Alberta Indigenous leaders feel ‘slighted' by Bill C-5
As Prime Minister Mark Carney's first session of Parliament draws to a close, Liberal MPs say they need to push ahead with a major projects bill.
Bill C-5 would give the federal cabinet the ability to set aside various statutes to push forward approvals for a small number of major industrial projects, such as mines, pipelines and ports.
The legislation would allow the federal government to designate projects in the 'national interest' and fast-track them by granting approvals within two years.
It appears Bill C-5 will be pushed through the House this week with the support of both Liberal and Conservative MPs, despite warnings from environmental and Indigenous groups.
The legislation is being widely criticized by Indigenous leaders and community members across the country for a lack of consultation and a tight timeline in which the government wants to pass the bill.
Story continues below advertisement
'We have not been properly consulted in all the bills, all the legislation throughout. It's a one-shoe-fits-all in the government's favour,' said Grand Chief Greg Desjarlais of Treaty Six First Nations.
'It's a slight, there is just no other way to look at it,' Chief Troy 'Bossman' Knowlton of Piikani Nation said, saying Parliament's urge to push Bill C-5 ahead will affect First Nations.
Get weekly health news
Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'It can destroy our past, it can destroy of our footprint that our people had left for thousands of years to tell the story today of who we are.'
Tweet This
Click to share quote on Twitter: "It can destroy our past, it can destroy of our footprint that our people had left for thousands of years to tell the story today of who we are."
2:11
Moe, Smith repeat calls for federal action and support for energy projects
If the legislation isn't pushed through this week, the House will rise and won't return until September.
Some Liberals want to see this dealt with now. MP Karina Gould said the government must strike the right balance on the bill or face court challenges.
Story continues below advertisement
'There is a clear desire on the part of Canadians to be able to get big projects done in this country. We haven't been able to find the right balance in order to do that,' she said.
Most Liberal MPs appear to be backing both the bill and the process.
'Are we going to continue to put this on hold, to tinker with it and make slight amendments?' said Liberal MP Marcu Powlowski.
'I think it's important we pass this legislation and there's always an opportunity afterwards to amend it.'
Tweet This
Click to share quote on Twitter: "I think it's important we pass this legislation and there's always an opportunity afterwards to amend it."
Meanwhile, other Liberal MPs say the idea of the legislation is solid, but it's not perfect, and might need more time to finalize.
'I think we should move quickly to get projects done as quickly as possible. That's not to say we should have unfettered discretion and unchecked power in the government; we've got to make sure there are guardrails,' said Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith.
The House sitting is scheduled to end on Friday. The Liberal government has said it wants the bill passed before then.
For more on this story, watch the video above.
1:46
Can the Liberal government's trade bill unify Canada's economy?
— With files from Alessia Passafiume, David Baxter and Sarah Ritchie, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
Canada's intelligence agency CSIS confirms Khalistani extremism on its soil
Ottawa [Canada], June 19 (ANI): For the first time ever, Canada's premier intelligence agency, Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) officially acknowledged that Khalistani extremists are using Canadian soil to promote, fundraise, and plan violence in India. CSIS released its annual report on Wednesday, outlining some key concerns and threats to Canada's national security. Canada intelligence agency CSIS report categorically states, 'Khalistani extremists continue to use Canada as a base for the promotion, fundraising or planning of violence primarily in India.' India has been raising concerns about Khalistani extremists operating from Canadian soil for years, but Canada had largely turned a blind eye to the issue. The CSIS report confirmed that Canada has become a safe haven for anti-India elements, validating India's concerns that have been raised for years. This comes a day after Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Canadian counterpart Mark Carney 'agreed to take calibrated steps to restore stability to the relationship' and decided to restore High Commissioners to each other's capitals. At the G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney held talks with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and both leaders agreed to designate new high commissioners, with a view to returning to regular services to citizens and businesses in both countries, according to a press release from the Prime Minister of Canada. The Politically Motivated Violent Extremism (PMVE) threat in Canada has manifested primarily through Canada-based Khalistani extremists (CBKEs) seeking to create an independent nation state called Khalistan, largely within Punjab in India. The report noted that since the mid-1980s, the PMVE threat in Canada has manifested primarily through CBKEs. 'A small group of individuals are considered Khalistani extremists because they continue to use Canada as a base for the promotion, fundraising or planning of violence primarily in India. In particular, real and perceived Khalistani extremism emerging from Canada continues to drive Indian foreign interference activities in Canada,' the report reads. This revelation, part of CSIS's latest annual report, has reignited concerns about foreign interference and extremist activity within Canada, particularly in the context of its sensitive diplomatic relationship with India. Canada's own intelligence security has confirmed what New Delhi has long maintained -- Canada has become a safe haven for anti-India elements. The report called for sustained vigilance against both external influence campaigns and domestic extremist financing networks 'These activities attempt to steer Canada's positions into alignment with India's interests on key issues, particularly with respect to how the Indian government perceives Canada-based supporters of an independent homeland that they call Khalistan,' added the report. Tensions escalated further when former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau claimed that his government had 'credible allegations' of India's involvement in the killing of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Canada in 2023. India has strongly denied the allegations, terming them 'absurd' and 'motivated,' and has accused Canada of giving space to extremist and anti-India elements. In the aftermath, India recalled six diplomats from Canada after they were declared 'persons of interest' by Canadian authorities investigating Nijjar's killing. Nijjar was shot dead outside a gurdwara in Surrey, British Columbia, on June 18, 2023. 'Links between the Government of India and the Nijjar murder signals a significant escalation in India's repression efforts against the Khalistan movement and a clear intent to target individuals in North America, Wednesday's report read. 'Real and perceived Khalistani extremism emerging from Canada continues to drive Indian foreign interference activities in Canada, the report added. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney faced criticism for inviting Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the G7 summit, with some Sikh advocates and his own MPs expressing disapproval. However, Carney defended his decision, citing India's significance in global affairs. Carney emphasized India's status as the world's fourth-largest economy and most populous country, making it a crucial player in addressing global challenges. (ANI)
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
In Virginia and New Jersey governor's races, Democrats reprise a 2018 roadmap for opposing Trump 2.0
HENRICO COUNTY, Va. (AP) — Abigail Spanberger opened her general election bid for Virginia governor Wednesday using her high school alma mater near Richmond. 'I grew up walking the halls of Tucker High School,' the former congresswoman says as she walks past a bank of lockers in her first ad since securing the Democratic nomination. Later, she notes her experience as a CIA case officer, then in the halls of Congress as a tough-minded, get-things-done lawmaker. The same kind of message is echoing in New Jersey from Rep. Mikie Sherrill, as she also makes a bid for governor. Both women are selling themselves as Democrats who can rise above the rancor of Donald Trump's Washington. For national Democrats who have spent months debating how to counter the president's aggressive second administration, it's a reminder of what worked for the party during Trump's first term. Spanberger and Sherrill were headliners in the 2018 roster of center-left Democrats who helped flip House control from Republicans with balanced appeals to moderates, progressives and even anti-Trump conservatives. Now, they're leading statewide tickets in races that could offer Democrats a back-to-the-future path forward as they look toward next year's midterms. 'There are a lot of similarities' in Democrats' current position and the 2018 campaigns, said Sen. Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., who, as a House member, chaired his party's congressional campaign arm during Trump's first midterm election cycle. The 2018 Democratic freshman class yielded a net gain of 40 seats with a lineup that featured record numbers of women and plenty of candidates with national security and business backgrounds. A similar effort yielded a net gain of six governors. The party's 2018 winners also included outspoken progressives like Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, elected in more liberal, urban districts. But the balance of power shifted on the backs of centrist candidates who carried the nation's suburbs and improved Democrats' performance in exurbs and even small-town, GOP-dominated areas. Among Spanberger's and Sherrill's freshman colleagues were Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, another former CIA analyst, who won a suburban Detroit seat before her elevation to the Senate last November; Rep. Jason Crow, a former Army officer, who represents suburban Denver; and Rep. Angie Craig, who flipped a GOP-held seat in greater Minneapolis and now is running for Senate. Crow is now co-chairman of candidate recruitment for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Similar resumes are popping up among new Democratic recruits. In Michigan, for example, Bridget Brink, former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, announced her bid for Slotkin's old 7th Congressional District on Wednesday by leaning into her international experience as a counter to Trump. Luján said the common thread has been recruiting 'real people, regular folks' with 'incredible credentials' and an ability to hold 'a real conversation with people around economic issues … around the kitchen table' and campaign in any area. So even as New Jersey's Sherrill calls her Republican rival Jack Ciattarelli a 'Trump lackey' and Spanberger pledges in a fundraising email to 'defeat Trump's agenda at the ballot box,' their wider appeal depends on different arguments. Sherrill has from the start touted her biography: a Naval Academy graduate, Navy Sea King helicopter pilot, federal prosecutor and mother of four. Her blue and gold yard signs have a chopper hovering above her name. She is also promising an 'Affordability Agenda' to address voters' economic concerns. Spanberger, part of the Problem Solvers Caucus when she was on Capitol Hill, leans into her deal-making centrism, promises to confront economic gaps and has pledged to campaign in every Virginia congressional district, including where Trump has dominated. 'It's not the job of the governor of Virginia to cater to President Trump,' Spanberger said in one of her final primary campaign speeches. 'It's not the job of the governor of Virginia to cater to a political party.' In an Associated Press interview earlier this spring, Spanberger even criticized former President Joe Biden for 'posturing' by promising to eliminate student debt — something he could not accomplish by presidential action alone. 'Don't make promises you can't keep,' she said. She also bristled when asked to describe her place on the political spectrum. She instead said she set goals by asking, 'How do I impact the most people in the fastest way possible?' Jared Leopold, a Democratic strategist who worked as a senior staffer for the Democratic Governors Association during the 2018 cycle, said it's notable that Spanberger and Sherrill avoid getting mired in the internal party tussle among progressives, liberals and moderates. 'Most voters aren't really thinking about things along a simple left-right political spectrum,' especially in statewide races, Leopold said. 'People are looking for politicians who they think understand them and can get things done to help them.' He pointed to another 2018 Democratic standout: Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. Now a potential 2028 presidential candidate, Whitmer first gained national attention as a state legislator who spoke out about abortion rights and her experience of being raped as a college student. But she became a juggernaut in the governor's race with what Leopold called a 'brilliant and simple' slogan: 'Fix the damn roads!' Of course, Democrats do not dispute that a candidate's military and national security experiences help neutralize routine Republican attacks of all Democrats as too liberal or out of touch. 'These credentials for how they've served the country — they're just sharing who they are,' Luján said. Said Leopold: 'It certainly gives a different definition of what the Democratic Party is to some voters.' In Virginia, Republican nominee and Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, who like Spanberger would become the first woman to serve in the state's top elected office, is trying to tie the Democratic nominee to her national party. Earle-Sears' social media accounts frequently share pictures of Spanberger and Biden hugging and wearing masks. She accuses Spanberger of effectively rubber-stamping Biden's legislative agenda while in Congress. 'Part of the challenge,' Spanberger retorts, 'is that either my opponent or people who might be running anywhere, who don't necessarily have things to run on, are going to try and distract.' Spanberger, Sherrill and Democrats like them hope that most voters assess the GOP attacks and their own branding efforts like Fred Martucci, a retired glazier who voted early in Trenton, New Jersey. The 75-year-old expressed a visceral distaste for Trump. As for what impresses him about Sherrill, he said: 'She was a Navy helicopter pilot. You can't be a dummy — she's sharp.' ___ Olivia Diaz is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. ___ Barrow reported from Atlanta, Catalini from Trenton, New Jersey.
Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Most Liberal government bills unlikely to pass before House of Commons summer break
Most of the minority Liberal government's legislative agenda is unlikely to pass before the House of Commons breaks for summer on Friday, as bills on affordability and border security face strong criticism over privacy-related elements. Prime Minister Mark Carney clearly prioritized Bill C-5, which pledges to eliminate federal barriers to interprovincial trade and sets up a system to fast-track major infrastructure projects, saying the legislation must be approved before summer. That is expected to happen based on current schedules, though the bill is also generating strong criticism that it grants the government excessive powers. Critics also say the bill weakens requirements related to Indigenous consultation and environmental protection. The Official Opposition Conservatives supported procedural moves to speed up C-5's approval. On Tuesday, the House adopted two other bills, C-6 and C-7, that approve federal spending through what is known as the estimates process. On those spending bills, the Conservatives voted against while Bloc Québécois, NDP and Green Party MPs voted with the Liberals. What federal Bill C-5, the One Canadian Economy Act, is all about However, no other government bill appears to be on track to become law before summer, barring any last-minute deals among the parties. Bloc House Leader Christine Normandin confirmed this in a statement to The Globe and Mail. The list of bills that are unlikely to pass before summer includes C-2, the Strong Borders Act, which includes new border-security measures but is facing criticism over elements that would allow new powers for police to obtain information without a warrant. There are also privacy concerns related to Bill C-4, the Making Life More Affordable for Canadians Act, introduced by Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne. The minister promoted the bill as being focused on affordability as it includes campaign promises to cut income taxes, remove the GST on new homes priced at up to $1-million for first-time homebuyers, and eliminate the federal fuel charge. The tax changes can proceed even though the bill is not yet law because the measures were supported in an earlier vote by MPs. Mr. Champagne is facing criticism over the fact that the bill includes a fourth element unrelated to affordability that would shield federal political parties from provincial privacy laws. Several senators are expressing concern with that aspect of the bill and questioned why it wasn't introduced separately. During an appearance before the Senate Tuesday evening to defend the bill, Mr. Champagne said the privacy elements are about creating a common standard across the country and informing the courts about the federal government's intentions. Last year, B.C.'s Supreme Court ruled against the federal Liberal, New Democratic and Conservative parties, saying they are subject to the investigative powers of provincial privacy commissioners. The three national parties were challenging the legality of an investigation by the B.C. Privacy Commissioner. The matter is currently before the B.C. Court of Appeal. 'We need to provide predictability. We need to tell the courts the intent of the House. This time, it's not only the intent of one party, but it's the unanimous support of all members of Parliament,' Mr. Champagne said, in reference to last week's 335-0 vote in favour of the bill at second reading, which sent it to committee for further study. Conservatives raise privacy concerns over powers in government's border security bill Senator Paula Simons said the effect of C-4's privacy element is to create a lower standard for privacy protection than is currently in place under some provincial laws. 'I'm not surprised that all parties agreed. This is a question of foxes in the henhouse, because it is in the interests of those parties to be able to exploit that voter information,' she said. Senator Pamela Wallin said political parties are involved in 'a bit of an arms race' when it comes to how to profile Canadian voters. 'We can understand, of course, why you would all vote for this, but it doesn't necessarily improve – in fact, I think it distorts – democratic participation when you protect the political parties and allow them to micro-target and use that data in such a specific way," she said. Bill C-4 has been referred to the House of Commons finance committee for further study, but no meetings are scheduled to take place this week before the House is set to rise on Friday. The other House of Commons government bills introduced in the current Parliament are Bill C-3, which reintroduced legislation to grant citizenship to 'Lost Canadians' who were born abroad to foreign-born Canadians, and C-8, introduced Wednesday, related to cybersecurity. Neither bill has advanced beyond the initial stages. In addition, the government introduced S-2 in the Senate, which is similar to Bill C-38 from the previous Parliament, which was not adopted. The bill aims to address concerns related to registration under the Indian Act. It has not advanced beyond second reading in the Senate. On C-5, the bill concerning interprovincial trade and infrastructure projects, Conservative MP and intergovernmental affairs critic Philip Lawrence said Wednesday the legislation should have gone further. 'We believe, directionally, it's the right idea,' he said, pointing to support for building more projects and reducing barriers to interprovincial trade. 'But we certainly would have wanted to see a lot more.' Bloc Leader Yves-François Blanchet, who opposes C-5 as an intrusion into provincial jurisdiction, said Wednesday that the debate around the bill won't be going away. 'If they think shutting down debate on C-5 puts a lid on it, that will prove that there are people in this government who don't understand Parliament,' he said. Marie-Justine Torres, a spokesperson for Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon, said in an e-mail that the government bills are based on the mandate the Liberals received in the recent election. 'We are firmly committed to delivering on this mandate and will continue moving forward in the House in the fall sitting,' she said.
