logo
UN Experts Outraged By Reports Of Summary Executions And Enforced Disappearances

UN Experts Outraged By Reports Of Summary Executions And Enforced Disappearances

Scoop30-04-2025

GENEVA (30 April 2025) – UN experts today expressed outrage at the alleged summary execution of several dozen people in Mali, as well as the enforced disappearance of others. They warned that these unlawful killings may amount to war crimes, and that the enforced disappearances may constitute crimes against humanity if they are part of widespread or systematic attacks against civilians.
'We urge Malian authorities to conduct prompt, effective, thorough, independent, impartial and transparent investigations into these killings and enforced disappearances, in accordance with international law,' the experts said. State failure to investigate constitutes in itself a violation of the right to life.
'Those responsible for unlawful killings and enforced disappearances, whether by direct involvement or complicity, must be prosecuted, and measures must be taken to prevent their recurrence and provide reparation to the victims.'
On 12 April 2025, around 100 men, most of whom were from the Peul community, were arrested by the Malian Armed Forces (FAMa). They were accompanied by military and security personnel recruited by the Russia-based Wagner Group. The arrests took place at a market in Sebabougou, in the Diéma cercle of the Kayes region. While some of those arrested were released immediately, approximately 60 others were reportedly taken to the Kwala military camp in the Koulikoro region. According to unconfirmed reports, those arrested were tortured and interrogated about alleged links with 'terrorists' at the Kwala military camp. The victims were reportedly whipped during interrogation. Afterwards, military and security personnel recruited by the Wagner Group reportedly took the victims out of the camp and executed them by opening fire. Between 21 and 22 April 2025, several dozen decomposing bodies, suspected to be those arrested in Sebabougou on 12 April 2025, were found scattered on the outskirts of the Kwala military camp by people searching for their relatives.
While the exact death toll is unclear, it is reportedly believed that at least 65 people disappeared or went missing after being arrested in Sebabougou. The experts received a list from credible sources purporting to show the names of 54 alleged male victims. The fate and whereabouts of the victims remain unknown.
In a statement dated 28 April 2025, the Malian Armed Forces confirmed that they had conducted military operations between 11 and 15 April 2025 in several areas, including Sebabougou and Kwala. They added that they had 'neutralised' several combatants from 'terrorist armed groups'.
The experts expressed their solidarity with the families affected by the killings and enforced disappearances. 'Malian authorities must ensure that the bodies of the deceased are properly recovered, documented and protected to facilitate reliable identification, and prevent the victims from being classified as missing persons. The bodies must then be handed over respectfully to their families for mourning and final disposal,' they said.
They stressed that this process forms an integral part of the international legal obligation to conduct effective investigations and ensure accountability and effective remedies for human rights violations.
'We are deeply troubled by the apparent total impunity and lack of prosecution or prevention of these violations attributed to both Malian defence and security forces, and foreign military and security personnel from the 'Wagner' Group and/or 'Africa Corps',' the experts said.
'Failure to bring alleged perpetrators of human rights violations to justice could undermine public confidence in the armed forces and be exploited by violent extremist groups,' they said. 'Under the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, Governments must address the root causes of violence to effectively combat terrorism, such as impunity, prolonged unresolved conflicts, weak rule of law, human rights violations, discrimination, political exclusion, socio-economic marginalisation, and poor governance.'
The experts recalled the statement by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court on 23 March 2019. In this statement, the Prosecutor noted that the situation in Mali had been referred to her Office by Malian authorities in 2012, a formal investigation had been opened in 2013, and her Office would continue to closely monitor events in central Mali and other parts of the country. The experts stressed that the ICC could determine whether the Malian State lacks the capacity or will to conduct effective investigations and could expand its current investigation beyond crimes committed in northern Mali in 2012 and 2013, or open a new investigation into crimes under international law committed elsewhere in Mali.
'Under international law, military commanders and other superiors, including Government officials, can be held criminally responsible for crimes committed by armed forces under their effective command and control,' they said.
The experts also recalled recommendations concerning counter-terrorism measures in Mali, including calls on the Government to ensure that military operations are proportionate and non-discriminatory, and comply with international human rights law and international humanitarian law.
The experts are in contact with the Government of Mali, and have reiterated their offer to provide technical assistance on forensic matters.
*The expert: Eduardo Gonzalez, Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Mali; Jovana Jezdimirovic Ranito (Chair-Rapporteur), Ravindran Daniel, Michelle Small, Joana de Deus Pereira, Andrés Macías Tolosa, Working Group on the use of mercenaries; Morris Tidball-Binz, Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary, or arbitrary executions; Ben Saul, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism; Gabriella Citroni (Chair-Rapporteur), Grażyna Baranowska (Vice-Chair), Aua Baldé; Ana Lorena Delgadillo Pérez; and Mohammed Al-Obaidi, .

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Not a coincidence
Not a coincidence

Kiwiblog

time3 hours ago

  • Kiwiblog

Not a coincidence

Yesterday: The UN nuclear watchdog's board of governors on Thursday (local time) formally found that Iran isn't complying with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years, a move that could lead to further tensions and set in motion an effort to restore United Nations sanctions on Tehran later this year. Today: The facility at the heart of Iran's nuclear ambitions was engulfed in flames on Friday, according to social media images geolocated by CNN and Iranian state television. That seems a lot more effective than sanctions! Multiple Iranian state media outlets have confirmed that Major General Hossein Salami, the head of the country's elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), was killed Friday morning during Israeli strikes. The IRGC is one of the most powerful tools wielded by the Iranian state, overseeing its ballistic missile development, crushing dissent at home and projecting Iranian and military operations in the Middle East region. That's a bonus. The dissent crusher got crushed.

UN General Assembly Adopts Gaza Ceasefire Resolution By Overwhelming Majority
UN General Assembly Adopts Gaza Ceasefire Resolution By Overwhelming Majority

Scoop

time5 hours ago

  • Scoop

UN General Assembly Adopts Gaza Ceasefire Resolution By Overwhelming Majority

The move followed the Security Council's failure to pass a similar resolution last week due to a lone veto by permanent member the United States. The resolution was backed by 149 Member States, with 12 voting against and 19 abstaining. Among those opposing the resolution were the United States and Israel, who were joined among others by Argentina, Hungary and Paraguay. India, Georgia, Ecuador, Romania and Ethiopia were among the countries abstaining. End starvation as weapon of war Brought forward by over 20 countries, it strongly condemns the use of starvation as a weapon of war, demands a full lifting of the Israeli blockade on humanitarian aid, and insists on the protection of civilians under international law. Although General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding, they carry significant political and moral weight. On 4 June, the Security Council failed to adopt its draft resolution after a veto by the United States, a permanent member. Meanwhile, famine conditions continue to threaten lives across Gaza, and reports persist of civilians being killed or injured while trying to access food at distribution points operated independently of the UN but supported by Israel and the US. Assembly steps into as Security Council stalls Opening the special session, General Assembly President Philémon Yang said that 'the horrors in Gaza must end' after 20 months of war. He criticised the Security Council's ongoing paralysis and inability to fulfil its core responsibility to uphold peace and security. He called the situation on the ground 'unacceptable', highlighting the deprivation of food, water and medicine for civilians, the continued captivity of hostages, and the need for urgent international action. Mr. Yang noted that next week's high-level meeting in New York on implementing a two-State solution, chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, saying it would offer a chance for renewed commitment towards peace in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Key elements of the resolution: Ceasefire: Calls for an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire by all parties. Hostages: Demands the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other armed groups. Implementation: Urges the full and immediate implementation of Security Council resolution 2735 (2024), including the ceasefire, hostage and prisoner exchanges, return of displaced persons, and withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza. International law: Reaffirms that all parties must uphold international humanitarian and human rights law, with particular attention to civilian protection and accountability for violations. Starvation as a weapon: Strongly condemns the use of starvation and the denial of aid as tactics of war. Humanitarian access: Demands the full, safe and unimpeded delivery of aid – including food, medicine, water, shelter and fuel – throughout Gaza. Detention practices: Calls for the humane treatment and release of those arbitrarily detained, and the return of remains. ICJ advisory opinion: Recalls the request for an urgent advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on Israel's obligations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. End of blockade: Demands Israel immediately lift the blockade on Gaza and open all border crossings for aid deliveries. Accountability: Urges Member States to take necessary steps to ensure Israel complies with its international legal obligations. UN and humanitarian personnel: Calls for full respect for the work and immunity of UN staff and humanitarian workers. Protection of aid workers: Urges both humanitarian and UN bodies to ensure the safety of their personnel. Medical neutrality: Underscores the duty to protect medical workers, health facilities, and transport routes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store