Who's terrorising who? — Hafiz Hassan
JUNE 18 — G7 leaders urged de-escalation but did not condemn Israel's attack on Iran.
Extraordinarily, they affirmed Israel's right to self-defence after the regime's pre-emptive attack on Iran's nuclear enrichment programme.
Under international law, a country may only defend itself from an actual or imminent armed attack by another country.
Israel's claim that its attack is necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and using them in the future does not hold water.
And G7 leaders are defending a claim that does not hold water.
Iran has not built and has no single nuclear weapon; it did not attack Israel prior to Israel's strikes.
There may have been inflammatory and even genocidal rhetorics by Iranian officials over the years—like the vow to 'wipe the Zionist regime' off the political map—but that does not equate to a plan, let alone a concrete one, to launch an imminent nuclear attack.
There is no self-defence against a speculative threat. On the contrary, Israel's illegal, unlawful and lawless attack hands Iran the legal right of self-defence.
(Left to right) Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, French President Emmanuel Macron, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, U.S. President Donald Trump, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, participate in a group photo in front of the Canadian Rockies at the Kananaskis Country Golf Course during the G7 Leaders' Summit on June 16, 2025 in Kananaskis, Alberta. — AFP pic
According to international jurists, allowing a country to unilaterally decide when it wishes to attack another country's military, even when it has not been attacked, is a recipe for global chaos – and for the unjustified deaths of many innocent people.
According to Prof Ben Saul, the current Challis Professor of International Law at the University of Sydney and an Australian Research Council Future Fellow, Israel's attack may also have violated international humanitarian law (IHL), which regulates fighting once they begin.
The many Iranian nuclear scientists Israel has targeted were not taking a direct part in the hostilities and were thus protected civilians immune from attack.
It's mind boggling that while Israeli's impunity for alleged international crimes in Gaza has been allowed to continue, its attack against Iran has been defended as self-defence.
G7 leaders called Iran the principal source of regional instability and terror.
But it is Israel that's terrorising the Gazans.
So, who is terrorising who?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
42 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
‘We can't do this again': Trump faces MAGA backlash over possible Iran strike
WASHINGTON, June 19 — The prospect of a US strike against Iran has exposed divisions in the coalition of supporters that brought President Donald Trump to power, with some of his base urging him not to get the country involved in a new Middle East war. Some of Trump's most prominent Republican allies, including top lieutenant Steve Bannon, have found themselves in the unusual position of being at odds with a president who largely shares their isolationist tendencies. Bannon, one of many influential voices from Trump's 'America First' coalition, yesterday urged caution about the US military joining Israel in trying to destroy Iran's nuclear programme in the absence of a diplomatic deal. 'We can't do this again,' Bannon told reporters at an event sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor in Washington. 'We'll tear the country apart. We can't have another Iraq.' The anti-interventionist part of the Republican Party is watching with alarm as Trump has moved swiftly from seeking a peaceful diplomatic settlement with Iran to possibly having the United States support Israel's military campaign, including the use of a 30,000-pound 'bunker buster' bomb. The criticism shows the opposition Trump could face from his right-leaning 'Make America Great Again' flank should he join the fight, a step that Iran has warned would have big consequences for Americans without specifying what that might be. A decision by Trump to enter the conflict would be a sharp departure from his usual caution about foreign entanglements. It could impact his campaign to foster good relations in the Gulf and could be a distraction from his efforts to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine and make tariff deals with countries around the world. The MAGA coalition propelled Trump into office in the 2016 and 2024 elections and remains critically important to him even though he is prevented by the US Constitution from running for a third term. Upsetting that base could erode Trump's popularity and factor into whether Republicans hang on to control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections. Iran cannot have a 'nuclear weapon' Asked about the rift yesterday, Trump appeared unconcerned that some in his base could be turning its back on him, at least on this issue. 'My supporters are more in love with me today, and I'm in love with them more than they were even at election time,' Trump told reporters at the White House. 'I only want one thing: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.' He said some of his supporters 'are a little bit unhappy now' but that others agree with him that Iran cannot become a nuclear power. 'I'm not looking to fight. But if it's a choice between them fighting or having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do,' Trump said. Marc Short, an ally of former Vice President Mike Pence who served as Trump's legislative director during his first term, called the division over Iran within Trump's party a 'pretty large rift.' He said he thought Trump's base would stay with him despite the differences, however. 'The divisions are obviously coming out in the open in this moment, but ultimately I think that most of the president's followers are loyal to him more so than any worldview,' he said. Short said standing with Israel could help Trump politically, too. Traditionally conservative voters favor standing by Israel. In a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in March, 48 per cent of Republicans agreed with a statement that the US should use its military power to defend Israel from threats no matter where the threats come from, compared to 28 per cent who disagreed. Among Democrats, 25 per cent agreed and 52 per cent disagreed. International experts believe Iran has been intent on developing a nuclear weapon, despite Tehran's denials, and Israel believes it would be at risk as a result. US officials believe if Iran possessed an atomic weapon it would trigger an nuclear arms race in the Middle East. Israelis need to get job done Bannon, host of the popular War Room podcast, said 'the Israelis need to finish what they started' and that Trump should slow down deliberations over US involvement and explain his decision-making. 'This is one of the most ancient civilisations in the world, okay, with 92 million people. This is not something you play around with. You have to think this through at this level, and the American people have to be on board. You can't just dump this on them,' he said. Other influential MAGA voices with similar messages of worry include former Fox News Channel host Tucker Carlson and US Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican and long-time Trump ally. 'Anyone slobbering for the US to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA,' Greene said in a social media post on Sunday. 'We are sick and tired of foreign wars. All of them.' But another Trump ally, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, said on Fox News on Tuesday that he hopes Trump will help Israel 'finish the job' because Iran represents 'an existential threat to our friends in Israel.' The rift was on full display when Carlson, on his streaming programme, clashed with Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas late on Tuesday. A clip from Carlson's interview with Cruz went viral with Carlson strongly criticising the senator for seeking regime change in Iran, and Cruz expressing support for the president. 'You don't know anything about Iran!' Carlson told Cruz. 'I am not the Tucker Carlson expert on Iran,' Cruz fired back. 'You're a senator who's calling for the overthrow of the government,' Carlson retorted. Vice President JD Vance tried to tamp down talk of a rift on Monday with a social media post defending the president. 'People are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy. But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue,' he said. Now allies and opponents are waiting on Trump's decision-making process. The president said yesterday afternoon he had some ideas on how to proceed but had not made a final decision. — Reuters
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Asian stocks slip, gold gains with yen as Middle East conflict rages
TOKYO, June 19 — Stock markets in Asia edged lower today while safe havens such as gold and the Japanese yen gained as investors remained on edge over the possible entry of the United States into the week-old Israel-Iran air war. President Donald Trump kept the world guessing about whether the United States will join Israel's bombardment of Iranian nuclear sites, telling reporters outside the White House today, 'I may do it. I may not do it.' The Wall Street Journal said Trump had told senior aides he approved attack plans on Iran but was holding off on giving the final order to see if Tehran would abandon its nuclear programme. Japan's Nikkei sank 0.8 per cent, with additional downward pressure stemming from a stronger yen, which reduces the value of overseas revenues for the country's heavyweight exporters. Taiwan's stock benchmark slid 0.9 per cent, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng declined 0.8 per cent. US S&P 500 futures pointed 0.4 per cent lower, although most US markets — including Wall Street and the Treasury market — are closed today for a national holiday. Gold advanced 0.3 per cent to US$3,378 (RM14,398) per ounce. 'Market participants remain edgy and uncertain,' said Kyle Rodda, senior financial markets analyst at 'Speculation remains rife — fed probably strategically by the Trump administration — that the US will intervene, something that would mark a material escalation and could invite direct retaliation against the US by Iran,' he said. 'Such a scenario would raise the risk of a greater regional conflict, with implications for global energy supply and probably economic growth.' Brent crude LCOc1 edged down to US$76.32 per barrel, but remained not far from the 4-1/2-month peak of US$78.50 reached on Friday. The yen gained 0.2 per cent to 144.92 per dollar, while the US currency itself was also in demand as a haven, gaining 0.1 per cent to US$1.1472 per euro and 0.2 per cent to US$1.3398 versus sterling. The Swiss franc edged down 0.1 per cent to 0.8193 per dollar. The Bank of England and Swiss National Bank both announce policy decisions later in the day, with the BOE widely expected to keep interest rates steady while the SNB is seen as likely to cut rates by 25 basis points. Overnight, the Federal Reserve delivered some mixed signals to markets. Policymakers held rates steady, as expected, and retained projections for two quarter-point rate cuts this year. However, Fed Chair Jerome Powell struck a cautious note about further easing ahead, saying at his press conference later that he expects 'meaningful' inflation ahead as a result of Trump's aggressive trade tariffs. — Reuters
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Asian stocks slip, gold gains with yen as Middle East conflict rages
TOKYO: Stock markets in Asia edged lower on Thursday while safe havens such as gold and the Japanese yen gained, as investors remained on edge over the possible entry of the United States into the week-old Israel-Iran air war. President Donald Trump kept the world guessing about whether the US will join Israel's bombardment of Iranian nuclear sites, telling reporters outside the White House on Thursday, "I may do it. I may not do it." The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump had told senior aides he approved attack plans on Iran but was holding off on giving the final order to see if Tehran would abandon its nuclear programme. Japan's Nikkei sank 0.80 per cent, with additional downward pressure stemming from a stronger yen, which reduces the value of overseas revenues for the country's heavyweight exporters. Taiwan's stock benchmark slid 0.90 per cent, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng declined 0.80 per cent. US S&P 500 futures pointed 0.40 per cent lower, although most US markets – including Wall Street and the Treasury market – are closed on Thursday for a national holiday. Gold advanced 0.30 per cent to US$3,378.00 per ounce. "Market participants remain edgy and uncertain," said Kyle Rodda, senior financial markets analyst at "Speculation remains rife – fed probably strategically by the Trump administration – that the US will intervene, something that would mark a material escalation and could invite direct retaliation against the US by Iran," he said. "Such a scenario would raise the risk of a greater regional conflict, with implications for global energy supply and probably economic growth." Brent crude edged down to US$76.32 per barrel, but remained not far from the four-and-a-half-month peak of US$78.50 reached on Friday. The yen gained 0.20 per cent to 144.92 per dollar, while the US currency itself was also in demand as a haven, gaining 0.10 per cent to US$1.1472 per euro and 0.20 per cent to US$1.3398 versus sterling. The Swiss franc edged down 0.10 per cent to 0.8193 per dollar. The Bank of England and Swiss National Bank both announce policy decisions later in the day, with the BOE widely expected to keep interest rates steady while the SNB is seen as likely to cut rates by 25 basis points. Overnight, the Federal Reserve delivered some mixed signals to markets. Policymakers held rates steady, as expected, and retained projections for two quarter-point rate cuts this year. However, Fed Chair Jerome Powell struck a cautious note about further easing ahead, saying at his press conference later that he expects "meaningful" inflation ahead as a result of Trump's aggressive trade tariffs.
