How San Francisco's Castro district became the capital of LGBT America
In 1965, Life magazine declared San Francisco the capital of gay America. And the Castro was its beating heart.
Arguably the single most famous 'gayborhood' in the United States, some of the country's best known queer artists and activists settled there in the 20th century. It was where the first out gay male politician in the US was elected, where the Pride flag was born, and where many gay, trans and nonconforming people estranged from their biological families created new ones of their own.
At the time, the Castro was known as Eureka Valley, or Little Scandinavia. Amid the tumultuous 1960s, which were marked by protests against US involvement in the Vietnam War and the dawn of the hippie movement, young people flocked to San Francisco.
'The Castro neighborhood has been made famous for its incredible welcoming of LGBTQ people. And I think that that built through word of mouth,' says Roberto Ordeñana, executive director of the GLBT Historical Society.
The San Francisco institution was founded in 1985, at the height of the AIDS epidemic. Its goal was to collect as much memorabilia and ephemera as possible — today, its collection includes everything from back issues of queer zines to the original Pride flag.
The man who became the most visible symbol of the LGBT rights movement in the US was Harvey Milk. Born in New York state, he moved to San Francisco in 1972 and opened a camera shop on Castro Street.
The neighborhood gets its name from this street, which is its main artery. Milk became politically active, founding the Castro Village Association, one of the first predominantly LGBTQ-owned business groups in the country. His biographer, Randy Shilts, dubbed him the 'Mayor of Castro Street.'
In 1977, Milk was elected to San Francisco's Board of Supervisors, making him the first openly gay male politician in the country. He was among the leaders who worked to quash Proposition 6, a bill that would have required schools to fire gay and lesbian teachers.
'(Milk) crystallized the political hopes and dreams of a generation of out gay people in the aftermath of the gay liberation movement,' says Timothy Stewart-Winter, associate professor of history at Rutgers University-Newark, who specializes in LGBTQ history.
Less than a year after being elected to office, Milk and San Francisco Mayor George Moscone were assassinated by a fellow city supervisor named Dan White.
Following his murder, 'he became a martyr,' says Stewart-Winter. Like John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr a decade before, the timing of Milk's assassination froze him in history against the political and social turmoil of the era.
Since then, Milk's name has become synonymous with the LGBTQ community.
In 2019, the US Navy named a ship after him, a full circle moment considering that Milk — who served in the Korean War — was forced to resign from the Navy due to his sexuality. San Francisco International Airport (SFO) has also named a terminal in honor of Milk.
However, Ordeñana cautions against allowing Milk to be the sole representative of a large, diverse community.
'It's important for us to celebrate Harvey Milk and all of these other individuals that have done such incredible work for our community. But yet, there are stories like Sally Gearhart, who was a contemporary of Harvey Milk, who worked with him on the Proposition 6 campaign, whose story has been relegated out of mainstream narratives,' says Ordeñana.
Gearhart was a writer, teacher and activist who founded one of the first women's studies university programs at San Francisco State University.
'We want to make sure that we are lifting up the histories of people that have been most vulnerable in our community,' adds Ordeñana. 'That includes seniors, that includes young people, that includes women and trans people in particular.'
It has been 50 years since Harvey Milk set up shop in the Castro, and some could argue that the area has become a victim of its own success.
'The Castro on the one hand, it is paradigmatic, it's a place people associate with gayness. It's a place where people go to be gay, but it's also a place that is incredibly expensive, and where the contradictions of late capitalism are played out. The larger housing affordability crisis all over the country has been really bad in San Francisco,' says Stewart-Winter.
'The tech industry has transformed San Francisco,' he adds, pointing out that this neighborhood gentrification is not a recent phenomenon.
The Italian clothing brand Diesel opened a shop on the Castro's main thoroughfare in the 1990s. These days, Apple and Starbucks hold court alongside locally owned taquerias and art galleries.
Harvey Milk's camera store is still there at 575 Castro Street, an official city of San Francisco landmark with a plaque in front and a mural of Milk on the wall.
In a rapidly growing and gentrifying San Francisco, Ordeñana says that the Historical Society also wants to keep the Castro's gay history in the present tense. The organization was able to raise enough money to buy a permanent home in the neighborhood.
'Obviously LGBTQ people live everywhere. We are part of every community. We are part of every neighborhood. The Castro continues to be a destination for people coming in from all over the world, which is why it was important for us to open this museum in the Castro that's available for global tourism and city residents alike.'
'I was born and raised in San Francisco,' Ordeñana says. 'I never left. I love traveling the world, but this is home.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP Leadership Not Worried About Forcing Members To Go On Record On Worst Of DOGE
The White House finally sent over a rescissions package request — a move the administration has been dragging its feet on for months — asking Republicans in Congress to swallow a chunk of the sweeping cuts that Elon Musk has enacted with his DOGE destruction so far this year. While the request only includes a portion of the congressionally authorized federal funding that the Trump administration has lawlessly rescinded or frozen since Trump was sworn back into the White House, it includes some of the most damaging foreign aid cuts of the last few months. It conveniently does not include the most unpopular-at-home cuts to things like medical research, which has caused even some of the most ardently MAGA Republicans in Congress to shudder due to the toll they could take on institutions that employ many voters back home. And, so, Republican leadership is not at all concerned, apparently, with forcing members of their conference to choke down these efforts to gut foreign aid, reproductive rights resources abroad, and publicly funded media before midterms campaigning kicks into gear. We're expecting to hear some unease from Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) about the constitutionally backward demand from the Trump administration. Both Republican senators also tend to oppose attacks on women's health care, at least publicly. But in order to pass, the rescissions package only requires simple majority support in the House and the Senate, meaning Republican leadership won't need Collins' or Murkowski's votes to shove the whole thing through. If any other vulnerable House or Senate Republicans take issue with rescinding the $9.4 billion in federal spending that they appropriated, they've not yet vocalized those concerns. Among the cuts to foreign aid programs covered by the package are cuts specifically to those programs designed to support LGBTQ communities. It also includes cuts to federal education and transportation funds, reproductive health care programs and funding for the World Health Organization. It includes $142 million in cuts to UNICEF, $9 million in cuts to the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and guts $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting's budget. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) has already vowed to soon take action on the package. House Speaker Mike Johnson promised the same, applauding the White House for stripping federal funding from NPR and PBS, a pipe dream Republicans in Congress have been salivating over for decades. Here's House Republican leadership's statement: 'Today, the House has officially received the rescissions request from the White House to eliminate $9.4 billion in wasteful foreign aid spending at the State Department and USAID and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds NPR and PBS. 'Now that this wasteful spending by the federal government has been identified by DOGE, quantified by the Administration, and sent to Congress, House Republicans will fulfill our mandate and continue codifying into law a more efficient federal government. This is exactly what the American people deserve. 'Next week, we will put the rescissions bill on the floor of the House and encourage all our Members to support this commonsense measure.' Regardless of how this all might come back to bite them in the midterms, the embrace of the rescissions package before its brought to a vote is illustrative of Republican leadership's eagerness to strip the legislative branch of its own authority during Trump II — by lending an air of legitimacy to what was, originally, an illegitimate and likely in many ways illegal process. Even after the Ivy League school bent the knee on a litany of other demands from the Trump administration, the Department of Education is now attacking Columbia University's accreditation. Arguing the school is violating federal anti-discrimination laws (because students in support of Palestinians have continued to speak about their beliefs and protest on campus), Education Secretary Linda McMahon urged the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, which accredits Columbia, to 'take appropriate action' against the school. McMahon also claimed that 'Columbia University's leadership acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students on its campus,' despite the fact that, at the Trump administration's demand, it has cracked down on speech that draws attention to the plight of the Palestinian people, and is even considering curriculum changes. A new estimate from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicts House Republicans' reconciliation package would grow the federal deficit by $2.4 trillion over a decade. House Republican leadership almost immediately pushed back on the CBO's estimate. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) slammed the CBO report at a press conference Wednesday morning. 'I get that we got to play by the rules of the referee, but the referee's been wrong. We've got a referee that tries to sack our quarterback a lot,' Scalise said. The White House also pushed back against the impending assessment before the CBO even released its finding today, defending the bill and accusing CBO of being 'lefty.' Republicans tend to only criticize the legitimacy of the nonpartisan CBO when it's their own party's legislation getting assessed. Despite the downplaying, the score might still impact the Senate's decision making as Senate Republicans are now working on making changes to the bill. Several Senate Republicans have already indicated they think the bill adds too much to the deficit. 'I refuse to accept $2 trillion-plus deficits as far as the eye can see as the new normal. We have to address that problem, and unfortunately this bill doesn't do so,' Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), a member of the Senate Finance Committee, said during an ABC News interview following the CBO release. Johnson added regardless of individual CBO scores, the trajectory of deficits and debt is 'hard to dispute.' — Emine Yücel This Russian Dissident Won Political Asylum. ICE Refuses To Release Him. Donald Trump Sets Out To Create His Own Deep State NEW from Hunter Walker: Internal Docs Raise Questions About Trump IRS Pick Billy Long's 'No-Show Jobs' And 'Strange' Schedule Inside A Powerful Agency Man Who Tried To Lawlessly Do Congress' Job For It Criticizes 'Pork-Filled' Bill Trump White House Hires Harvard Law Review 'Whistleblower' Musk demands do-over on Trump budget bill Republicans Try to Discredit Experts Warning About the Cost of Tax Cuts Trump Is Losing Patience With Musk's Outbursts Over Megabill


Washington Post
16 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Migrants sent to Salvadoran prison need chance to challenge removals, judge rules
The first Venezuelan migrants deported to El Salvador under a rarely invoked wartime law must be given the opportunity to challenge their removals even if they remain outside the United States, a federal judge ruled Wednesday. U.S. District Court Chief Judge James E. Boasberg said those 137 migrants — whom the government accused of being members of the violent Tren de Aragua gang — were 'plainly deprived' of their right to contest their removals before they were flown to a notorious Salvadoran prison under the Alien Enemies Act in March. He gave the Trump administration until June 11 to submit proposals on how it intends to allow the detainees, who remain in El Salvador, to file those legal challenges.


New York Times
17 minutes ago
- New York Times
At ‘CPAC of the Center,' Democratic Moderates Beat Up on the Left
The centrist wing of the Democratic Party gathered on Wednesday in a hotel basement in downtown Washington with a grand plan. The party should start winning, and stop losing. Surveying the wreckage of the 2024 election, the proud moderates here pleaded that their faction should seize control of the party's messaging, stiff-arm liberal interest groups and experience the spoils of real-life victory, all while ignoring angry online activists. The Democrats in the room aimed to put a new sheen on — and perhaps some more spine in — what has long been tagged as the mushy middle, arguing that they are the majority-makers the party needs in 2026 and beyond to take control of Congress. It was a wonky gathering where the center-left Substack pundit Matthew Yglesias was greeted like a rock star and Lakshya Jain, a data-crunching analyst, detailed a ratings system to show which Democratic lawmakers had the highest candidate-quality WAR — Wins Above Replacement — a term borrowed from baseball analytics. 'This room may be full of nerds,' said Andrew Mamo, a Democratic strategist who attended the conference, WelcomeFest. 'But the focus is how to not look like losers — and how to not be losers.' This event was not the place to debate the finer points of policy. There was glancingly little discussion beyond what would sell with voters. If some called it the 'CPAC of the center' — after the big right-wing confab — there was far less red meat, and more crudités (a platter of chopped peppers, carrots and cauliflower was served in the back). Want all of The Times? Subscribe.