Cash boost for South West hospitals
Hospitals in Devon and Cornwall have been given more than £22m for vital repairs, the Department of Health and Social Care has confirmed.
It comes as part of the £750m announced for the NHS in England in the autumn budget.
Devon's hospitals have been given more than £15m for improvements, while Cornish hospitals will benefit from more than £8m.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the government was "on a mission" to rebuild the NHS through investment and modernisation.
Among the hospitals receiving funding were three of the largest in both counties - the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital (RD&E) in Exeter, Derriford Hospital in Plymouth, and the Royal Cornwall Hospital in Truro.
Derriford Hospital has been given £1,815,000 for improvements to ventilation equipment in the neonatal unit.
Ashley Dalton MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Public Health and Prevention, during a visit to Derriford Hospital, said the new system would improve environmental conditions for babies receiving specialist care.
Elsewhere in Devon, RD&E and North Devon District Hospital, managed by the Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, have been jointly allocated £5,412,000 for improvements to ventilation systems, and fire safety works.
Various healthcare units, managed by the Devon Partnership NHS Trust, have been given £300,000 for improvements to energy systems.
In Cornwall, the Royal Cornwall Hospital in Truro has been given £4,379,000 for improvements to energy, electrical, and water systems.
The Department for Health and Social Care also announced £3.9m for Bodmin Hospital, to improve fire safety.
The Department of Health and Social Care said fixing the "backlog of maintenance" at NHS hospitals would help to prevent cancellations.
It said services were disrupted more than 4,000 times across England in 2023 and 2024 due to issues with poor quality buildings.
Mr Streeting said: "A decade and a half of underinvestment left hospitals crumbling, with burst pipes flooding emergency departments, faulty electrical systems shutting down operating theatres, and mothers giving birth in outdated facilities that lack basic dignity."
He said patients and staff deserved to be in buildings which were "safe, comfortable, and fit for purpose."
Follow BBC Cornwall on X, Facebook and Instagram. Follow BBC Devon on X, Facebook and Instagram. Send your story ideas to spotlight@bbc.co.uk.
Views sought to improve local NHS services
Trust awarded £3.5m to establish research centre
Department of Health and Social Care
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Woman who wanted family home for therapy dogs loses inheritance battle
A former NHS worker has lost her inheritance battle over her late mother's £420,000 home. Sharon Duggan, 49, told her sisters Brenda, 55, and Ann, 60, that they couldn't have their thirds of the house in Southgate, Crawley, because she needed it for her and her emotional support dogs. But a judge has now ruled 'hyper-vigilant' Sharon can move into a flat instead, and the house must be shared equally among the sisters as laid out in their mother Agnes's will. Agnes Duggan died in August 2018, aged 78, and left her house to be split equally between her three daughters – Ann, the oldest sister, Sharon, a former NHS medical secretary, and Brenda, an alternative therapist. But Sharon – who told a judge she 'is dyslexic and suffers from a variety of health issues, including chronic fatigue syndrome, migraine, fibromyalgia, depression, anxiety, insomnia, PTSD, and Adjustment Disorder (and) also has long Covid' – claimed the house for herself and her rescue dogs, saying she was too sensitive for life in a flat. Sharon sued her two sisters under the 1975 Inheritance Act, claiming her medical ailments and sensitivity to noise meant she should get at least a life interest in the property. Although Ann remained neutral in the dispute, Brenda fought the case and has now won, after Judge Alan Johns KC threw out Sharon's claim at Central London county court. The court heard that most of Agnes's estate was tied up in her house, where Sharon had lived and cared for her during her final dementia-stricken years. But after Agnes died, Sharon insisted her needs outweighed her sisters' right to their inheritance, arguing that it would be difficult to find alternative accommodation for her and her two therapy dogs, which 'help with her mental and emotional well-being'. Sharon said she 'sacrificed' her career to move in and care for Agnes in 2014, before arguing their mother was planning to change her will to leave the house to her. She also claimed to have spent £30,000 funding Agnes's vet bills for her dog, Lady, and that she 'psychologically could not cope with living in a flat again'. Her written arguments to the court said 'she is anxious that neighbours may cause disturbances and impact upon her ability to sleep. She now has two rescue dogs, which help with her mental and emotional well-being, but which make finding suitable alternative accommodation difficult. 'The claimant maintains that moving from the property would affect her mental health greatly and that having to move into rented or temporary accommodation would further affect her health negatively.' She told the court: 'I have two dogs to consider and I am hyper-vigilant and sound-sensitive. 'A flat would not be suitable due to the noise levels. I would be better off living in a car, I couldn't cope with it.' Sharon wanted either the house to be transferred to her outright, the right to a life interest, or an order allowing her to buy her mother's old property for a small sum to be raised with a mortgage. But Brenda, who formerly ran a bioresonance therapy company and a business providing gluten-free altar bread to food-intolerant Catholics, defended the claim, insisting Sharon and her pets could move into a flat. Ruling against Sharon, Judge Johns said: 'It's my judgment that there has been no failure to make reasonable financial provision for her. 'I am not satisfied there was any promise that the property would be Sharon's – and certainly not a promise that Sharon was confident would be carried out.' He said she had lived with Agnes rent-free and, although she had spent time caring for her mum while in declining health, the court's role wasn't simply to 'reward meritorious conduct'. 'Given the circumstances in which Sharon occupied the property with Agnes, there's no moral claim strong enough to deprive her sisters of their share of this modest estate,' he said. 'I don't rule out flats as suitable accommodation,' he added, also noting that Sharon should be able to work once the court case is behind her. He also rejected her claim that Brenda was estranged from their mum towards the end of her life. 'Brenda told me that she tried to see her mother and call her, but that that wasn't permitted by Sharon,' he said. 'That evidence included that her telephone calls were blocked and I accept all that evidence.' 'This is a modest estate and Agnes had two other daughters to think of,' he said, adding that the money Sharon claimed to have spent on Lady's vet bills was an overestimate. 'Essentially, provision was made for Sharon by giving her one-third of the estate.' The decision means the three sisters are each due a third of their mother's estate, although Sharon's share could be wiped out by the court bills for the trial. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Ground beef sold at Whole Foods possibly contaminated with E. coli
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service has issued a public health alert for ground beef products sold at Whole Foods stores in over 25 states that tested positive for E. coli, the agency announced this week. The product is no longer available in stores, so a recall wasn't issued. Instead, a public health alert was issued, the FSIS said. The raw ground beef product was manufactured by Organic Rancher and was made on May 22, 2025, and May 23, 2025, according to FSIS. The health alert includes 1 pound vacuum-packed containers of Organic Rancher Organic Ground Beef, labeled as 85% lean with 15% fat. The label includes expiration dates of June 19, 2025 and June 20, 2025. According to the FSIS, the ground beef was shipped to distributor locations in Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois and Maryland, then sent to Whole Foods Market retail locations nationwide. The company let the FSIS know that the product tested positive for E. coli, leading to the public health alert. While there have been no confirmed reports of illness, the FSIS said it is concerned some customers may still have the products in their freezers. Here's what you need to know. In addition to the Organic Rancher Organic Ground Beef label listing 85% lean with 15% fat, the label also includes expiration dates June 19, 2025 and June 20, 2025. The product has an establishment number "EST. 4027" inside the USDA mark of inspection, the FSIS said. Those who have the products should not eat them, and should throw them out or return them to the store, the FSIS said. According to the FSIS, those who eat meat should make sure the meat has been cooked to a temperature of 160 degrees Fahrenheit. 'The only way to confirm that ground beef is cooked to a temperature high enough to kill harmful bacteria is to use a food thermometer that measures internal temperature,' the FSIS said. The ground beef was sold in Whole Foods stores in 27 states, including: Organic Rancher said on its website that the impacted products are no longer for sale. 'Other States not listed above are not impacted and products with different Use or Freeze By dates are NOT impacted and safe to consume,' the company said. The root cause of the issue has been identified, and immediate corrective actions have been put in place to ensure the ongoing integrity of the Organic Rancher brand.' According to the FSIS, consumers have multiple options if they have questions or concerns. Contact options include: E. coli is a potentially deadly bacterium that can lead to dehydration, bloody diarrhea and abdominal cramps for 2 to 8 days, or 3 to 4 days on average, the FSIS said. Most people recover from E. coli exposure within a week, while others develop a type of kidney failure called hemolytic uremic syndrome, or HUS. The condition is most common in children who are under 5 years old, as well as older adults. Symptoms include easy bruising, pallor, and decreased urine.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Whole Foods ground beef may be tainted with E. coli, health officials warn
US agriculture officials are warning that ground beef sold at Whole Foods markets nationwide may be contaminated with potentially dangerous E. coli bacteria. Officials issued a public health alert for 1-pound, vacuum-packed packages of Organic Rancher beef, produced on May 22 and May 23, by NPC Processing Inc., of Shelburne, Vermont. The products have use-by dates of June 19 and June 20. The products have use-by dates of June 19 and June 20. AP The US Food Safety and Inspection Service did not request a recall because the products are no longer available for purchase. However, they may still be in consumers' refrigerators or freezers. The meat was produced in Australia or Uruguay and processed in the US. It was sent to distributors in Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois and Maryland and then to Whole Foods stores nationwide. The problem was discovered when company officials notified FSIS that they had shipped beef products that tested positive for E. coli O157:H7, a type of bacteria that can cause serious illness. To date, no illnesses linked to the product have been reported, officials said. Consumers who have the product should throw it away or return it to the store. To date, no illnesses linked to the product have been reported, officials said. Consumers who have the product should throw it away or return it to the store. Gado via Getty Images E. coli bacteria can cause infections with symptoms that include dehydration, diarrhea and cramps. Most people recover within a week, but some people can become severely ill and develop a dangerous kidney condition. Children under age 5 and older adults are most at risk.
