Thai panel upholds suspension of doctors who helped ex-PM Thaksin Shinawatra dodge jail
BANGKOK, June 12 (Reuters) - Thailand's medical council on Thursday upheld its suspension of two doctors who enabled influential politician Thaksin Shinawatra to spend his prison sentence in hospital, a day ahead of the start of a Supreme Court case that could see him jailed.
Thaksin, the driving force behind the current government, returned from 15 years of self-exile in 2023 to serve a prison term for abuse of power and conflicts of interest, but was sent to hospital after only a few hours in jail complaining of chest problems.
The polarising billionaire, whose daughter Paetongtarn Shinawatra is prime minister, stayed in a VIP wing of the hospital for six months until his release on parole without a single night in jail, prompting public outrage and deep scepticism about the extent of his ailments.
"More than two-thirds of the council voted to uphold the punishments," Medical Council of Thailand vice president, Prasit Watanapa, told reporters.
"Members made the decision based on medical principles, evidence and reason."
The suspensions could impact a case at the Supreme Court that begins on Friday in which the legality of Thaksin's hospital stay has been challenged, with the possibility the tycoon could be made to serve that time again, in prison.
Thaksin, 75, remains a towering figure in Thai politics and though he holds no formal government role, he is highly influential.
His lawyer declined to comment on Thursday on the council's decision.
The revival of the controversy over Thaksin's hospital stay comes at a challenging time for Paetongtarn's government, which is seeing its popularity dwindle amid a prolonged struggle to spur economic growth and domestic pressure to take a tougher stance on an ongoing border dispute with Cambodia.
Thaksin's sentence was originally eight years, but it was commuted to a year by the king and he became eligible for parole after six months.
The medical council's vote overrides a veto of its earlier decision by Health Minister Somsak Thapsutin, a Thaksin ally.
The council had yet to confirm the duration of the suspension of the two doctors, who it found had issued documents that contained false medical information. They had denied wrongdoing and stood by their medical assessments.
Another doctor with the corrections department received a warning for failing to meet medical standards in a referral notice for Thaksin.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘They entrusted me with their daughter's memory': Women's prize winner Rachel Clarke on her story of a life-saving transplant
To read Rachel Clarke's The Story of a Heart, which has won this year's Women's prize for nonfiction, is to experience an onslaught of often competing emotions. There is awed disbelief at the sheer skill and dedication of the medical teams who transplanted the heart of nine-year-old Keira, who had been killed in a head-on traffic collision, into the body of Max, a little boy facing almost certain death from rapidly deteriorating dilated cardiomyopathy. There is vast admiration for the inexhaustible compassion of the teams who cared for both children and their families, and wonder at the cascade of medical advances, each breakthrough representing determination, inspiration, rigorous work, and careful navigation of newly emerging ethical territory. And most flooring of all is the immense courage of two families, one devastated by the sudden loss of a precious child, the other faced with a diagnosis that threatened to tear their lives apart. Sign up to Bookmarks Discover new books and learn more about your favourite authors with our expert reviews, interviews and news stories. Literary delights delivered direct to you after newsletter promotion To write such a story requires special preparation. 'I was full of trepidation when I first approached Keira's family,' Clarke tells me the morning after she was awarded the prize. 'I knew that I was asking them to entrust me with the most precious thing, their beloved daughter Keira's story, her memory.' The former journalist trained as a doctor in her late 20s, and has spent most of her medical career working in palliative care. Subsequently, she has also become an acclaimed writer and committed campaigner, publishing three memoirs: Your Life in My Hands, Dear Life and Breathtaking. She turned to her medical training for guidance when writing The Story of a Heart. 'I said to myself, my framework will be my medical framework, so I would conduct myself in such a way that they would, I hoped, trust me in the same way that someone might trust me as a doctor. And if at any point they changed their mind, then they could walk away from the project.' Each family read the manuscript in its entirety, with Clarke determined that she would not publish if they had any qualms. On the morning that we speak, she has been in touch with them, and she reads me a message from Loanna, Keira's mother. It says simply: 'Keira really has made such a difference to so many people. She is just incredible.' Loanna, she goes on to tell me, now visits schools to tell children about Keira; Max's mother, Emma, is an 'indefatigable' ambassador for the NHS's organ donation programme. Nobody who reads the book could forget the almost superhuman fortitude of Keira's father, Joe, or her sisters, all of whom not only consented but pressed forward with donating her organs, even as Loanna and Keira's brother were gravely injured. There, too, is the bravery of Max's father, Paul, supporting his desperately ill son through the pain and trauma of treatment; and Max's brother, Harry, now finishing his second year at medical school. It is because of these people that in 2020, Max and Keira's Law entered the statute books, ruling that adults would be presumed to have given consent to organ donation, rather than having to opt in, an enormously important step in addressing the scarcity of donor organs. For Clarke, it was also important to shine a light on the care with which the medical teams treat those who, in death, are giving someone else the chance of life; from the 'moment of honour' that precedes all surgery to retrieve donor organs, in which all fall silent to consider the patient, to the last offices of washing and dressing performed by nurses. 'It's the patient that's the important person,' she explains. 'And I think that says something very profound about us as a species, doesn't it?' Clarke, who is the mother of two teenagers, spends half her time working with patients, and half on 'other things'; not only writing books, but shining a light on the challenges her profession – and by extension all of us – are facing. At the moment, she is furious about the government's recent decision to stop issuing visas to foreign care workers, because what they do is regarded as unskilled labour. With a shortage of 100,000 care workers, the result is patients unable to be discharged from hospital: 'A direct consequence of that is I will see more patients on trolleys dying outside an A&E that they can't even get into because we don't have enough care workers. I will look them in the eye. Keir Starmer won't. Wes Streeting won't. But I will, and I will try to give them the best care I can in a corridor where there isn't even a curtain to draw around them for dignity.' She has, she says, always been torn between the arts and science, but that medicine is 'the perfect marriage of hard science and beautiful, messy humanity. And I try to write books that represent medicine accurately in that sense. You are not a good doctor if you're just a scientist and you're not a good doctor if you're just about emotion and feeling: you have to marry the two.'
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
MPs vote to let doctors raise assisted dying with terminally ill patients
MPs have voted to allow doctors to bring up assisted dying unprompted when speaking to terminally ill patients. An amendment to the Terminally Ill Adults Bill aimed at only allowing medical professionals to discuss assisted death if a patient raises it first was narrowly voted down on Friday. MPs debated Kim Leadbeater's proposals to legalise assisted dying for terminally ill adults over the age of 18 in England and Wales with six months or less left to live on Friday. The Commons will vote on the Bill as a whole next week, in a crunch vote that could see assisted dying effectively become law, subject to scrutiny in the House of Lords. Those who felt the Bill lacked safeguards for vulnerable adults put forward a change to prevent doctors mentioning assisted dying without their patient bringing it up. The amendment tabled by Dame Meg Hillier, a Labour MP, said: 'No registered medical practitioner or other health professional shall raise the subject of the provision of assistance in accordance with this Act with a person unless that person has first raised it.' The move was strongly opposed by the British Medical Association, which said that it would impede doctors from being able to freely talk to patients 'about all reasonable and legally available options'. But MP backers of the amendment said that it was vital to prevent subtle coercion of vulnerable adults. It was voted down by 256 votes to 230. But a second amendment banning medical professionals from raising assisted dying unprompted to a young person under the age of 18 narrowly passed. The safeguard for children will be added into the legislation, in a defeat for Ms Leadbeater, alongside a ban on advertising of assisted dying services. Labour MPs who oppose Ms Leadbeater's Bill said that her defeat represented an '11th-hour rejection of the claims made about the safety of this Bill'. 'Today's vote was a vote of no confidence in the Bill and has shattered the claim that this Bill was the safest in the world,' they added. They pointed to 'over 100' other amendments aimed to introducing other safeguards that had not been selected for debate 'and which MPs have not had a chance to scrutinise or vote on'. A number of other amendments were also passed, including a provision for deaths through assisted dying to not automatically be referred to a coroner. This comes after the Royal College of Pathologists, which represents medical examiners, saying that they were 'not qualified' for such a role and urging for coroners to be involved. The vote next Friday will be a free vote for MPs, which means that they are able to vote according to their conscience and will not have to follow a party whip. Kieran Mullan, a shadow health minister, expressed concerns that there had been insufficient time to scrutinise the 'deeply consequential and highly contentious piece of legislation for society'. But Stephen Kinnock, the care minister, argued that the over 90 hours of parliamentary time allotted to the Bill was 'more than most'.
Scottish Sun
11 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Scots schools that previously offered only gender-neutral toilets to make major change
The majority of schools in Scotland offer both single-sex and gender-neutral toilets LOO RULES Scots schools that previously offered only gender-neutral toilets to make major change Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SCHOOLS that previously offered only gender-neutral toilets are set to make a major change following a legal ruling. Around 18 schools in Scotland will reintroduce single-sex facilities in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling in April that a woman is defined by biological sex. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Schools across Scotland will reintroduce single-sex facilities following April's Supreme Court ruling Credit: PA This then meant that guidance around toilets, changing rooms and other facilities had to be reviewed to exclude trans people where single-sex services are provided. Now, schools in Aberdeenshire, Argyll and Bute, Scottish Borders and Shetland will create separate bathrooms for boys and girls. It comes after the Scottish government said that local authorities have a statutory responsibility for the school estate, including the provision of toilets. The majority of schools in Scotland offer both single-sex and gender-neutral toilets. But data obtained by BBC Scotland News revealed that 52 schools across 11 council areas have only gender-neutral toilets. Ten of these are located in Shetland, which now plans to add separate provisions. Scottish Borders, Aberdeenshire and Argyll and Bute councils are also following suit. The rules around gender provision in school toilets have not been updated since the School Premises (General Requirements and Standards) (Scotland) Regulations 1967 came into force. Seven councils are yet to confirm whether their schools will comply with the ruling. Dumfries and Galloway Council's legal team is reviewing its position. Landmark UK Supreme Court rules 'woman' means biological female in humiliating defeat for SNP Meanwhile, City of Edinburgh Council is "considering what changes need to be made" with an update expected this summer. Five other councils - Clackmannanshire, East Ayrshire, North Ayrshire, Midlothian and Perth and Kinross - all confirmed that they had at least one school in which offered no single-sex facilities. They did not confirm whether changes would be made. South Ayrshire, Moray, Stirling and South Lanarkshire councils said none of their schools had any gender-neutral toilets.
