'Abhorrent' graffiti painted in Stoke Newington park's play area
An investigation has begun after "abhorrent" graffiti was painted in a children's play area in a north-east London park over the Easter weekend.Hackney's mayor Caroline Woodley took to social media to hit out at the vandalism after swastikas were painted on rocks in Stoke Newington's Clissold Park on Easter Sunday.She said officers were out on Sunday night and on Monday morning to remove the graffiti.The Metropolitan Police said it was investigating a hate crime incident. It said inquiries were ongoing.
The Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) found since March 2023 there had been 443 recorded antisemitic hate crime incidents in the borough, according to Met police data.
Clissold is flanked by two Jewish institutions — Kehillah North London community centre from its south eastern corner, and Adath Yisroel synagogue to its north east.On X, Woodley described the graffiti as "abhorrent" and said there was "no place for hate".Ward councillor Fliss Premru called the incident a "disgusting act which we will not tolerate in our community".She told the LDRS it had been "swiftly reported by Clissold Park users and quickly dealt with by council and park team"."The police were alerted as soon as possible," the independent councillor added.Labour councillor Susan Fajana Thomas, the borough's community safety and regulatory services lead, said: "Hackney Council strongly condemns the hateful graffiti that appeared in a local play area this week."This behaviour is completely unacceptable and has no place in our borough."She added: "We are committed to ensuring that everyone in Hackney feels safe in our public spaces, especially places designed for children and families."We're also working closely with partners, including the police, to investigate this matter and take any further necessary action."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
Tory MP chases down would-be thief
A Tory MP has been praised for getting 'stuck in' after he chased a suspected thief down a London high street and secured his arrest. Gareth Davies, a Conservative shadow minister, witnessed a man taking an item from a vehicle in north-west London on Saturday morning. He followed the man for 15 minutes through the streets of Maida Vale, an affluent area of the capital, in the hope he could be arrested. The suspect did not know he was being watched during the low-speed pursuit, but Mr Davies had called the police to report what he'd seen and tell officers where the man was located. The man tried to board a bus but was apprehended by officers at the bus stop. A Metropolitan Police spokesman told The Telegraph that a 'member of the public' had called the police to report a man had stolen an item from the back of the car. 'Officers quickly attended and a 48-year-old man was arrested near the scene,' the spokesman said. 'He was taken into custody and has since been bailed while further inquiries are carried out.' The victim's belonging was later returned. It comes after a series of vigilante law enforcement stunts in London, including from Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary. Mr Jenrick filmed a video chasing fare dodgers through a Tube station, asking them why they had not paid for tickets. One would-be fare evader told the Tory MP to 'f--- off', while another claimed he had a knife. Mr Jenrick accused Sir Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, of ' driving a proud city into the ground ', adding: 'Lawbreaking is out of control. He's not acting. So, I did.' Reacting to Mr Davies' pursuit of the suspect, he told The Telegraph: 'Good for Gareth. Sometimes you have to get stuck in and sort things out.' Other campaigners have taken to the Tube to clean off graffiti, after reports that Bakerloo line trains in London had been defaced and not cleaned by Transport for London (TfL) staff. TfL said last month that the uptick in graffiti was caused by the breakdown of an automatic train washer. 'We were only able to clean trains by hand, which takes a significantly longer amount of time,' a spokesman told the BBC.
Glasgow Times
11 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Constance Marten victim of ‘relentless and dogged' smears, court told
Marten, 38, and convicted rapist Mark Gordon, 51, are on trial at the Old Bailey accused of the manslaughter of their newborn baby Victoria, who died in a tent on the South Downs. In a closing speech on Wednesday, Marten's barrister, Tom Godfrey, said: 'The persistent attempts to tarnish the defendants' names have been relentless and dogged. It really boils down to what happened in that tent.' He rejected the prosecution case that Victoria died from hypothermia or was smothered, saying it was a 'tragic accident' and no-one can be sure how she died. Marten gave birth to Victoria in 'secret' after four other children were taken into care, the Old Bailey was told. At the time, the defendants mistakenly believed they were 'being watched', as Marten's parents had deployed private investigators in a 'menacingly' named Operation Lynx in 2021, Mr Godfrey said. It was against this background that the couple opted to go off grid and live in a tent, after their car burst into flames near Bolton, Greater Manchester, jurors heard. CCTV footage of Constance Marten holding baby Victoria under her coat in East Ham, east London, which was shown in court during their trial (Metropolitan Police/PA) Mr Godfrey told jurors: 'Why do they flee and hide as they did? The prosecution seem to be saying it was because they cared not a jot for Victoria and they focused on their selfish needs? Can that be right? 'You may think their greatest fear was they would lose her. Constance Marten feared the baby would be taken from her so they fled. 'Did they behave sensibly and rationally? They could have sought assistance from police, explained their predicament. 'We can all criticise decisions, and there are many decisions by Constance Marten that are open to criticism. 'This case is not about what could have been done differently.' Mr Godfrey said the police appeal to find the baby made 'instant headline news around the country' and the 'country became obsessed'. He told jurors: 'It was from this moment on, Constance Marten and Mark Gordon determined the only way to keep Victoria to themselves was to avoid detection. 'Irrespective of the rights and wrongs, the net effect was to drive Constance Marten and Mark Gordon further underground.' Screen grab taken from body worn camera footage of the moment Constance Marten was arrested in the street (Metropolitan Police/PA) After Victoria's death, they were reduced to a 'state of near derangement', and a 'feeling of hopelessness and guilt', Mr Godfrey said. He rejected any suggestion the defendants had made a 'nefarious pact' not to answer questions, having each cut short their evidence before they could be cross-examined. Mr Godfrey suggested Gordon's decision was sparked by the jurors being told about his 1989 rape conviction in the United States, and two assaults on police officers at a maternity unit in 2017, where Marten gave birth to their first child. He said: 'Why did you hear about those matters? Because Mark Gordon sought to mislead you about his character by telling you he had empathy and respect for the law. 'We say these convictions, and ones from Wales from 2017, are of no assistance whatsoever in determining how baby Victoria died. 'We ask you to ignore them, as with a lot of smoke and mirrors put up, and focus on the issue in this case. How did baby Victoria die? That is what this case is about. 'If there was a wall of silence being maintained they would say nothing at all. Nothing in interview and nothing in evidence. That is not the position here.' Marten and Gordon, of no fixed address, have denied the gross negligence manslaughter of their daughter and causing or allowing her death between January 4 and February 27 2023. Jurors have been told the defendants were convicted at an earlier trial of concealing the birth of a child and perverting the course of justice. The trial continues.
Daily Record
14 hours ago
- Daily Record
Exam clash fears prompt change to West Lothian school holidays
The changes will see the Easter holiday moved forward, and will also take account of the council election in early May 2027. Easter holiday dates for West Lothian schools are being changed after concerns were raised about the SQA exam dates. West Lothian council has revised its term dates for the new school year in 2026-27. The changes will see the Easter holiday moved forward, and will also take account of the council election in early May 2027. In a report to the Education PDSP Hannah Haywood, Customer Services Manager said: 'Easter is early in 2027.' She added: 'Proposed dates for session 2026/27 were presented to Education PDSP on 1 April. Consultation on the proposed dates was still under way at that time. 'Four responses were received, two expressing satisfaction with the proposed dates, and two requesting that the Easter Break should be later. 'Since the meeting on 1 April 2025, new information about the SQA time-scales has been provided, and it is now clear that the previously proposed timing of the Easter break would potentially negatively impact on students meeting submission deadlines for SQA awards. She added: ' Easter is early in 2027, and the original proposal was for the schools to break up on Friday 19 March, and resume on Monday 5 April, with the Easter weekend in the middle. 'A new proposal is now being presented, which moves the Easter break to make it one week later, starting on Good Friday 26 March, and resuming on Monday 12 April. 'As the Easter break is now two weeks and one day long rather than two weeks, the new proposal removes the Friday from the September weekend to make sure that we provide the required 190 teaching days in the session.' As ever the West Lothian holidays are unlikely to tie with neighbouring councils, many of which have yet to be confirmed. Chairing the PDSP Councillor Andrew McGuire said he and fellow councillors were unlikely to forget to move an in-service day to the first Thursday in May as this marks the end of their current council term. The in-service day in May 2026 has also been moved from Tuesday 5 May to Thursday 7 May to coincide with the Scottish Parliamentary Election. Term dates for 2026/27 are:- Pupils return: Wednesday 12 August September weekend: Monday 21 September October holiday: Friday 16 October-Tuesday 27 October Christmas holiday: Friday 18 December- Tuesday 5 January Mid Term: Friday 5 February - Tuesday 16 February Easter Holidays: Thursday 26 March - Monday 5 April May Day holiday Monday 3 May Staff in-service Thursday 6 May. The new term dates will have to be confirmed by the Education Executive when it meets in two weeks' time.
