Judge orders Trump to admit 12,000 refugees into US
WASHINGTON: A judge on Monday ordered President Donald Trump's administration to admit around 12,000 refugees into the United States, a blow to the government's efforts to re-shape America's immigration policy.
The order clarifies the limits imposed by an appeals court ruling which allowed the Trump administration to suspend the refugee admissions system, but said it must admit people already granted refugee status with travel plans to the United States.
The Trump administration argued at a hearing last week that it should only have to admit 160 refugees who were scheduled to travel within two weeks of an executive order in January halting the system.
But US District Judge Jamal Whitehead overruled the claim on Monday, saying "the government's interpretation is, to put it mildly, 'interpretive jiggerypokery' of the highest order.
"It requires not just reading between the lines" of the appeal decision "but hallucinating new text that simply is not there," Whitehead wrote in his order.
Whitehead had originally blocked Trump's executive order halting refugee admissions, ruling in February that it likely violated the 1980 Refugee Act.
But his decision was overruled by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals a month later.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
32 minutes ago
- Mint
The US and China Are Talking Again. Don't Call It a Reset
Trade negotiations between the US and China in London mark a cautious step toward easing tensions, but not a new beginning. It's a short-term strategy to avoid further deterioration — a fragile truce that could be reversed at any moment. At the core is a deeper issue: National security. Both sides now view trade through that lens, and handshakes won't fix it. Washington must recognize that Beijing seeks respect and won't accept a one-sided, long-term deal. China, for its part, needs to understand that it won't be business as usual — and that the US will expect more concessions and market access to the world's second-largest economy. The alternative is continued hostility, which will make for a more chaotic global trade environment, and a more dangerous world. The London climbdown is positive, but precarious. Rapprochement has turned into recrimination before. After the initial euphoria of a trade-war ceasefire agreed in Geneva in May, both sides accused the other of reneging on a deal to temporarily lower tariffs that had climbed well above 100%. Now negotiators say they've reached an agreement in principle on a framework to deescalate trade tensions, based on the consensus forged in Geneva. Delegations from both sides will take the proposal back to their respective leaders, following nearly 20 hours of talks over two days. 'Once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it,' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said. The full details of the accord weren't immediately available, but US officials said they 'absolutely expect' that issues around shipments of rare earth minerals and magnets will be resolved. There are no winners or losers coming out of this, notes Steve Okun, founder and chief executive officer of AC Advisors. The fundamental questions are much larger than any round of talks. 'The Trump administration needs to decide whether it views Beijing as a strategic competitor, or an existential threat,' he told me. 'Washington can take the economic hit from a trade war, but politically, Xi Jinping can suffer the hit for longer than Trump can. So one side has economic leverage, and the other political leverage — that's a standstill, for now.' The Chinese president is biding his time, despite a sluggish economy. In the most recent sign of how the trade war is hurting, exports rose less than expected last month. The worst drop in US-bound shipments since February 2020 — the outbreak of the pandemic — counteracted strong demand from elsewhere. Still, sales to other markets are providing much-needed support for an economy stuck in deflation and struggling with weak domestic demand. Beijing is sticking to its narrative that this trade war is Washington's problem, and that China is being unfairly targeted. A recent Xinhua commentary warned that America's security-focused view of economic issues risks undermining global cooperation. There is a pathway to peaceful coexistence, but compromises are required, notes Ryan Hass of the Brookings Institution. To break through with Xi, Trump will need to acknowledge that both countries are major powers. Neither can dictate terms to the other. Both would be hurt by high tariffs on each other's goods — but on their own, they're not enough to force capitulation. The US public has no appetite for a broader conflict with Beijing. Disapproval of China's behavior may be high, but the top priority is still to avoid war. Americans are clear in their desire to manage competition without that escalating into open conflict. For that to happen, Washington must recognize that Beijing craves respect. The US would be wise to pay heed to the Chinese concept of mianzi or 'face' — Xi will only agree to a long-term deal that he can pitch at home and abroad as a win. Beijing has taken lessons from Trump's first trade war, and judged that agreement to be one-sided in favor of Washington. It won't make that mistake again. China doesn't always like reciprocating face, but officials would be wise to give some to Trump, too. His tariffs have been outlandish, but his supporters also demand that he show strength, not concession. Beijing should be able to understand what happens when politicians need to cater to public pressure. Neither side has the upper hand to make the other come away an obvious loser. At the most, the London talks might have achieved just enough to help shape the future on a less-hostile basis. That in itself is progress — but it would be a mistake to call this moment a reset. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Karishma Vaswani is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia politics with a special focus on China. Previously, she was the BBC's lead Asia presenter and worked for the BBC across Asia and South Asia for two decades. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Will be met with very big force': Donald Trump's stern warning to protesters in Washington; security tightened in DC ahead of US Army's 250th parade
Donald Trump US President Donald Trump has warned demonstrators planning to protest during the upcoming military parade in Washington that they would face 'very big force." Speaking from the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump issued a blunt message. 'For those people that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force,' he said. 'And I haven't even heard about a protest, but you know, this is people that hate our country, but they will be met with very heavy force. ' The event on Saturday marks the 250th anniversary of the US Army and coincides with the MAGA chief's 79th birthday. The day will feature an Army festival on the National Mall, a military parade through the capital, and a mass enlistment and re-enlistment ceremony led by the president. Law enforcement is preparing for massive crowds. According to US Secret Service Special Agent in Charge Matt McCool, thousands of personnel from federal and local agencies will be deployed. 'At least nine permits have been issued for protests on that day,' he confirmed. Both the FBI and Metropolitan Police have said there are no credible threats. ' Nationwide Day of Defiance ' One of the major organisers of nationwide protests is a group called No Kings. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like May 2025: Top 5 Dividend Stocks [Read Now] Seeking Alpha Read Now Undo On its website, the group says, 'They've defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights and slashed our services. The corruption has gone too far. No thrones. No crowns. No kings.' The group has opted not to protest in Washington itself, accusing Trump of turning the parade into 'a made-for-TV display of dominance.' Instead, they are calling for a 'Nationwide Day of Defiance' to draw attention to what they describe as authoritarian politics under Trump. POTUS's action regarding LA protests The president also defended his recent decision to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, after protests broke out over immigration raids. 'Los Angeles was under siege until we got there,' Trump said, although state officials argue that the military deployment has only worsened tensions. While Trump cited violent episodes, including torched vehicles and attacks on officers, protest supporters say most demonstrations have been peaceful. Trump claimed without evidence that many protesters were 'paid insurrectionists.' The president's stance mirrors his long history of strong support for law enforcement and scepticism towards protest movements. In 2020, during nationwide unrest after George Floyd's killing, he reportedly asked military leaders if protesters could be shot. California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have strongly condemned the decision to deploy the National Guard in Los Angeles. Former presidential candidate Kamala Harris has also joined in the criticism. Many other Democratic leaders have criticised Trump's decision to deploy force without the state's permission, calling him a 'dictator.' Trump's birthday and US Army's 250th parade in DC A grand military parade is set to take place in Washington, DC on June 14 to mark the 250th anniversary of the US Army's founding. The day also happens to be Trump's 79th birthday, and he is expected to speak at the event. Organised by the US Army and America250 commission, the celebration will include historical and modern military displays, fireworks, a parachute show by the Golden Knights, and a concert on the National Mall. About 200,000 people are expected to attend. The main parade route runs along Constitution Avenue, with standing room only for spectators. Security will be tight, as the event has been labelled a National Special Security Event by the Department of Homeland Security. Entry will be limited to specific checkpoints, and several items like drones, chairs, and large bags are banned. Roads, flights, metro stations, and river access will face temporary disruptions. Concerns have been raised over damage from heavy tanks, prompting the Army Corps of Engineers to install steel plates to protect roads. The event is expected to cost between $25 million and $45 million, including possible road repairs. Trump defended the spending, calling it a valuable show of strength.
Hindustan Times
40 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
NASA's new employee separation agreement haunts thousands of employees. Here's what's happening
NASA has become the latest federal agency to roll out a new buyout option aimed at trimming its workforce. The option offers employees a chance to resign at a later date while still receiving pay. The space agency's Deferred Resignation Program (DRP) is part of a broader push to cut costs and align staffing with shifting mission priorities amid deep budget cuts proposed by the Trump administration. On Friday, NASA's acting Administrator Janet Petro said the agency is introducing new voluntary separation programs to help ease the transition for workers impacted by the changes. 'Looking ahead, we're taking steps to streamline operations and ensure we're aligned with mission priorities,' Petro said. 'Starting next week, we'll introduce voluntary separation tools, including a new Deferred Resignation Program (DRP) to help manage workforce transitions thoughtfully and transparently.' ALSO READ| Donald Trump military parade FAQs: RSVP, ticket prices, venue details, date and more While most deferred resignations so far have kept employees on paid administrative leave only through 30 September, NASA's program allows eligible workers to remain on the books until 9 January 2026. Some deemed essential to ongoing operations will stay even longer until 30 September 2026 with paid leave beginning in April of that year. 'NASA is continuing its phased approach to streamline its workforce and reduce its overall headcount,' NASA spokesperson Cheryl Warner said in a statement. 'This affords employees the opportunity to depart while ensuring the agency remains fully capable to pursue its mission.' NASA centres have already warned staff of staffing cuts. At the Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, leadership has told employees they expect to lose 18% of the workforce. ALSO READ| After Fort Bragg, Trump lists military bases that will be renamed - Fort Robert E Lee to Fort Hood Notably, President Trump's 2026 budget proposal calls for a 24% cut to NASA's budget and a 29% reduction in its civil service workforce. Petro acknowledged and said NASA would 'remain focused on maintaining the technical excellence and capability our mission demands.'
