logo
Penn State president wants to close 7 campuses. Internal records explain why.

Penn State president wants to close 7 campuses. Internal records explain why.

Yahoo13-05-2025

This story was produced by the State College regional bureau of Spotlight PA, an independent, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to investigative and public-service journalism for Pennsylvania. Sign up for Talk of the Town, a weekly newsletter of local stories that dig deep, events, and more from north-central PA, at spotlightpa.org/newsletters/talkofthetown.
Penn State President Neeli Bendapudi has asked university trustees to approve closing seven of its commonwealth campuses because the current statewide model 'subsidizes decline,' according to internal records obtained by Spotlight PA.
Penn State York, Mont Alto recommended for closure; report
'Fulfilling our land-grant mission does not require a four-year campus in every corner of Pennsylvania,' the president wrote. Instead, under the proposal, online classes could replace some in-person offerings and a leaner university with fewer locations could invest in the parts of Pennsylvania where Penn State believes it can still succeed.
Bendapudi has proposed closing Penn State's DuBois, Fayette, Mont Alto, New Kensington, Shenango, Wilkes-Barre, and York campuses. More than 500 employees and thousands of students would be affected by the move.
'These are not just campuses; they are homes, launching pads, and sources of deep pride. And yet … if we delay action, the pressures we face—demographic, financial, competitive—will continue to mount. In time, those forces will make decisions for us, not with the care, intention, or commitment to students and communities that this process allows,' Bendapudi wrote to trustees.
On Monday, the Philadelphia Inquirer first reported the list of seven campuses Bendapudi wanted to close. In response, board chair David Kleppinger said in a statement, 'I find it deeply frustrating that someone with early access to this recommendation decided to share it with the media with absolutely no regard for how this information would impact members of our campus communities. Our students, faculty and staff deserve better.'
But the Penn State Board of Trustees still needs to approve the plan, a vote that's grown more contentious. Questions, as well as outright disapproval, from some trustees delayed a scheduled vote this week, according to people with knowledge of the board's operations.
Trustees will meet privately Thursday to continue discussing the proposal.
Spotlight PA obtained the materials trustees are reviewing, which total almost 250 pages. The full text of the university's recommendation and related materials offer the most detailed look to date at Penn State's justification for potentially shuttering locations, upending the lives of thousands of employees and students, and markedly changing the educational landscape of Pennsylvania.
The records provide a campus-by-campus rationale for closing, offer insights into how trustees feel about the decision, and reveal that Penn State officials anticipate minimal political and funding fallout from the move.
Penn State's Office of Strategic Communication did not respond to a request for comment for this story.
In the documents, Penn State claims that previous university administrations failed to act. Closing campuses is presented to trustees as the only viable option: 'We now have an opportunity to address what's long been understood.' The documents note that enrollments at Penn State's smallest 12 campuses continued declining despite more than $1 billion in investments between 2010 and 2024, including $105 million under Bendapudi. Likewise, they highlight that new academic programs, digital advertising, tuition discounts, and increased support for out-of-state and international students largely failed to boost enrollments.
'The plan to close campuses was not the initial intent of this administration; rather, it was a discovered reality,' the documents say.
Under the proposal, the new Penn State will be regionalized to incentivize larger classes and on-campus living instead of commuting. Locations that generate revenue or are near self-sustaining, those with the largest enrollments, and those in areas with growing populations will remain.
Historical enrollment trends and opportunities for future growth were key factors in the university's recommendation. Other criteria given significant weight were nearby housing availability and the ability to duplicate academic offerings at a nearby campus or online.
The records include a multi-paragraph rationale for closing each of the seven campuses, which say in part:
For DuBois, the main reason is 'sustained and substantial enrollment decline,' the report reads. The population in the surrounding area — Clearfield, Elk, and Jefferson Counties — is aging and declining. Other organizations, like the Triangle Tech vocational school, are leaving the region too, the university argued.
At Fayette, successful programs at other campuses are not driving enrollments there. The campus is 'underutilized,' and there is 'limited demand for in-person education in this location.' While the local college-age population is expected to grow, Penn State faces regional competition with PennWest California and Waynesburg University.
Penn State recommends closing Mont Alto due to enrollment and demographic challenges. 'The limited pool of prospective students constrains the campus' ability to rebuild enrollment organically, even with aggressive outreach or new program development.' Declining use of campus housing is also driving up per-student costs.
New Kensington has 'struggled to maintain relevance and scale in an increasingly competitive higher education environment' around Pittsburgh, the report reads. The campus' offerings mirror other locations and nearby Penn State Beaver will maintain Penn State's presence in the area.
For Shenango, declining populations and economic challenges in the surrounding region 'fundamentally limit the potential for future enrollment stabilization.' Without more campus housing, Penn State could not bring more students to the campus, either.
Wilkes-Barre was recommended for closure because its campus is small and has limited housing, which makes it less appealing than nearby locations like Scranton and Hazleton. 'There is no compelling academic niche or distinctive program portfolio at Penn State Wilkes-Barre that cannot be replicated or consolidated' at another campus or online.
Penn State York lacks the campus housing to attract non-commuter students. The nearby Harrisburg location has such housing and offers more diverse programming.
Five other locations — Beaver, Greater Allegheny, Hazleton, Schuylkill, and Scranton — were considered but not recommended for closure.
The university estimates closing the seven campuses would save around $50 million a year, along with clearing around $200 million in needed maintenance at the properties.
The records do not offer an estimate of what it will cost to implement the plan.
Julio Palma, a Penn State Fayette professor, told Spotlight PA that shutting down a location is not innovation. Penn State is abandoning communities, like coal companies have done throughout Appalachia, he said.
'This is a public university that receives funding from the state, it receives funding from taxpayers,' Palma said. 'Those taxpayers are spread in every corner of the state. They are in Fayette. And while the taxpayers are supporting Penn State across the state, Penn State is closing doors, closing opportunities.'
Penn State estimates that 520 full-time employees will be affected by the closures. Non-tenure-line faculty and staff could be rehired and could be given priority consideration for jobs at remaining campuses and University Park.
'The largest expense will likely be severance costs for employees who are no longer employed by Penn State,' the recommendation says. No cost estimate is provided in the records, though the university expects to reduce such workforce expenses through attrition, retirements, and voluntary separations.
More than 3,100 students were enrolled in the seven campuses in fall 2024, representing 3.6% of Penn State's systemwide enrollment, according to university data. Other campuses could absorb these students without needing to hire additional staff, the university estimates.
Affected students could receive additional financial aid, adjusted costs when attending another campus, or even gas cards, according to the proposal. These students will be offered 'navigation coaches' who will help students clarify their goals, stay motivated, and find experts to answer their questions.
Students at these campuses are not necessarily going to travel a greater distance to enroll at another campus, or they may not have the means, Andrea Adolph, a Penn State New Kensington professor, told Spotlight PA. The administration and trustees do not understand this reality, she said: 'This is going to be an incredible blow to opportunities for students who can't pick up and move somewhere else.'
Penn State, in its recommendation, argues that fewer campuses will benefit students. 'Treating all campuses the same would have meant continued subsidies to locations with little growth potential—ultimately disadvantaging students elsewhere across the commonwealth. With this recommendation, the University can focus on targeted investments where it can do the greatest good, particularly for first-generation, Pell-eligible, and underserved students.'
Penn State will not accept new student applications for closed campuses after fall 2025.
Trustees were expected to vote on Bendapudi's proposal on Thursday but the volume of questions from board members, as well as consternation from some, have delayed the move.
Thursday's meeting will be a private executive session. The board also gathered Friday morning in private at University Park, during which they discussed the closure plan, according to a public statement by board Chair Kleppinger and people with knowledge of trustee discussions.
In private, Kleppiner has told trustees the board should unanimously support Bendapudi's proposal and that dissent could hurt her legacy, according to multiple sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private board dynamics.
Last month, trustees Jay Paterno and Ted Brown, and later Nicholas Rowland, publicly questioned the administration's approach to the decision and stated reasons in several op-eds in StateCollege.com. 'Our campuses are not line items to cut or assets to liquidate; they are integral parts of the whole,' Rowland wrote.
But several factors work in Bendapudi's favor. The size of Penn State's board — 36 voting members — requires a large number of trustees to vote against the measure to stop it. Also, trustees will take one vote on the proposal, not consider closures on a campus-by-campus basis. Finally, voting data shows that trustees are often loath to vote against an administration's proposal.
A previous Spotlight PA analysis of trustee votes between 2019 and 2024 found that they passed nearly 85% of measures without a single oppositional vote. The board voted down just four of the 328 measures it considered during this period, three of which were motions a trustee proposed mid-meeting. The other, in July, was an option for how trustees should be elected to the board.
According to the board documents, trustees have questioned how the administration will implement the plan, the estimated costs and savings, and how Penn State could divest from the associated real estate. The records provide some insight into how Penn State's governing body is thinking about the proposal given that, to date, the board has not held public discussions on the topic.
The board previously planned a virtual-only meeting this week to vote on the plan, an act that legal experts previously told Spotlight PA could run afoul of Pennsylvania's open meetings law. Someone could challenge the meeting in court, and if they were successful, a judge could potentially overturn the trustees' votes, the lawyers told Spotlight PA. (Penn State did not respond to requests for comment at the time.)
This spring, some members of the university community, including employees, called on Bendapudi to reconsider closing campuses. They felt the president's reasons for weighing closures— at first financial and later about the student experience — lacked clarity and transparency.
The vast majority of the more than 500 public comments Penn State received — from community members to alumni to lawmakers — asked the university to keep all locations open. Trustees received brief summaries of these comments. The recommendation documents note that some people said they supported closures but felt pressured to publicly say otherwise, though the report did not include further information about these claims.
Opponents of campus closures did not offer any 'fully developed or funded proposals,' the board's documents say. Likewise, Bendapudi and her chief of staff, Michael Wade Smith, talked to Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro and state lawmakers, and 'there have been no offers of financial support in these conversations,' the document reads.
Shapiro's office did not return a request for comment for this story.
According to the internal documents, Penn State does not anticipate political or reputational fallout from the decision, nor does it think the hundreds of millions of dollars it receives each year in taxpayer funds, now under consideration, are in jeopardy.
'We do not expect this decision to have long-term negative implications on the Penn State brand,' the documents read. '… We can expect short-term dissatisfaction within the local communities where campus closures will have an impact, which is likely to manifest in negative news coverage — local and regional.'
and help us reinvigorate local news in north-central Pennsylvania at spotlightpa.org/donate. Spotlight PA is funded by foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability and public-service journalism that gets results.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal budget bill could strip 300K Pennsylvanians of Medicaid coverage, push rural hospitals to the brink
Federal budget bill could strip 300K Pennsylvanians of Medicaid coverage, push rural hospitals to the brink

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Federal budget bill could strip 300K Pennsylvanians of Medicaid coverage, push rural hospitals to the brink

This story was produced by the State College regional bureau of Spotlight PA, an independent, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to investigative and public-service journalism for Pennsylvania. Sign up for Talk of the Town, a weekly newsletter of local stories that dig deep, events, and more from north-central PA, at HARRISBURG — President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill could have a disastrous effect on the health of rural Pennsylvanians and the operations of the hospitals and other medical centers that care for them. The federal budget proposal, which passed the U.S. House by a one-vote margin in May, calls for nearly $800 billion in Medicaid cuts over the next decade. It also includes a new 80-hour-per-month work or service requirement for Medicaid recipients between the ages of 19 and 64 who aren't caregivers or who have disabilities. Among other changes, the bill would require verification of coverage eligibility every six months rather than annually. While supporters of the budget bill argue that it will slow spending and safeguard government programs, critics say the cuts and new requirements will create more paperwork for states and make it harder to access essential care. Opponents also argue the changes would push struggling rural hospitals and other providers to the brink, and force them to scale back services or close entirely. More than 3 million people in Pennsylvania — 23% — are covered by Medicaid, according to data from the state Department of Human Services, which administers the program. The agency estimates that more than 300,000 would lose Medicaid coverage under the proposal. Val Arkoosh, secretary of the department, said the bill would not only hurt those losing coverage but 'all of us who would face the real-life consequences of crowded emergency departments, increases in the cost of health insurance, and the catastrophic effects on economies and health systems in rural areas.' More than 737,000 Medicaid recipients live in rural counties, where residents are typically older and more reliant on government-funded insurance programs. Such programs reimburse at lower rates compared to private insurance companies and haven't kept up with inflation. Cameron County Commissioner James Moate, a Republican, said the Medicaid reimbursement rate should have never been less than 100%. 'That's why we have struggling hospitals,' he told Spotlight PA. On average, Pennsylvania hospitals absorb a loss of 18 cents on the dollar for care provided to Medicaid patients, said Nicole Stallings, president and CEO of the Hospital and Healthsystem Association of Pennsylvania, which represents more than 230 hospitals statewide. In rural communities, the average loss is 26 cents on the dollar, she added in a May statement. 'Medicaid plays a vital role in the health of rural residents, and it is important to preserve this funding so that families can continue to access the care they need for healthier lives,' said Douglas Winner, chief financial officer for Penn Highlands Healthcare, a nonprofit system with nine hospitals in rural counties. Penn Highlands President and CEO Steve Fontaine has told lawmakers that consolidating with other health systems and expanding into new areas has helped facilities survive. This strategy, which has helped Penn Highlands diversify its patient and insurance bases, is why the system expanded into Centre County, where resident numbers are expected to grow, he told lawmakers last year. Still, the health system has shuttered services and reported operating losses over the past year. Winner said Penn Highlands is 'greatly concerned' about the proposed Medicaid cuts. 'Rural hospitals have experienced substantial cost increases for labor, drugs, and supplies,' he said in a statement. 'Coupled with decreasing volumes, inadequate reimbursement rates, and ongoing staffing shortages — recruitment and retention — we are struggling financially.' Advocates worry the cuts in the federal budget will force rural hospitals to slash services even more or close altogether. And once facilities end a service or shut down, they rarely reopen, Stallings told Spotlight PA. Community health centers could also be strained. These facilities, also known as federally qualified health centers, provide services regardless of someone's ability to pay and primarily see patients who use Medicaid and PENNIE, the state's Affordable Care Act marketplace. More uninsured people will likely lead to an increase in uncompensated care, said Eric Kiehl, director of policy and partnership for the Pennsylvania Association of Community Health Centers. And these facilities are already strapped for resources, he told Spotlight PA. A surge in demand could cause these health centers to shutter core services — such as medical, dental, or behavioral health — reduce hours, or close, Kiehl said. Pennsylvania's U.S. House delegation voted along party lines on the federal budget bill, with Republicans supporting and Democrats opposing the proposal. Medicaid spending totaled roughly $44 billion in fiscal year 2023. The federal government provided almost $28 billion of those dollars. Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro has said the state won't be able to make up those dollars to support the Medicaid program. In a statement, Shapiro said he hopes 'common sense and a concern for the people of Pennsylvania' will prevail in the U.S. Senate, where Democratic U.S. Sen. John Fetterman and Republican U.S. Sen. Dave McCormick disagree on aspects of the bill. McCormick did not respond to a request for comment for this story. He has expressed support for the budget bill, which he says will reduce and slow government spending. During a Fox News forum, McCormick said he isn't advocating for taking benefits from 'vulnerable people' but is trying to ensure 'people for whom the program was designed' benefit. Fetterman called the plan 'a bad bill,' telling Spotlight PA in a statement: 'Republicans want to put more money in the pockets of the ultra-rich at the expense of hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvanians who will lose access to Medicaid if this disastrous bill is passed.' and help us reinvigorate local news in north-central Pennsylvania at Spotlight PA is funded by foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability and public-service journalism that gets results. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

UCLA, Penn State deny reports of private equity funding from Elevate
UCLA, Penn State deny reports of private equity funding from Elevate

Miami Herald

time2 days ago

  • Miami Herald

UCLA, Penn State deny reports of private equity funding from Elevate

UCLA and Penn State have denied a report Monday by Sportico that they have partnered with consulting firm Elevate to receive funding from its $500 million College Investment Initiative. Elevate formally announced the initiative earlier Monday and told news outlets that two schools had signed up with the project. However, UCLA and Penn State officials each denied Sportico's reporting that they have engaged with the new fund. Both schools said they're partnered with Elevate for ticketing operations but not for private equity. The College Investment Initiative is backed by Velocity Capital Management and the Texas Permanent School Fund. The idea behind the initiative is to offer capital to schools for revenue-generating projects -- like NIL platforms or athletic venue upgrades. Boise State athletic director Jeramiah Dickey told Front Office Sports that his university is 'actively considering' private equity and hopes to have a deal set within the next six months. Field Level Media 2025 - All Rights Reserved

Kraft rebukes involvement in private equity fund
Kraft rebukes involvement in private equity fund

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Kraft rebukes involvement in private equity fund

UNIVERSITY PARK (WTAJ) — Sports agency network Elevate said they have partnered with Penn State and UCLA as the company introduces a $500 million private equity fund for college athletics, but both schools have rebuked the report. Penn State athletics director Pat Kraft released a statement saying 'Elevate serves as our partner in ticketing strategy and operations. To clarify, our relationship is strictly limited to these services, and we have no affiliation or involvement with any private equity firm or fund.' UCLA released a similar statement linking the Bruins to the company for ticketing purposes only. Elevate's College Investment Initiative is a private equity (PE) fund funded primarily by Velocity Capital Management and the Texas Permanent School Fund. PE is widely viewed as the next frontier in college athletics as schools look to offset costs by the changing landscape of the sports, and the new revenue sharing model set up by last week's groundbreaking House Settlement deal. Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for US colleges to pay athletes millions The nearly $3 billion settlement provides back pay benefits, sets up NIL oversight and allows schools to share more than $20 million in revenue with athletes. That number is close to 10% of what the highest earning schools make, but also more than some of the lowest schools make in a year, like Louisiana-Monroe, who make $19 million according to a 2024 report by USA Today. But many questions on how this would all work out remain. College football teams are not businesses and can't be bought and sold like stocks and companies, though some suggest PE could purchase teams, portions of teams, or assets like merchandise or media rights. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store