Student athlete disqualified from college admission for wearing cap with school emblem
Court says swimming cap should be considered part of swimsuit
The Seoul Administrative Court upheld the disqualification of a student athlete who was denied admission to a university in 2024 after wearing a swim cap bearing the emblem of one's high school during the practical entrance examination.
The applicant, a water polo player, challenged the decision, arguing that the university's admission guidelines ban only names or school affiliations on swimsuits — not on swim caps.
However, the court ruled that the swim cap could reasonably be interpreted as part of the swimsuit under conventional usage of the term. The Korean term "suyeongbok" literally translates as "swimming clothes."
"Regarding the swimming cap as part of the swimsuit is in keeping with the conventional interpretation of the word (swimsuit) ... Considering that the rule is to ensure a fair applications process by assessing each applicant's abilities in no regards to one's affiliations, there is no reason to treat swimsuit and swimming cap differently," the court said.
The plaintiff also argued that two other applicants were not disqualified despite wearing marked swimming caps, but the court pointed out that markings on the mentioned caps did not show their school affiliations.
Addressing the plaintiff's claim that no examiners warned them about the disqualifying attire during the test, the court stated that the absence of such an on-site warning could not be construed as assurance that the applicant would not face disqualification.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Murderer who lured young victims to sea with false kindness dies behind bars
Oh Jong-geun, Korea's oldest death row inmate, killed four tourists in 2007 A death row inmate convicted of multiple sexual assaults and murders has died in prison at the age of 86, nearly two decades after he was incarcerated for committing the heinous crimes in 2007. It was belatedly reported Sunday that Oh Jong-geun, born in July 1938, died last year at the Gwangju Correctional Institution, where he had been imprisoned. He had become the oldest person in Korean history to be sentenced to death in June 2010, a month before he turned 72. The cause of death was not revealed to the public. Oh was a fisherman who lived his entire life in Boseong-gun, South Jeolla Province, and committed two separate double murders. On Aug. 31, 2007, he took a young couple both aged 19 out to sea, where he pushed the male victim into the water and murdered him. He then sexually assaulted the woman before killing her. The second attack occurred on Sept. 25, when he attempted to sexually assault two young women on his boat in the same manner as the first attack. In both attacks, he is believed to have used a fishing pole to strike the victims and keep them from climbing back onto the boat. The victims were reported as missing, and the deaths in the first attack were initially thought to be an accident, even after the bodies were found. But investigators suspected foul play after they found that one of the victims in the second attack had sent a text message to a woman whom she had met by chance shortly before getting on Oh's boat. The woman who received the text had earlier asked one of the victims to let her use her cellphone to call her husband, whom she had lost track of while on a family trip. This left the husband's phone number on the victim's phone, enabling the victim to send a text message saying, "We're the people who lent you our phone. I think we're locked inside a boat. Please call the police." The couple attempted to call the victims throughout the night to no avail, and learned the next day that one of the women had been found dead at sea. They said they had offered to give the victims a ride, but the two women declined, saying they were about to go on a boat ride offered by "a kind old man." Investigation and aftermath The police grew suspicious and searched the nearby docks, pinpointing a single boat that had switched positions on the day of the attack -- indicating that the boat had been used. A subsequent search found the victims' hair and belongings such as credit cards and pens, which prompted officers to arrest Oh at his home. Oh admitted to the September attack, but claimed that the deaths in the August attack were purely an accident. The victims' DNA was not found on the murder weapon, and the recorded call from the female victim's phone to the 119 emergency center was not conclusive. However, authorities recovered the female victim's digital camera, which had fallen into the water, and the National Forensic Service managed to restore the data to find incriminating photos of Oh onboard the boat. He was indicted for the murder of four people, and received the death penalty from the Gwangju District Court in February 2008 for rape and murder. Despite the evidence, he denied committing the crimes, claiming he was too old and frail to harm young people, and even saying at one point it was their own fault for trying to get a boat ride for free. Oh's crime dealt a fatal blow to his family as well. His oldest son reportedly took his own life in 2008, a year after the crimes. His wife left their hometown and went to live with their daughter in Seoul. Another of his daughters, who remained in Boseong, told visiting reporters that she had nothing to do with the man who committed the crimes. Oh would continue to fight his sentence, filing a constitutional complaint seeking a punishment less severe than the death penalty. It was the second constitutional complaint ever filed challenging the death penalty itself. But the Constitutional Court ruled against Oh in a 5-4 decision in 2010, and the Supreme Court later that year upheld the sentence. While South Korea's legal system upholds capital punishment as the most severe penalty for a crime, it is internationally considered to have de facto abolished the death penalty as it has not carried out an execution since 1997. As of 2024, Ministry of Justice data showed that 53 people were serving indefinite prison sentences after receiving the death penalty, excluding death row inmates held at the Military Correctional Institution. The last time a death sentence was handed down was in 2016, sentencing soldier Im Do-bin to death for a shooting spree at a military barracks that killed five and injured nine.
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Six Americans caught trying to send bottles to North Korea
Six American nationals were caught early Friday in Ganghwa-gun, Incheon, while attempting to send plastic bottles filled with rice, $1 bills and Bibles to North Korea. The group, ranging in age from their 20s to 50s, allegedly tried to launch about 1,300 bottles into the sea at around 1 a.m. on Friday, according to South Korean police. The South Korean military, which had been monitoring the coastline using surveillance cameras, spotted the group and reported them to police. The group was caught before putting the bottles in the ocean. 'Since the Americans are not fluent in Korean, we'll be assigning a translator to assist with a more thorough investigation,' police said. Sending materials to North Korea from Ganghwa-gun has been banned since Nov. 1 of last year, under an administrative order issued due to safety concerns and complaints from local residents. People in the area have voiced concerns about noise and the risk of retaliation from the North. This is not the first attempt to send items across the border since the ban was imposed. On Nov. 3 last year, a man was caught trying to send 121 plastic bottles filled with rice. Police said he had planned to use the ocean tide to carry them to the North. At the time, the man told police that he "came up with the plan after hearing that North Korean residents were starving due to a lack of rice."
Korea Herald
3 days ago
- Korea Herald
Why NewJeans declined re-appeal — and how it could affect main lawsuit against Ador
Legal expert says main trial could take up to two and a half years NewJeans is facing what may be the most difficult moment in its short but high-profile career. The girl group chose not to re-appeal in a court case that had barred them from pursuing independent activities without their agency Ador. Under Korean law, a re-appeal to an injunction ruling must be filed within seven days of notification. Since NewJeans did not meet the deadline, the ruling became final at midnight on Wednesday. The injunction, upheld by the appeals court, recognized Ador as the group's legal agency and prohibited the members from signing advertising or commercial deals without Ador's involvement. NewJeans' decision not to contest the ruling suggests the group has opted to shift its focus — possibly to the main legal battle over the validity of its contract. Why the group declined to re-appeal Entertainment lawyer Bae Jin-sung of Law Firm Myoungjae believes there are two likely reasons for NewJeans' decision not to re-appeal. 'Trials in Korea go through three stages. The first and second instances are fact-finding trials, while the third is a legal review based on those facts,' Bae told The Korea Herald, Thursday. 'Since the factual circumstances haven't changed, NewJeans likely determined there was no legal merit in pursuing another appeal.' The second reason, Bae said, may have been strategic. 'They may have wanted to avoid appearing defiant of the court's decision, especially since it could influence the main lawsuit still in progress.' That main lawsuit began in January, when Ador filed a lawsuit to confirm the validity of its exclusive contract with NewJeans. The girl group had unilaterally announced the termination of its exclusive contract with the agency in November, citing a breach of trust. The case is currently in the first trial stage, with the third hearing set for July 24. While the recent injunction decision is technically separate from the contract validity case, Bae said it may carry indirect weight. 'The judge in the main case is not legally bound by the injunction ruling, but it could serve as a reference point and may have intangible influence,' he said. How long will the lawsuit take — and who stands to lose more? According to Bae, the main trial could take up to two and a half years, though some extreme cases take up to five years. 'Realistically, each trial level typically takes six months to a year, and even if the case goes all the way to the Supreme Court, it's unlikely to stretch out to five years,' he said. If NewJeans eventually wins, the earlier injunction that upheld Ador's status as NewJeans' agency would become void. This would allow the group to resume independent activities. However, Bae added that Ador could then raise a separate legal claim for lost revenue during the group's inactive period — setting the stage for further litigation. The stakes are high. NewJeans, which debuted in July 2022, is in a key growth phase when constant activity is vital to maintaining its momentum. In contrast, Ador has less to lose, as it can create a new group. Bae also weighed in on NewJeans' legal argument, based on five claims — one of which was the dismissal of former Ador CEO Min Hee-jin. 'It's difficult to comment definitively without reviewing the evidence,' he said. 'But based on what has been made public, NewJeans' chances of winning seem low. 'For example, they cited Min's dismissal as a breach of contract, but that's a shareholder right. It's hard to legally frame that as a betrayal of trust or contractual violation,' he added.
