Senate wants a trust fund for unclaimed property
PIERRE, S.D. (KELO) — South Dakota lawmakers may have found a way to forever save some golden eggs that have been unexpectedly falling into state government's lap.
Senators on Thursday unanimously approved legislation that would gradually reduce the amount of unclaimed property revenue that's been used to prop up state government's budgets year after year.
Ag groups support 67% threshold for CO2 easements
The legislation, Senate Bill 135, would instead steer into a special interest-bearing account the millions of dollars of revenue from unclaimed property that owners neglect or have forgotten about, and that banks and others by law must turn over to state government after three years.
An accompanying measure, Senate Joint Resolution 505, calls for a statewide vote in 2026 on adding a trust fund for unclaimed property to the South Dakota Constitution.
For decades revenue from unclaimed property has by law flowed into state government's general fund for use as the Legislature sees fit. Republican Sen. Taffy Howard has tried for years to get lawmakers to change the law, so that most of the money wouldn't be spent.
On Thursday, that day came.
Howard modestly said her legislation 'took a lot of collaboration, negotiation' that through the years involved the commissioner of the Bureau of Finance and Management, Jim Terwilliger; current State Treasurer Josh Haeder and his predecessor, Rich Sattgast, who's now state auditor; current Lt. Gov. Tony Venhuizen, while he was still a House member; former state Sen. Brock Greenfield, who's now state school and public lands commissioner; 'many state senators' including Republicans Chris Karr, Ernie Otten, Glen Vilhauer and Carl Perry; and several House members such as Republican Chris Kassin and Democrat Erik Muckey.
'So many hands went into making this,' Howard told the other 34 senators. 'And this is something that is going to benefit our citizens, I believe, for generations to come.'
She explained why. 'We are liable in perpetuity for any claims to that money. So we have spent the money, but we have nothing set aside to pay their own claims. This will remedy that,' Howard said.
According to State Treasurer Haeder, state government's liability for unclaimed property now exceeds $1.2 billion. His office works through promotional advertising and other means to let people know they have money waiting to be claimed, and tens of millions of dollars have been paid in recent years. But that's just a fraction of how much state government has received.
Vilhauer noted how Howard spread the recognition. 'But I have to give all the credit to her for quarterbacking this, this year,' he said. As an accountant, Vilhauer said he had asked himself why unclaimed property was considered state revenue when it's legally not 'At best, it's an interest-free loan that we're using,' he said. With the increasing amounts that have been turned over to the state treasurer in recent years, it's now become 'a huge issue,' Vilhauer said.
Karr, now in his ninth year as a legislator, said that the legislation would be memorable, in a good way.
'I think this is one of those moments when we all need to take a second and realize that, I think, you're going to be really proud of this and what we are doing here today,' Karr said. 'This is going to be something you're going to look back in 20 years and — as this compounds and grows, it creates a revenue stream all of its own, in a responsible way, to help take care of the needs of South Dakota — we started that today. We started it here.'
Karr turned toward Howard. 'The good senator has championed this,' he told the rest of the Senate. 'We wouldn't be here today, I think, without the senator, being the champion since I've been here. (She) brought this several times — uphill battle — and it's great that so many parties got together to work this out in a responsible way. We didn't just pull the rug out underneath the revenue and say, 'Yup, we got a hole, good luck.' We figured out a responsible way to do this and set up something we are going to be proud of for South Dakota.'
The legislation would cap unclaimed-property revenue at $61,384,827 in the 2026 budget for state government and $58 million for the 2027 budget. From there, the amount would go down $4 million each subsequent year until it reaches $25 million for the 2035 budget. It would remain at $25 million after that.
Karr turned again and looked at Howard. 'I just want to recognize that and all those that have been involved with this,' he said.
Said Perry, 'This is something we can look back on and say, this is a great idea.'
The legislation and the resolution will next be considered by the House of Representatives, where Kassin is lead sponsor.
Howard busied herself with desk work as the Senate roll call vote proceeded. She looked up and smiled after Republican Sen. Tom Pischke enthusiastically responded 'Yes!' when his turn came.
Senate Secretary Peggy Laurenz read the tally: 'Mr. President, we have 35 yeas, zero nays.' Howard looked up again.
This time, the smile was that of a long fight, finally won.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
28 minutes ago
In their own words: Trump, Newsom trade insults and barbs over National Guard in Los Angeles
The swiftly evolving situation in the Los Angeles area over protests surrounding immigration enforcement actions has also cued up a public spat between President Donald Trump and Gov. Gavin Newsom, the California governor who has been one of the Republican president's most vocal Democratic critics. After Trump on Sunday called up 2,000 National Guard troops to respond, Newsom said he would sue the administration, a promise on which the state followed through a day later. Trump cited a legal provision that allows him to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." The president also agreed with one of his top advisers that maybe the governor should be arrested. Here's a look at back-and-forth between Trump and Newsom in their own words: 'You have violent people, and we're not gonna let them get away with it.' — Trump, Sunday, in remarks to reporters in Morristown, New Jersey. ___ Newsom's ire has been elevated over Trump's decision to, without his support, call up the California National Guard for deployment into his state. In a letter Sunday, Newsom called on Trump to rescind the Guard deployment, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty.' The governor, who was in Los Angeles meeting with local law enforcement and other officials, also told protesters they were playing into Trump's plans and would face arrest for violence or property destruction. 'Trump wants chaos and he's instigated violence,' he said. 'Stay peaceful. Stay focused. Don't give him the excuse he's looking for.' In an interview with MSNBC, Newsom said Sunday he had spoken with Trump 'late Friday night,' after the protests had begun, but said deploying the National Guard 'never came up.' "We talked for almost 20 minutes, and he — barely, this issue never came up. I mean, I kept trying to talk about LA, he wanted to talk about all these other issues," Newsom said. 'We had a very decent conversation.' 'He never once brought up the National Guard,' Newsom said of Trump, calling him 'a stone-cold liar.' Saying, 'I did call him the other night,' Trump told reporters Sunday that he told Newsom in that call: ''Look you've got to take care of this. Otherwise I'm sending in the troops.' ... That's what we did.' On Monday, Trump posted on social media that Los Angeles would have been 'completely obliterated' without his intervention and referred to Newsom as 'Newscum,' a pejorative moniker he has used to refer to the governor. 'We are suing Donald Trump. This is a manufactured crisis. He is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. constitution.' — Newsom, Monday, X post. ___ As Newsom promised, California officials sued the Trump administration on Monday, with the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, arguing that the deployment of troops 'trampled' on the state's sovereignty and pushing for a restraining order. The initial deployment of 300 National Guard troops was expected to quickly expand to the full 2,000 that were authorized by Trump. Late Monday, Trump authorized an additional 2,000 National Guard troops. Ahead of that move, Newsom accused the president of inflaming tensions, breaching state sovereignty and wasting resources, while warning protesters not to 'take Trump's bait.' Teasing the suit, Newsom told MSNBC that he saw the deployment as 'an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' Asked Monday about the lawsuit, Trump said it was 'interesting' and argued 'that place would be burning down' without the federal government's intervention. 'I'm very happy I got involved," Trump added. "I think Gavin in his own way is very happy I got involved.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing." — Trump, Monday, in remarks to reporters. ___ Tom Homan, the Trump administration's border czar, previously warned that anyone, including public officials, would be arrested if they obstructed federal immigration enforcement. Newsom's initial response to Homan, during the MSNBC interview and in subsequent posts on his own social media: 'Come and get me, tough guy.' On Monday Trump seemed to agree with his border chief, telling reporters, 'I would do it if I were Tom.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,' Trump added. "He's done a terrible job. Look — I like Gavin, he's a nice guy, but he's grossly incompetent, everybody knows." Homan later said there was 'no discussion' about actually arresting Newsom, but reiterated that 'no one's above the law.' wrote Monday on X that they represented 'a day I hoped I would never see in America' and said Trump's call for his arrest marked 'an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.'
an hour ago
Minnesota budget deal cuts health care for adults who entered the US illegally
ST. PAUL, Minn. -- Adults living in the U.S. illegally will be excluded from a state-run health care program under an overall budget deal that the closely divided Minnesota Legislature convened to pass in a special session Monday. Repealing a 2023 state law that made those immigrants eligible for the MinnesotaCare program for the working poor was a priority for Republicans in the negotiations that produced the budget agreement. The Legislature is split 101-100, with the House tied and Democrats holding just a one-seat majority in the Senate, and the health care compromise was a bitter pill for Democrats to accept. The change is expected to affect about 17,000 residents. After an emotional near four-hour debate, the House aroved the bill 68-65. Under the agreement, the top House Democratic leader, Melissa Hortman, of Brooklyn Park, was the only member of her caucus to vote yes. The bill then went to the Senate, where it passed 37-30. Democratic Majority Leader Erin Murphy, of St. Paul, called it 'a wound on the soul of Minnesota,' but kept her promise to vote yes as part of the deal, calling it "among the most painful votes I've ever taken." Democratic Gov. Tim Walz, who insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, has promised to sign the legislation, and all 13 other bills scheduled for action in the special session, to complete a $66 billion, two-year budget that will take effect July 1. 'This is 100% about the GOP campaign against immigrants,' said House Democratic Floor Leader Jamie Long, of Minneapolis, who voted no. 'From Trump's renewed travel ban announced this week, to his effort to expel those with protected status, to harassing students here to study, to disproportionate military and law enforcement responses that we've seen from Minneapolis to L.A., this all comes back to attacking immigrants and the name of dividing us.' But GOP Rep. Jeff Backer, of Browns Valley, the lead author of the bill, said taxpayers shouldn't have to subsidize health care for people who aren't in the country legally. Backer said California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has proposed freezing enrollment for immigrants without legal status in a similar state-funded program and that Illinois' Democratic governor, JB Pritzker, has proposed cutting a similar program. He said residents can still buy health insurance on the private market regardless of their immigration status. 'This is about being fiscally responsible,' Backer said. Enrollment by people who entered the country illegally in MinnesotaCare has run triple the initial projections, which Republicans said could have pushed the costs over $600 million over the next four years. Critics said the change won't save any money because those affected will forego preventive care and need much more expensive care later. 'People don't suddenly stop getting sick when they don't have insurance, but they do put off seeking care until a condition gets bad enough to require a visit to the emergency room, increasing overall health care costs for everyone,' Bernie Burnham, president of the Minnesota AFL-CIO, told reporters at a news conference organized by the critics. Walz and legislative leaders agreed on the broad framework for the budget over four weeks ago, contrasting the bipartisan cooperation that produced it with the deep divisions at the federal level in Washington. But with the tie in the House and the razor-thin Senate Democratic majority, few major policy initiatives got off the ground before the regular session ended May 19. Leaders announced Friday that the details were settled and that they had enough votes to pass everything in the budget package.
an hour ago
New York lawmakers approve bill that would allow medically assisted suicide for the terminally ill
ALBANY, N.Y. -- Terminally ill New Yorkers would have the legal ability to end their own lives with pharmaceutical drugs under a bill passed Monday in the state Legislature. The proposal, which now moves to the governor's office, would allow a person with an incurable illness to be prescribed life-ending drugs if he or she requests the medication and gets approval from two physicians. A spokesperson for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said she would review the legislation. The New York Senate gave final approval to the bill Monday night after hours of debate during which supporters said it would let terminally ill people die on their own terms. 'It's not about hastening death, but ending suffering,' said state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a Democrat who sponsored the proposal. Opponents have argued the state should instead improve end-of-life medical care or have objected on religious grounds. 'We should not be in the business of state-authorized suicide,' said state Sen. George Borrello, a Republican. The state Assembly passed the measure in late April. The proposal requires that a terminally ill person who is expected to die within six month make a written request for the drugs. Two witnesses would have sign the request to ensure that the patient is not being coerced. The request would then have to be approved by the person's attending physician as well as a consulting physician. The legislation was first introduced in 2016, Hoylman-Sigal said, though it has stalled year after year in the New York statehouse. Dennis Poust, executive director of the New York State Catholic Conference, which has opposed the measure, said 'This is a dark day for New York State." Eleven other states and Washington, D.C., have laws allowing medically assisted suicide, according to Compassion & Choices, an advocacy organization that backs the policy. Corinne Carey, the group's local campaign director, said lawmakers had 'recognized how important it is to give terminally ill New Yorkers the autonomy they deserve over their own end-of-life experiences.' 'The option of medical aid in dying provides comfort, allowing those who are dying to live their time more fully and peacefully until the end,' said Carey.
