Food research halted at MSU after Trump's USAID stop work order
This story has been updated with new information.
EAST LANSING — The funding freeze for a government agency that administers foreign aid could have critical impacts closer to home.
In a 40-year period from 1983 to 2023, Michigan State University received $190 million from USAID for its Food Security Group. The lead project of the program is the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research, Capacity, and Influence, which aims to transform food policy in countries across Africa, Asia and Central America.
Michigan is one of 13 states with universities where research has been halted in the wake of President Donald Trump's decision to freeze funding for USAID. On Jan. 24, a stop-work order was sent to all recipients of USAID grants and contracts, including the two Feed the Future initiatives at MSU.
Professor David Tschirley, director of MSU's Lab for Food Security Policy Research, Capacity and Influence, said the lasting impacts of the funding freeze haven't been clearly thought out, and the benefit of the labs to the nation and Michigan should be enough to make the federal government reconsider.
"Some of the biggest supporters of many of these labs stateside are commodity groups in the U.S.," Tschirley said. "They see the value of this work ... the people who actually work in the sector understand the value of these labs domestically."
USAID delivers billions of dollars in humanitarian aid and foreign assistance to dozens of countries. Some programs it funds have won emergency waivers. Others have launched legal challenges. But the order has caused widespread disruption and sparked concerns about the real-world consequences if USAID is largely defunded or disbanded altogether.
Tschirley said those benefits include research on growing disease-resistant crops that Michigan farmers can use. He pointed to the Michigan Bean Commission and the Michigan Soybean Committee, both of which have used some of the research MSU has collected over the years.
And the help given to foreign countries eventually comes back to the U.S., in the form of international stability, increased exports to developing countries and general goodwill.
"The most recent study on the benefits of all this kind of research for the U.S. is that for every dollar invested in these programs, $30 to $40 comes back to the U.S.," Tschirley said.
Joe Cramer, executive director of the Michigan Bean Commission, said there was "no question" that the research projects being done overseas benefited Michigan farmers.
And although he was skeptical of the research offshore at first, he said he realized that the research being done in other countries wouldn't have a negative impact on the success of the dry bean industry in the U.S., and that the development of stronger bean genetics that could survive drier climates and were resistant to more disease was a positive for everyone.
"It took me a long time to understand that we weren't developing a competitor," he said.
The dry bean industry in Michigan is in a great place, Cramer said, and there's less risk involved in farming than there was 25 years ago. He attributes part of the success of the business to the research being done by MSU and other labs across the world.
"If we can get our best minds and researchers on this, I don't really care where (the research) is being done," he said.
The Feed the Future lab received $5 million from USAID last year, Tschirley said. A little over a dozen other institutions also receive money from USAID for projects under the Feed the Future lab, including Kansas State University and the University of California, Davis.
The Feed the Future lab isn't the only research project at the university that receives funding from USAID. MSU's College of Education received $17 million last November to improve STEM education in Malawi, through the USAID Transforming Higher Education Systems project.
'As a leading global public research university, Michigan State is committed to student success and to access and equity in higher education both here on our campus and around the world,' MSU President Kevin Guskiewicz said in a November news release.
Tschirley said that although it may seem like the foreign countries are getting all of the benefit, that isn't true. Students who are educated through MSU programs like the one in Malawi may continue their education in the U.S., which is a benefit to the U.S. economy. At MSU alone, international students contribute over $200 million to the local economy, and support over 2,000 jobs in the Lansing area, an MSU report on international students showed.
The legality of Trump's orders are working their way through the court system. On Feb. 13, a federal judge extended an order blocking the firing of thousands of workers from USAID who argued the Trump administration is dismantling the foreign aid agency. On Friday, a federal judge cleared the way for the Trump administration to put USAID workers on leave, Reuters reported.
On Sunday, the Trump administration said it was placing all personnel, except leaders and critical staff, on paid administrative leave and eliminating 1,600 positions in the United States.
"I regret to inform you that you are affected by a Reduction in Force action," said an email sent to one of the workers being fired that was reviewed by Reuters. Those who received the email will be let go from federal service effective April 24, the email said.
But despite the legal challenges, Tschirley said researchers have been cut off from funding.
When he was notified of the first order on Jan. 20, a pause and 90-day review on all research receiving federal funding, Tschirley said he wasn't too worried. Research activity would have been able to continue, because USAID doesn't give cash up front but instead pays back what MSU spends. However, he said he wasn't prepared for the stop work order on Jan. 24.
"Some labs had experiments in the field," he said. "So you're talking about losing millions and millions of dollars already invested in these studies that if stopped in the middle would completely go to waste. And so there was a lot of confusion, trying to get clarity about what we could and could not do."
Luckily for the researchers at MSU, Tschirley said, MSU is able to cover the basic expenses, like salaries, with existing contracts and grants.
But work might be lost.
"If you don't keep watering the plants and weeding the plants, then you're going to lose that trial," he said. "If you miss the window for a survey, if it's sensitive to season, you also lose that work."
Tschirley said he's expecting a questionnaire to come from USAID in the next couple months about his work and why it should be funded. But he said he's worried about how long the university will be able to pay the salaries of the researchers.
"The uncertainty is very, very difficult," he said. "And the longer it goes on, the more destruction there will be."
USA TODAY reporter Kim Hjelmgaard and Reuters contributed to this story. Contact Sarah Atwood at satwood@lsj.com. Follow her on X @sarahmatwood
This article originally appeared on Lansing State Journal: Food research halted at MSU after Trump's USAID stop work order

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after Trump feud. What does it mean for the US space industry?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. An explosive, and very public, feud between President Donald Trump and SpaceX founder Elon Musk on Thursday (June 5) has raised doubts over the future of America's space industry. The war of words could place $22 billion of SpaceX's government contracts with multiple U.S. space programs at risk, according to one estimate, although the real figure — which remains classified — could be significantly higher. Following threats from the president on his social media platform Truth Social that the U.S. could cancel the government contracts and subsidies awarded to Musk's companies, the CEO of SpaceX retorted that his space company would "begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately." Hours later, Musk responded to a follower telling him to "cool off" by saying "Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." The disagreement began on Tuesday (June 3) when Musk criticized the administration's proposed tax and spending bill on his social media platform X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," Musk wrote on X. Related: 'No radio astronomy from the ground would be possible anymore': Satellite mega-swarms are blinding us to the cosmos — and a critical 'inflection point' is approaching This then escalated into a full-blown social media feud on Thursday, with Musk claiming that Trump's name appears in unreleased files relating to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The White House condemned these allegations. "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted," representatives wrote on X. Trump then claimed Musk "just went CRAZY," posting: "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" SpaceX's Dragon capsule is a reusable spacecraft capable of carrying up to seven passengers and cargo to and from Earth orbit, according to SpaceX. NASA currently relies on the capsule to ferry astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS), so canceling these government contracts effectively eliminates America's ability to launch astronauts to space from American soil, Live Science's sister website, reported. NASA also heavily relies on SpaceX for other space programs, having selected the Starship Human Landing System (HLS), a lunar lander variant of the company's next-generation Starship spacecraft, to carry American astronauts to the moon for the first time in more than 50 years aboard the 2027 Artemis 3 mission. NASA is investing $4 billion into Starship's development, and canceling its contract could seriously handicap NASA and the future of U.S.-led space exploration. While other competitors exist, such as Amazon founder Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin and Boeing's Starliner spacecraft, they lag far behind SpaceX. RELATED STORIES —Facing steep funding cuts, scientists propose using black holes as particle colliders instead of building new ones on Earth —Trump's 2026 budget would slash NASA funding by 24% and its workforce by nearly one third —NASA plans to build a giant radio telescope on the 'dark side' of the moon. Here's why. The Starliner capsule is not yet certified to fly operational astronaut missions and was responsible for "stranding" two astronauts on the ISS for nine months last year. The astronauts returned to Earth on March 18 aboard a SpaceX Dragon capsule, and neither Boeing nor NASA have offered any significant updates into fixes that will make Starliner flightworthy. SpaceX's lead on its competitors is reflected in the size of its government subsidies. In April, the U.S. Space Force, the military branch of U.S. space exploration, awarded the company nearly $6 billion in launch contracts, while the United Launch Alliance received $5.4 billion and Blue Origin $2.4 billion. In response to the feud between Musk and Trump, NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens declined to comment on SpaceX, but she did tell Reuters that "we will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met." NASA's deputy administrator Lori Garver told Reuters that, as well as not being in national interests, canceling SpaceX's contacts would probably not be legal. However, she also added that "a rogue CEO threatening to decommission spacecraft, putting astronauts' lives at risk, is untenable."

23 minutes ago
A top Taliban official offers amnesty to Afghans who fled the country and urges them to return
A top Taliban official said on Saturday that all Afghans who fled the country after the collapse of the former Western-backed government are free to return home, promising they would not be harmed if they come back. Taliban Prime Minister Mohammad Hassan Akhund made the amnesty offer in his message for the Islamic holiday of Eid al-Adha, also known as the 'Feast of Sacrifice.' The offer comes days after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a sweeping travel ban on 12 countries, including Afghanistan. The measure largely bars Afghans hoping to resettle in the United States permanently as well as those hoping to go to the U.S. temporarily, such as for university study. Trump also suspended a core refugee program in January, all but ending support for Afghans who had allied with the U.S. and leaving tens of thousands of them stranded. Afghans in neighboring Pakistan who are awaiting resettlement are also dealing with a deportation drive by the Islamabad government to get them out of the country. Almost a million have left Pakistan since October 2023 to avoid arrest and expulsion. Akhund's holiday message was posted on the social platform X. 'Afghans who have left the country should return to their homeland,' he said. 'Nobody will harm them." "Come back to your ancestral land and live in an atmosphere of peace,' he added, and instructed officials to properly manage services for returning refugees and to ensure they were given shelter and support. He also used the occasion to criticize the media for making what he said were 'false judgements' about Afghanistan's Taliban rulers and their policies. 'We must not allow the torch of the Islamic system to be extinguished,' he said. 'The media should avoid false judgments and should not minimize the accomplishments of the system. While challenges exist, we must remain vigilant.' The Taliban swept into the capital Kabul and seized most of Afghanistan in a blitz in mid-August 2021 as the U.S. and NATO forces were in the last weeks of their pullout from the country after 20 years of war. The offensive prompted a mass exodus, with tens of thousands of Afghans thronging the airport in chaotic scenes, hoping for a flight out on the U.S. military airlift. People also fled across the border, to neighboring Iran and Pakistan. campaign against the Taliban.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oklahoma National Guard not expected to participate in Trump's military parade
Gov. Kevin Stitt poses for a picture with a member of the Oklahoma National Guard before a contingent of 50 troops deploy to El Paso for a 30-day mission at the U.S.-Mexico border. (Photo provided by the Governor's Office) OKLAHOMA CITY – The Oklahoma National Guard is not planning on participating in the nation's largest military parade. The June 14 parade will feature tanks rolling through the U.S. capital's streets, thousands of soldiers marching and military fly overs to celebrate the Army's 250th birthday. Additionally, it will also be President Donald Trump's 79th birthday. Col. Kristin Tschetter, Chief of Public Affairs, said the Oklahoma National Guard is not planning on participating in the parade. Tens of thousands of people are expected to show up. The parade will feature a plethora of militarized equipment, such as helicopters used in the Vietnam War, tanks and other vehicles. In celebration of the evolution of the Army, various uniforms from throughout the years will be worn by soldiers. The parade is expected to take place on Constitution Avenue. The parade will continue to Independence Avenue. The specific cost of the event was not immediately known. Ronald Reagan National Airport was expected to halt flights during the parade. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX