New Dundee Transport Museum plans get £1m boost
Plans for a new Dundee Museum of Transport have been given a boost as the project secures a further £1,000,000.
The museum, which is currently located at Market Mews on Market Street, is hoping to relocate to the former Maryfield Tram Depot.
Museum bosses believe this will boost visitor numbers to more than 50,000 every year, bringing with it up to 30 new jobs and an economic boost of around £2.5m to Dundee.
Maryfield Tram Depot was built in 1901, and extended in 1913 and 1920 to form the current iteration.
A planning application lodged with Dundee City Council last year detailed how developers hope to utilise the depot's history as part of the rebuild
The total cost of the relocation project is estimated to be £5.5m.
The Scottish Government have now confirmed the development will receive a total of £1,001,430 from the Regeneration Capital Grant Fund.
It follows on from the £1.2m in Levelling Up funding promised by the UK Government.
This had been in doubt following Chancellor Rachel Reeves' budget last October, where she made no direct mention of the levelling up money.
However, the funding was officially confirmed earlier this year.
In total, the project has secured more than £3 million in funding over the past 12 months – including £250,000 from the Northwood Charitable Trust.
In addition to the funding, the museum has also received support from the National Fund for Acquisitions to secure its first artefact for the new premises.
This will be a vintage 1953 AEC Regent III double-decker bus in original Dundee Corporation livery. The iconic Number 137 bus served the city between 1954 and 1974.
The artefact will take centre stage in the new museum in a nostalgic street scene depicting life in Dundee in the 1950s.
Paul Jennings, executive director of Dundee Museum of Transport, said: 'Our consistent efforts over the last few years are now being rewarded with funding success, putting us in a position to appoint a main contractor later this year.
'While we still have additional funds to raise, once building work begins, they will continue through to completion of the new museum, which we anticipate will be by the end of 2026.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Why winter fuel payment changes may not be revealed for months
The government has been criticised for unclear messaging around upcoming changes to the winter fuel payment, with millions of pensioners left are uncertain. No decisions regarding the winter fuel allowance will be made until the Autumn budget, the science secretary has indicated, despite speculation of an announcement at next week's spending review. Peter Kyle said that the spending review will set overall constraints for government departments, with specific allocations to be determined later. The government faces a challenge to implement changes between the October budget and the winter months, following Rachel Reeves' confirmation of a U-turn on controversial cuts for this winter. Changes to winter fuel payments, which previously provided £300 to help with energy costs, aim to target those most in need, with concerns raised about pushing 100,000 pensioners into poverty by 2026.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Spending review is a chance for Reeves to paint a more positive picture
Rachel Reeves hopes to use Wednesday's spending review to tell a long-overdue story about Labour's purpose in power, that looks beyond fixing the Tories' fiscal mess. After the winter fuel U-turn and Labour's battering at the hands of Reform in last month's local elections, the chancellor's team are well aware that voters and backbench MPs need reasons to believe. And they are irked that Reeves gets little credit for the significant uplift in public spending she is delivering for priorities including the NHS – with debate dominated instead by the coming squeeze on 'unprotected' departments. They do have a point. Day-to-day departmental spending, known as RDEL in Treasury parlance, bobbled around £300bn a year between 2010 and 2019, before shooting up during the Covid pandemic and subsequent energy crisis to hit £423bn in 2023-4. Last autumn's budget, let's not forget, included a stonking £40bn-a-year tax increase, and bumped up RDEL to an estimated £481bn for the current financial year – a significant jump in spending that prompted thinktanks to increase their forecasts for economic growth. The growth rate of spending at the back end of the parliament will be considerably lower, after this early jolt, and the voracious demands of health and defence will force difficult decisions. But austerity this is not. By the end of the parliament, Labour expects day-to-day departmental spending to be more than £540bn a year. News that schools spending per pupil will reach its highest ever level in real terms is an example of what the government wants to do with the extra resources it is making available. The unfortunate truth for Reeves and her colleagues, though, is that two things can be true at the same time: the uplift in spending she has outlined is significant, and will make a real difference, but it is not enough to meet the scale of the challenges the UK faces. While the government is rightly trumpeting an uplift in public investment, for example, current plans show departmental capital budgets declining in real terms in the final two years of the parliament. It seems hard to imagine that being plausible, given the crumbling state of many hospitals, prisons and schools. The 'moral mission' of tackling child poverty, which Reeves has talked about, may also demand additional resources. The government badly needed a clearer story from the outset about what it wanted to achieve. But it will need it all the more if, as seems increasingly likely, it decides to come back to the country with more tax rises. Voters don't just want to hear the what (filling the 'black hole' in the public finances), but also the why. The economist Mariana Mazzucato – whose idea of the 'mission economy' Keir Starmer borrowed to create his cross-party, thematic approach to government – last week put her finger on one reason Labour may have struggled to explain its purpose. Speaking at a conference hosted by the IPPR thinktank, she said a primary mistake had been to try to make restoring economic growth a mission in itself. 'Growth is not a mission,' she said. 'The whole point about missions was to stop just talking about growth, focus on the problems, and design the solutions to those problems in such a way that drives, not just the rate of growth, but the direction.' She added: 'In a country like this one, where the private sector does not invest enough … missions should be designed in such a way to catalyse that missing private sector investment. And so, starting with the problems, whether it's net zero, whether it's health problems for cities, whether it's problems like knife crime – having really clear goals that you can actually answer: 'Yes or no, did we achieve it?'' Mazzucato argued that Labour's aspiration to become a clean-energy powerhouse was the only one of its five 'missions' that might qualify as such by her definition. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion She suggested that defence, too, which if pursued strategically could catalyse research and development and create jobs in a targeted way in left-behind areas, has mission-like characteristics. Economic growth for its own sake, not so much. Another reason Reeves now needs to remind the public what she stands for results from a sombre pre-election rebrand, aimed at overcoming voters' preconceptions about a woman – specifically, a Labour woman – in charge of the country's purse strings. One Labour pollster recalls a focus group early in Reeves's tenure as shadow chancellor when she had visited a construction site with Starmer, and and one voter wanted to know: 'Why has he taken his wife with him?' The sharp suits, serious demeanour and relentless focus on tough choices are a riposte to this kind of regrettable 'Rachel from accounts' nonsense, but they have resulted in a reductive idea of what Reeves stands for. Expect to hear more on Wednesday, then, about the scourge of child poverty, as well as the need to tool up to face the changed geopolitical context – and to rebalance the economy away from London and the south-east. Even if she sticks with current spending plans for the rest of the parliament, Reeves may yet have to make more tax increases in the autumn. It looks increasingly likely the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) will decide to downgrade its projections for productivity growth. The consultancy Oxford Economics suggests that if the OBR moves into line with the consensus on productivity – and cuts its growth forecasts as a result – it would leave the chancellor having to find an extra £20bn a year. Given that she is determined not to abandon her fiscal rules, that would mean tax increases. Reeves will need to be ready to tell a compelling story about why these are necessary. That should start this week, with a clearer and more hopeful picture of what Labour wants to achieve.
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Rachel Reeves turning around UK's finances 'like Steve Jobs did for Apple', claims minister
Rachel Reeves will turn around the economy the way Steve Jobs turned around Apple, a cabinet minister has suggested ahead of the upcoming spending review. Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle compared the chancellor to the late Apple co-founder when asked on Sky News' Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips where the £86bn for his department is coming from. The package, confirmed ahead of the full spending review next week, will see each region in England granted £500m to spend on science projects of their choice, including research into faster drug treatments. Asked by Trevor Phillips how the government is finding the money, Mr Kyle said: "Rachel raised money in taxes in the autumn, we are now allocating it per department. "But the key thing is we are going to be investing record amounts of money into the innovations of the future. "Just bear in mind that how Apple turned itself around when Steve Jobs came back to Apple, they were 90 days from insolvency. That's the kind of situation that we had when we came into office. "Steve Jobs turned it around by inventing the iMac, moving to a series of products like the iPod. "Now we are starting to invest in the vaccine processes of the future, some of the high-tech solutions that are going to be high growth. We're investing in our space sector... they will create jobs in the future." The spending review is a process used by governments to set departmental budgets for the years ahead. Asked if it will include more detail on who will receive winter fuel payments, Mr Kyle said that issue will be "dealt with in the run-up to the autumn". "This is a spending review that's going to set the overall spending constraints for government for the next period, the next three years, so you're sort of talking about two separate issues at the moment," he said. 0:42 Scrapping universal winter fuel payments was one of the first things Labour did in government - despite it not being in their manifesto - with minsters saying it was necessary because of the financial "blackhole" left behind by the Tories. But following a long-drawn out backlash, Sir Keir Starmer said last month that the government would extend eligibility, which is now limited to those on pension credit. It is not clear what the new criteria will be, though Ms Reeves has said the changes will come into place before this winter. Mr Kyle also claimed the spending review will see the government invest "the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system". However, he said the chancellor will stick to her self-imposed fiscal rules - which rule out borrowing for day-to-day spending - meaning that while some departments will get extra money, others are likely to face cuts.
