
Government would struggle to cope with severe animal disease outbreak
The Government is not properly prepared for the growing risk from animal diseases and would struggle to cope with a major outbreak, the spending watchdog has warned.
Animal diseases such as bird flu, bluetongue and African swine fever can pose serious threats to England's farming sector, food security, human health and wildlife, and costs associated with an outbreak can spiral into the billions of pounds, a report from the National Audit Office (NAO) has said.
The 2001 outbreak of foot and mouth cost an estimated £13.8 billion in today's prices, with farming businesses devastated, thousands of animals slaughtered and the countryside shut to recreation and tourism.
And 7.2 million birds have been culled in avian flu outbreaks since 2020, which have also devasted wild seabird colonies across the UK.
But while the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) has worked hard to tackle recent outbreaks, the NAO said it is likely the public bodies would struggle with a more severe outbreak or concurrent serious outbreaks.
A report from the NAO warned that long-term resilience to disease in livestock was being undermined by officials having to focus on increasingly frequent outbreaks – and there was no long-term strategy for improving the situation.
There are significant gaps in contingency plans for outbreaks, and plans for specific diseases have not been updated with the latest findings, with its strategy for coping with foot and mouth disease not updated since 2011.
Just 5% of live animal imports are undergoing physical checks, all taking place at the final customer destination, against a target of 100% checks at border control, raising the risk of 'exotic' diseases arriving from abroad.
A fifth of vet roles are vacant at the APHA, and there is a 'very high' risk of site failure at the Government's key animal science lab at Weybridge, the report said.
The report said that while a £2.8 billion redevelopment programme at Weybridge was now on track, the main new laboratory facilities will not be delivered for another 10 years.
The report found Defra thought there was a 'very high' risk of an outbreak to which it would be unable to respond effectively, but it lacks a long-term strategy and action plan for improving resilience to animal disease, and many of its activities are reactive rather than part of a coherent plan.
A comprehensive livestock movement tracing system – crucial once infection is detected – is lacking, with the costs of an upgraded scheme now estimated at £563 million amid concerns over delivering it in the face of rising costs and funding constraints, while there are also issues with vaccine supplies.
Gareth Davies, head of the NAO, said: 'Defra has assessed that the risk of an outbreak to which it would be unable to respond effectively is above the level it considers tolerable, but it has not determined a way to reduce this risk.
'A long-term strategy and action plan are urgently needed, to protect national economic resilience as well as food security, human health and rural communities.'
Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chairman of the parliamentary Committee of Public Accounts, said: 'Despite some good work to identify new threats, Government's preparations for a future major outbreak are being hampered by a lack of capacity, skills and long-term strategy.
'Government's failure to carry out checks on animal imports is also threatening biosecurity at the border.
'Resilience to a severe outbreak has not been tested in recent years, but the threat remains ever increasing as our livestock become more susceptible to disease.
'Without changes to the current operating system, there is a very real risk that Government would not be able to respond effectively.'
Biosecurity Minister Baroness Hayman said: 'This Government's commitment to maintaining the country's biosecurity in the face of the mounting risks of disease is unwavering – we will do whatever it takes to protect our farmers and economy.
'We took immediate action to ban personal imports of meat and dairy from Europe after a wave of foot and mouth cases on the continent and, after years of underinvestment, we are investing £200 million into a new National Biosecurity Centre.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Navarro responds to Musk-Trump feud
By Published: | Updated: Trump trade advisor Peter Navarro brushed off the exploding feud between President Trump and Elon Musk by comparing the world's richest man to something a consumer might forget about in the back of the fridge. Navarro, a Trump loyalist who served four months in prison for refusing to comply with a congressional subpoena, was among the first Trump Administration officials on camera after the Trump-Musk clash went into meltdown mode. The two men were completely at odds over Trump's tariffs, which prompted a reporter to ask Navarro at the White House whether he was glad to see Musk out of the fray. 'No, I'm not glad. Whatever,' Navarro replied. 'It's – people come and go from the White House. He was a Special Government Employee with an expiration date,' Navarro said. Musk served in government as a 'Special Government Employee,' and the administration cited the 130-day limit when explaining his departure, although Trump had the power to renew it. Trump himself used language Thursday that gave the impression he fired Musk. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave,' Trump wrote in just one of his slams on his former first buddy. Later, Navarro, 75, had something nice to say about Musk's team of programmers and aides who got access to agency computer systems and searched for contracts. 'I work with the DOGE folks a lot here, and I've got a very special project, which at some point I'll come out here and talk about with them,' Navarro said. He claimed to have identified a government computer program that 'is run like a 1950s IBM punch card operation at great expense.' 'We're going to turn that from a Model T into a Ferrari,' he said. But he refused to divulge specifics on an extraordinary intervention. 'Stay tuned,' he said. Navarro has been a key proponent of Trump's tariffs, during both the first and second term, helping promote Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs that the administration calls 'reciprocal' to hit back at countries running a trade surplus with the U.S. In his stunning clash with Trump Thursday, Musk wrote that 'The Trump Tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year.' That put him at odds with Trump's cherished policy – and Trump's 'favorite word' in the dictionary – even while taking on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which is Trump's top legislative priority. Navarro tried to smooth over the policy differences.


The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
The new Indian railway arch bridge 35m higher than Eiffel Tower
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the Chenab Railway Bridge, the world's tallest railway arch bridge at 359m above the Chenab River, 35m taller than the Eiffel Tower, in the Reasi district of Jammu and Kashmir. The bridge, a key part of the Udhampur-Srinagar-Baramulla Rail Link (USBRL) project, connects the Kashmir region with the rest of India via an all-weather rail line, spanning 1,315m and designed to last 120 years. Construction involved stabilising slopes in the fractured Himalayan geology, using cement grouting, steel rod reinforcement. The USBRL project, approved in 2003, includes 36 tunnels and 943 bridges, costing Rs437.8bn (£3.7bn), with the Chenab Bridge alone costing approximately Rs14.86bn (£128m). The Chenab Bridge is expected to significantly reduce travel time between Katra and Srinagar to three hours via the Vande Bharat Express.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
How much Elon Musk stands to lose in Trump spat as his staggering government contracts are revealed
Elon Musk 's revenge war against Donald Trump has seen the Tesla billionaire savage his former boss with toxic insults on his platform X. But it might be the president who gets the last laugh - as the fallout threatens to lose the SpaceX founder billions of dollars. Trump has threatened to cut off huge federal loans and subsidies to Musk's companies after they fell out over the 'Big Beautiful Bill'. In the last twenty or so years, the tech guru's firms have received some $38billion in government contracts, according to The Washington Post. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on Thursday. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' The threat came after the world's richest man, worth over $330billion, torched Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as a ' disgusting abomination,' largely because it's projected to add trillions of dollars to the deficit. Tesla and SpaceX - Musk's biggest companies - have received by far the most help from the government over the years. SpaceX President and COO Gwynne Shotwell estimates that SpaceX has gotten $22billion in federal spending. And last year alone, at least a quarter of the rocket designer's revenue came directly from federal contracts valued at $3.8billion. Tesla has already had $11.4billion in regulatory credits from environmentally-focused federal and state programs looking to boost the number of zero-emission vehicles. At least $2.1billion of that total has been to help Tesla develop new cars and improve upon its battery technology, according to advocacy group Good Jobs First. Trump hasn't yet said he wants to get rid of these regulatory credits, which is good for Musk because his companies get these credits for free and can sell them for virtually 100 percent profit. Though these credits make up a relatively small percentage of Tesla's revenue, they represent a staggering 32 percent of the company's profits since 2014, according to E&E News. What could be worrying to Musk is that there are 52 ongoing contracts with seven different government agencies that are set to pay his companies an additional $11.8 billion over the next few years, according an analysis from The Post. If Musk as DOGE chief was able to cancel government contracts he felt were wasteful, there's no reason to believe Trump as president wouldn't be able to do the same to Tesla, SpaceX and others. Starlink, a satellite internet service, is one of Musk's smaller companies and is far less reliant on government assistance. While Tesla and SpaceX have received billions, Starlink has only gotten about $6 million from various federal agencies in 2022 and 2023. That includes a pledge from the Department of Defense back in 2022 to buy $1.9million worth of Starlink technology. Though Starlink may be able to weather a potential boycott from Trump, investors are worried about Tesla's fortunes given its large reliance on the federal government. Shares of Tesla plummeted nearly 12 percent on Thursday, when the worst of the jabs between Trump and Musk were happening. It's stark reversal from just several months ago, when Trump was helping Musk sell Tesla cars on the South Lawn of White House. Before markets closed on Thursday, Musk dramatically claimed that Trump is in the Epstein files, which he said explained why they haven't been released in full by the Justice Department. Trump didn't directly respond to the Epstein accusation, instead posting what amounted to a shrug on Truth Social. He also shifted the focus back to the 'big, beautiful bill,' which he continues to vehemently support despite Musk's qualms. 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago,' Trump wrote. 'This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress.' Musk's attacks on the bill further complicates its passage in the Senate, where the 53 GOP senators already weren't in lockstep on certain provisions.