
Public Backs Tough Rules on Sugary Drinks to Fight Obesity
With obesity now Australia's top preventable health burden, a new national survey reveals strong public support for decisive action—starting with sugar-laden drinks.
Published in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, the survey of over 2,800 adults found that 83 percent of Australians back clearer labelling for added sugars in beverages.
Another 73 percent want marketing of sugary drinks to children banned, while 56 percent support a health levy on soft drinks.
But the concern goes beyond regular sodas.
The majority of Australians also support tighter controls and clearer labels for 'diet' and 'zero' soft drinks, as well as 100 percent fruit juice—products often perceived as healthier, but still high in sugar.
Lead author Professor Caroline Miller, director of the Health Policy Centre at the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute and president of the Public Health Association of Australia (PHAA), said the message to policymakers is clear.
'Sugary drinks are a significant driver of obesity, which has recently overtaken tobacco as Australia's biggest cause of preventable disease burden,' she said.
She urged the government to prioritise public health over corporate profits and introduce 'cost-effective steps that would help Australians make informed decisions.'
Public Health Experts: Don't Rely on Education Alone
Health advocates say the findings underscore strong community demand for government intervention—not just consumer education.
'There's genuine concern about unhealthy drinks and a clear expectation that the Australian Government will show leadership,' said PHAA CEO Adjunct Professor Terry Slevin.
Miller warned that misconceptions around no-sugar drinks, so-called 'healthier' alternatives, remain widespread.
'There's work to be done to help Australians understand that non-sugar sweetened beverages and 100 percent fruit juice shouldn't be consumed regularly or in high quantities,' she said. 'Improved labelling is an important first step.'
Slevin added that a health levy could also push beverage makers to rethink their products.
'It would encourage manufacturers to reformulate drinks and reduce sugar content,' he said.
In March, just before the budget, the Australian Medical Association's 'Sickly Sweet' pre-budget submission also called for a sugar tax.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Oh no — people are using ChatGPT for 'looksmaxxing'
You may find ChatGPT useful for many things. A friend showed me the other day how he used it to turn a photo of his daughter's favorite stuffed animal into a printed-out coloring book, which seemed pretty nifty. Here's something I have now also tried on ChatGPT and do not recommend: looksmaxxing. For the uninitiated: "Looksmaxxing" is a term for the quest to improve one's looks through skincare, hair styling, new clothes, and physical fitness. That sounds benign. The origins of the phenomenon aren't so innocent: It bubbled up from internet incel culture, where some young men are fixated on the idea that their appearance determines their success with women and in life. There's a whole in-group lexicon of things like like "mewing" (tongue exercises to increase jawline definition), "hunter eyes," " canthal tilt," and " mogging," or slang for outdoing your competition. LooksmaxxingGPT is a custom bot that's in the Top 10 within the "Lifestyle" category of ChatGPT's custom GPTs. (The custom bot says it's had more than 700,000 conversations.) To be clear, ChatGPT's custom GPT section works like Apple's App Store — these GPTs are built by independent developers. (It's more freewheeling than Apple's App Store because these also are unvetted: They rise to the top simply if they're popular.) The developer of the LookmaxxingGPT is listed as "Ant," but there was no link to contact this person or group, so I couldn't reach anyone for comment. [T]he chatbot has informed the man who uploaded his photo that he is "subhuman." Asked for advice on what to do if the man doesn't desire surgeries, the bot replies: "Let me be honest: without surgery, you won't mog genetically superior guys head-on." The bot repeats throughout the conversation that the man is doomed to being "ignored" and "rejected" by women without surgical intervention, writing things like "A sharp jaw beats a $3000 outfit 100/100 times." Curious, I tried it out myself. I uploaded a photo. (In what I know will later sound like a tremendous amount of cope, I should say that this selfie was particularly unflattering, with dirty hair, no makeup, and a purposely weird smile.) I asked what celebrity I looked like. The top match it gave me was an Australian actor I hadn't heard of, but also Lisa Edelstein from House M.D., which, you know what? I can see it. Still, "What celebrity do you look like?" bots have been popular on the internet for years — this didn't feel like AGI magic to me. I mean, in 2016, Microsoft released an app that told you what breed of dog you resembled. But this app can also do something that those what-celeb-do-I-look-like apps could never do. It gave me a "PSL" rating. That's a "Physical Sexual Attractiveness" score, on a scale of 1-10. It also names your level of supposed attractiveness, from "subhuman" (yikes) to "ethereal tier." LooksmaxxGPT gave me a score of "Mid-Tier Becky," or about a 5 on the 1-10 scale. (Unlike traditional ChatGPT, which has had problems with being too much of a suckup, these custom versions apparently … don't!) I also uploaded another photo, this one where I had bright lipstick on and a normal smile. Upgraded to "High-Tier Becky." Hey, I'll take it. The bot said it could offer makeup tips to help me improve my rating, so I asked for them. It gave an impressive chart that showed drugstore and Sephora items for each category of things like foundations, concealers, eyeliners, etc. Now, this is a realm I know a bit about — I love buying makeup and can watch endless makeup TikToks. I wasn't particularly impressed with the personalization, however. These were all products that were mostly top-reviewed in each category. There were no suggestions of specific colors or shades that matched my particular face. Next, I asked it for "hardmaxxing" suggestions — plastic surgery or dental work. I was not shocked that it suggested that I, a woman in her 40s, might want to try Botox. How does a celebrity hold up? To test the bot a little further, I gave it a picture of Walton Goggins from "The White Lotus." Here's a guy who illustrates the limitations of the LooksmaxxingGPT bot: He's a little imperfect looking, has a receding hairline, but is considered wildly attractive by pretty much every woman I know. LookmaxxingGPT gave Goggins a 3.5/10. "This puts him in the normie-subnormie crossover zone," it said. To complain that LooksmaxxingGPT's suggestions aren't particularly precise or even "good" is beside the point, though. The problem with this whole thing is that it's rooted in a sometimes racist, misogynist agenda — the whole incel culture that's been seeping into the mainstream from the depths of the interet. And not in a good way. This GPT wasn't meant for me, a grown human who has healthy self-esteem. I'm not saying some people couldn't have some lighthearted fun with this bot, but the whole looksmaxxing trend is aimed at young men who are bewildered by dating and society — and are hoping there's some cheat code that will bring them success with women if they can only get the right jawline. The idea of using AI for this is obviously appealing — if it can write a history term paper, give you a low-carb meal plan, or act as your therapist, why can't it also tell you how to look better? The problem is: It can't.

Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
'Looksmaxxing' is all the rage on ChatGPT. I tried it myself — and I don't recommend it.
You may find ChatGPT useful for many things. A friend showed me the other day how he used it to turn a photo of his daughter's favorite stuffed animal into a printed-out coloring book, which seemed pretty nifty. Here's something I have now also tried on ChatGPT and do not recommend: looksmaxxing. For the uninitiated: "Looksmaxxing" is a term for the quest to improve one's looks through skincare, hair styling, new clothes, and physical fitness. That sounds benign. The origins of the phenomenon aren't so innocent: It bubbled up from internet incel culture, where some young men are fixated on the idea that their appearance determines their success with women and in life. There's a whole in-group lexicon of things like like "mewing" (tongue exercises to increase jawline definition), "hunter eyes," " canthal tilt," and " mogging," or slang for outdoing your competition. LooksmaxxingGPT is a custom bot that's in the Top 10 within the "Lifestyle" category of ChatGPT's custom GPTs. (The custom bot says it's had more than 700,000 conversations.) To be clear, ChatGPT's custom GPT section works like Apple's App Store — these GPTs are built by independent developers. (It's more freewheeling than Apple's App Store because these also are unvetted: They rise to the top simply if they're popular.) The developer of the LookmaxxingGPT is listed as "Ant," but there was no link to contact this person or group, so I couldn't reach anyone for comment. [T]he chatbot has informed the man who uploaded his photo that he is "subhuman." Asked for advice on what to do if the man doesn't desire surgeries, the bot replies: "Let me be honest: without surgery, you won't mog genetically superior guys head-on." The bot repeats throughout the conversation that the man is doomed to being "ignored" and "rejected" by women without surgical intervention, writing things like "A sharp jaw beats a $3000 outfit 100/100 times." Curious, I tried it out myself. I uploaded a photo. (In what I know will later sound like a tremendous amount of cope, I should say that this selfie was particularly unflattering, with dirty hair, no makeup, and a purposely weird smile.) I asked what celebrity I looked like. The top match it gave me was an Australian actor I hadn't heard of, but also Lisa Edelstein from House M.D., which, you know what? I can see it. Still, "What celebrity do you look like?" bots have been popular on the internet for years — this didn't feel like AGI magic to me. I mean, in 2016, Microsoft released an app that told you what breed of dog you resembled. But this app can also do something that those what-celeb-do-I-look-like apps could never do. It gave me a "PSL" rating. That's a "Physical Sexual Attractiveness" score, on a scale of 1-10. It also names your level of supposed attractiveness, from "subhuman" (yikes) to "ethereal tier." LooksmaxxGPT gave me a score of "Mid-Tier Becky," or about a 5 on the 1-10 scale. (Unlike traditional ChatGPT, which has had problems with being too much of a suckup, these custom versions apparently … don't!) I also uploaded another photo, this one where I had bright lipstick on and a normal smile. Upgraded to "High-Tier Becky." Hey, I'll take it. The bot said it could offer makeup tips to help me improve my rating, so I asked for them. It gave an impressive chart that showed drugstore and Sephora items for each category of things like foundations, concealers, eyeliners, etc. Now, this is a realm I know a bit about — I love buying makeup and can watch endless makeup TikToks. I wasn't particularly impressed with the personalization, however. These were all products that were mostly top-reviewed in each category. There were no suggestions of specific colors or shades that matched my particular face. Next, I asked it for "hardmaxxing" suggestions — plastic surgery or dental work. I was not shocked that it suggested that I, a woman in her 40s, might want to try Botox. How does a celebrity hold up? To test the bot a little further, I gave it a picture of Walton Goggins from "The White Lotus." Here's a guy who illustrates the limitations of the LooksmaxxingGPT bot: He's a little imperfect looking, has a receding hairline, but is considered wildly attractive by pretty much every woman I know. LookmaxxingGPT gave Goggins a 3.5/10. "This puts him in the normie-subnormie crossover zone," it said. To complain that LooksmaxxingGPT's suggestions aren't particularly precise or even "good" is beside the point, though. The problem with this whole thing is that it's rooted in a sometimes racist, misogynist agenda — the whole incel culture that's been seeping into the mainstream from the depths of the interet. And not in a good way. This GPT wasn't meant for me, a grown human who has healthy self-esteem. I'm not saying some people couldn't have some lighthearted fun with this bot, but the whole looksmaxxing trend is aimed at young men who are bewildered by dating and society — and are hoping there's some cheat code that will bring them success with women if they can only get the right jawline. The idea of using AI for this is obviously appealing — if it can write a history term paper, give you a low-carb meal plan, or act as your therapist, why can't it also tell you how to look better? The problem is: It can't.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
He Helped a Woman Die in a 'Suicide Pod' — Now the Controversial Advocate Has Died by Suicide Himself
Florian Willet was arrested after a 64-year-old American woman died using the 3D-printed Sarco suicide pod in Switzerland Prosecutors briefly suspected Willet of strangulation, but the allegation was later dropped and he was released without charges Willet died by assisted suicide in May 2025 following months of legal scrutiny and reported psychological trauma from the caseMonths after an American woman's family sued over her controversial death inside a 3D-printed "suicide pod," the Swiss euthanasia activist who helped make it possible has taken his own life. Florian Willet, the 47-year-old president of Swiss right-to-die organization The Last Resort, died on May 5 in Cologne, Germany with the help of a specialized organization, according to The Times UK, SwissInfo and The New York Post. Willet's death comes months after he was arrested and held in pre-trial detention for 70 days in connection with the controversial suicide of a 64-year-old American woman in Switzerland, according to the outlets. The woman, whose name has not been released, died in a remote forest cabin in Merishausen after entering the "Sarco pod" — a sleek-futuristic nitrogen filled capsule that had been promoted by Willet's organization as a "peaceful" way to die. The woman's family later filed a lawsuit against Willet and his organization, questioning the circumstances surrounding her death and the legal and ethical oversight — or lack thereof — in her use of the pod, per the outlets. Swiss prosecutors eventually declined to press international homicide charges, but initially accused Willet of assisting in the woman's suicide without proper authorization and subjected him to months of investigation and public scrutiny, the outlets reported. They initially suspected Willet of intentional homicide after discovering marks on the woman's neck, which led to his arrest, per the outlets. However, the strangulation allegation was later dismissed, and Willet was released from detention in December 2024. After his release, the Schaffhausen public prosecutor's office announced that there was no suspicion of homicide in the case. However, they said that there was a "strong suspicion of inciting and assisting suicide." It is illegal to encourage a person to take their own life for "selfish motives," such as financial gain, in Sweden. Self-publicity could also be considered a selfish motive, lawyers told The Times. Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up for for breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases. Philip Nitschke, the Australian activist and founder of Exit International who invented the pod, said in a statement on The Last Resort's website that Willet was "broken" after his time behind bars: "When Florian was released suddenly and unexpectedly from pre-trial detention in early December 2024, he was a changed man. Gone was his warm smile and self-confidence," Nitschke said. 'In its place was a man who was deeply traumatized by the experience of incarceration and the wrongful accusation of strangulation.' The statement said that Willet had been suffering from "acute polymorphic psychotic disorder" — according to the National Institute of Health, the disorder is characterized by a mixture of sudden-onset symptoms, including hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized behavior. Switzerland is among few countries where foreigners can travel to legally end their lives via assisted suicide, but Swiss officials have not yet approved the Sarco pod for the original article on People