logo
HPV Infection May Increase the Risk of Heart Disease. Could Vaccination Lower It?

HPV Infection May Increase the Risk of Heart Disease. Could Vaccination Lower It?

Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes nearly 38,000 cancers a year, including most cervical and throat cancers. Now recent research suggests HPV infection also increases the risk of heart disease. An analysis of seven studies with a total of nearly 250,000 participants found that those who tested positive for HPV were 33 percent more likely than those who tested negative to develop cardiovascular disease.
Now Stephen Akinfenwa, an internal medicine resident at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine and one of the lead authors of the analysis, says he would like to study whether the HPV vaccine, which can prevent 90 percent of cervical cancers, also reduces the risk of heart disease.
The vaccine, which has been recommended for adolescents since 2006, protects against infection with nine strains of HPV, including high-risk types that are the most likely to cause cervical cancer, as well as strains that cause genital warts. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that boys and girls receive a series of two HPV shots at ages 11 or 12 as part of their routine childhood vaccinations—and that people receive three shots if their first dose is instead administered between the ages of 15 and 26. The vaccine is most protective when given before people become sexually active.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
The HPV vaccine has been strikingly effective. Cervical cancer deaths in women under age 25—the first generation eligible to receive the vaccine— fell by 65 percent from 2012 to 2019.
Learning that heart disease may be related to HPV is exciting because HPV infection is preventable, Akinfenwa explains. 'It feels like good news,' he says. 'We're hoping that [the vaccine] will be a powerful tool for prevention.'
Akinfenwa and his colleagues presented a condensed version of their analysis in March at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology. It has not yet been published as a peer-reviewed study. The analysis included studies published between 2011 and 2024 that followed women for three to 17 years.
The largest study included in the analysis was published by researchers in South Korea in 2024 and followed apparently healthy women who were tested for 13 strains of high-risk HPV as part of a routine screening for cervical cancer. The women returned for health checks every year or two for an average of 8.6 years. Although heart disease and death were rare among these women, who had an average age of 40, those who tested positive for high-risk HPV were nearly four times as likely as those who tested negative to develop blocked arteries or die from heart disease, the study found.
Women aren't the only ones at risk, Akinfenwa says. In one paper included in the analysis, a 2017 study of people undergoing radiation therapy for head and neck cancer, 75 percent of patients were men. (Head and neck cancers are more than twice as common in men as they are in women, according to the National Cancer Institute.) The 2017 study found that people who tested positive for HPV were more likely to have strokes compared with those who tested negative.
HPV is ubiquitous and the most common sexually transmitted infection in the U.S. Among sexually active people, more than 90 percent of men and more than 80 percent of women are infected with HPV during their lifetime. About half of HPV infections involve high-risk strains that cause the bulk of cancers of the cervix, throat, vagina, vulva, anus and penis.
Vaccine hesitancy and lack of awareness about HPV has kept many parents from vaccinating their children against the infection, research shows. Some parents are reluctant to vaccinate their kids against HPV because they don't think their children will have sex as teenagers. Only 61 percent of adolescents are up to date on all HPV vaccines.
Even without a study that has specifically analyzed the effect of HPV vaccination on heart disease, the link between HPV and heart disease suggests that 'vaccination is a good idea, and our study definitely supports that,' Akinfenwa says.
Given what scientists know about HPV, it's likely that the vaccine could prevent cases of heart disease related to the virus or at least the nine strains of the virus that are included in the shot, says Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, who studies emerging infectious diseases and was not involved in the new analysis.
Other experts aren't so sure about the link between HPV and heart disease. Mark Einstein, chair of obstetrics and gynecology and women's health at Montefiore Einstein, who also was not involved in the analysis, says researchers have a long way to go before they can confidently say that the virus causes heart disease. 'This sort of association has come up a number of times over the years,' Einstein says. 'When you have a common disease—heart disease—and a common infection—HPV—it's easy to use statistical nuance to show a correlation,' he says. But 'association is different than causality.'
A Source of Chronic Inflammation
Scientists don't know exactly how HPV may increase the risk of heart disease, but it's unlikely that the virus directly infects the heart or blood vessels, says C. Noel Bairey Merz, director of the Barbra Streisand Women's Heart Center at the Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute in Los Angeles, who was not involved in the new research.
HPV causes cancer in parts of the body that come into direct contact with the virus through sexual activity, says Kevin Ault, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine. The virus is not thought to travel to distant organs and cause lung or liver cancer, for example. 'We usually don't think of human papillomavirus as going all around the body,' Ault says. 'It's going to infect mostly skin' or mucous membranes.
Instead, Merz says, HPV probably increases the risk of heart disease by causing inflammation, which occurs as the immune system attempts to control the virus. Chronic inflammation has been shown to irritate blood vessels and can lead to the hardening of fatty plaques in the lining of the arteries, which reduces blood flow to the heart. Inflammation can also cause those plaques to burst and form blood clots, which can lead to a heart attack or stroke.
Although the immune system naturally controls most HPV infections within a year or two, a small number of infections become chronic, a problem that increases the risk of cervical cancer, says Rebecca Perkins, obstetrician and gynecologist at the Woman, Mother and Baby Research Institute at Tufts Medical Center.
Even after HPV is controlled, the virus doesn't disappear from the body. Like the virus that causes chicken pox (varicella-zoster), HPV can lie dormant in the body for decades. And just as the varicella-zoster virus can reactivate decades after a childhood infection and cause shingles, HPV can wake up and cause women to test positive during cervical cancer screenings, Perkins says.
The studies included in the new analysis typically cited the result of a single test for HPV, Akinfenwa says. HPV tests are now included in most routine cervical cancer screenings, either alone or in combination with a Pap smear. So a positive test result cannot distinguish among a recent exposure, a reactivation of the virus and a chronic infection, Akinfenwa says.
How Infections Can Damage the Heart
Many pathogens can cause heart disease, Adalja says. A wide variety of viruses, bacteria, parasites and fungi can trigger myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, which can make the heart too weak to pump blood efficiently. Those include the viruses that cause influenza and COVID. And untreated strep throat and scarlet fever, caused by Streptococcus bacteria, can lead to rheumatic fever, which can damage heart valves and cause heart failure.
'Many infectious diseases set off inflammatory cascades that can prompt cardiovascular and neurological events like heart attacks, blood clots and strokes,' Adalja says. 'By staving off infection, [vaccinating] against these agents—such as influenza, varicella-zoster virus and, presumably, HPV—these events will be prevented or become less likely.'
Doctors have frequently been surprised by unexpected or off-target benefits from vaccines, Adalja says. A growing number of studies suggest that the shingles vaccine also reduces the risk of dementia —possibly by preventing the inflammation that contributes to the disease, Adalja says. The bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine against tuberculosis also has been found to reduce risk of other diseases in which the immune system goes awry, including type 1 diabetes, cancer, multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease. And an analysis published in 2024 found that meningitis vaccines reduced the incidence of gonorrhea by 30 to 59 percent. Such cross-protective immunity can occur when two bacteria are from similar families. The bacterium that causes gonorrhea is related to the meningococcus bacterium, which causes most cases of meningitis, an inflammation of the protective membranes around the brain, Adalja says.
To better understand how HPV damages the heart and whether the HPV vaccine might offer protection, Merz says, researchers could compare rates of chronic inflammation in adolescents who were vaccinated with rates in those who weren't vaccinated. 'It's logical to think preventing the HPV infection itself via vaccination will reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease,' Akinfenwa says. 'Having said that, it needs to be tested.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Same-Day Discharge Criteria Outlined for AF Ablation
Same-Day Discharge Criteria Outlined for AF Ablation

Medscape

time3 hours ago

  • Medscape

Same-Day Discharge Criteria Outlined for AF Ablation

SAN DIEGO — Same-day discharge after ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an appropriate strategy for saving costs if performed with strict selection criteria and protocols, according to a recently issued joint statement from the American College of Cardiology and the Heart Rhythm Society. Same-day discharge has long been indicated for catheter ablations to abort routine atrial flutter, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, and focal atrial tachycardias, according to the authors of the new joint statement. Although they maintained patients selected for elective catheter ablation of AF require heightened scrutiny, they endorsed same-day AF ablation when used selectively. The statement evaluates 'evidence supporting shorter hospitalization stay with same-day discharge for intracardiac ablations agonistic to site of care,' reported Amit J. Shankar, MD , an electrophysiologist with Canton-Potsdam Hospital in Potsdam, New York, who served as a representative for the Heart Rhythm Society in developing the statement. Whether in a hospital setting or an outpatient facility, the statement describes same-day discharge ablation as an opportunity to improve patient access, improve efficiency, and reduce healthcare costs. The adoption of same-day discharge after AF ablation was accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic, said Samuel O. Jones, MD, a cardiologist affiliated with The Chattanooga Heart Institute in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and a fellow of the American College of Cardiology. 'Improved workflows, technological innovations, and procedure advancements have also contributed to the high rates at which these are performed,' added Jones, who helped write the statement. The statement was released on April 24 to coincide with the first day of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) 2025 annual scientific meeting. It was simultaneously published in Heart Rhythm and the Journal of the American College of Cardiology . The scientific statement's recommendation is intended for elective rather than urgent or emergency ablations. Support for the statement was drawn from multiple case-controlled studies, meta-analyses, and outcome databases. In one example, a 12-study meta-analysis with data from more than 18,000 elective ablations showed no significant differences in major complications from the procedure among the 40.5% of patients discharged the same day relative to those who were discharged after at least one night in the hospital. In another study, drawn from a real-world prospective registry, outcomes were compared for potential candidates for same-day ablation on the basis of prespecified criteria and those who were not eligible for the procedure. These criteria included no bleeding history, a left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 40%, no pulmonary disease, and no surgical procedures within the previous 60 days. Of the 2332 patients included in the analysis, 1982 (85%) were deemed candidates for same-day ablation. Although freedom for atrial arrhythmias was comparable ( P = .0212) for the two groups, patients discharged the same day had a lower rate of complications (0.8% vs 2.9%; P < .001). The rate of readmission was similar (0.8% vs 09%; P = .924), according to the researchers. Contraindications for Same-Day Ablation In the document, relative contraindications for same-day ablation include decompensated heart failure, significant pulmonary disease, significant risk of bleeding, and any major unstable comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, or renal disease. The document recommends limiting same-day procedures to patients who can have readily available social support and can return to a hospital quickly in the event of a post-procedural complication. Acknowledging that most large hospitals offering ablation for AF already have formal selection criteria and protocols in place for same-day discharge, the authors called for free-standing sites to establish their own if they have not done so. In these settings, the authors emphasized the need to rigorously follow prespecified and 'ironclad' selection criteria and protocols. From this standpoint, Shankar said same-day procedures should always be performed on the basis of shared decision-making with the patient. While the economic benefits of same-day procedures might be shared by the facility and the patient, the latter should understand the inherent differences in the settings and participate actively in any decision of where the ablation is performed. Jones said while a substantial body of evidence supports same-day AF ablation as a safe and effective procedure that can free up necessary resources in the healthcare facility, the potential advantages are relevant only to appropriately selected patients. The new statement also suggests transfer agreements with inpatient facilities should be arranged in advance and that patients should be informed such a transfer is a possibility outside of a hospital setting. However, the document makes clear same-day ablations in alternative sites of care are reasonable when the precautions are observed. In any setting that AF ablation is performed, the writing committee encouraged tracking outcomes to ensure that high-quality care is achieved and sustained. Shankar and Jones reported no potential conflicts of interest.

Avoid These Foods At Your Hotel's Breakfast Buffet
Avoid These Foods At Your Hotel's Breakfast Buffet

Buzz Feed

time8 hours ago

  • Buzz Feed

Avoid These Foods At Your Hotel's Breakfast Buffet

Most food lovers agree that when you're on vacation, one of the perks of staying at a hotel is the free continental breakfast or breakfast buffet included with your visit. On the other hand, one of the biggest setbacks you can have on a vacation is being relegated to the bathroom after you've contracted a foodborne illness. And food that's been sitting out all morning can be at high risk of potential bacteria contamination, so it's important to know which items are safe to eat — and which you may want to skip. 'There are two main factors I think about … that can increase [the] risk of getting foodborne illness,' explained Dr. Ellen Shumaker, director of outreach for the Safe Plates program at North Carolina State University. '[Those are] temperature control of foods [and] … other guests potentially contaminating utensils or food due to lack of handwashing.' A lot of the time you can't taste the difference when food is contaminated, so it's key to know what to look out for ahead of time. 'There's a number of different microorganisms [that can contaminate food and] can prove to be pathogenic or produce toxins,' said Dr. Bryan Quoc Le, food scientist and food science consultant. 'For example, [with] certain species of E. coli, salmonella or listeria, you only need a couple cells to really cause havoc.' We talked to food safety experts about what they usually avoid at a hotel breakfast — and what they feel comfortable eating and drinking. 'Hot foods [should be] staying hot, and cold foods [should be] staying cold,' Shumaker said. '[This helps to] avoid … the temperature danger zone where bacteria like to grow.' When foods are left out in the 'danger zone' (between 40 and 140 degrees Fahrenheit) for more than two hours, germs that make you sick can rapidly reproduce, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). And in a buffet or continental breakfast setting, food is likely sitting out longer than that. If you see sausage patties, bacon, scrambled eggs, quiches or other meat and egg products sitting out without any heating appliance, you're going to want to skip those. These types of foods should be kept warm with a device such as a hot plate or chafing dish, Shumaker explained. 'This does not give the exact temperature, of course, but is an indicator that measures are being taken to keep food in a safe temperature range,' she said. 'If there's milk that's been sitting around and it's not on ice or hasn't been refrigerated, that's certainly something that I'm planning on avoiding,' Le said. You're going to want to make sure perishable items (like yogurt, cheeses and deli meats) are kept cold and stay out of the temperature 'danger zone.' Some precut fruits and veggies (like tomatoes, leafy greens and melon) also should be chilled because 'when cut, the fleshy part … has the level of moisture and pH to allow bacteria that can cause illness to grow,' according to Shumaker. As for juices, both fresh and pasteurized should be cold. Since fresh juice isn't pasteurized, it's at a higher risk for growing harmful bacteria when left out at room temperature. Shelf-stable juice packaged in boxes, bottles or cans don't need to be refrigerated, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Individually wrapped creamers and butter packets also don't need to be kept cold. These types of creamers have been treated to kill off bacteria, and the salt in the butter helps it maintain shelf stability, Shumaker explained. While Le generally eats from the salad bar if it looks clean and fresh, he pays attention to signs that the fruits and veggies aren't being properly handled. For example, if they have soft edges or if there's any dirt or other material on the surfaces, this could indicate that they're old or haven't been thoroughly washed. Melons, like cantaloupes, can be particularly risky because people often don't wash the rinds, he said. If the rind is damaged and there's bacteria on it, it can spread to the inside part of the melon. It can also cross-contaminate other fruits or veggies it touches. 'Fresh vegetables that are normally picked from the ground, like a lettuce or a cabbage … can pick up dirt quite a bit and then spread that … if they haven't been washed carefully,' Le added. 'Dirt can … start to produce a number of different microorganisms.' Raw sprouts (such as alfalfa or mung bean) should be avoided, Shumaker explained. They're grown from seeds and beans under warm, humid conditions, which are ideal for the growth of E. coli, salmonella and listeria, according to the FDA. 'If just a few harmful bacteria are present in or on the seed, the bacteria can grow to high levels during sprouting.' Sure, that tray of fruit may look appetizing — until you notice there's no serving utensil for it and people are touching it with their bare hands. If they haven't washed their hands after using the restroom, coughing or blowing their nose, they could be contaminating the other food on the plate, Shumaker said. When you do use serving utensils or shared condiments that a lot of other people are touching, you want to make sure your hands are clean before picking up the food on your plate. 'Other guests may have hands that have not been washed thoroughly after using the restroom or … have been in their mouths for their finger-licking first course,' said Dr. Jonathan Deutsch, professor of culinary arts and science at Drexel University. 'I always try to sanitize my hands between making my plate and sitting down to eat.' Norovirus, known as the 'stomach bug,' is the most likely culprit to be transferred from unclean hands to utensils and surfaces. 'If not cleaned and sanitized, norovirus can persist on surfaces for weeks,' Shumaker said. Making sure food and beverages are served at the appropriate temperature and washing your hands before eating are two of the most important guidelines. There are a few other items experts say are safest to consume. 'I'm going to trust [packaged foods, like muffins or individual yogurts] more just because there's a lot of processes that are involved to make sure that [they] are kept safe,' Le said. '[And] no one's touching them or handling them.' Deutsch said whole fruits that haven't been cut (like bananas or oranges), cooked-to-order options like omelets, and cereal in a dispenser (wash your hands after touching the handle) are also usually safe bets, particularly if you're immunocompromised. For people who are at a higher risk of food poisoning (weakened immune system, pregnant, aged 65 and older, or younger than 5), they should especially be aware of options that are safer to eat and what to avoid. While anyone can get food poisoning, individuals in these groups could get severely sick from it, according to the CDC. Do your research — and follow your gut. Besides the above safety guidelines, you can also check out inspection reports for restaurants and hotels. (They are usually publicly available in the United States and many other countries, according to Deutsch.) And when you're eating out at a restaurant or hotel, 'don't be afraid to ask questions regarding how food has been handled,' Deutsch said. 'And follow your gut — if you see something that's questionable or if you have a health condition that makes you particularly vulnerable, pack some protein bars.'

Feds' abrupt cutoff of HIV prevention funds threatens decades of progress, S.F. providers say
Feds' abrupt cutoff of HIV prevention funds threatens decades of progress, S.F. providers say

San Francisco Chronicle​

time21 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Feds' abrupt cutoff of HIV prevention funds threatens decades of progress, S.F. providers say

Leaders in HIV care in San Francisco and across the country say their critical efforts to stop new infections are under attack by a Trump administration that already has cut several key federal programs and now appears to be withholding money meant to go specifically toward prevention. The bulk of HIV prevention work is supported by federal money, including grants issued through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But the CDC's HIV programs have been gutted this year, and millions in grant money that should have been in the hands of state and local health care providers by now has yet to arrive. In parts of California, including Los Angeles, some prevention programs already have been impacted because the money hasn't come through. Los Angeles County sent notices to dozens of organizations it works with that their contracts would be terminated if federal funds weren't available by June 1. San Francisco may be less immediately impacted because it does not rely on outside contractors for services, and local leaders have promised to backfill any missing federal money. The Los Angeles and San Francisco grants are for about $19 million and $7 million, respectively, and the state gets a separate allotment. But the situation is grim, said experts in HIV care, who worry that any efforts to dismantle public health and services for vulnerable communities will have disastrous effects, and could undo decades of work to slow down and eventually end the AIDS epidemic. 'We have an incredible, effective, world-class HIV prevention and care system, and we can't afford to go back because of what's happening at the federal level,' said Jonathan Frochtzwajg, director of health justice policy for the San Francisco AIDS Foundation. 'This level of uncertainty and instability is unprecedented,' Frochtzwajg said. 'In the past, funding levels may increase or decrease and we would always be in the fight. But with this administration, it's the wholesale elimination of funding streams and programs.' In San Francisco, the federal funding supports HIV prevention efforts along with programs to end other sexually transmitted diseases and hepatitis C, which are often concurrent infections. Losing that money would jeopardize the city's work toward ending the epidemic, said the San Francisco Department of Public Health, and 'significantly weaken' efforts to provide testing, offer uncomplicated access to care for those who test positive, monitor case rates and provide education and outreach. The public health department said Friday that it had not yet received the grant money, which was supposed to arrive by Sunday. HIV care leaders said they were caught off guard by President Donald Trump's attacks on their work since he took office in January. In his previous administration, the president had been supportive of efforts to end the epidemic, and had not touched federal funding. Now, those leaders say, they fear their programs have been swept up in larger plans to scale back federal government and in particular get rid of diversity, equity and inclusion programs. The CDC has especially come under attack in the second Trump administration, and several programs aimed at HIV — including the CDC's HIV research arm — have been scaled back or killed entirely. Trump also has divested from or severely curtailed involvement in programs to support HIV care internationally. HIV care requires intense public health work to control spread of disease, and efforts often are focused on vulnerable communities including people of color and transgender people, who are at much higher risk of infection than other groups. 'That's what they seem to be objecting to: 'Oh, you work with transgender people? You work with gay people? You work with Black people? '' said Carl Schmid, executive director of the HIV+Hepatitis Policy Institute in Washington. 'We don't have the luxury of not thinking about those things,' Schmid said. 'In fact, if you want to utilize tax dollars, that's where the (HIV) cases are. That's what I call being efficient.' Ending the epidemic must include widespread, easy access to testing and prevention tools like PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis), say HIV experts. And those who are infected must be treated in order to keep them from passing the infection to others. Indeed, the nation's prevention programs have had a profound effect on slowing down the epidemic, which at its peak in the late 1980s and early '90s was seeing 130,000 new infections a year; that's down to about 30,000 now. In San Francisco, cases dropped from about 2,000 a year during the worst times to about 145 last year. 'Accessible HIV testing, accessible PrEP, accessible care for people living with HIV — all of that is what is driving down our new diagnoses,' said Frochtzwajg. 'We'll see that trend reverse if you take away those services.' Schmid said the timing of the federal cuts was especially frustrating because new prevention tools that will soon become available — including PrEP that may require only one injection a year to be effective — require stable foundations to get the care to people who need it. 'It's really sad, because we have such great hope on the horizon,' Schmid said. 'We have the science, and we're losing the infrastructure.' Lance Toma, chief executive of San Francisco Community Health Center, said he was concerned about the fate of organizations that reach the most vulnerable communities because they tend to be smaller and less resourced. At an event at the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco on May 21, Toma and others painted a dire outlook for HIV care, even as they said they intended to fight for resources. 'We're really headed toward a potential future where we will see the dismantling of organizations that we hold dear,' Toma said. 'Everything we've worked so hard at, the efforts we've made to make competent trans programs, or gay men of color programs — that's where I get scared. These are the folks we've worked so hard for, and these are the folks being targeted.' The Commonwealth Club event called up two panels, one focused on young activists and the other on the current climate. Several participants said they must now look to past activism — in particular, the efforts of ACT UP, a grassroots organization fighting for people with HIV and AIDS — as they pick up the battle all over again. 'We all lived through it, when it was so grim that we didn't really see any light at the end of the tunnel,' said Cecilia Chung, senior advisor with the Transgender Law Center in Oakland who is transgender and HIV positive herself. 'We persevered, we fought and we pushed through. And that's phenomenal.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store