
Pak struggles to open air base hit during Op Sindoor, closure extended again
Pakistan has once again issued a notice to airmen (NOTAM) for Rahim Yar Khan base that was struck by Indian missiles during Operation Sindoor in May.OSINT expert Damien Saymon shared the update on X and wrote, "Pakistan once again issues a NOTAM for Rahim Yar Khan, the runway struck by India in May 2025 now remains offline estimated till 04 July 2025."
advertisementThe strikes on Rahim Yar Khan were part of India's Phase 2 of Operation Sindoor, launched on May 7, in retaliation for Pakistan's attacks on Indian military and civilian targets. India had already struck terror camps in the first phase of the operation.
Days after the strike in May, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, while addressing a rally in Rajasthan's Bikaner, mounted an attack on Pakistan while reminding that its Rahim Yar Khan airbase is still not operational after being hit by Indian missiles during counter-airstrikes."Pakistan's Rahim Yar Khan airbase is still in ICU, not sure when it will reopen," PM Modi said.Rahim Yar Khan, considered one of Pakistan's strategic airbases, is housed within the international airport of the same name in Punjab province. The air base suffered massive damage, inflicting a major blow to Islamabad's military capabilities. Later, Pakistan's Civil Aviation Authority reportedly declared that the sole runway would be non-operational for a week. The formal Notice to Airmen (NOTAM), issued on the evening of May 10, cited the closure from 4:00 pm Pakistan time (4:30 pm IST) on May 10 until at least 4:59 am Pakistan time (5:29 am IST) on May 18.advertisementHowever, the closure has now been extended till July 4.The Indian government confirmed that the airbase was targeted in a carefully calculated move to neutralise Pakistan's military infrastructure while minimising collateral damage.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
BCI hits back at Society of Indian Law Firms over foreign law firm rules
The Bar Council of India (BCI) on Thursday (June 19, 2025) pushed back against criticism from the Society of Indian Law Firms (SILF), the apex body of law firms in India, over its recent move to let foreign lawyers and law firms work in India in a limited capacity. Responding to SILF's public statements, the BCI — the regulatory authority for the legal profession — said the group does not speak for most Indian law firms, especially smaller and newer ones. 'It (SILF) functions primarily as a closed group dominated by a few large, well-established firms. Its stance and actions do not reflect the concerns or aspirations of more than 90% of India's smaller or emerging law firms,' BCI said. Also read: India warms to foreign law firms, but legal concerns simmer In May 2025, the BCI introduced a notification permitting foreign lawyers to function in non-litigious areas only. BCI said the decision was 'based on extensive consultations and overwhelmingly positive feedback from Indian law firms across the country'. 'Contrary to the misleading claims being circulated, these rules do not allow foreign lawyers to practice Indian law, litigate in Indian courts, or appear before any Indian tribunal or statutory authority,' it said. The rules restrict foreign law firms and lawyers strictly to advisory roles in non-litigious matters involving foreign law, international law, or international commercial arbitration, all subject to regulatory oversight and a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Government of India. Committee set up BCI said it has already constituted a high-level committee chaired by Cyril Shroff and comprising senior partners from leading law firms, who have been tasked with reviewing the rules and incorporating feedback from stakeholders, including SILF. The council has also resolved to individually engage with law firms nationwide and are working to convene a national-level conference of Indian law firms in Mumbai this September. 'Old win in new bottle' While speaking to The Hindu last month, SILF chairman Lalit Bhasin while welcoming the entry of foreign law firms and lawyers in India raised a few legal concerns. Mr. Bhasin said the BCI's move might go against a 2018 Supreme Court ruling. While the earlier 2023 BCI notification was put on hold, he said that the latest notification feels like 'old wine in a new bottle'. He also suggested that Parliament should step in and amend the law to avoid confusion. On the other hand, the BCI targeted SILF saying it has 'historically acted to preserve its members commercial interests at the expense of young, deserving Indian lawyers and new legal practices striving to grow in an increasingly competitive and global legal arena'. BCI alleged that many of the firms comprising SILF have maintained 'close, long-standing professional affiliations with major foreign law firms'. 'These affiliations have enabled a parallel legal services economy, wherein foreign legal work is funnelled through select Indian firms. This has systematically denied fair opportunities to the vast majority of Indian legal practitioners,' it said. It also stated that SILF has, for over 20 years, opposed any serious engagement with foreign firms — hurting Indian law firms that want to grow internationally.


The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Canada-based Khalistani extremists continue to plan, fund violence in India, says report
Canada doubled down on allegations of a link between the Indian government and the Nijjar killing, while acknowledging for the first time that Canada-Based Khalistani Extremists (CBKE) continue to plan and fund violence in India in a report released on Wednesday (June 18, 2025). The Canadian Security and Intelligence Service (CSIS), which named India, along with China, Iran, Pakistan and Russia as the 'main perpetrators of foreign interference and espionage against Canada', was released online on Wednesday (June 18, 2025), a day after Prime Minister Narendra Modi met with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney at the G7 Summit outreach in Kananaskis and agreed to restore High Commissioners and a number of dialogue mechanisms. It was tabled by the CSIS in the Canadian Parliament last week. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) declined to comment on the report, which indicates that while Canada is taking note of India's concerns over Khalistani groups more than in the past, it maintains its allegations over the Nijjar killing and other accusations of foreign interference, including Transnational Repression (TNR), which New Delhi has repeatedly denied. 'Links between the Government of India and the Nijjar murder signal a significant escalation in India's repression efforts against the Khalistan movement and a clear intent to target individuals in North America,' the CSIS annual report for 2024, marking 'Forty years of national security' said. Referring to the continuing investigation into the murder of Khalistani activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, who was gunned down at a gurdwara outside Toronto in June 2023, the CSIS said four individuals were arrested in May 2024 and charged with first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder and criminal proceedings were underway. It said investigations 'point to a link between agents of the Government of India and criminal networks to sow violent activity in South Asian communities in Canada', adding that six Indian diplomats were expelled to 'disrupt this network'. In October 2024, the Canadian government expelled India's High Commissioner Sanjay Kumar Verma and five other embassy officials on charges linked to the case, which India roundly denied, expelling six Canadian diplomats. The report added Canada-based Khalistani extremist groups for the first time to its section on Politically Motivated Violent Extremism (PMVE), indicating that the CSIS is taking India's complaints about violence from these groups more seriously than before, which has been a source of New Delhi's long-held grievance against Ottawa. However, it said that while 'some' of Khalistani separatist supporters took part in legitimate protests and other activities, 'only a small group of individuals are considered Khalistani extremists because they continue to use Canada as a base for the promotion, fundraising or planning of violence primarily in India'. The CSIS found no attacks in Canada in 2024 carried out by these groups, but said their ongoing involvement in violent activities 'continues to pose a national security threat to Canada and Canadian interests', an assessment which will find favour in India. Be vigilant, says report The report said Canada 'must remain vigilant about continued foreign interference conducted by the Government of India, not only within ethnic, religious and cultural communities but also in Canada's political system,' referring to an official Commission's allegations against New Delhi of political interference and the alleged 'use of proxies' to influence elections by the Indian government in January this year. The MEA had denied these allegations, saying it was Canada that interfered in India's internal activities rather than the other way around. New Delhi is expected to also protest a politically-charged comment in the latest CSIS report that links its allegations on transnational repression with India's 2024 election outcomes and the Modi government's 'Hindu-nationalist policy agenda' in particular. 'Prime Minister Modi and his core Ministers and advisers are keen to build India's global influence and counter any activity they consider as 'anti-India,' at home or abroad, in the name of domestic stability and prosperity,' the report said. It conceded that India's history of calling Canada a 'haven for anti-India activity' was rooted in the 1985 Air India 'Kanishka' flight bombing and subsequent terrorist activity in India, but added that this perception continues to 'drive Indian foreign interference activities' in Canada. The CSIS report said Pakistan too had attempted to interfere in Canadian politics, by helping 'pro-Pakistan' candidates over those seen as 'Pro-India' and also carried out TNR activities to suppress Pakistani dissidents and critics in the country.


Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Operation Sindoor: Deputy PM admits Pakistan asked for ceasefire after India struck 2 airbases
Pakistan foreign minister Ishaq Dar NEW DELHI: Dragging his feet to the truth after repeated denials, Pakistan's deputy prime minister Ishaq Dar on Thursday admitted that India struck Rawalpindi's Nur Khan airbase and the Shorkot airbase during Operation Sindoor , which was carried to avenge the Pahalgam terrorist attack, in which ISI-groomed terrorists killed 26 civilians. India attacked the Nur Khan and Shorkot airbases on the intervening night of May 6 and 7. Within 45 minutes of the strike, Saudi Prince Faisal offered to speak to external affairs minister S Jaishankar on behalf of Pakistan's deputy PM, seeking to halt further action against Pakistan. Dar's statement strongly suggests that Islamabad desperately scrambled to find help in persuading India to halt its kinetic action, which was "precise, measured and non-escalatory". Nur Khan airbase Pakistan air force Base Nur Khan, situated in Chaklala, Rawalpindi is around 10km from Islamabad, Pakistan capital. It is an active airbase that encompasses the former Benazir Bhutto International Airport within its grounds. The facility, originally established as RAF Station Chaklala and later known as PAF Base Chaklala, continues to serve as a vital military installation in Pakistan. The base is also home to PAF College Chaklala, which trains Aviation Cadets, and Fazaia Inter College Nur Khan, providing additional educational facilities on the premises. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo Imtiaz Gul, a defence analyst, claimed that the strategically important Nur Khan airbase in Rawalpindi is 'under American control.' Rafiqui airbase Pakistan air force base Rafiqui, situated near Shorkot in Jhang District, is a major military installation located 337 kilometers south of Islamabad. The base features a 10,000-foot runway with a parallel taxiway that serves as an emergency landing strip. The airbase was previously known as PAF Base Shorkot before being renamed after Sarfaraz Ahmed Rafiqui, a fighter pilot from the Indo-Pakistani War of 1965. The base's infrastructure includes a primary runway and an emergency taxiway system that allows for aircraft recovery operations when needed. Operation Sindoor Operation Sindoor was India's swift, calculated tri‑service cross-border assault on the dead night of May 6 and 7, targeting nine terror camps deep inside Pakistan and Pakistan‑occupied Kashmir in retaliation for the brutal April 22 Pahalgam massacre that claimed 26 innocent lives. Within 25 minutes, India's Army, Navy and Air Force deployed SCALP cruise missiles, HAMMER smart bombs, loitering munitions and ground-to-ground weaponry, killing around 70 to 100 militants and crippling key Lashkar‑e‑Taiba, JeM and Hizbul Mujahideen infrastructure at Bahalwalpur and Muridke in Pakistan. Pahalgam's terrorists thought they were sending a message when they murdered husbands in front of their wives, after selecting victims by their religion. Via the name Operation Sindoor, the government sent an immeasurably bigger message back as India avenged the loss suffered by those women. Sindoor, vermillion, is a symbol of marriage in Hindu custom. Pakistan's military-intelligence-jihadi complex would have been among the first to note the image put out by Indian Army right after government's confirmation of the strikes - Operation Sindoor in block letters, with the first 'O' represented by a bowl of vermillion.