U.S. Tanker Aircraft Head to Middle East as Threat of Iran War Rises
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
U.S. Air Force aerial refueling aircraft are heading for the Middle East amid an escalating war between Israel and Iran and the possibility that U.S. forces could also become involved, according to flight data tracking sources.
Newsweek has reached out to the Pentagon for comment.
Why It Matters
The U.S. is redeploying military forces as the conflict between Israel and Iran stretched over the week, raising tensions between Washington and Tehran. The American repositioning could be a sign of an increased possibility that it gets involved in an attack on Iran although Washington has so far said that it is not joining Israel in striking Iran.
U.S. President Donald Trump had previously not ruled out military action if Iran did not agree to curbs on its nuclear program. Iran has also blamed the United States for Israel's attacks though has not repeated earlier threats of attacking U.S. bases in the region.
The USAF Thunderbirds mid-air refueling during the Atlantic City, NJ Air Show on August 24, 2022 in Atlantic City, New Jersey.
The USAF Thunderbirds mid-air refueling during the Atlantic City, NJ Air Show on August 24, 2022 in Atlantic City, New Jersey.What To Know
KC-135R Stratotankers and KC-46A Pegasus tankers, commonly used during transatlantic deployments and support for combat aircraft appeared to be heading to the Middle East through Europe, data from Flightradar 24 showed.
More than two dozen U.S. Air Force KC-135R and KC-46A tankers took off from bases across the U.S. and headed east over the Atlantic, The War Zone reported earlier. The U.S. Navy's aircraft carrier USS Nimitz has also appeared to be heading toward the Middle East from Asia.
"Over the weekend, I directed the deployment of additional capabilities to the United States Central Command Area of Responsibility," Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wrote on X on Monday.
pic.twitter.com/TMb47DQMVZ — Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth (@SecDef) June 16, 2025
Messaging from Trump has been fluctuating, with earlier remarks expressing hope for a "real end" to the conflict—and before that describing a nuclear deal with Tehran as achievable—to telling reporters aboard Air Force One he was not in "too much in the mood to negotiate" with Iran.
Following Israeli strikes on Iranian territory last week, Iran retaliated with missile attacks targeting Israeli cities, resulting in civilian casualties on both sides. Tehran has held Washington responsible for Israel's offensive, after previously warning of a regional response that could include U.S. targets.
Britain is deploying additional RAF Typhoon jets and refueling aircraft to the Middle East for "contingency support," Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced, according to the BBC.
What People Are Saying
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Fox News: "Right now, we've got assets in the region and we're going to defend them. We're strong, we're prepared, we're defensive ... President Trump hopes there can be peace."
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Saturday: "This is what Israel is doing with the support, the clear support of the President of the United States, Donald Trump, and the American people and many others in the world. So, with God's help and with the goodwill and resolution of all free societies, we shall win."
Chief Pentagon Spokesperson Sean Parnell wrote on X: "American Forces are maintaining their defensive posture & that has not changed. We will protect American troops & our interests."
What Happens Next
Trump, who made an early exit from the G7 summit on Monday against the backdrop of Israel-Iran escalation, is expected to convene with the National Security Council. This could give a clearer picture of whether the United States becomes involved in attacks on Iran. Any Iranian attack on U.S. forces could well also bring the United States into the war.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
21 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Republican Congressman Calls On Trump To Expand Work Visas
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A Republican Congressman has called on President Donald Trump to expand work visas after the administration's back-and-forth over its immigration enforcement policy targeting farms, hotels and restaurants. Maryland Representative Andy Harris, who chairs the House Freedom Caucus, said Tuesday that the president and Congress needed to make an effort to maintain the U.S. workforce while deporting immigrants with criminal records. His comments came after Trump said Thursday that he had heard concerns about workplace raids on farms and at hospitality venues, including restaurants and hotels, signaling a pause in U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions. This was then walked back Monday night. "There has to be an effort to figure out how to make sure that we have the workforce we need, whether it's H-2A, H-2B, whether it's, again, a different category that will result in having an adequate number of workers here in the United States to keep the economy going," Harris told reporters. "The president acknowledged it. I believe that now may be the time to have Congress, again, look at these categories, revise the categories, create new categories as necessary as the president, again, attempts to deport people who are here, especially criminals who are here illegally. Clearly, the workforce issues are significant." Why It Matters Harris's comments reflect a growing concern among the GOP that labor shortages in critical industries could worsen without reforms to temporary work visa programs. The H-2A and H-2B visas allow U.S. employers to bring in foreign workers for seasonal agricultural and non-agricultural jobs, respectively. Trump has pledged to launch the largest mass deportation effort in U.S. history as part of his strategy to tackle illegal immigration and strengthen border security. However, the proposal has raised concerns about its impact on the U.S. economy. A group of Mexican H-2A seasonal farm workers harvest cucumbers in Eastern North Carolina, June 30, 2023. Inset: U.S. Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) leaves a House Republican caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol on June... A group of Mexican H-2A seasonal farm workers harvest cucumbers in Eastern North Carolina, June 30, 2023. Inset: U.S. Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD) leaves a House Republican caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol on June 04, 2025 in Washington, DC. More Milton Lindsay/What To Know According to the American Business Immigration Coalition (ABIC), agricultural production could decline by $30 billion to $60 billion if Trump's deportation policy is fully enacted, while the American Immigration Council projects that the president's mass deportation policy could carry a one-time cost of $315 billion. Trump appeared to have heard some of those concerns when he posted on Truth Social last Thursday, but the pause on ICE workplace raids was then lifted on Monday. Harris said Tuesday that the president clearly realized that deporting known illegal immigrant criminals could run in parallel to improvements to work-based visas to ensure U.S. businesses could keep running. "With an unemployment rate of 4 percent, you're not going to find American workers for a lot of these tasks," Harris said. "You haven't found them even when the unemployment rate was higher." Alongside Harris at the ABIC briefing were restaurant and farming leaders, also concerned about ICE raids, who want to see long-term solutions. The Republican said others in Congress were aware that a long-term solution was needed to make sure farm workers could continue coming to the U.S. legally and that he hoped for progress within the next year. Other recent attempts to make significant changes to U.S. immigration laws have failed, with no major changes since the early 1990s. What People Are Saying President Trump wrote on Truth Social last week: "Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace." Rebecca Shi, CEO, American Business Immigration Coalition told reporters on Jun 17: "We need Congress and the administration to go further with real solutions, and that's work visas for people who've lived, worked, and pay taxes here." Matt Teagarden, CEO of Kansas Livestock Association, speaking at Tuesday's briefing: "These raids disrupt our food supply and contribute to higher food prices. In addition to the workers who have been detained, they also instill fear in these communities, even for legal workers. We're encouraged by the President's recognition of the need for a balanced approach to this issue." What Happens Next The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has reversed last week's guidance that had temporarily halted workplace immigration raids at farms, hotels, and restaurants.
CNN
21 minutes ago
- CNN
Inside Trump's decision to bail on the G7 early: A Middle East crisis and a distaste for group projects
It only took a few hours of summitry in the Canadian woods on Monday for President Donald Trump to decide he'd rather be elsewhere. Returning to Washington on an overnight flight, Trump attributed his decision to abruptly abandon the Group of 7 summit to operational security, suggesting there could be prying ears among the fir trees listening to his secret conversations. 'I don't believe in telephones, because people like you listen to them,' he told reporters on Air Force One. 'Being on the scene is much better, and we did everything I had to do at the G7.' Everything he had to do, yes. But not quite everything his counterparts had planned for him at the first international conference of his second term, where attempts to avoid open rupture were almost immediately scuttled the moment Trump first appeared before cameras to object to an 11-year-old decision to eject Russia from the group. Back in Washington on Tuesday, Trump was planning to meet with national security officials in the White House Situation Room to discuss the situation in the Middle East. He said as he was flying home he was seeking a 'real end' to the conflict rather than a ceasefire, and described himself as 'not too much in the mood to negotiate.' His vice president wrote on X that Trump 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment,' hinting at increased US involvement in the escalating Israel-Iran conflict. And Trump issued a series of afternoon posts on Truth Social that seemed to take a more menacing posture toward Iran, noting the US knew the supreme leader's location and calling for 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' Though he initially framed his departure from Alberta as a matter of great urgency, he told reporters heading back to Washington that the picture would be clearer on Israel's intentions 'over the next two days.' If there was a imminent and specific reason for his abrupt departure, he and aides didn't reveal it. If one thing was clear, it was Trump's belief that the Middle East crisis wouldn't be resolved in the woods of Canada. Though he was surrounded by his foreign counterparts, Trump appeared to give little weight to the idea of collective action, believing instead it was his decisions – and his alone – that could determine the fate of the region. A day earlier, European leaders had been scrambling to complete a joint leaders' statement calling for de-escalation between Israel and Iran. They'd met resistance from US officials, who objected to some of the language in the draft and signaled that Trump would not sign on, officials familiar with the matter said. By the time a leaders' dinner rolled around late Monday — hours after Trump announced he would be departing a day early — some of the language in the statement had been watered down. With some urging from his counterparts over their meal, Trump said he would sign off, two US officials said. But as he returned to Washington, he seemed mostly uninterested in the details. He said he hadn't read the document. Never one for group meetings, nor particularly fond of rustic lodges, Trump had wavered on attending this week's G7 at all. Organizers took pains to adjust the schedule and expectations to meet Trump's preferences, Western officials said. Instead of a lengthy joint communiqué to issue at the summit's conclusion, shorter statements on individual topics were prepared in the hopes a few disputed lines would not scupper a broader show of unity. And instead of stacking the agenda with back-to-back group sessions, which even presidents before Trump have described as tedious, time was left for more lively one-on-ones that would allow leaders to engage Trump informally. The goal: don't let Trump get bored. That, many European officials believe, is when disaster can strike. Trump's aides said before the summit began that foreign leaders were scrambling to meet him, in part to make their case on trade deals that could avoid punishing new tariffs next month. And it did appear as if the line to engage Trump stretched well out the door of the Kananaskis Mountain Lodge. Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney began by wishing Trump a happy birthday. Other leaders came armed with gifts. The president of the European Council, António Costa, handed Trump a Portugal shirt signed by soccer star Cristiano Ronaldo. Trade — the topic Trump came to Canada to discuss — was indeed discussed. After avoiding her for months, Trump finally sat for talks with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen as they work out terms of a trade deal. And he was eager to showcase a new trade pact with the United Kingdom, though he mistakenly identified it as an agreement with the European Union and the papers fell all over the ground as he was showing them to reporters. 'A very important document,' Prime Minister Keir Starmer deadpanned after bending down to scoop up the signed agreement. But all of the individual attention was not enough to keep Trump in Canada. By mid-afternoon, it was clear to aides he wanted to leave early, a White House official said. The crisis in the Middle East had preoccupied the president, who constantly asked for updates amid the meetings, the official said. 'As soon as I leave here, we're going to be doing something. But I have to leave here,' he said during his appearance with Starmer, suggesting he was under pressure to depart. Trump's counterparts tried to take the news in stride. 'I am very grateful for the president's presence and I fully understand why he is leaving,' Carney said as he and Trump departed the summit's ritual family photo. French President Emmanuel Macron described Trump's early departure as a positive sign, saying there had been an offer 'to get a ceasefire and to then kick-start broader discussions' between Iran and Israel. Trump denied that as he was departing, calling Macron 'publicity seeking' and misinformed. 'Whether purposely or not, Emmanuel always gets it wrong,' Trump wrote as his plane was taxiing in Calgary, having just left Macron and the other leaders behind in the mountains. In the sky above the airport, a plane carrying Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky — who had been planning to meet Trump on Tuesday — was waiting to land. The two men did not cross paths.
Fox News
21 minutes ago
- Fox News
Vance defends Trump's Iran position amid 'crazy stuff on social media'
Vice President JD Vance on Monday defended President Donald Trump's position on Iran in response to what he described as "crazy" accusations on social media. "Look, I'm seeing this from the inside, and am admittedly biased towards our president (and my friend), but there's a lot of crazy stuff on social media, so I wanted to address some things directly on the Iran issue," Vance wrote on X. He said Trump "has been amazingly consistent, over 10 years, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. "Over the last few months, he encouraged his foreign policy team to reach a deal with the Iranians to accomplish this goal. The president has made clear that Iran cannot have uranium enrichment. And he said repeatedly that this would happen one of two ways--the easy way or the 'other' way." The vice president said he saw "a lot of confusion" online over the issue of "civilian nuclear power" and "uranium enrichment." "These are distinct issues. Iran could have civilian nuclear power without enrichment, but Iran rejected that," Vance said. "Meanwhile, they've enriched uranium far above the level necessary for any civilian purpose. They've been found in violation of their non-proliferation obligations by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which is hardly a rightwing organization. "It's one thing to want civilian nuclear energy. It's another thing to demand sophisticated enrichment capacity. And it's still another to cling to enrichment while simultaneously violating basic non-proliferation obligations and enriching right to the point of weapons-grade uranium." Vance said he's yet to see "a single good argument for why Iran needed to enrich uranium well above the threshold for civilian use" and "for why Iran was justified in violating its non-proliferation obligations." "I've yet to see a single good pushback against the IAEA's findings," he wrote. "Meanwhile, the president has shown remarkable restraint in keeping our military's focus on protecting our troops and protecting our citizens. He may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the president. "And of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy. But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue. And having seen this up close and personal, I can assure you that he is only interested in using the American military to accomplish American people's goals. Whatever he does, that is his focus." Trump on Tuesday took to TRUTH Social to call for an "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER" from Iran on the fifth day since Israel launched its preemptive attacks on Iranian nuclear sites and leadership. The United States has been surging assets to the Middle East and reportedly helped Israel block Iranian counter-strikes. Trump left the G7 summit in Canada early Monday to head back to Washington, D.C., for a Situation Room meeting on Iran Tuesday afternoon. "We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding," Trump wrote earlier Tuesday in a social media post. "He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Trump said Tuesday that the United States and Israel have "complete and total control of the skies over Iran."
