King's Birthday public holiday trading hours: Coles, Woolies, Kmart and Bunnings
Millions of Australians are gearing up for a long weekend in celebration of King Charles III's 76th birthday.
The public holiday is celebrated by most of the country in June, however those in Western Australia and Queensland will have to wait until later in the year to catch an extended break.
For those in NSW, Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia, the ACT and the Northern Territory, here's what you need to know about what's open and when on the Monday public holiday.
Some Woolworths Metro stores are open, but customers are again encouraged to check their local stores' trading hours on the Woolworths Store Finder for specific trading hours.
Most stores will be 10am-7pm across the states observing the King's Birthday public holiday. However some hours may vary store to store, and customers can check their local store's trading hours online for specific trading hours.
As IGA stores are independently-owned, the hours will differ between stores — some stores will be trading as normal while others may have restricted hours. IGA customers can check trading hours with their local IGA or online.
Most Big W stores are open, but customers are encouraged to check for their local stores on the Big W Store Finder for specific trading hours.
ALDI stores in NSW, ACT and VIC will operate as per normal, with no change to trading hours. However trading hours may vary in SA, and customers are advised to visit the ALDI store locator for more information on individual store trading hours.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Trade talks rest on Anthony Albanese's meeting with Donald Trump in Canada
Australia's case for exemptions or relief from American tariffs will rest on Anthony Albanese's meeting next week with US President Donald Trump. Trade Minister Don Farrell had two conversations with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer on the sidelines of OECD and World Trade Organisation meetings in Paris last week to press Australia's case, but says it's clear the leaders need to make the final call. Ministers and officials at all levels have consistently been arguing the US shouldn't impose tariffs on Australia because it has a trade surplus here, selling more to Australians than it buys each year. The Trump administration has so far imposed hefty tariffs on steel and aluminium imports, which have just risen to 50 per cent, and also slugged Australia with a 10 per cent so-called reciprocal tariff despite Australia not having tariffs on any US goods. Mr Albanese and Senator Farrell have repeatedly said the imposts are not the actions of a friend. Nevertheless, Senator Farrell said he'd had a 'friendly discussion' with Mr Greer but the final decision would be made at a higher level. 'He certainly made it clear that these are ultimately decisions that the President of the United States will make,' the minister told Sky News on Sunday. 'But I certainly haven't given up on the prospect of getting these tariffs removed, and every opportunity I get, I'll continue to pursue that argument with the United States.' Mr Albanese has flagged he expects to meet Mr Trump for the first time on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada next weekend. The Government is in the final stages of a review of the rules around American beef imports, with Trump administration figures repeatedly raising Australia's 'ban' on US meat as one of their trade gripes. Australia has biosecurity restrictions on the import of Canadian and Mexican beef that is slaughtered in the US and Mr Albanese has insisted his Government will not risk the safety of local agriculture by relaxing rules. The UK has secured exemptions from some of the US tariffs by striking a new deal that in part allows greater market access for American beef. Shadow finance minister James Paterson pointed to the UK deal as a measure of the success of Mr Albanese's imminent meeting with Mr Trump. '(UK Prime Minister) Keir Starmer has now achieved a partial exemption from the steel and aluminium tariffs, and Australia is at least as good an ally of the United States as the United Kingdom is and so there's no reason why the Prime Minister shouldn't at least be able to secure that exemption,' Senator Paterson told ABC's Insiders. 'I'm just saying that Keir Starmer proves that it is possible to get an exemption. It is not an impossible task.' Senator Farrell said the main topic of discussions with counterparts at the WTO and OECD was ensuring other countries didn't increase their protectionism in the face of the US moves. He pointed out Australia hadn't his China with counter-imposts when it imposed trade barriers on goods such as wine, barley and lobster, and nor had it retaliate against the US. 'I think there's a move around the world to push the case for less protectionism and more free and fair trade,' he said. 'I'm hopeful that those countries around the world who do believe in free and fair trade can reach agreement to extend free trade agreements across the globe so that, irrespective of what the Americans might choose to do, we have a greater diversity of trading partners.'
Perth Now
5 hours ago
- Perth Now
‘No Boomers' super app tackles housing crisis
A share trading app which famously had a blunt message for those born before 1970 is trying to get more Aussies into their own home through an unused government scheme. Pearler, a share trading app moving into the superannuation space, has launched a product they are calling 'HomeSoon' with the aim of simplifying the steps needed to take advantage of the government's first home savers scheme (FHSS). The company says it is also the first platform in Australia to allow customers to use open banking to track bank savings, FHSS savings, shares, and other assets in one place – regardless of whether those assets are held with Pearler. Australians are not using the first home super saver scheme. NewsWire / Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire Pearler co-founder Nick Nicolaides said house price growth is outpacing savings, meaning it is no longer sustainable for the average person to park their money in a bank account while they are saving for a deposit. 'Bank savings are no longer sustainable for a seven-eight year journey, and with that it adds complexity,' Mr Nicolaides told NewsWire. 'I don't think people really have a choice but to have their house deposit spread across bank accounts, probably some shares and the FHSS. 'It is more of a case of getting to the end goal of being wealthy enough to buy into the housing market, you now need to not only understand savings and budgeting, you now need to understand investing and this scheme,' he said. NED-7083-Housing-price-changes Mr Nicolaides said ideation was simple – to help first home buyers get into the housing market by taking the complexity out of a current scheme. 'We've been talking to customers for a while with only a fraction of customers actually using the scheme,' he said. 'When we asked why, it was very clear that firstly the scheme was in super which people feel some nervousness about and if you then get your head around putting additional savings into super, tracking, knowing what you can withdraw and withdrawing it in time, it quickly layers up. 'So a combination of a complex superannuation system and a not very mainstream scheme really puts most people off.' The latest PropTrack Home Price Index shows it has never been more expensive for first home buyers to get into the market. National house prices hit a new peak in May, lifting by 0.39 per cent over the month for a 4.12 per cent year-on-year gain. All capital cities saw home prices grow in May, with Melbourne leading the way up 0.79 per cent, followed by Adelaide up 0.52 per cent and then Sydney up 0.39 per cent. Nationally, since the Covid falls starting in March 2020, house prices are up 50.1 per cent for a new median house price value of $809,000, while Australia's most expensive city, Sydney, will set the median buyer back $1,124,000. House prices continue to outpace saving deposit rates. NewsWire/ Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia Pearler's latest superannuation move follows launching a fund in late March saying it caters for younger members with a simple slogan 'for people born after 1970 (sorry, Boomers)'. During the launch, Mr Nicolaides said the 'no Boomers' fund was more about solving a problem for younger Australians than a display of anti-Boomer rhetoric. 'If you take a casual interest in what is written about superannuation, most articles are written about how the superannuation industry can deal with retirement,' he said. 'It makes sense that it gets the most attention because it is an immediate problem now. 'But at the other end of the spectrum, the industry and the media recognise that engagement in super is lacking in younger people. If we don't fix that, then today's younger people will find themselves in the same boat in 20, 30 years time,' Mr Nicolaides said. The FHSS allows people to contribute and access up to $15,000 of their voluntary contributions into super each financial year (up to a total cap of $50,000) for a home deposit. The main benefit of saving for a home this way is super's lower tax rate – meaning Australians can potentially get to their deposit faster. The scheme currently has a relatively low take up, with Pearler saying just 13.7 per cent of home buyers bought through the FHSS. Mr Nicolaides said the onus was not on the government to market the product better but instead on the general financial advice sector to do a better job of educating people. 'The government got the ball rolling on a fantastic scheme but there is only so much that can be done,' Mr Nicolaides said. 'We have a situation in Australia where, whether generationally like it or not, most of our financial decisions are going to be self-directed for the average person on the average wage. 'It becomes our job as an industry to educate people by giving them the tools and the guidance in mediums people want to use.' Mr Nicolaides says he hopes over time three in four Australians trying to buy a house will do so through the FHSS.
The Age
7 hours ago
- The Age
The rich get richer: Australia is at risk of becoming an inheritocracy
It's been a little over a year since I last said this, but once again, there is a record number of billionaires in Australia. According to the Australian Financial Review' s annual Rich List, which names the 200 wealthiest Australians, our island nation is now home to 161 billionaires. Compared to last year's 150 billionaires, that's a growth rate of 7 per cent over just 12 months. Compared to the first Rich List, which was published in 1984, it's even more staggering. That list had just two people with the equivalent wealth of $1 billion in today's money. Each year's list always makes for interesting reading. In part because it's a pervy way of knowing more about notoriously private people, sure. But mostly because it tells us a lot about the state of personal wealth in Australia. And while this year's list is no exception, the picture it paints is far from idyllic. Some of the main takeaways from this year's list: there are only 10 new names from last year's, which makes the list's entry rate just 5 per cent. For comparison, in 2000, there were 40 new entries. It's also worth noting that only one of the 10 new entrants is a woman, and women comprise just 21 per cent of the total list of 200 (42 people). The most remarkable name among the newcomers list, though, is easily Michael Dorrell, the founder of investment firm Stonepeak, who not only made the top 200 for the first time, but made his way to No.7 with a personal wealth of $13.8 billion. Then there's the fact that the 'poorest' person on the list has a personal wealth of $747 million. Meanwhile, the richest person in Australia, Gina Rinehart, has a whopping $38.11 billion. She's also held the top spot for six years running. Collectively, the wealth of these top 200 Australians comes to a combined $667 billion. That's 20 per cent of Australia's GDP. And did I mention that while the rest of us struggled through the cost-of-living crisis that feels never ending, the group's wealth grew by a cool 6.9 per cent compared with last year? Perhaps most significantly, though, is the analysis of economist Reuben Finighan, which looked at 40 years' worth of Rich Lists (from 1984 to 2024) and compared them in real, inflation-adjusted terms. Here, he found that the spoils of the wealthiest 200 Australians grew 7.7 times faster than per capita wealth over those four decades.
