logo
Labour's welfare cuts consultation called a ‘sham' as PIP changes not up for discussion

Labour's welfare cuts consultation called a ‘sham' as PIP changes not up for discussion

Yahoo11-04-2025

The millions of benefit claimants affected by Labour's planned changes to welfare will soon be able to have their say on the controversial package, but with one crucial catch: they aren't allowed to talk about the planned cuts.
This is because several of the policies will not be included in the consultation, the Department for Work and Pension's (DWP) 'Pathways to Work' green paper reveals, prompting campaigners and charities to label the process a 'sham'.
Amounting to £4.8 billion in welfare cuts, Labour's proposed changes would scale back some of the key health-related entitlements in the UK.
The biggest cost-cutting measure in the package are the changes to the personal independence payment (PIP) – claimed by 3.6 million people – which make up 85 per cent of the savings.
Alongside this is a freeze to the rate the Universal Credit health element for existing claimants, and the move to nearly halve it for new claimants.
But neither of these measures will be included in the DWP's consultation, meaning disabled people will not be asked to discuss the changes at any of the sessions. In total, only half of the 22 policies proposed in the package will be in the scope of the conversations.
Those interested in sharing their views have been invited to attend one of 15 in-person or online sessions which will be taking place across the UK for 12 weeks, from April to June.
Announcing the start of the consultation on Monday, social security and disability minister, Sir Stephen Timms said: 'We inherited a broken welfare system, which incentivises ill-health, locks people out of work and isn't fit for a future in which so many of us will face long-term health conditions.
'We want a system that genuinely works for disabled people and those with health conditions, as well as the country and the economy, and we want to hear their views and voices at the heart of the new system.
'I encourage people to engage so they can have their say as we listen, learn and deliver support which will help millions into work, put welfare spending on a more sustainable path, and unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change.'
But a coalition of 21 groups called the Disabled People's Organisation (DPO) Forum has now written an open letter to work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall raising 'serious concerns with the human rights implications' of the consultation process.
The letter, signed by Disability Rights UK and Amnesty International, says the DWP has clearly already decided on some of the most substantial policies in the package, going against the Cabinet Office's own rules on consultations.
It adds that it is also concerned about its delay in publishing accessible versions of the paper, as well as the possibility that MPs will be voting on the policies without being able to see an analysis of how they will help people into work.
'In short, the consultation is essentially a sham – it removes our rights as Disabled people to take part in civic society,' the signatories say, adding that Labour must 'ensure that all proposals are open to consultation and public scrutiny, and reissue consultation questions which cover all policy proposals within the paper (not just those that DWP have chosen to include).'
In January, the High Court found that a consultation on changes welfare health assessments that were proposed by the previous Conservative government were unlawful due to being 'unfair and misleading.'
In his judgement, Mr Justice Calver said the eight-week consultation was 'rushed' and 'unfair,' finding it failed to reflect the 'substantial' loss of benefits many claimants would have faced as a result of the planned changes.
He added it gave the 'misleading impression' that the plans were about supporting people into work when cutting welfare spending was likely the 'central basis'.
Responding to the judgement at the time, Labour said it would 'address its shortcomings' at its own consultation. However, the DPO Forum writes that it notes'striking similarities to this process in the green paper with serious concerns.'
A DWP spokesperson said: 'We have set out a sweeping package of reforms to health and disability benefits to make urgent changes so people are genuinely supported into work, while putting the welfare system on a more sustainable footing, so that the safety net is always there to protect those who need it most.
'The publication of all accessible versions triggered the start of the official consultation, providing everyone with 12 weeks to respond.
'We encourage people to engage with the consultation, so a wide range of voices are reflected in the responses we receive.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour climate envoy racks up 76,000 air miles in eight months
Labour climate envoy racks up 76,000 air miles in eight months

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Labour climate envoy racks up 76,000 air miles in eight months

Labour's climate envoy has billed the taxpayer for flying the equivalent of three times the circumference of the Earth, The Telegraph can reveal. Rachel Kyte travelled by aeroplane on more than a dozen trips since becoming the Government's top diplomat for net zero in September, despite admitting her carbon footprint was 'a source of deep discomfort'. The majority of Ms Kyte's flights were business class and have cost taxpayers a total of £38,769, according to a Freedom of Information request made by this newspaper. When the distances of every leg of Ms Kyte's travel – all of which was on official business – are added up it equates to a little under 76,000 miles, according to website Air Miles Calculator, roughly three times the length of the equator. The busy travel itinerary, which saw the 60-year-old visit a foreign country every month between October and May, means her personal carbon footprint for the air travel could be as much as 15 metric tonnes of CO2, a carbon-tracking formula used by online database Earth911 suggests. Ms Kyte has previously spoken of air travel's negative impact on the environment and said that partly as a result she has felt personally conflicted about flying at times. In an interview with The New Statesman in 2021, Ms Kyte said: 'Having worked internationally for years, and with family on the other side of the Atlantic and friends spread across the world, the carbon footprint wrapped up in my social and professional identity is a source of deep discomfort.' In an interview with the Cleaning up Podcast in 2020, Ms Kyte said of her career: 'For a long time, I had been on a plane every Sunday night and on a plane many days during the week and I have to say I had angst about that kind of flying from a climate perspective.' She added that frequent flying also made it difficult to balance family life with work. There is no suggestion the academic, who is also a professor at Oxford University, has done anything wrong. Labour unveiled Ms Kyte as Britain's new special representative for climate in September. The post was previously vacant for more than a year after being axed by Rishi Sunak in 2023. The Government's website says Ms Kyte's objectives are to 'deepen and progress international climate partnerships' and 'drive for results in the clean energy transition and green and inclusive growth'. Ms Kyte racked up expenses for 16 journeys since October, flying business class on 12 occasions and economy class on 11. Richard Tice, deputy leader of Reform UK, said: 'The climate envoy is more like a travel writer travelling around the world to exotic locations.' It comes after David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, was embroiled in a hypocrisy row after his air travel bill rose to £1.2m between October and December last year. In January, Ms Kyte travelled on a return business class flight from London to Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, to 'unlock private sector investment in renewable energy' through her attendance at the Africa Energy Summit, at a cost of £6,040 to taxpayers. A one-way business class flight that took Ms Kyte from Boston in the US to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to attend the COP16 conference in December cost £5,436. Another one-way business class flight took Ms Kyte from Washington DC to London in April, costing £5,129. A further journey saw Ms Kyte fly business class from London to Hanoi, Vietnam, last month, returning via Jakarta, Indonesia, on tickets that cost £4,559. On the trip she visited Singapore using economy class flights, which together cost £578. In Singapore she spoke at climate events including Ecosperity Week and the GenZero Climate Summit and met with government representatives to 'deepen collaboration on areas such as energy connectivity and carbon markets'. Other destinations on Ms Kyte's itinerary since becoming climate envoy include Cape Town and Johannesburg in South Africa, Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates, Baku in Azerbaijan, New Dheli and Rome. A Foreign Office spokesman said: 'The Special Representative for Climate was appointed specifically to support ministers in driving action on this government's strategic priorities on international climate action and energy policy. Her international diplomacy has supported efforts to unlock more private finance to tackle the climate crisis and taken forward our mission to be a clean energy superpower. All travel has complied with internal travel policies. 'All FCDO travel is undertaken using the most efficient and cost-effective travel arrangements. Travel plans are decided with consideration of the best use of time and in the interests of the taxpayer.'

UK lawmakers consider decriminalizing abortion amid increasing prosecution concern

time5 hours ago

UK lawmakers consider decriminalizing abortion amid increasing prosecution concern

LONDON -- British lawmakers are preparing to debate proposals to decriminalize abortion amid concerns that police are using antiquated laws to prosecute women who end their own pregnancies. The House of Commons on Tuesday is scheduled to consider two amendments to a broader crime bill that would bar the prosecution of women who take steps to end their pregnancies at any stage. Tonia Antoniazzi, the Labour member of Parliament who introduced one of the amendments, said change is needed because police have investigated more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortions over the past five years, including some who suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths. 'This is just wrong,' she said ahead of the debate. 'It's a waste of taxpayers' money, it's a waste of the judiciary's time, and it's not in the public interest.' Doctors can legally carry out abortions in England, Scotland and Wales up to 24 weeks, and beyond that under special circumstances, such as when the life of the mother is in danger. Abortion in Northern Ireland was decriminalized in 2019. Changes in the law implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic allow women to receive abortion pills through the mail and terminate their own pregnancies at home within the first 10 weeks. That has led to a handful of widely publicized cases in which women were prosecuted for illegally obtaining abortion pills and using them to end their own pregnancies after 24 weeks or more. A second amendment would go even further than Antoniazzi's proposal, barring the prosecution of medical professionals and others who help women abort their fetuses. Anti-abortion groups oppose both measures, arguing that they will open the door to abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy. 'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers,' said Alithea Williams, public policy manager for the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, which describes itself as the U.K.'s biggest pro-life campaign group.

UK lawmakers consider decriminalizing abortion amid concern about increasing prosecution of women
UK lawmakers consider decriminalizing abortion amid concern about increasing prosecution of women

Hamilton Spectator

time5 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

UK lawmakers consider decriminalizing abortion amid concern about increasing prosecution of women

LONDON (AP) — British lawmakers are preparing to debate proposals to decriminalize abortion amid concerns that police are using antiquated laws to prosecute women who end their own pregnancies. The House of Commons on Tuesday is scheduled to consider two amendments to a broader crime bill that would bar the prosecution of women who take steps to end their pregnancies at any stage. Tonia Antoniazzi, the Labour member of Parliament who introduced one of the amendments, said change is needed because police have investigated more than 100 women for suspected illegal abortions over the past five years, including some who suffered natural miscarriages and stillbirths. 'This is just wrong,' she said ahead of the debate. 'It's a waste of taxpayers' money, it's a waste of the judiciary's time, and it's not in the public interest.' Doctors can legally carry out abortions in England, Scotland and Wales up to 24 weeks, and beyond that under special circumstances, such as when the life of the mother is in danger. Abortion in Northern Ireland was decriminalized in 2019. Changes in the law implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic allow women to receive abortion pills through the mail and terminate their own pregnancies at home within the first 10 weeks. That has led to a handful of widely publicized cases in which women were prosecuted for illegally obtaining abortion pills and using them to end their own pregnancies after 24 weeks or more. A second amendment would go even further than Antoniazzi's proposal, barring the prosecution of medical professionals and others who help women abort their fetuses. Anti-abortion groups oppose both measures, arguing that they will open the door to abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy. 'Unborn babies will have any remaining protection stripped away, and women will be left at the mercy of abusers,' said Alithea Williams, public policy manager for the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, which describes itself as the U.K.'s biggest pro-life campaign group.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store