US-Iran Talks: 2nd Round to Kick Off in Rome
The second round of nuclear talks between the US and Iran is set to start on Saturday in Rome, Italy, to negotiate over Tehran's atomic ambitions.
The talks follow a first round in Muscat, Oman, which both sides described as 'positive' and 'constructive,' amid the US President Donald Trump's reiteration that he will never allow Iran to possess a nuclear weapon. Indirect Talks in Rome
The Iranian Foreign Minister, Abbas Aragchi, has arrived in Rome to participate in the second round of talks, according to a post on his Telegram account.
Aragchi is leading Iran's delegation in the negotiations with the US Special Envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff. Negotiations will take the form of indirect discussions through mediators from Oman, reported Reuters. Iran's Cautious Optimism
On Friday, Aragchi said that Tehran believes that reaching a deal with Washington is 'possible' as long as the US is realistic. Moreover, the Spokesperson for Iran's Foreign Ministry, Esmail Baghaei, on Saturday emphasized that Iran is committed to diplomacy.
'Iran always demonstrated, with good faith and a sense of responsibility, its commitment to diplomacy as a civilized way to resolve issues. We are aware that it is not a smooth path but we take every step with open eyes, relying also on the past experiences,' he wrote on X.
However, Iran tried to lower expectations of a quick agreement, amid speculations that the US would lift sanctions soon. In the light of this, Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, played down expectations of a breakthrough in the talks. He said this week that he was 'neither overly optimistic nor pessimistic.' Trump's Threats
Trump has repeatedly vowed that the will not allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon, threatening Tehran of military action if diplomacy failed. 'I'm for stopping Iran, very simply, from having a nuclear weapon. They can't have a nuclear weapon. I want Iran to be great and prosperous and terrific,' he told reporters on Friday.
The US President has warned Iran that it would be 'in real danger' in case the talks failed. 'If it requires military, we're going to have military. Israel will obviously be very much involved in that. They'll be the leader of that,' Trump threatened earlier.
Furthermore, Washington has sent the USS Carl Vinson aircraft carrier and its striking group to the Gulf of Oman ahead of Rome talks, to support the USS Harry Truman, which has been launching strikes against the Houthis as part of the US campaign against the Iranian-backed militia in Yemen. Curbing Iran's Nuclear Ambitions
The US wants Iran to abandon its nuclear program, fearing that Tehran is pursuing an atomic bomb. 'Any final arrangement must set a framework for peace, stability, and prosperity in the Middle East – meaning that Iran must stop and eliminate its nuclear enrichment and weaponization program,' Witkoff wrote on X on Tuesday.
Witkoff also said that Iran's uranium enrichment levels should not exceed 3.67%. On Monday, he told Fox News: 'They do not need to enrich past 3.67%. In some circumstances, they're at 60%, in other circumstances, 20%. That cannot be.'
The US Special Envoy suggested that the Trump administration may consider the terms of the 2015 nuclear deal, known as JCPOA, from which Trump unilaterally withdrew in 2018, as a basis for negotiations.
'This is going to be much about verification on the enrichment program, and then ultimately verification on weaponization. That includes missiles, the type of missiles that they have stockpiled there. And it includes the trigger for a bomb,' Witkoff added. Iran Red Lines
Tehran has insisted that its defense capabilities, including its missile program, are not up for negotiation. Moreover, Iran has asked for reliable guarantees that the US will not scrap the agreement as Trump did in 2018.
Tehran's red lines also include never agreeing to dismantle its uranium enriching centrifuges, halt enrichment altogether, or reduce its enriched uranium stockpile below levels agreed in the 2015 deal, a senior Iranian official told Reuters on condition of anonymity.
The US, Israel, and Western countries worry that Iran is pursuing an atomic bomb by accelerating its uranium enrichment to 60% purity, close to the 90%-weapon-grade level.
On Tuesday, the political advisor to the Iranian Supreme Leader, Ali Shamkhani, said that Iranian negotiators have full authority to reach a comprehensive deal based on 9 principles. These include seriousness, guarantees, lifting sanctions, halting threats, containing aggressors (such as Israel), and facilitating investments, he posted on X.
Short link :
Post Views: 63
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
5 hours ago
- Arab News
NATO defense buildup must ‘outpace Russia': US envoy
BRUSSELS: NATO's push to ramp up defenses must outstrip Russia's rearmament drive as Moscow is already gearing up for its 'next move' beyond Ukraine, the US ambassador to the alliance said Wednesday. The warning came ahead of a meeting of NATO defense ministers Thursday that will seek to forge a deal on hiking military spending for a summit later this month. US President Donald Trump has called on Washington's allies to commit to spending five percent of their GDP on defense. NATO chief Mark Rutte looks on track to secure a compromise deal agreement at the upcoming summit in the Hague for 3.5 percent of GDP on core military spending, and 1.5 percent on broader security-related areas such as infrastructure. 'The urgency of this moment is undeniable as the Russia-Ukraine conflict grinds on, Moscow is already preparing for its next move,' US ambassador Matthew Whitaker told journalists. 'We are already seeing the Kremlin aims to rebuild its military. NATO allies must outpace Russia. We have no other choice. Let me be clear, the time is now.' Whitaker said 'the United States expects every ally to step up with concrete plans, budgets, timelines, deliverables, to meet the five percent target.' 'This is not going to be just a pledge. This is going to be a commitment. Every ally must commit to investing at least five percent of GDP in defense and security, starting now again, this is not a suggestion,' he said. The US envoy said that Washington remained committed to NATO's Article Five mutual defense clause — but expected allies to step up their spending. 'We will defend every inch of allied territory, and we will do it from a position of unmatched strength,' Whitaker said. NATO ministers will sign off at their meeting in Brussels on new capability targets for the weaponry needed to face the threat from Russia. 'We are going to take a huge leap forward,' Rutte said. 'These targets set out what forces and concrete capabilities the allies need.' Rutte said he was 'absolutely, positively convinced' that NATO countries would agree to a new spending deal in The Hague. The NATO chief insisted that the United States 'have made totally clear their commitment to Article Five.' He similarly insisted that Washington remained committed to backing Ukraine despite defense secretary Pete Hegseth skipping a meeting of Kyiv's backers in Brussels on Wednesday.
Asharq Al-Awsat
8 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Musk Calls Trump's Tax-Cut and Spending Bill ‘a Disgusting Abomination'
Billionaire Elon Musk plunged on Tuesday into the congressional debate over President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill, calling it a "disgusting abomination" that will increase the federal deficit. Several fiscally conservative Republicans in the US Senate supported the views Musk expressed in social media posts, which could complicate the bill's path to passage in that chamber. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Tesla and SpaceX CEO Musk wrote in a post on his social media platform X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination." He added: "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." Musk's comments hit a nerve. Republican deficit hawks have expressed concerns about the cost of the bill, which would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative accomplishment, while boosting spending on the military and border security. The House of Representatives passed it by one vote last month, after the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the measure would add $3.8 trillion to the federal government's $36.2 trillion in debt. The Senate, also controlled by Trump's Republicans, aims to pass the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" in the next month, though senators are expected to revise the House version. Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, which oversees tax policy, are due to meet with Trump at the White House on Wednesday afternoon to discuss making the bill's business-related tax breaks permanent, according to Senator Steve Daines, a panel member. Analysts have warned that such a move would greatly increase the measure's cost. Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he disagreed with Musk's assessment about the cost of the bill and stood by the goal of passage by July 4. "We have a job to do - the American people elected us to do. We have an agenda that everybody campaigned on, most notably the president of the United States, and we're going to deliver on that agenda," the South Dakota lawmaker told reporters. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson also dismissed Musk's complaints, telling reporters, "my friend Elon is terribly wrong." TEST OF INFLUENCE Musk's loud opposition to a bill that Trump has urged Republicans to pass presents a test of his political influence a week after leaving his formal role in the administration as a special government employee with the Department of Government Efficiency came to an end. As DOGE chief, he upended several federal agencies but ultimately failed to deliver the massive savings he had sought. The richest person in the world, Musk had spent nearly $300 million to back Trump's presidential campaign and other Republicans in last year's elections. But he has said he would cut his political spending substantially while returning to his role as Tesla CEO. The White House dismissed Tuesday's attack, just as Trump dismissed earlier Musk complaints about the legislation. "Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill," spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said at a White House briefing. "It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." REPUBLICAN DISAGREEMENTS Senate Republicans were divided about the bill even before Musk's missives. Deficit hawks are pushing for deeper spending cuts than the $1.6 trillion over a decade in the House version, while another coalition of rural-state Republicans are pushing to protect the Medicaid healthcare program for low-income Americans. One of the hawks, Senator Mike Lee, called on party members to use the Trump bill and future spending measures to reduce the deficit. "We must commit now to doing so, as this is what voters justifiably expect - and indeed deserve - from the GOP Congress," the Utah Republican said on X while reposting Musk's message. Republicans have a 53-47 seat majority in the Senate and can afford to lose support from no more than three members, if they expect to pass the legislation with a tie-breaking vote from Vice President JD Vance by a July 4 deadline. Another hardliner, Senator Ron Johnson, predicted that lawmakers would not be able to meet the deadline and secure an adequate number of cuts. Lee and Johnson are among at least four Senate hardliners demanding that the bill be changed to restrict the growth of the debt and deficit. The faction of party lawmakers determined to limit spending cuts to project Medicaid beneficiaries and business investments in green energy initiatives is of similar size. "I certainly have an interest in making sure people with disabilities are not harmed. But also, there's the broad issue of how does it affect hospital reimbursements," Senator Jerry Moran told reporters. "There's a set of my colleagues who are pushing to do more. And so, it turns on how do you get the votes to pass a bill," the Kansas Republican said. Other Senate Republicans said lawmakers may have to look elsewhere to boost savings, including the possibility of leaving Trump's much touted tax break proposals for tips, overtime pay and Social Security benefits for later legislation. "Those are all Democrat priorities. I'm not sure why we shouldn't be doing that in a potential bipartisan bill to create headspace for this bill," said Republican Senator Thom Tillis.
Asharq Al-Awsat
8 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Iran's Khamenei Criticizes US Proposal in Nuclear Talks but Doesn't Reject the Idea of a Deal
Iran's supreme leader on Wednesday criticized an initial proposal from the United States in negotiations over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program, though he stopped short of entirely rejecting the idea of agreement with Washington. The remarks by Ali Khamenei colored in the red line expressed over recent days — one that says Tehran refuses to give up enriching uranium in any possible deal with the US. That demand has been repeatedly made by American officials, including President Donald Trump, though it remains unclear just how much US Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff brought it up in his initial proposal to Iran. But what Khamenei did not say in his speech matters as well. He didn't reject the talks, which Iran views as crucial for its economy to lift some the crushing economic sanctions it faces. Khamenei also did not insist on any specific level of nuclear enrichment. Iran now enriches uranium up to 60% — a short, technical step from weapons-grade levels. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who has led the talks with Witkoff, said Tehran soon will offer its response to the US Khamenei's speech Wednesday at the mausoleum of Khomeini may serve as a preview. 'If we had 100 nuclear power plants while not having enrichment, they are not usable for us,' Khamenei said. 'If we do not have enrichment, then we should extend our hand (begging) to the US.' Khamenei touched on previous remarks The 86-year-old Khamenei, who has final say on all matters of state in Iran, often balances his remarks over the demands of reformists within the country who want the talks against hard-line elements within Iran's theocracy, including the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard. Late in August, Khamenei in a speech opened the door to possible talks with the US, saying there is 'no harm' in engaging with the 'enemy.' The supreme leader later tempered that, saying that negotiations with America 'are not intelligent, wise or honorable,' after Trump floated nuclear talks with Tehran. Khamenei's speech on Wednesday, marking the anniversary of Khomeini's death, offered an opportunity to discuss Witkoff's proposal. He described it as '100% against the idea of 'we can,'' borrowing from an Iranian government slogan. He described the US as having long sought the dismantling of Iran's entire nuclear industry. 'The impolite and insolent American leaders keep repeating this demand with different wordings," Khamenei said. He added, using a slogan he's said before: 'Those currently in power, Zionist or American, should be aware that they can't do a damn thing about this." Some nuclear power nations do get uranium from outside suppliers, however. Experts long have viewed Iran as using its nuclear program as a chip in negotiations with the West to get sanctions relief. The details of the American proposal remain unclear after five rounds of talks between Iran and the US. A report by the news website Axios on the American proposal, the details of which a US official separately confirmed, include a possible nuclear consortium that would enrich uranium for Iran and surrounding nations. Whether Iran would have to entirely give up its enrichment program remains unclear, as Axios reported that Iran would be able to enrich uranium up to 3% purity for some time. A failure to get a deal could see tensions further spike in a Middle East already on edge over the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip. Iran's long-ailing economy could enter a free fall that could worsen the simmering unrest at home. Israel or the US might carry out long-threatened airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. And Tehran may decide to fully end its cooperation with the United Nations' nuclear watchdog and rush toward a bomb.
