logo
Blue city faces calls for corruption probe in teacher's 'suicide' by 20 stab wounds case

Blue city faces calls for corruption probe in teacher's 'suicide' by 20 stab wounds case

Yahoo16-02-2025

The former Pennsylvania state trooper and private investigator who spent more than a decade digging into the suspicious death of Philadelphia teacher Ellen Greenberg wants President Donald Trump's Justice Department to launch a corruption probe into Philadelphia as he slammed Gov. Josh Shapiro over his involvement in the controversial case.
The remarks come shortly after the forensic pathologist who conducted the autopsy finally abandoned his highly disputed finding that her death from 20 stab wounds was a suicide.
Half of them came from behind, including one that experts say was likely inflicted after she was already dead. Dr. Marlon Osbourne, a former member of the Philadelphia Medical Examiner's Office who has since moved to Florida, initially ruled her death a homicide but changed his finding to suicide days later, after a closed-door meeting with police, according to court records. Details about that meeting have never been made public, and the lawyer for Greenberg's parents said no record of who took part from the police department or what was discussed inside exists.
That meeting alone is enough for a federal corruption probe, according to Tom Brennan, the family's private investigator for nearly a decade and a former Pennsylvania state trooper.
Death Of Teacher With 20 Stab Wounds To Be Reexamined As Parents Settle With City
Greenberg's parents have demanded a new investigation for years. Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner, citing a conflict of interest due to a past attorney-client relationship with the family, kicked the case up to the state attorney general's office headed by Shapiro at the time.
Read On The Fox News App
Nothing happened for years under Shapiro's office, according to Brennan.
"I can't stand a lying politician," he told Fox News Digital.
Teacher's Unlikely 'Suicide' Ruling Called Out As Web Sleuths Dig Into Surveillance Video
Brennan spent 25 years with the state police, including eight as an undercover detective investigating white-collar crime in Philadelphia.
"Don't tell me about corruption in Philadelphia," he said. "These people are foul. They are really foul."
Watch 'Teacher Death Mystery' On Fox Nation
As recently as last week, Shapiro said his office's investigation "pointed toward a suicide" in an interview with WHTM-TV.
In July 2022, an independent journalist named Gavin Fish posted a YouTube video alleging that AG Shapiro had "a clear conflict of interest" in the case and that Greenberg's fiancé's family was among his campaign donors. The AG's recusal from the case was announced three days later. He denied having "an actual conflict" but acknowledging the "appearance" of one.
On top of that, he had hired a former Philadelphia prosecutor who had overseen Greenberg's case in the city and assumed leadership of it in his office, Brennan said, another conflict when she was tasked with reviewing her own work.
But the alleged motivation to do nothing with the case may have been as simple as winning votes, Brennan said.
"Who needed the Philadelphia police and the Philadelphia vote in order to get into the governor's office? Attorney General Shapiro," Brennan said. "This guy puts politics above everything."
Despite offering public sympathy to Greenberg's parents, Brennan said Shapiro has never had a conversation with them or their investigative team about the case.
Follow The Fox True Crime Team On X
The case ultimately went to investigators from the Chester County District Attorney's Office, who spent two years reexamining it under Democratic DA Deb Ryan. They ultimately said they did not have enough evidence to bring criminal charges against anyone.
Much of the physical evidence was destroyed by a crime scene cleanup crew before police arrived at the apartment with a search warrant. Digital evidence may have been tainted after it was removed from the crime scene by prominent Pennsylvania Judge James Schwartzman, the uncle of Greenberg's fiancé.
"This guy's a judge and an attorney. He disciplines attorneys for doing things wrong," Brennan said. "What the hell was he thinking of?"
Neither Goldberg nor Schwartzman have been accused of any wrongdoing, but multiple judges have slammed the handling of the crime scene and the forensic investigation as part of the parents' two lawsuits.
Judge Tied To Ellen Greenberg's Fiancé Took Items From Her 'Suicide' Scene Before Police Search
Greenberg died Jan. 26, 2011, after Goldberg called 911 and said he found her dead in the kitchen of their Philadelphia apartment during a snowstorm. There was a half-prepared fruit salad on the countertop above her, she had just sent out save-the-date notices for their expected wedding and friends and family said she had not seemed suicidal.
Goldberg said he found her after returning from the gym in their building. However, according to Brennan, the first responders who arrived found him wearing different clothes than the athletic wear he had on in surveillance video downstairs.
WATCH: Sam Goldberg, fiancé of Ellen Greenberg at the time, seen in 2011 surveillance footage
Judge Dumbfounded By Error At Site Of 'Suicide' Where Teacher Was Found Stabbed 20 Times
The 27-year-old teacher was covered in bruises at various stages of healing, and half of her 20 stab wounds had been inflicted from behind. There was evidence that at least one wound was inflicted after her death, the scene had been staged and that her body had been moved, according to Brennan. He said dried blood would not have dripped sideways across her face if she'd died in the position she was found. And an outside autopsy found signs of manual strangulation on top of the other injuries.
"Reviewing the file and the crime scene photographs and the medical examiner's photographs, I don't know how you come to that conclusion [of suicide]," Guy D'Andrea, a former homicide prosecutor with the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, told Fox News Digital previously.
SIGN UP TO GET True Crime Newsletter
Police have been heavily criticized for their handling of the crime scene, which was left unsecured and cleaned up by a crew called in by building management before they returned with a search warrant.
After more than a decade of trauma for the parents and a pair of lawsuits, Dr. Osbourne finally walked back the controversial suicide finding in a letter to a Pennsylvania court last month.
"It is my professional opinion Ellen's manner of death should be designated as something other than suicide," he wrote. "Since issuing the amended death certificate, I have become aware of additional information I did not have at the time of issuing the amended death certificate which may have impacted my opinion."
GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE True Crime Hub
Days later, the City of Philadelphia settled a lawsuit with Greenberg's parents, Dr. Josh and Sandee Greenberg, that accused local officials and the medical examiner's office, including Osbourne, of participating in a "concealed conspiracy for the purpose of disguising Ellen's homicide as a suicide," according to legal documents.
Brennan is calling for a federal probe into the investigation and city officials by President Donald Trump's new Justice Department.
"You have people who are actually trying to hide a homicide," he told Fox News Digital. "Don't you think the federal government would be interested in the corruption?
"I hope, and I pray that Trump appoints a Republican U.S. attorney in Philadelphia."
Shapiro's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Fox News' Mollie Markowitz contributed to this report.Original article source: Blue city faces calls for corruption probe in teacher's 'suicide' by 20 stab wounds case

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Effort to ease cannabis rules faces new opposition from experts
Effort to ease cannabis rules faces new opposition from experts

Boston Globe

time40 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Effort to ease cannabis rules faces new opposition from experts

The US Department of Health and Human Services during President Joe Biden's term made the case that cannabis warrants rescheduling because it's already widely used as medicine in state programs to offer relief for conditions such as chronic pain, and carries a lower potential for abuse and harm than substances like opioids. Advertisement However, the study's authors criticized the comparison. 'In essence, HHS' reasoning is tantamount to saying that getting hit by a truck is relatively safe because it's less damaging than getting hit by a train,' the authors said. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The authors include Bertha Madras, a Harvard Medical School professor and addiction researcher who served on President Donald Trump's 2017 opioid commission. The second author, Paul Larkin, was previously a Justice Department lawyer who's now at the Heritage Foundation, which helped develop the Project 2025 agenda, a conservative policy plan that shares common themes with Trump's policy priorities. They also argue that federal health officials failed to fully consider risks such as youth consumption, rising rates of cannabis-use disorder, cannabis-impaired driving, and growing evidence linking high-potency marijuana to psychosis. Advertisement Rescheduling would move cannabis into a lower-risk category, recognizing its potential medical use. It wouldn't legalize the drug federally but would loosen restrictions, ease tax burdens and make it easier for cannabis companies to access financial services and claim tax deductions. The shift could also spark investment and legalization in more states, analysts say. The effort to reschedule cannabis began in 2022, when Biden instructed federal health and law enforcement agencies to reassess marijuana's status as a Schedule I drug, the government's strictest classification that includes LSD and heroin. The Justice Department later recommended moving cannabis to Schedule III, prompting a formal review by the Drug Enforcement Administration. The rescheduling process has stalled under the current Trump administration, leaving the cannabis industry and investors in limbo. The DEA postponed hearings earlier this year following legal appeals, and federal officials have not announced a new timeline. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who previously supported federal decriminalization, recently warned about the public health risks of high-potency marijuana. In February, Kennedy said there is a need for more research on cannabis effects and called for policies to address its harms. The House Appropriations Committee previously called for an investigation into the cannabis rescheduling process. In a report published last July, lawmakers directed the HHS Inspector General to review whether the Biden-era review followed proper standards and encouraged the FDA to study the mental health risks of high-potency marijuana use among adolescents.

Undocumented students ask judge to let them challenge sudden loss of in-state tuition
Undocumented students ask judge to let them challenge sudden loss of in-state tuition

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Undocumented students ask judge to let them challenge sudden loss of in-state tuition

A group of undocumented students on Wednesday asked a judge to let them intervene in a case that revoked their access to in-state tuition, the first step in their ultimate goal of overturning the ruling. The filing comes a week after the U.S. Department of Justice sued Texas over its 24-year-old law that allowed undocumented Texans who had lived in the state for three years and graduated from a Texas high school to qualify for lower tuition rates at public universities. Texas quickly agreed with the Trump administration's claim that the law was unconstitutional and asked a judge to find the law unenforceable. The quick turnaround — the whole lawsuit was resolved in less than six hours — represents a 'contrived legal challenge designed to prevent sufficient notice and robust consideration,' lawyers for these students argued in their motion. They're asking U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor to allow them to join the lawsuit and argue for why the statute should remain in effect. The Justice Department and the Texas attorney general's office oppose the motion on the grounds that the matter has been resolved and the case is terminated, court documents say. O'Connor, the George W. Bush appointee who blocked the law, has long been a favored judge for the Texas attorney general's office and conservative litigants. The Justice Department filed its lawsuit in the Wichita Falls division of the Northern District of Texas, where O'Connor hears all cases. The people who are most impacted by a lawsuit typically have a right to have their voices heard on a case, said David Coale, a Dallas appellate attorney. Getting O'Connor to agree to reopen might be a tough sell, he said, but if they're denied, they could appeal that ruling and the rest of the case alongside it, to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. 'The 5th Circuit's obviously a very conservative court, but part of that conservatism is a pretty limited view of the judicial role,' Coale said. 'So if they get a chance to argue their case there … they may have some luck.' The law, which has been in effect since 2001, grants in-state tuition to anyone who has been living in the state for three years and graduated from a Texas high school. All students who claim this benefit must sign an affidavit saying they intend to become U.S. citizens as soon as they are able; many of them are here as part of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. The motion lays out the human impact of the law's sudden reversal — a man who is reconsidering his plans to go to medical school in Texas; a woman who will have to drop out of her masters program, where she was studying to become a counselor; a teacher-in-training who will have to delay her plans to graduate and begin working. They are represented by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which said in a press release that the abrupt overturning of the law has left students scrambling. 'What happened last week – the invalidation of longstanding state law in the course of one afternoon – was an abuse of our judicial system,' said MALDEF President Thomas A. Saenz. 'Those affected by the attempted invalidation have the right to be heard on the legality of the Texas Dream Act.' Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer. Get tickets. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

Trump seeks to undo California's two newest national monuments
Trump seeks to undo California's two newest national monuments

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Trump seeks to undo California's two newest national monuments

The Trump administration is moving forward with plans to abolish California's two newest national monuments, Sáttítla Highlands National Monument in the state's far north and Chuckwalla National Monument near Joshua Tree. The push to eliminate the designations, issued earlier this year by former President Joe Biden, was revealed in a U.S. Justice Department memo this week, responding to legal questions from the administration about rolling back the California monuments. Sáttítla Highlands monument was established in January to protect a remote 224,000-acre volcanic landscape northeast of Mount Shasta, known for lava beds and caves. The designation was sought by Northern California's Pit River Tribe to prevent geothermal power production at tribally sacred sites. The Chuckwalla monument safeguards 624,000 acres of desert that was similarly under threat of energy development. The Trump administration did not directly respond to questions from the Chronicle about the California monuments. However, in a statement, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields cited the president's pledge to 'liberate our federal lands and waters to oil, gas, coal, geothermal and mineral leasing.' National monuments, under the Antiquities Act of 1906, have long been a way for presidents to unilaterally set aside ecologically or culturally important lands for protection. Less common and legally debatable is a president's authority to roll back the designations. The Justice Department, led by appointees of President Donald Trump, said in Tuesday's memo requested by the White House that the president could proceed with the elimination of California's monuments. The opinion, however, is certain to be challenged if and when the administration follows through on any repeals. Media reports in March suggested that plans to eliminate or reduce the size of several national monuments established by Biden were imminent, but the moves never came to pass. During Trump's first term, he drastically shrank two national monuments in southern Utah, Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante. The actions were reversed by the Biden administration. Legal action challenging those reductions was never resolved. The Justice Department's new 50-page legal memo, prepared by Deputy Assistant Attorney General Lanora C. Pettit, concludes that the Antiquities Act gives the president the power to determine that national monuments have become, or never were, worthy of the designation. While the act doesn't explicitly address rollbacks of monuments, Pettit says its silence on the subject implies such authority. While the opinion was prepared in response to questions about Sáttítla Highlands and Chuckwalla, it could apply to any national monument. The opinion reverses prior legal opinion by the federal government that monuments cannot be altered. The Center for Biological Diversity, which fought the shrinking of the Utah monuments, says the Department of Justice opinion is wrong. The environmental organization says it's committed to going to court to protect California's monuments or any others that Trump might target. 'It's remarkable to see the DOJ trying to manufacture legal rationale to undo monuments that the American public cherishes,' said Taylor McKinnon, southwest director for the Center for Biological Diversity. 'These are some of our most important public lands.' National monuments have often been upgraded by Congress to national parks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store