logo
Superior council considers splash pad, road construction contracts

Superior council considers splash pad, road construction contracts

Yahoo17-05-2025

May 16—SUPERIOR — Two major projects could get underway soon after the Public Works Committee recommended awarding contracts and entering related agreements Thursday, May 15. The projects are the reconstruction of East Fifth Street between 24th and 31st avenues east and a new splash pad in Wade Bowl.
The East Fifth Street project is expected to get underway in June and wrap up in mid-October. Plans include a full excavation and replacement of the roadway and sidewalk, a new drainage system to extend the life of the new road and utility work.
The committee recommended awarding the construction contract to M. Jolma Inc. of Ashland after the company submitted a low bid of less than $3.4 million for the project. Five companies submitted bids, with the next lowest bid costing about $428,000.
However, Northern Building Trades, a collective of trade unions, questioned whether the lowest bid was presented by a company that meets the requirements of the city's responsible contractor ordinance. The ordinance defines what a responsible contractor is based on applicable state and federal law.
Dan Olson, who served on the council when the ordinance was written, shared the building trades concerns, including over a violation of employee-related offenses regarding wage and hour violations and secondary violations related to the Davis Bacon Act investigated by the U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division.
"It is my information that M. Jolma withheld the information of the violations and the responsible contractor's ordinance says that you need to disclose all this stuff and it wasn't," Olson said.
"It's never fun to go in front of a city council," said Aaron Dean, an attorney representing M. Jolma Inc. "We want the contract. We don't want the fight."
Dean said the company paid what it was required to following the investigation.
"We didn't try to chisel anyone and say we're going to question any of the allegations," Dean said.
City Attorney Frog Prell cautioned the committee to brace themselves for packets of information on every contractor or subcontractor the city would do business with and higher costs if they start rejecting the low bid.
Councilor Garner Moffat made the motion to accept M. Jolma Inc.'s bid, which was seconded by Councilor Tylor Elm.
"You're sitting across from someone that basically lied on their application and did not disclose things," Olson said.
Elm said the violation should have been disclosed, suggesting the ordinance is not working the way that it should.
However, "The fact that the Department of Labor did not put a penalty on this is telling," Elm said.
Oversight of the project would be performed by Short Elliot Hendrickson Inc. for $282,000.
Agreements with Superior Water, Light & Power, and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway were also recommended as part of the reconstruction project.
Water infrastructure will be removed and replaced, and SWL&P agrees to pay for the estimated $760,000 expense associated with the water infrastructure. Utility service interruptions are anticipated during the project.
The railroad crossing at about 25th Avenue East will also be replaced. While the current crossing does not require replacement under the Office of the Commissioner of Railroads' guidelines, BNSF has agreed to partner with the city and share the cost equally for sidewalk replacement and roadway crossing improvements. The city contribution totals about $54,000.
The project will be funded with grants from the state's Local Road Improvement Program and the city's capital improvement program. The Environmental Services Division enterprise fund will pay for sanitary and storm sewer work.
Wade Bowl was selected as the site for a splash pad after the Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan identified the community's desire for a splash pad.
Designed by MSA, the splash pad includes multiple water features built around an outdoor nature theme, a picnic and seating area, and a bio-infiltration swale to collect and absorb water to support a natural vegetation area.
The committee is recommending Northern Interstate Construction Inc. of South Range for the project after the company submitted the low bid of $688,000. Three companies bid on the project.
The splash pad will be funded through the city's Community Development Block Grant.
The council will consider all the agreements and contracts when it meets Tuesday, May 20.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Couche-Tard Sees ‘Clear Path' to Seven & i Deal With US Stores Divestment
Couche-Tard Sees ‘Clear Path' to Seven & i Deal With US Stores Divestment

Bloomberg

time24 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Couche-Tard Sees ‘Clear Path' to Seven & i Deal With US Stores Divestment

Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. said several potential buyers have made proposals to acquire convenience stores in the US that overlap with Seven & i Holdings Co., showing progress toward a deal that could help the Canadian retailer win regulatory approval for its proposal to buy its Japanese rival. The two agreed earlier this year to discuss the potential divestment of more than 2,000 stores in the US and seek out interested parties in order to address concerns by Seven & i over a merger being blocked by the US Federal Trade Commission. Couche-Tard also pushed back against any parallels to the failed $24.6 billion merger of grocery chains Kroger Co. and Albertsons Cos.

These L.A. Business Owners Say Protest-Fueled Mayhem Is Hammering Their Sales
These L.A. Business Owners Say Protest-Fueled Mayhem Is Hammering Their Sales

Wall Street Journal

time27 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

These L.A. Business Owners Say Protest-Fueled Mayhem Is Hammering Their Sales

LOS ANGELES—Johnny Wong has been painting over graffiti outside his downtown flower shop every morning since political protests marred by vandalism and violence began late last week. On Wednesday morning, he gave up. 'We just got tired,' said Wong, whose revenue is down 80% in the past few days. He closes each day around noon. Foot traffic has plummeted and many people aren't braving the streets to pick up orders.

Female athletes contest new NCAA ruling, claiming violations of federal anti-discrimination law
Female athletes contest new NCAA ruling, claiming violations of federal anti-discrimination law

Fox News

time29 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Female athletes contest new NCAA ruling, claiming violations of federal anti-discrimination law

Eight women's college soccer, volleyball and track and field athletes have filed an appeal challenging the House v. NCAA antitrust settlement. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken approved the settlement last week, clearing the way for direct payments from universities to athletes. The eight women argue female athletes won't receive their fair share of $2.7 billion in back pay for athletes barred from making money off their name, image and likeness (NIL). Kacie Breeding of Vanderbilt; Lexi Drumm, Emma Appleman, Emmie Wannemacher, Riley Haas, Savannah Baron and Elizabeth Arnold of the College of Charleston; and Kate Johnson of Virginia lead the appeal. They all previously filed objections to the proposed settlement. Ashlyn Hare, one of the attorneys representing the athletes, said in a statement the settlement violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. "We support a settlement of the case, but not an inaccurate one that violates federal law. The calculation of past damages is based on an error that ignores Title IX and deprives female athletes of $1.1 billion," Hare said. "Paying out the money as proposed would be a massive error that would cause irreparable harm to women's sports." The House settlement figures to financially benefit football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, who are likely to receive a big chunk of the $20.5 million per year that colleges are permitted to share with athletes over the next year. Some athletes in other sports that don't make money for their schools could lose their partial scholarships or see their roster spots cut. "This is a football and basketball damages settlement with no real benefit to female athletes," Hare said. "Congress has expressly rejected efforts to exempt revenue-generating sports like football and basketball from Title IX's antidiscrimination mandate. The NCAA agreed with us. Our argument on appeal is the exact same argument the conferences and NCAA made prior to settling the case." The appeal, filed by the law firm Hutchinson Black and Cook of Boulder, Colorado, was first reported by Front Office Sports. It will be heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store