logo
Second rally planned at Rep. Brad Finstad's Rochester office

Second rally planned at Rep. Brad Finstad's Rochester office

Yahoo27-02-2025

Feb. 26—ROCHESTER — A self-described "progressive" organization hopes to send a message to U.S. Rep. Brad Finstad. So far, an organizer claims, he's not present and not listening.
The Rochester chapter of Indivisible.org, a grassroots organization with a nationwide reach, will host a rally at noon on Thursday, Feb. 27, 2025, at the Rochester office of Finstad, the 1st Congressional District representative and Republican who represents southern Minnesota.
This is the second rally within the last two weeks that will occur at Finstad's office in Rochester. On Feb. 18, a group organized by ISAIAH, visited Finstad's office with the message "Medicaid Matters."
A statement from Finstad said, "Since President Trump took office, we've been seeing increased engagement with our office from both ends of the political spectrum. We're getting a lot of communication from constituents who are eager to see the fraud, waste, and abuse cleaned up and their federal tax dollars used respectfully, and we're also hearing from constituents who are concerned with the administration's actions."
John Shaffer, one of the organizers of Thursday's event, said while Finstad won't be in Rochester, he hopes the congressman will hear the concerns of people in Minnesota about issues ranging from Elon Musk's leadership at the Department of Government Efficiency and the recently passed budget resolution in the U.S. House of Representatives.
"We hope he hears that he is supposed to serve all of his constituents, not just his Republican buddies," said Shaffer. "We want him to have a town hall to actually listen to our concerns. We hope he comes to understand how his choices are going to hurt regular Minnesotans."
Shaffer said the "recent vote to gut Medicaid is on my list" of items where he believes Finstad isn't representing Minnesotans.
On Tuesday, the House voted mainly along party lines to support a budget bill that Democrats and some Republicans believe could lead to the cutting of $880 billion from Medicaid though 2034.
The House bill would need to be reconciled with any bill passed in the U.S. Senate, so no changes have been made yet.
"Medicaid is the largest single source of health insurance in Minnesota. which plays a huge role in MN's all-time low uninsurance rate of 3.8%," Shaffer wrote in an email to the Post Bulletin.
Shaffer said 60% of Medicaid spending in Minnesota helps the state's most vulnerable people.
"It covers half of long-term care costs for Minnesotans," he said. "Medicaid pays for more of our mental health services than any other payer. ... Deep cuts to these systems will impact almost every Minnesotan, especially the less fortunate amongst us."
Finstad said the concern over the budget framework passed this week is mainly due to misinformation about the nature of cuts to Medicaid benefits.
"According to President Trump, only fraud and improper payments within these programs are being targeted and those who need Medicaid services will have them," Finstad said.
The congressman pointed out that Tuesday's vote in the U.S. House was "procedural, and no cuts have been made to legitimate recipients of Medicaid benefits."
"The Trump administration is taking steps to root out the waste, fraud and abuse that exists within programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, allowing us to make sure they're truly serving the individuals who depend on them," Finstad said.
A January story in the Post Bulletin noted that about 80 million individuals nationwide receive health care benefits from Medicaid or Children's Health Insurance Program. In Minnesota, 18% of residents get their health insurance from Medicaid.
A statement from Minnesota Sen. Liz Boldon, DFL-Rochester, noted that 83,000 individuals across the 1st Congressional District receive Medicaid or CHIP benefits.
"Shameful. At a time when we should be bolstering our social safety nets and protecting the most vulnerable people in our communities, Congressional Republicans are doing the exact opposite and advancing their chaos agenda," Boldon wrote. "In Minnesota, we care about our neighbors, and stand up for them."
Boldon sent a letter to Finstad expressing her concern and asking Finstad to "reconsider this harmful budget resolution as soon as possible, and act in the best interests of your constituents who rely on these programs."
Allen Kern of Faribault, Minnesota, said he plans to attend Thursday's rally in Rochester.
If he had a chance to talk to Finstad, Kern said he'd ask the congressman to stand up to Trump, especially with regard to "drastic cuts to Medicaid" and tax cuts that benefit wealthy Americans.
"I'm going to be, soon," Kern said when asked if he uses Medicaid. "I'm 64 and can apply soon, assuming that it's still there."
Kern said he doesn't have a problem with cost-cutting or even reducing the federal workforce, as long as it's done by an appropriate government agency, and done in a systematic way. The Musk-led DOGE effort, he said, doesn't meet that criteria.
As for concerns that he's not listening to his constituents, Finstad balked at such a claim, saying he's always open to hearing comments and concerns, and responds to people who contact his office.
"We may not agree on every issue, but we respond," Finstad said.
Finstad added that when not in Washington, D.C., he travels across southern Minnesota, meeting with individuals, public officials, commnity groups, first responders and business owners.
"Since taking office, I have visited all 21 counties multiple times and will continue to do so regularly. We routinely highlight our work in both D.C. and the district on social media and our weekly email newsletter," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The 21 cases left for the Supreme Court to decide, including transgender care
The 21 cases left for the Supreme Court to decide, including transgender care

New York Post

time11 minutes ago

  • New York Post

The 21 cases left for the Supreme Court to decide, including transgender care

The Supreme Court is in the homestretch of a term that has lately been dominated by the Trump administration's emergency appeals of lower court orders seeking to slow President Donald Trump's efforts to remake the federal government. But the justices also have 21 cases to resolve that were argued between December and mid-May, including a push by Republican-led states to ban gender-affirming care for transgender minors. One of the argued cases was an emergency appeal, the administration's bid to be allowed to enforce Trump's executive order denying birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of parents who are in the country illegally. The court typically aims to finish its work by the end of June. 7 The Supreme Court has 21 cases to resolve that were argued between December and mid-May. REUTERS Here are some of the biggest remaining cases: Tennessee and 26 other states have enacted bans on certain treatment for transgender youth The oldest unresolved case, and arguably the term's biggest, stems from a challenge to Tennessee's law from transgender minors and their parents who argue that it is unconstitutional sex discrimination aimed at a vulnerable population. At arguments in December, the court's conservative majority seemed inclined to uphold the law, voicing skepticism of claims that it violates the 14th amendment's equal protection clause. The post-Civil War provision requires the government to treat similarly situated people the same. 7 The oldest unresolved case stems from a challenge to Tennessee's law on transgender youth AP 7 The court is weighing the case amid other federal and state efforts to regulate the lives of transgender people, such as which bathrooms they can use, and pushes to keep transgender athletes from playing in girls' sports. The court is weighing the case amid a range of other federal and state efforts to regulate the lives of transgender people, including which sports competitions they can join and which bathrooms they can use. In April, Trump's administration sued Maine for not complying with the government's push to ban transgender athletes in girls sports. Trump also has sought to block federal spending on gender-affirming care for those under 19 and a conservative majority of justices allowed him to move forward with plans to oust transgender people from the U.S. military. Trump's birthright citizenship order has been blocked by lower courts The court rarely hears arguments over emergency appeals, but it took up the administration's plea to narrow orders that have prevented the citizenship changes from taking effect anywhere in the U.S. The issue before the justices is whether to limit the authority of judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past 10 years. 7 Protesters confront law enforcement outside of a federal building and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention center in Los Angeles. Getty Images These nationwide court orders have emerged as an important check on Trump's efforts and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies. At arguments last month, the court seemed intent on keeping a block on the citizenship restrictions while still looking for a way to scale back nationwide court orders. It was not clear what such a decision might look like, but a majority of the court expressed concerns about what would happen if the administration were allowed, even temporarily, to deny citizenship to children born to parents who are in the country illegally. Democratic-led states, immigrants and rights groups who sued over Trump's executive order argued that it would upset the settled understanding of birthright citizenship that has existed for more than 125 years. 7 A majority of the court last month expressed concerns about what would happen if the administration were allowed to deny citizenship to children born to parents who are in the country illegally. REUTERS The court seems likely to side with Maryland parents in a religious rights case over LGBTQ storybooks in public schools Parents in the Montgomery County school system, in suburban Washington, want to be able to pull their children out of lessons that use the storybooks, which the county added to the curriculum to better reflect the district's diversity. The school system at one point allowed parents to remove their children from those lessons, but then reversed course because it found the opt-out policy to be disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction with an opt-out provision in the county's schools. 7 LGBTQ+ veterans hold signs protesting the ban on transgender military members as they march in the World Pride parade in Washington, DC on June 7. Nathan Posner/Shutterstock The school district introduced the storybooks in 2022, with such titles as 'Prince and Knight' and 'Uncle Bobby's Wedding.' The case is one of several religious rights cases at the court this term. The justices have repeatedly endorsed claims of religious discrimination in recent years. The decision also comes amid increases in recent years in books being banned from public school and public libraries. A three-year battle over congressional districts in Louisiana is making its second trip to the Supreme Court Lower courts have struck down two Louisiana congressional maps since 2022 and the justices are weighing whether to send state lawmakers back to the map-drawing board for a third time. The case involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court that has been skeptical of considerations of race in public life. At arguments in March, several of the court's conservative justices suggested they could vote to throw out the map and make it harder, if not impossible, to bring redistricting lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act. 7 The case about Louisiana congressional maps involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court. AP Before the court now is a map that created a second Black majority congressional district among Louisiana's six seats in the House of Representatives. The district elected a Black Democrat in 2024. A three-judge court found that the state relied too heavily on race in drawing the district, rejecting Louisiana's arguments that politics predominated, specifically the preservation of the seats of influential members of Congress, including Speaker Mike Johnson. The Supreme Court ordered the challenged map to be used last year while the case went on. Lawmakers only drew that map after civil rights advocates won a court ruling that a map with one Black majority district likely violated the landmark voting rights law. The justices are weighing a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing online pornography Texas is among more than a dozen states with age verification laws. The states argue the laws are necessary as smartphones have made access to online porn, including hardcore obscene material, almost instantaneous. The question for the court is whether the measure infringes on the constitutional rights of adults as well. The Free Speech Coalition, an adult-entertainment industry trade group, agrees that children shouldn't be seeing pornography. But it says the Texas law is written too broadly and wrongly affects adults by requiring them to submit personal identifying information online that is vulnerable to hacking or tracking. The justices appeared open to upholding the law, though they also could return it to a lower court for additional work. Some justices worried the lower court hadn't applied a strict enough legal standard in determining whether the Texas law and others like that could run afoul of the First Amendment.

Immigration raids are threatening businesses that supply America's food, farm bureaus say
Immigration raids are threatening businesses that supply America's food, farm bureaus say

Los Angeles Times

time16 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Immigration raids are threatening businesses that supply America's food, farm bureaus say

VENTURA, Calif. — Large-scale immigration raids at packinghouses and fields in California are threatening businesses that supply much of the country's food, farm bureaus say. Dozens of farmworkers have been arrested recently after uniformed federal agents fanned out on farms northwest of Los Angeles in Ventura County, which is known for growing strawberries, lemons and avocados. Others are skipping work as fear in immigrant communities has deepened as President Donald Trump steps up his immigration crackdown, vowing to dramatically increase arrests and sending federal agents to detain people at Home Depot parking lots and workplaces including car washes and a garment factory. It also comes as Trump sent National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles following protests over his immigration enforcement operations. Demonstrations have since spread to other U.S. cities. Maureen McGuire, chief executive of Ventura County's farm bureau, said between 25% and 45% of farmworkers have stopped showing up for work since the large-scale raids began this month. 'When our workforce is afraid, fields go unharvested, packinghouses fall behind, and market supply chains, from local grocery stores to national retailers, are affected,' she said in a statement on Thursday. 'This impacts every American who eats.' California's farms produce more than a third of the country's vegetables and more than three-quarters of its fruits and nuts. While the state's government is dominated by Democrats, there are large Republican areas that run through farm country, and many growers throughout the state have been counting on Trump to help with key agricultural issues ranging from water to trade. Primitiva Hernandez, executive director of 805 UndocuFund, estimates at least 43 people were detained in farm fields in Ventura and Santa Barbara counties since Monday. The number is from both the Mexican consulate and the group's own estimates from talking with family members of people detained, she said. Elizabeth Strater, the United Farm Workers' director of strategic campaigns, said her group received reports of immigration arrests on farms as far north as California's Central Valley. Lucas Zucker, co-executive director of the Central Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy, said farmworker members reported that agents went to at least nine farms but were turned away by supervisors because they lacked a warrant. 'This is just a mass assault on a working-class immigrant community and essentially profiling,' Zucker said. 'They are not going after specific people who are really targeted. They're just fishing.' In response to questions about the farm arrests, Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement that the agency will follow the president's direction and continue to seek to remove immigrants who have committed crimes. On Thursday, Trump acknowledged growers' concerns that his stepped-up immigration enforcement could leave them without workers they rely on to grow the country's food. He said something would be done to address the situation, but he did not provide specifics. 'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' he said on his social media account, adding: 'We must protect our Farmers, but get the CRIMINALS OUT OF THE USA. Changes are coming!' The California Farm Bureau said it has not received reports of a widespread disruption to its workforce, but there are concerns among community members. Bryan Little, the bureau's senior director of policy advocacy, said the group has long pressed for immigration reform to deal with long-running labor shortages. 'We recognize that some workers may feel uncertain right now, and we want to be very clear: California agriculture depends on and values its workforce,' Little said in a statement. 'If federal immigration enforcement activities continue in this direction, it will become increasingly difficult to produce food, process it and get it onto grocery store shelves.' One worker, who asked not to be named out of fear, said he was picking strawberries at a Ventura County farm early Tuesday when more than a dozen cars pulled up to the farm next door. He said they arrested at least three people and put them in vans, while women who worked on the farm burst out crying. He said the supervisors on his farm did not allow the agents inside. 'The first thing that came to my mind is, who will stay with my kids?' the worker, who is originally from Mexico and has lived in the United States for two decades, said in Spanish. 'It's something so sad and unfortunate because we are not criminals.' He said he didn't go to work Wednesday out of fear, and his bosses told him to stay home at least one more day until things settle down. But that means fruit isn't getting picked, and he isn't getting paid. 'These are lost days, days that we're missing work. But what else can we do?' he said. Taxin and Pineda write for the Associated Press.

Who are the lawmakers who were shot?
Who are the lawmakers who were shot?

New York Times

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Who are the lawmakers who were shot?

The lawmakers who were shot on Saturday morning in Minnesota were State Representative Melissa Hortman, the top Democrat in the House, and State Senator John A. Hoffman, a fellow Democrat and longtime lawmaker. Ms. Hortman, who was assassinated at her home in Brooklyn Park, Minn., was a lawyer by training and a legislator for about 20 years who served as the speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives from 2019 to 2025. She represented a reliably Democratic district and routinely won re-election by more than 20 percentage points. She played a key role in passing a trove of bills during the 2023 session, when Democrats held a slim majority in the Legislature, including legislation that expanded abortion rights, legalized recreational marijuana and required employers to offer paid family and medical leave. This year, under Ms. Hortman's leadership, Democrats in the House boycotted the early weeks of the legislative session amid a fight for control of the chamber. Voters last year left Democrats and Republicans with an equal number of seats in the House, but challenges to two of the elections won by Democrats created a period of uncertainty around which party would control the chamber. When those challenges were settled, Ms. Hortman agreed to let the top Republican in the House, Representative Lisa Demuth, serve as speaker. Colleagues have long praised Ms. Hortman's work ethic, negotiation skills and pragmatism. Jerry Gale, Ms. Hortman's campaign manager, said in an interview that she was a tireless campaigner who was passionate about recruiting fellow Democrats to run for office. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store