
Newsom's position on trans athletes was the 'key one,' he said. 'But I think he's also dealing with the aftermath of the fires and some of the things they're very much wanting to engage the private sector on in California. And that's good, that's a good development.'
As for the podcast, a leading Republican contender to succeed Newsom said it contained a cautionary tale for conservatives. Chad Bianco, the Riverside County sheriff, said he thought Kirk had Newsom 'on the ropes' at times in their episode, but that Kirk underestimated the governor's ability to control a conversation.
'In law enforcement, we call it verbal judo,' he said. 'They taught us that in the academy, on how you maintain control of the conversation with a suspect when or a witness that doesn't want to tell you the truth.'
Nicole Norman and Holly Otterbein contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
Tina Smith confronts Mike Lee over posts about fatal shooting of Minnesota lawmaker
Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) on Monday confronted Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) over of series of comments he made blaming Democrats for the fatal shooting of a Minnesota state lawmaker. Shortly after the Senate began its Monday evening vote, Smith was seen walking into a conference room where Republicans were about to hold a meeting to discuss the text the Finance Committee had just unveiled for the party's massive tax bill. She emerged a minute later talking to Lee in an adjacent hallway. The two spoke for a couple of minutes before the Minnesota Democrat emerged. Andddd she found him 'Let me gather myself,' Smith said as she left, declining to comment initially. She eventually told told reporters that Lee 'seemed a little surprised to be confronted.' Lee angered Democrats of all stripes when he pinned blame on their side of the aisle after Melissa Hortman, the Democratic former Speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives, and her husband were killed over the weekend at their home. The same man is suspected of shooting a second state lawmaker, state Sen. John Hoffman (D), and his wife at their home. 'This is what happens When Marxists don't get their way,' Lee wrote on Sunday on his personal X account. Shortly after, he commented, 'Nightmare on Waltz Street,' referring to Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D), alongside a photo of the suspected shooter. The two remarks were condemned by numerous Democrats. Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) called Lee's remarks 'beyond dangerous' and 'absolutely unacceptable.' Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), a friend of the late legislator, had told MSNBC prior to returning to Washington that she also planned on talking to Lee and condemned his comments. 'What I'm going to tell him is: This isn't funny,' she said.
CBS News
15 minutes ago
- CBS News
Senate Republicans unveil long-awaited details on Trump tax bill
Washington — Senate Republicans on Monday released details on the most contentious elements of the sweeping legislation to enact President Trump's second-term agenda. The Senate Finance Committee unveiled its portion of Mr. Trump's "big, beautiful bill," which makes changes to the tax and Medicaid provisions in the version that narrowly passed the House last month. Senate Republicans are aiming to make key progress this week in their effort to approve the legislation, but some of the key sticking points still appear unresolved, making it less certain they'll get the bill to Mr. Trump's desk by their self-imposed deadline of July 4. Medicaid and provider taxes GOP senators have proposed steeper cuts to Medicaid funding by lowering provider taxes — which states use to help fund their share of Medicaid costs — from 6% to 3.5% by 2031. The House bill seeks to lower federal costs by freezing states' provider taxes at current rates and prohibiting them from establishing new provider taxes. Several Republicans have said the bill could lose their support if the provider tax were to be frozen or decreased, pointing to the potential negative impact on rural hospitals. SALT — the state and local tax deduction The Senate version proposes permanently extending the $10,000 state and local tax deduction, known as SALT. It's a considerable difference from the House measure, which increases the deduction from $10,000 to $40,000 per household for incomes up to $500,000. House Republicans from blue states threatened last month to withhold their support for the bill if the cap were not raised and quickly said Monday they'd vote against the package when it comes back to the House. House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, has urged senators to make as few changes to the legislation as possible, noting that he can afford to lose just a few votes with his narrow majority. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, called the $10,000 cap a starting point. "We understand that it's a negotiation," he told reporters Monday evening. "Obviously, there had to be some marker in the bill to start with, but we're prepared to have discussions with our colleagues here in the Senate and figure out a landing spot." Debt ceiling increase Senate Republicans are also calling for a $5 trillion increase in the debt ceiling — $1 trillion above the limit set by the House. The Child Tax Credit would increase to $2,200 under the Senate bill, $300 less than the House-passed hike. Taxes on tips, auto loan interest The Senate version also includes provisions to end taxes on tips, overtime and auto loan interest, while making tax cuts enacted during Mr. Trump's first term permanent. Republican leaders have been pushing to get the legislation to the president's desk by early July. But with a short week this week, Senate Republicans need to move quickly in the coming days to put the legislation on a course for passage in the upper chamber before it returns to the House for sign-off on the changes. Thune said he plans to bring up the budget agenda for a vote next week, but he has threatened to keep senators in Washington, D.C., over the Fourth of July recess to pass it, since several Republicans have expressed doubt about the upper chamber's ability to finish its work on the bill before the self-imposed deadline. "We need to get it done," Thune told Fox News on Sunday. "We will roll into the Fourth of July recess if necessary, in order to get this on the president's desk." contributed to this report.
Politico
18 minutes ago
- Politico
Who's scared of Newsom's money grabs?
BOXED OUT FROM BALLOT-BOX BUDGETING — In his effort to resolve differences in school funding formulas, state Sen. Dave Cortese is up against a lot: voter-approved measures that set the education budget, wealthy communities content with the status quo, and a Legislature newly ambivalent about making big decisions about money at a moment of economic uncertainty. Now the Bay Area Democrat faces one more hurdle: newfound uncertainty about whether successfully selling voters on the change would actually deliver any effect on policy. During this year's budget season, Gov. Gavin Newsom has repeatedly brushed aside the votes Californians cast last November, rerouting money from a climate bond, leaving an anti-crime initiative's policy changes unfunded, and disregarding a new health-care financing formula altogether. The willingness of Cortese and his Silicon Valley backers to take their cause to the ballot is turning into an early test of whether Sacramento decision-makers' disregard for voters' preferences will affect the willingness of deep-pocketed interests to invest in shaping policy through what political scientists call 'ballot-box budgeting.' Cortese has been focused on the budget gap between schools in low-tax and high-tax districts since serving as a San Jose city councilmember in the early 2000s. Disparities between high-tax districts and low-tax districts, he argued to Playbook, are the result of two separate statewide measures approved by voters. By capping property taxes, Prop 13 in 1978 shifted the burden of education spending to the state. Then, 20 later, Prop 98 amended the constitution to include a K-12 funding formula based on per capita income, attendance, and state revenue. 'All of that requires constitutional changes that are provocative — problematic to say the least,' Cortese said. He would create a reserve account, fed during surplus budget years, whose investment proceeds would go to schools otherwise receiving less money from the state under the Prop 98 formula. Cortese's SB 743, currently moving through the Legislature, establishes the reserve-account framework but would become active only through a constitutional amendment he plans to introduce in January. But now Cortese has reason to be uncertain that is even a viable route to his policy goal. In the past few months, Newsom has repeatedly treated last November's ballot measures as little more than nonbinding advisory votes from the electorate that could be ignored in the face of an unforeseen budget crunch. Prop 35 was supposed to lock down revenue from a health-insurance tax, but Newsom nevertheless swept the money up into the general fund. Prop 36 changed sentencing rules but has yet to send money to the counties expected to administer treatment programs for convicted criminals. The Prop 4 bond laid out long-term climate priorities, but Newsom grabbed millions from it to address wildfire needs he considered more urgent. It's enough precedent to wonder who would bother with ballot-box budgeting anymore — to convince either lawmakers or voters that it's worth the cost to create the reserve accounts if the governor could decide to redirect the money due for them toward another purpose. Cortese's SB 743 passed the Senate floor last week and now heads to the Assembly. Even Should the bill fail there, or be vetoed by the governor, Cortese could fold its provisions into the amendment he would take straight to voters. He says tech entrepreneur Dave House and the Silicon Valley Education Foundation, which produced the documentary Zip Code Red about funding disparities, stand at the ready to back a petition campaign. 'If we have polling in early 2026 that says go, I don't know why we would stop,' Cortese said. But last year's experience could sour his backers from lavishly spending at the ballot. A California Medical Association-led coalition spent $54 million only to see its meticulously drawn Medi-Cal formulas be treated in Sacramento as a dead letter. The Yes on 35 coalition has yet to sue the governor, or take any action beyond a few aghast press releases, to rectify the situation. 'That's flat-out false. Anyone pushing this narrative either hasn't read the measures or is counting on others not to,' said Newsom spokesperson Izzy Gardon. 'Prop 35 and Prop 36 are being implemented as the voters approved — full stop. And Prop 4 was designed specifically to fund wildfire-related projects.' Cortese said a recalcitrant governor may be the biggest hurdle he faces now, but is optimistic that by the time this could reach the ballot Newsom's priorities may shift in his direction. 'Maybe this is wishful thinking, but for a governor approaching the last year of his term would be a legacy move to leave an equalization bill behind,' said Cortese. 'He's not going to be the governor to lose his fiscal discretion.' — With help from Eric He NEWS BREAK: LA Mayor Karen Bass reduces downtown LA curfew hours to 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. … Man suspected of shooting two Minnesota lawmakers taken into custody … Southern California wildfire survivors file suit against State Farm. Welcome to Ballot Measure Weekly, a special edition of Playbook PM focused on California's lively realm of ballot measure campaigns. Drop us a line at eschultheis@ and wmccarthy@ or find us on X — @emilyrs and @wrmccart. TOP OF THE TICKET A highly subjective ranking of the ballot measures — past and future, certain and possible — getting our attention this week. 1. Pay for performance (San Jose, 2026?): San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan may need to return to a ballot measure to launch his pay-for-performance initiative, after the city council voted against adopting the proposal outright last week. 'It may be time to take this question directly to the voters, instead of leaving it to the political insiders,' he said. 2. Measures A and B (Huntington Beach, 2025): An alliance of bookworms and progressive activists prevailed, by unexpectedly wide margins, in its effort to wrest back control over Huntington Beach's public library system from a conservative city council that conceded the battle, if not the war. 'We now have an opportunity to grow from this, for greater future use, in ways we never could have grown through a victory at this moment in time,' councilmember Chad Williams wrote on social media. 3. California Forever (Solano County, 2026?): As Suisun City pushes forward with a reimbursement agreement to annex land that would keep California Forever from having to go to the ballot, county officials are increasingly concerned about getting left behind. Last week, Solano supervisors sent a letter to the financially struggling city, asking it to pause discussions with the would-be start-up city's developers until after the county updates its general plan. 4. SMART transit funding (Sonoma and Marin counties, 2026): Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit officially launched its campaign committee to renew a quarter-cent sales tax that will determine whether the North Bay commuter-rail system can keep running after the same measure failed in 2020. The campaign, which is aiming for the June 2026 ballot, boosts the support of a local luminary who suddenly has more time to spend on local ballot politics: outgoing Senate Pro Tem Mike McGuire. 5. Minimum wage referendum (Los Angeles City, 2025): Unions are fighting a travel-industry-backed referendum effort to overturn the city's new $30 minimum wage. LA-based Unite Here Local 11 filed a lawsuit late last week against what it said are signature-gatherers' misleading statements to voters, an allegation the Alliance for Tourism, Jobs and Progress campaign denies. 6. Voter ID (2026?): Assemblymember Carl DeMaio launched his campaign with a coastal tour through Santa Monica, Huntington Beach and San Diego, teaming up with fellow GOP lawmakers and MAGA-world activists like Scott Presler, who characterized the initiative as a tool for Republicans to flip Southern California Democratic-held congressional districts. 7. Parking lot development (Menlo Park, 2025?): Menlo Park's city council is preparing for a ballot fight over its contentious plans to turn city-owned downtown parking lots into housing. As local retailers aim to qualify a measure that would mandate voter approval for changes to the lots, the city has hired consulting firm Tripepi Smith to help sell the vision. ON OTHER BALLOTS After voters in Nebraska bucked the national trend on abortion-rights measures last year and voted for a constitutional amendment that banned abortions after the first trimester, the state's anti-abortion activists are launching a push to put a total abortion ban on the 2026 ballot … A group pursuing an abortion-rights constitutional amendment says the Idaho's Supreme Court's delay delivering a decision nearly two months after hearing arguments in a ballot-language dispute is putting their organizing efforts at a disadvantage … Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signed legislation to refer two measures to the November 2026 ballot that would maintain or expand the state's existing free school lunch program, including through a cap on tax deductions from high-earners … A coalition of progressive education groups in Michigan is launching an initiative effort that would increase the income tax on those earning over $500,000 to help fund K-12 schools … Lawmakers in New York voted to place a constitutional amendment on the November 2025 statewide ballot that would allow the state to build Nordic skiing and biathlon trails on forest preserve land at the upstate Mount Van Hoevenberg Olympic Sports Complex in exchange for acquiring new forest land in the surrounding area … And tenants-union members in Duluth, Minnesota submitted signatures for a 'right to repair' measure that would allow residents paying for home repairs to deduct the cost from their rent. IN MEMORIAM A BAN ON FORCED PRISON LABOR: After a constitutional amendment to end forced prison labor in California failed at the statewide ballot in 2024, supporters had high hopes that a repeat attempt could yield a different outcome. For this year at least, the cause appears to be dead. In February, Assemblymember Lori Wilson introduced two pieces of legislation, ACA 6, a constitutional amendment to formally ban slavery in the state's founding document, as well as AB 475, a companion bill that would prohibit the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation from requiring inmates to work, and developing wage regulations for those who chose to do so. But there appears to be little momentum to move either bill forward soon. ACA 6 never even received a committee hearing, and AB 475 was held in appropriations at the end of May. Neither Wilson's office nor a representative of last year's campaign to pass Prop 6 responded to requests for comment. The effort to banish slavery from California's constitution is survived by a national anti-slavery movement working to put the issue on more than a dozen ballots in 2026 and 2028. POSTCARD FROM ... … NEVADA COUNTY: Few prominent political careers have been launched from the dry foothills of the Sierra Nevada. But local Republicans are looking to stop future members of the county board of supervisors — where chair Heidi Hall was just elected to her third term — from making a career out of it. The Nevada County Republican Party has begun a petition drive to place an initiative on the June 2026 ballot that would impose term limits under an authority clarified by the legislature in 2021. Restricting supervisors to two terms, argue the measure's boosters, will ensure fresh blood circulates through the county administration building in Nevada City. 'If you stay too long the ideas get a little too calcified,' said Nevada County Republican Party chair Mac Young. 'This wasn't designed to be punitive to anyone. It's just good, bi-partisan housekeeping.' Young points to 17 other California counties with such limits on its supervisors, including Los Angeles, San Diego and Orange. But he looked to another conservative, rural county closer to home for a template: Shasta County, where 76 percent of voters backed Measure C last March. It caps service at two four-year terms, but applies only to newly elected county supervisors. 'It's not a partisan thing, it's just something we think fits well with our county,' Young said. Last month the party launched a petition drive to qualify for next year's ballot. Nevada has one of the oldest populations among the state's counties, and Young says he is counting on an army of retirees active on his party's central committee to gather the 5,074 signatures due by November. Despite its partisan character, Young's campaign appears surprisingly unpolarizing, its good-government approach evoking a bygone age. He says the proposal was met with support or at least indifference from the current county leadership, perhaps because existing supervisors would not be directly affected. 'I'd love to tell you there's some miraculous timing to the whole thing,' he said. 'But really it's just an availability of time and resources.' THAT TIME VOTERS ... … WENT SHOPPING: Californians have seen ballot measures on a wide variety of questions related to shops, markets and boutiques including to: Require most stores to close on Sundays (1930, failed) … Create a definition for stores and require a state license to operate (1932, did not qualify) … Allow the Legislature to authorize the sale of liquor in its original packaging in retail stores where it is not being consumed (1932, did not qualify) … Set up a licensing system for stores, prohibit operating a store without a license, and limit the hours of labor in stores (1934, did not qualify) … Prohibit indoor smoking in businesses, restaurants and other establishments, except in specifically designated areas (1976, did not qualify) … Reduce criminal penalties for shoplifting, among other theft- and drug-related crimes (2014, passed) … Legalize recreational marijuana and require stores to get a state license in order to sell marijuana for recreational use (2016, passed) … And increase penalties for theft- and drug-related crimes, including shoplifting (2024, passed).
