SEC College Basketball Games: Live Stream and TV Channel Info for March 4, 2025
SEC College Basketball Games: Live Stream and TV Channel Info for March 4, 2025
Tuesday's college basketball slate includes five games with SEC teams on the court. Among those games is the Auburn Tigers taking on the Texas A&M Aggies.
Check out: USA TODAY Sports Coaches Poll
How to watch SEC games on March 4
College basketball odds courtesy of BetMGM Sportsbook. Odds updated Monday at 8:54 p.m. ET. For a full list of sports betting odds, access USA TODAY Sports Betting Scores Odds Hub.
No. 1 Auburn Tigers at No. 11 Texas A&M Aggies
Auburn meets Texas A&M at 9 p.m. ET on Wednesday at Reed Arena in College Station, Texas.
TV channel: ESPN
ESPN Live stream: Fubo (Watch for free Regional restrictions may apply)
LSU Tigers at No. 23 Kentucky Wildcats
LSU plays Kentucky at 7 p.m. ET on Wednesday at Rupp Arena in Lexington, Kentucky.
TV channel: ESPN
ESPN Live stream: Fubo (Watch for free Regional restrictions may apply)
Texas Longhorns at No. 24 Mississippi State Bulldogs
Texas will match up with Mississippi State at 8 p.m. ET on Wednesday at Humphrey Coliseum in Starkville, Mississippi.
TV channel: SECN
SECN Live stream: Fubo (Watch for free Regional restrictions may apply)
Georgia Bulldogs at South Carolina Gamecocks
Georgia meets South Carolina at 6 p.m. ET on Tuesday at Colonial Life Arena in Columbia, South Carolina.
TV channel: SECN
SECN Live stream: Fubo (Watch for free Regional restrictions may apply)
Arkansas Razorbacks at Vanderbilt Commodores
Arkansas will take the court against Vanderbilt at 10 p.m. ET on Wednesday at Memorial Gymnasium in Nashville, Tennessee.
TV channel: SECN
SECN Live stream: Fubo (Watch for free Regional restrictions may apply)
Follow the latest college sports coverage at College Sports Wire.
Watch college basketball on Fubo!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Ranking every SEC basketball stadium by seating capacity
Ranking every SEC basketball stadium by seating capacity The Georgia Bulldogs are not known for having the best basketball program in the SEC, but the Dawgs were part of the best conference in men's basketball during the 2024-2025 season when a record-breaking 14 (of 16) SEC teams made March Madness. The Florida Gators ended up as the national champions to cap the SEC's elite season. That means 87.5% of SEC basketball fan bases had a team that made the 2024-2025 NCAA Tournament. The Georgia Bulldogs were one of those teams to make March Madness. They went 20-13 in the 2024-25 season, good enough to earn a No. 9 seed in March Madness. The Bulldogs can welcome up to 10,253 fans in Stegeman Coliseum and in 2024-2025 those fans were treated to a Georgia team that reached new heights not seen in years. Stegeman Coliseum ranks just 13th in maximum seat capacity among all SEC basketball stadiums. Despite that, Georgia was still able to beat Kentucky and Florida in Stegeman Coliseum in 2024-2025, showing that UGA still has a strong home-court advantage. Ranking all 16 SEC men's basketball stadiums by capacity Tennessee Volunteers (Stadium: Thompson-Boling Arena, Max Capacity: 21,678) Kentucky Wildcats (Rupp Arena, 20,500) Arkansas Razorbacks (Bud Walton Arena, 19,368) South Carolina Gamecocks (Colonial Life Arena, 18,000) Alabama Crimson Tide (Coleman Coliseum, 15,383) Missouri Tigers (Mizzou Arena, 15,061) Vanderbilt Commodores (Memorial Gymnasium, 14,316) LSU Tigers (Pete Maravich Assembly Center, 13,215) Texas A&M Aggies (Reed Arena, 12,989) Oklahoma Sooners (Lloyd Noble Center, 11,528) Texas Longhorns (Moody Center, 10,763) Mississippi State Bulldogs (Humphrey Coliseum, 10,575) Georgia Bulldogs (Stegeman Coliseum, 10,523) Florida Gators (Exactech Arena at the Stephen C. O'Connell Center, 10,151) Ole Miss Rebels (The Sandy and John Black Pavilion at Ole Miss, 9,500) Auburn Tigers (Neville Arena, 9,121) Follow UGAWire on Instagram!
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
The leaders of college sports still don't get it
A quarter century ago, the NCAA invested $150,000 in lobbying on Capitol Hill. To a couple of lobbyists. For one year. In the first quarter of this year alone, the college sports governing body spent more than a quarter of a million dollars on the same. Using more than a dozen lobbyists. After having spent more than half a million dollars on lobbying last year, just as it had in each year since 2021. While throwing its authority behind bills such as H.R. 8534, titled the 'Protecting Student Athletes' Economic Freedom Act,' which would actually do anything but by restricting college athletes from being classified as employees who receive a paycheck and benefits like everyone else working in college sports. The NCAA's lobbying fund has been well spent. So too, apparently, was the $200,000 that the bellwether college athletic conference, the SEC, spent in 2025's first quarter to get its concerns before legislators, on top of the $800,000 it doled out last year. And the $160,000 the Big Ten spent in this year's first quarter, chasing the $460,000 it paid in 2024. Because listening Thursday to a congressional subcommittee discussing the barely week-old court approval of the multibillion dollar House v. NCAA settlement, which codified for the first time that colleges can pay their athletes directly, it was clear that what much of the media touted last week as a landmark victory for athletes may have been a big win for those who have always controlled them — the NCAA and the colleges and universities for whom they toil. Certainly, the Republicans who control House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on commerce, manufacturing and trade sounded Thursday as if they had bought what those entities were selling, from outdated terminology describing college athletes to ideas about how to manage them in the future, no matter last week's liberating decision. They called the hearing, 'Winning Off the Field: Legislative Proposal to Stabilize NIL and College Athletics.' The senior member of the committee, Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R-Florida), and most others referred to college athletes as 'student-athletes,' the misleading phrase created by the modern NCAA's architect, Walter Byers, as a prophylactic for the NCAA and its member schools against claims that college athletes were employees entitled to compensation and, particularly if injured, benefits. Most of the inquisitors — 14 of the subcommittee's 25 members are Republicans — seemed to prefer answers from one of the four witnesses, SEC associate commissioner William King, who in his opening statement regurgitated the false bromide about college athletes: 'We're the only country in the world where elite athletes … can use their athletic ability to receive a college education for free while pursuing their athletic goals at the same time.' Free? Their athleticism, which results in scoring touchdowns and getting buckets, is called labor. In return, they get room and board and the chance to pursue a degree. Meanwhile, King, on the backs of those athletes' labor, was paid three-quarters of a million dollars last year and his boss, SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey, pocketed $4.2 million. SEC football and basketball players are no less employees than the conference executives, athletic directors and coaches for whom they perform. And they should be treated as such. Sharing in the revenue they produce in addition to selling their name, image and likeness. Enjoying the ability to organize. Being represented at the bargaining table. But the Republicans running Thursday's subcommittee have also floated legislation titled the 'Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements Act of 2025' that includes, among other restrictions on those athletes, several provisions ensuring those athletes would not be designated as employees. Unless and until those who control college athletics fully acknowledge and treat athletes as the employees who make college sports thrive, it will forever be a queasy enterprise, morally and ethically. Even Supreme Court Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh underscored as much four years ago in the ruling that tipped the scale and helped make last week's ruling possible. 'The bottom line is that the NCAA and its member colleges are suppressing the pay of student-athletes who collectively generate billions of dollars in revenues for colleges every year,' Kavanaugh wrote in NCAA v. Alston. 'Those enormous sums of money flow to seemingly everyone except the student-athletes. College presidents, athletic directors, coaches, conference commissioners, and NCAA executives take in six- and seven-figure salaries. Colleges build lavish new facilities. But the student-athletes who generate the revenues, many of whom are African American and from lower-income backgrounds, end up with little or nothing.' Yet these legislators, so many college athletic administrators from the most powerful conferences such as the SEC and, of course, the NCAA, still don't want to share the whole loaf. Only a slice. Last week's agreement gives colleges the options to share up to $20.5 million with their athletes over the next year. But that's a fraction of the wealth produced by college sports. King defended using the vernacular vestiges that deny employment status to college athletes by claiming, without evidence, that most SEC athletes don't want to be employees of their universities. This is the same conference that I found talking its football players into playing amid a newfangled pandemic with long-term health consequences unknown at the time. It strains credulity, of course, that those athletes wouldn't want to be paid like King, or their coaches, or even someone on the maintenance crew — and to receive all the same health benefits, long-term and short, and worker's comp. After all, the NCAA likes to tout that most of its athletes 'go pro in something other than sports.' Which means college is their biggest opportunity to earn money from their athletic talent. Don't be hypocritical by denying them.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
US Open live leaderboard updates: Final round tee times, pairings, how to watch
US Open live leaderboard updates: Final round tee times, pairings, how to watch Show Caption Hide Caption J.J. Spaun calls it his best putting day of the year J.J. Spaun navigated Oakmont's tough setup with sharp putting and gritty play in round one of the U.S. Open. USGA The 2025 U.S. Open enters its final chapter on Sunday at Oakmont Country Club. The leaderboard highlights just how arduous this journey has been for golf's brightest. American Sam Burns enters Sunday as the leader after posting 4-under for the tournament, followed closely by Adam Scott (-3) and J.J. Spaun (-3), who are both tied for second entering the final round. Absent from the top is world No. 1 golfer Scottie Scheffler, who is tied for 11th as Sunday tees off. Bryson DeChambeau, the 2024 champion, failed to make the cut after posting a seven-over par 77 on Friday. Oakmont's treacherous course will offer no favors to the field as weather may be an issue on the final day. USA TODAY Sports has you covered on the U.S. Open's final round with tee times, updates and more: U.S. Open 2025 live leaderboard 1. Sam Burns: -4 (F) (F) T2. J.J. Spaun: -3 (F) (F) T2. Adam Scott: -3 (F) (F) 4. Viktor Hovland: -1 (F) (F) 5. Carlos Ortiz: E (F) (F) T6. Thriston Lawrence: +1 (F) (F) T6. Tyrrell Hatton: +1 (F) (F) 8. Rasmus Neergaard-Petersen: +2 (F) (F) T9. Robert MacIntyre: +3 (F) (F) T9. Cameron Young: +3 (F) ➤ Complete U.S. Open leaderboard Where to watch the US Open: TV channel, streaming Sunday The 2025 U.S. Open is being broadcast by NBC and USA Network, with the two networks splitting coverage for the third and final rounds. All rounds of the U.S. Open will be live streamed on Peacock, the USGA app and Fubo, which offers a free trial. Peacock will also broadcast U.S. Open All-Access, its whip-around style offering, for every round. Final Round: Sunday, June 15 9 a.m.-12 p.m. on USA Network, Fubo 12-7 p.m. on NBC, Peacock, Fubo Watch the U.S. Open on Fubo (free trial)
