Pro-Turkiye Syria groups reduce presence in Kurdish area
DAMASCUS: Pro-Turkiye Syrian groups have scaled down their military presence in a historically Kurdish-majority area of the country's north which they have controlled since 2018, a Syrian defense ministry official said on Tuesday.The move follows an agreement signed last month between Syria's new authorities and Kurdish officials that provides for the return of displaced Kurds, including tens of thousands who fled the Afrin region in 2018.The pro-Ankara groups have 'reduced their military presence and checkpoints' in Afrin, in Aleppo province, the official told AFP, requesting anonymity as they were not authorized to speak to the media.Their presence has been 'maintained in the region for now,' said the official, adding that authorities wanted to station them in army posts but these had been a regular target of Israeli strikes.After Islamist-led forces ousted longtime ruler Bashar Assad in December, the new authorities announced the disbanding of all armed groups and their integration into the new army, a move that should include pro-Turkiye groups who control swathes of northern Syria.Turkish forces and their Syrian proxies carried out an offensive from January to March 2018 targeting Kurdish fighters in the Afrin area.The United Nations has estimated that half of the enclave's 320,000 inhabitants fled during the offensive.The Kurds and rights groups have accused the pro-Turkiye forces of human rights violations in the area.Last month, the Kurdish semi-autonomous administration that controls swathes of northern and northeastern Syria struck a deal to integrate its civil and military institutions into those of the central government.The administration's de facto army, the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), played a key role in the recapture of the last territory held by the Daesh group in Syria in 2019, with backing from a US-led international coalition.A Kurdish source close to the matter said the people of Afrin were 'waiting for all the checkpoints to be removed and for the exit of pro-Turkiye factions.'Requesting anonymity as the issue is sensitive, the source told AFP that in talks with Damascus, the SDF was pushing for security personnel deployed in Afrin to be from the area.The SDF is also calling for 'international organizations or friendly countries from the international coalition' to supervise collective returns, the source added.Syria's new leadership has been seeking to unify the country since the December overthrow of longtime president Bashar Assad after more than 13 years of civil war.This month, Kurdish fighters withdrew from two neighborhoods of Aleppo as part of the deal.Syrian Kurdish official Bedran Kurd said on X that the Aleppo city agreement 'represents the first phase of a broader plan aimed at ensuring the safe return of the people of Afrin.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
14 hours ago
- Arab News
Will Lebanon learn from Al-Sharaa's government?
It has been about 150 days since Joseph Aoun and Nawaf Salam took office. On the one hand, Lebanon is experiencing its best chapter in two decades. On the other hand, there are concerns about the slow pace of progress — and that another war is on the verge of erupting. Regardless of whether the fighters on either side of the Litani River are preparing for a decisive battle — which is unlikely — the road is long before Lebanon can fully reclaim its sovereignty from both Israel and Hezbollah. Israeli forces still occupy Lebanese land and Hezbollah has handed over only a fraction of its weapons — barely the tip of the iceberg. The repeated rhetoric in both leaders' speeches about the 'Israeli enemy' carries no real weight today, nor is it necessary in modern political discourse. The bitter truth, for some, is this: it is Israel — not the Lebanese authorities — that will determine the shape of Hezbollah's future. Israel will define its size, the limits of its capabilities and its influence. Al-Sharaa did not attack Israel in his speeches. Nor did he inflate statements with false claims of confrontations and victories. Abdulrahman Al-Rashed Neighboring Syria is facing a similar situation, but it has chosen a different approach. Bashar Assad's regime has collapsed, just like Hezbollah's grip has weakened, leaving behind a complex legacy to navigate with the region's 'superpower' neighbor. Israeli forces are also present on Syrian soil and continue to frequently target Syrian sites. Amid this complex situation, President Ahmad Al-Sharaa's government has managed to turn crisis into opportunity — and has earned global praise not only for what it has done, but for what it has deliberately chosen not to do. It quickly abandoned the head-in-the-sand approach of previous regimes, which failed to address internal and external politics with realism. Al-Sharaa did not attack Israel in his speeches. He did not mobilize his forces or instruct his militias to clash or even respond to Israeli fire. Nor did he inflate government statements with false claims of confrontations and victories. In fact, he never even referred to Israel as 'the enemy,' nor did he reject mediation or negotiations with the 'evil' neighbor. He made it clear: his goal is to stabilize war-torn Syria — not destabilize those around it. Lebanon's president and prime minister come from elite circles — military and civilian, respectively. Salam is a graduate of the Sorbonne in France and Harvard in the US — arguably the most internationally qualified leader in Lebanese political history. In contrast, Al-Sharaa is a product of Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham and had seen nothing of the world before assuming power, except what lay between Iraq's Anbar and Syria's Idlib. Lebanon today has a rare opportunity — perhaps once in 40 years — to end decades of foreign domination. Abdulrahman Al-Rashed You do not need a magnifying glass to see that Al-Sharaa has advanced Syria's recovery, securing deals with both friendly and hostile powers. He has neutralized threats from Israel, Iran, Iraqi factions and US sanctions — through dialogue — and has lured foreign investors with contracts to build and operate airports, ports, energy facilities and industrial projects. We recognize that the challenges in Beirut differ from those in Damascus. Nevertheless, Lebanon today has a rare opportunity — perhaps once in 40 years — to end decades of foreign domination, from the Palestinians to the Syrians and now the Iranians. This moment demands flexibility and a new approach, unlike the rigid policies of the past. Hezbollah has only three possible futures. First, it could return as a cross-border regional force, threatening Israel, managing Yemen's Houthis and operating in Syria and Iraq. But that now seems impossible given Israel's insistence on a policy of preempting any force that poses a threat to its borders. Note that Egypt, Jordan and Syria — under their treaties with Israel — agreed to regulate weapon types and distances from the border, something Hezbollah used to reject. Yet, under last year's ceasefire agreement, it accepted withdrawing from the south of the Litani River, surrendering its heavy weapons and military production platforms, and dismantling its infrastructure. Second, Hezbollah could reposition itself as a purely local force. This would require acknowledging the shift in the balance of power and abandoning its role as a threat to Israel or as a bargaining chip for Iran. It may try to keep its weapons to maintain dominance in Lebanon. To counter that, Lebanese and Israeli authorities could cooperate — Israel providing Beirut with intelligence on hidden arms and the Lebanese side carrying out raids and seizures. But Hezbollah is skilled at the game of hiding — though the current environment is tougher than before. This time, there is no escape, even after sidelining US mediator Morgan Ortagus, whom Hezbollah and its allies portray as Benjamin Netanyahu's puppet. The reality is that it is Israel — not the US — that now dictates Lebanon's course. This is underscored by the unprecedented scale of recent Israeli strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs. The Lebanese presidency has promised to restore full state sovereignty by disarming Hezbollah and ending Lebanon's role as a proxy warfront. So far, it has not succeeded. Without this, the country will remain fragile and investment will stay limited. Lebanon's future over the next 10 to 20 years hinges on what happens in these very days, transforming the country from a militia playground into a sovereign state focused on its internal affairs and the needs of its citizens. This is exactly what Al-Sharaa is doing in Syria — with courage and cunning — even though his circumstances are arguably far more difficult and dangerous than those faced by Lebanon's leadership. And it is false to claim that the world simply rushed to support Al-Sharaa — not at all. He set his priorities clearly, forged his own alliances and refused to be blackmailed by local or regional propaganda about 'jihad' or the 'enemy.' His task now is to fight the remnants and separatists, repair the economy and focus on rebuilding a state that has been collapsing since the end of the Cold War.
Asharq Al-Awsat
17 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Lebanon Says Two Dead in Israel Strike
An Israeli strike killed a Lebanese father and son Tuesday in a southern village, the Lebanese health ministry and state media said, the latest deaths despite a November ceasefire. A second son was also wounded in the strike in Shebaa, the state-run National News Agency reported. There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military. "An Israeli enemy drone carried out a strike in the village of Shebaa, killing two people and wounding one," a health ministry statement said, AFP reported. Israel had warned on Friday that it would keep up its strikes on Hezbollah targets across Lebanon despite the condemnation expressed by the Lebanese government after a massive strike on south Beirut the previous night on the eve of the Eid al-Adha holiday. Hezbollah said the strikes levelled nine residential blocks. The Israeli military said they targeted underground drone factories. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun condemned the strikes as a "a flagrant violation" of the November 27 ceasefire agreement, which was supposed to end more than a year of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah that culminated in two months of full-blown war.
Arab News
19 hours ago
- Arab News
Building a just and inclusive Syria from within
The recent withdrawal of hundreds of American troops from Syria — estimated at 500 personnel and accompanied by the closure or handover of multiple bases to the Syrian Democratic Forces — marks more than just a tactical shift in US foreign policy. It may, if seized wisely, signal the dawn of a new opportunity for Syrians to redefine their nation's future through unity, reconciliation and inclusivity. This move, characterized by US officials as 'safe, deliberate and conditions-based,' reflects a major recalibration following the fall of the Assad regime. For years, Syria has been trapped in a brutal vortex of conflict, foreign intervention and sectarian fragmentation. Now, as international military footprints shrink, the onus is increasingly on Syrians themselves to shape the road ahead. The handover of military sites — such as Mission Support Site Euphrates — to the SDF is emblematic of a transition from foreign-led stabilization to local governance. While this raises valid concerns about the future balance of power among Kurdish, Arab and other ethnic groups in northeastern Syria, it also presents a rare chance to lay the groundwork for a decentralized, inclusive system that respects Syria's diversity. Yet the departure of US forces should not be mistaken for an end to instability. Instead, it is a fork in the road. Syrians — regardless of ethnicity, faith or political affiliation — must now decide: Will they allow the vacuum to be filled by renewed factionalism or will they use this space to chart a united course toward nation-building? As international military footprints shrink, the onus is increasingly on Syrians themselves to shape the road ahead Hani Hazaimeh The SDF, a Kurdish-led coalition with substantial Arab participation, has been praised for maintaining a degree of stability in northeastern Syria. However, its dominance has also fueled tensions with Arab tribes and raised concerns about representation. True inclusivity means more than shifting military control — it demands a political solution that empowers all Syrians, from Qamishli to Deraa. A meaningful path forward could include the development of a new federal model for Syria — one that devolves authority to regional entities while safeguarding national unity. Such an arrangement would not only address long-standing grievances but also prevent the return of autocracy under new guises. As Syria emerges from dictatorship and war, there must be a concerted effort to pursue transitional justice rather than retribution. Mechanisms should be put in place to acknowledge the atrocities of the past, support victims and hold perpetrators accountable through fair legal processes. Only through truth and justice can real reconciliation take root. The chance to build a new Syria — one that is inclusive, accountable and representative — is within reach Hani Hazaimeh The country's young generation — many of whom have only known war — must be given a leading role in rebuilding Syria. Education, entrepreneurship and civic participation should be national priorities. Civil society organizations, long stifled or co-opted, need space to grow independently and help rebuild trust between citizens and their institutions. International actors can and should play a supportive role, not as overseers but as partners in reconstruction and capacity-building. Any engagement must be conditional on the inclusion of marginalized voices and the advancement of human rights. The withdrawal of US forces should not be seen as abandonment, but as an inflection point. The real question is not what foreign powers will do next, but what Syrians will do now. The chance to build a new Syria — one that is inclusive, accountable and representative — is within reach. It will not be easy. But with courage, dialogue and vision, the Syrian people can reclaim their future — not through force, but through unity. History has shown that peace imposed from the outside rarely endures. But peace built from within can transform nations. Now is the time for Syrians to choose the path of transformation.
