
Ontario PCs to limit debate on controversial Bill 5, among other legislation
TORONTO – Ontario Premier Doug Ford's government is moving to shut down debate on its most controversial piece of legislation this session, one of a plethora of bills getting the fast-track treatment before the legislature rises for a summer break.
A mining law known as Bill 5 that would give the government power to suspend provincial and municipal laws for chosen projects in areas deemed to have economic importance – and remove some endangered species protections – has sparked a lot of opposition.
A legislative committee heard from First Nations leaders and environmental groups, as well as mining groups, over two days and as the committee was considering amendments last week the NDP and Liberals used procedural tools to grind the process to a halt, in protest.
Government house leader Steve Clark is now stepping in to limit further committee time and require the bill to go back to the house for third reading, with just one hour of debate, and a final vote that same day.
While Bill 5 got two days of committee hearings, the six other pieces of legislation the government is speeding up have had no hearings, and will have as little as half an hour of third-reading debate, with just nine minutes each allotted to the two recognized opposition parties.
The opposition parties say pushing bills through without much public consultation or debate is undemocratic.
The NDP's Opposition house leader, John Vanthof, spoke in a debate last week over the government limiting debate and bypassing committee for four bills – including the budget bill – in what's called a time allocation motion.
'What's happening now with the time allocation, specifically on four bills, is removing the right of the people to speak, and in many ways, the opposition to speak,' Vanthof said.
'You actually don't need a parliament. We're actually almost going back to where you have, like, a king. That's truly scary. I'm not opposed to the monarchy as a figurehead, but we came very far in our democracies to actually have parliaments. What the government is doing is basically making the premier the king.'
Vanthof stressed the seriousness of the matter, though he had the opposition benches laughing while he was reading out quotes from government house leader Steve Clark, upset about time allocation motions when he was in opposition.
'My party loves to hear from people,' Clark said in the waning days of the former Liberal government.
'If this government doesn't want to listen to people, I'll give them a guarantee. I'll give them, actually, the people's guarantee, because we will listen to them, and we will ensure that those Ontarians are being listened to.'
Clark, who during that 2017 debate called such motions 'anti-democratic,' said last week that the younger Steve Clark was 'maybe more brash and abrupt,' defending the current moves.
'The government has decided that these four bills are very important for us,' he said.
Wednesdays
A weekly look towards a post-pandemic future.
'There needs to be certainty from the government's agenda…The government decides that they're going to prioritize certain things, the government is going to move forward with those legislations. That's my message.'
However much the former Liberal government shut down debate, the Progressive Conservative government is a worse offender, Vanthof said.
'Two time allocation votes in a day was probably the previous record for the travesty to democracy, probably the previous record, and that was held by the Liberals,' he said.
'But this government is so efficient, including destroying the democratic process, that they put four bills, including a budget, in one time allocation motion.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 2, 2025.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Calgary Herald
25 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
Tasha Kheiriddin: Indigenous leaders put Carney's dreams on notice
Will Prime Minister Mark Carney's national infrastructure dreams be kiboshed by Canada's First Nations? That's the question hanging over Ottawa this week — and if Carney's not careful, the answer could well be yes. Article content At Monday's First Ministers' meeting in Saskatoon, the PM rolled out his big plan: slash approval times for 'national interest' infrastructure projects from five to two years. He got buy-in from the premiers, hoping to stimulate growth, counter U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs, and pull Canada together as one economy. Despite a shortage of specifics, there finally appears to be a willingness to get things done and reconcile the interests of East and West. Quebec Premier François Legault said he's open to a pipeline, Ontario Premier Doug Ford was positively giddy about energy corridors, and even Alberta's Danielle Smith was cautiously optimistic. Article content Article content Article content Indigenous leaders, however, are not impressed. National Chief Cindy Woodhouse of the Assembly of First Nations warned that the plan risks trampling Indigenous rights and took umbrage at being given seven days to review draft proposals. Regional Chief Scott McLeod of the Anishinabek Nation went further, suggesting that Canada could see a new indigenous protest movement along the lines of Idle No More. That movement arose in 2012 in response to Bill C-45, legislation advanced by then-Prime Minister Stephen Harper that sought to streamline the project approvals process, and spawned protests and rail travel disruptions across the country. Article content Article content Now, Carney could face the same opposition, made worse by the actions of his own party and other progressive politicians over the past ten years. Their version of reconciliation did little to advance Indigenous people economically, but much to reinforce the idea that non-Indigenous people are guests in their own country. Article content Article content From the denigration of Canadian historical figures like John A. Macdonald, Henry Dundas and Egerton Ryerson, to the performative and divisive repetition of land acknowledgements, to the spreading of falsehoods about the existence of mass graves at residential schools, Canada was depicted as the country that could do no right by its First Nations. Little wonder, then, that many Indigenous people don't see themselves as part of Canada and have little interest in pulling together for the 'national interest.' Article content Article content There is no question that a succession of Canadian governments implemented policies that damaged generations of First Nations people, including the Indian Act, the residential school system, the pass system, and the potlatch ban. But guilt will not help fix current problems facing First Nations. Nor will opposition to development. It will actually hurt, by weakening Canada economically and reducing its capacity to fund real change in indigenous communities, such as ending all boil water advisories and building adequate housing and schools.


Calgary Herald
33 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
Bell: Danielle Smith says 'the ball is in Carney's court' regarding Alberta separatism
Article content 'If we make some progress, that will determine the outcome of any potential vote,' says the premier. Article content Smith feels 'if people are feeling good about the relationship with Canada and good about Alberta's place in it' then separatist sentiment will dissipate as it did in the past. Article content Article content In Ottawa, the federal Conservatives aren't buying what Carney is selling. Article content 'We don't need headlines. We need results. Get our resources to market,' says Shuvaloy Majumdar, a Conservative member of parliament from Calgary. Article content There is stuff Carney and his Liberal government could do now. They don't have to wait. Article content Talking about an oil pipeline to the west coast is all well and good but no one is going to put their money on the line until Liberal anti-oil policies are dumped. Article content There is still the job-killing baggage from the days former prime minister Justin Trudeau was ringmaster of the Liberal circus. Article content Article content Get rid of the No New Pipelines law, demands the MP. Article content Get rid of the tanker ban off the B.C. coast. End the Liberal cap on oil and gas emissions. Article content Majumdar, the southwest Calgary MP, says Carney can 'break from Justin Trudeau's legacy.' Or not. Article content Tim Hodgson, Carney's main man on oil and gas, tip-toes through the Liberal government talking points. Article content Two other Conservative MPs from the West have a go at Hodgson. Article content Will he and his government scrap the crap, the anti-oil measures on the books standing in the way of big money flowing to a pipeline project? Article content Hodgson, a rookie politician, is already learning the not-so-fine art of speaking without saying anything. Let's remember in Calgary he did not take questions from newshounds. Article content 'There is no question this government will make Canada an energy powerhouse,' he says. Article content That is not an answer. Article content 'We support new pipelines if there is a national consensus.' Article content


Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
Border bill primed to give Mark Carney's government sweeping new powers. Who asked for this?
It was 'elbows up' during the federal election campaign as Mark Carney's Liberals portrayed themselves as fierce fighters against U.S. President Donald Trump and his administration's slide towards authoritarianism. But now it's 'elbows down' as the prime minister's new government tries to appease Trump's White House and puts Canadians' privacy rights and those of asylum seekers on the chopping block. The 'Strong Borders Act,' a sweeping omnibus bill was tabled Tuesday. It has 16 parts, and amends more than a dozen laws in ways that affect the rights of citizens and non-citizens, measures that Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree stated were a response to 'some of the concerns that have been posed by the White House.' But it also includes long-standing requests by Canadian law enforcement agencies who waited for an opportune time to slide through legislative changes.