PSU Altoona professor adds ‘penny experiments' to lesson plan
ALTOONA, Pa. (WTAJ) — More than 200 billion pennies are estimated to be in active circulation throughout the United States today. Last month, President Donald Trump ordered the U.S. Treasury to stop minting new pennies, because production costs more than the coin. So for right now, its future hangs in the balance.
Now, a professor at Penn State Altoona is using the coin to educate his students. Dr. William Van Der Sluys an Assistant Teaching Professor of Chemistry has been conducting a few experiments with his students, one of which determines the density of metals.
'The current market value of the zinc that's in our penny and the coating of the copper amounts to about 0.8 cents. So there's a very slight margin, there but, the published cost of making a penny these days is about three and a half cents,' Van Der Sluys said.
Mount Aloysius offering four summer camps for high school students
According to the 2024 Annual Report from the U.S. Mint, there's been a decrease in the amount of shipments for the penny.
In 2022, the Mint made 5,387 shipments. 2023 had 4,136, and last year there were 3,172 shipments of pennies. With this and current events, Van Der Sluys said it makes the experiment more relevant for students.
'Our main goal is to find things that students will find interesting. And, it's really important that students have some sort of previous experience with what we're doing. If you don't give them some relevance, then it's not quite as fun to learning experience for them,' Van Der Sluys said.
Professor Van Der Sluys has collected pennies for years, and he said the possibility of losing them is sad. However, he's in favor of stopping the coin's production.
As the saying goes, 'If you love something, let it go.'
'There's lots of good reasons we should not be minting pennies. Environmentally, it's probably not the best thing to be doing. But I would say, copper is a very valuable metal in terms of electronic materials, and we could be doing other things with that metal,' Van Der Sluys noted.
For the experiment, the professor cuts and dissolves pennies, for educational purposes. He has a goal of publishing the study to encourage his students even more.
*All forms of currency in the United States, including bills and coins, are protected by federal law. Intentionally mutilating, defacing, or rendering U.S. currency unfit for reissue is illegal.*
'Understanding the various types of reactions, balancing reactions quantitatively determine the amounts of various elements in a sample. Those are all skills that can translate into engineering jobs. Other scientific jobs,' Van Der Sluys said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Army to lead nuclear microreactor development to power bases
Some Army installations could be powered by nuclear microreactors under an executive order recently issued by President Donald Trump. The order, published May 23, calls for deploying advanced nuclear reactor technologies for national security and directs Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll to establish a program using the technology for both installation and operational energy. It orders the operation of a nuclear reactor at a domestic military base or installation by Sept. 30, 2028. 'Advanced nuclear reactors include nuclear energy systems like Generation III+ reactors, small modular reactors, microreactors, and stationary and mobile reactors that have the potential to deliver resilient, secure, and reliable power to critical defense facilities and other mission capability resources,' according to the order. Pentagon to build micro nuclear reactor to power far-flung bases Testifying before the House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday, Driscoll and Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George took multiple questions from various committee members on the initiative. Driscoll indicated his support for the move in response to a question from Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis., as to where microreactors fit into America's national security strategy. 'I think microreactors can be an incredible asset as we solve against the future energy needs of the United States Army, both CONUS [continental United States], OCONUS [outside the continental U.S.] and peacetime and wartime,' Driscoll said. 'We are excited to lead that effort.' Neither Driscoll nor George had details as to which installation might feature such a reactor. But both said the reactors could provide energy resilience and independence for some installations. Pentagon officials announced in early 2022 that the Defense Department would build a nuclear microreactor that could be flown to an austere site by a C-17 cargo plane and set up to power a military base. The initiative, dubbed 'Project Pele,' outlined a 40-ton reactor that could fit in three to four 20-foot shipping containers and provide one to five megawatts of power on full power for up to three years before refueling. The name is a reference to the Hawaiian deity Pele, the goddess of fire and volcanos. The acronym also stands for Portable Energy for Lasting Effects. The Pentagon awarded an initial $300 million contract in June 2022 to Lynchburg, Virginia-based BWX Technologies to build the reactor.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Brain Drain: Talented Young People Are Abandoning Plans to Become Scientists as White House Undermines the Entire Career
As the Trump administration continues its crusade against the institutions of science, the careers of would-be researchers in the US are on the line. President Donald Trump has suggested slashing NASA's science directorate's budget in half, which could deal a fatal blow to dozens of future science missions and greatly undermine the United States' leadership in space, experts warn. Trump's outright anti-science agenda could have devastating knock-on effects for anybody looking to make a career in the sciences, preventing the next generation of researchers from flourishing — and likely curtailing decades of cutting-edge research that long distinguished the US on the world stage. Researchers are already looking for greener pastures as job opportunities dry up in the US. The troubling trend is kickstarting a brain drain that could massively undercut the nation's supremacy in fields ranging from medicine to biology to physical sciences, as the New York Times reports. Meanwhile, the US has shut down its borders to some of the brightest minds, denying visas to Chinese students pursuing educations. With grant money drying up fast, researchers are moving abroad, enticed by the promise of building out a career in a politically more stable place. China and Europe, in particular, are looking to swipe up an immense amount of talent as the number of graduate student or postdoctoral positions in the US continue to crater. "We are embarking on a major experiment in restructuring the innovative engine in America, and China is the control," geophysicist and the president of the National Academy of Sciences, Marcia McNutt, told the NYT. "China is not going to cut its research budget in half." Trump's cabinet seems to have little fear of national brain drain or missing out on international science talent. As the NYT points out, at least half of the workers in the US with doctorates were born abroad. It all comes in the context of the White House's assault on the most influential academic institutions in the country. Trump has directly targeted international students, going as far as to attempt to prevent Harvard University from enrolling foreign-born students, a horrifying decision that was blocked by a judge last week. The executive branch also recently temporarily halted student visa appointments, triggering panic among students from around the world. In short, the Trump administration has made it very clear that the United States is a hostile place to build a career as a scientist, whether you were born within its borders or not. "What we see is a full-scale assault on science in America," representative George Whitesides (D-CA) told PBS. "It is probably the biggest attack on our scientific establishment in history." More on brain drain: Nobel-Winning Scientist Says His Researchers Are Fleeing the Country Because of Trump's Cruelty
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: STEM's Grand Challenges — And Opportunities
Never in our history have science and technology figured so prominently in our economic well-being and national security. STEM jobs and products dominate the economy, accounting for 69% of the U.S. gross domestic product. Emerging technologies across energy, information, transportation, healthcare, agriculture, and every other aspect of life are now battlegrounds of capable, competitive nations. In his recent letter to the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, President Donald Trump charged his Office of Science and Technology Policy to 'cement America's global technological leadership and usher in the Golden Age of American Innovation.' Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter Tha means the administration will do all it can to bolster the STEM K-12 talent pipeline, right? And Americans will surely support policies aimed at equipping youth for high-demand and mission-critical career paths, eh? U.S. STEM education faces eight ornery, grand challenges, each conceivably conquerable if we rally. 1. America's STEM Education imperative is being eclipsed by an AI exigency. The stakes associated with leading in artificial intelligence blow the 1958 Sputnik crisis out of the sky. The Trump administration recently released an AI-in-education executive order. The STEM education community should seize leadership of a chaotic AI-in-education landscape, leveraging vast networks and partnerships as testbeds. STEM gives AI context and purpose. Many leading AI developers and funders are investing strongly in K-12 technology education. 2. Federal education research and development funding has been sharply diminished lately. STEM education leaders are going to miss the data and research that flowed from the Institute of Education Sciences at the U.S. Department of Education through its now-diminished National Center for Education Statistics, including the hobbled National Assessment of Educational Progress and the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. But as plans for carving up federal education grant programs into state block grants emerge, state STEM networks will be well-positioned to advance this sort of analysis. Related 3. Teachers of STEM subjects from pre-K to college level may not be career-ready for the modern teaching job. Systems of teacher preparation and professional development remain largely discipline focused, while the messiness of real-world issues meshes the disciplines. The President's termination of ED grants for Teacher Quality and Teacher Leadership, as well as Effective Educator Development, exacerbate the challenge of changing how we prepare educators. But state block grants could represent an opportunity for supporting STEM-focused educator development. 4. Well-documented STEM education innovations dot the U.S. education landscape, but progress toward scaling is inequitable and frustratingly incremental. A recent National Academies report examined hurdles, including decentralization and lack of incentives to scaling proven practices in STEM were familiar: increased federal investments in professional development, more data collection, and broadened connections for partnerships and collaborations. In reality, evidence-based practices identified by research have often been ignored by public school districts and the education schools that prepare teachers. If the estimated $1.5 billion annual federal education R & D investment were carved into 50 chunks for states, STEM leaders could make the case for devoting tens of millions of dollars to bringing innovations to scale. 5. Standards for K-12 science, mathematics, technology, are great for leveling the playing field, but may inhibit STEM innovation. The entire K-12 galaxy spins on a standards axis: curricula, professional development, assessment and grading, publishers, performance reviews. But when organizations and states define what students should know and be able to do at each grade level, rarely do they feature the more integrated aspects of STEM (see challenge #3). Standards-driven systems favor efficiency and conformity (i.e., teach to the standards) over creativity and inventiveness. It's time to flip the script from emphasizing content (What do you know?) to practices (What can you do?), which are hallmarks of STEM education. 6. Now that the acronym is target practice for many folks in power at the national and state level, that puts at risk the STEM community's consensus objective to broaden the talent pipeline. The shift is starkly evident at the National Science Foundation, where updated priorities state that 'Awards that are not aligned with NSF's priorities have been terminated, including but not limited to those on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)….' Is there room to continue prioritizing outreach to the underserved and underrepresented? Yes, says NSF 'so long as these programs do not preference or limit participation based on these protected characteristics.' STEM for all. 7. The skills and attributes that STEM education aspires to imbue – teamwork, curiosity, ideation, negotiation, accountability and 95 more – are tough to measure. Simulations, portfolios, interviews, and AI chatbot diagnostics are so far questionably valid, reliable, and equitable at distinguishing learners' acquisition of soft skills, a.k.a. employability skills, 21st century skills, or durable skills. Competency born of practice is the ideal route for STEM education, and now that all 50 states permit competency-based assessment, STEM can lead a culture shift. 8. American STEM education faces a public awareness problem. The 1958 Sputnik scare was Tinker Toys compared to today's global competition to own quantum, AI, and other emerging technologies. A functionless, beeping satellite spurred a multi-billion-dollar investment in STEM, while today's government shrinks science budgets and dismisses experts. What's lacking is a jolt 'to snap the U.S. out of its complacency.' But unlike 1958, we have today a vast array of university STEM centers, local and regional STEM ecosystems, STEM specialty schools, and STEM learning centers across the continent. If public awareness of the nation's STEM imperative were prioritized as a mission action by all, the jolt could spark a STEM rally. This ornery octet of challenges faced by the STEM education community is surmountable if we work at it. A 'golden age of American innovation' sounds great but calls for a strong system of STEM education to fuel the talent pipeline and to wisely manage profound human inventiveness.
