logo
Store, harvest, fix: How Texas can save its water supply

Store, harvest, fix: How Texas can save its water supply

Yahoo31-03-2025

This article is part of Running Out, an occasional series about Texas' water crisis. Read more stories about the threats facing Texas' water supply here.
Bad news: Texas is running out of water.
Good news: There are several solutions local and state leaders can take to make sure we don't.
The state's water supply is threatened by a changing climate, rapid population growth, and outdated infrastructure, which loses billions of gallons of water each year. Texas' water demand is growing. By 2070, the state is projected to need an additional 7.7 million acre-feet of water per year to meet the needs of residents, farmers, and industries if strategies are not implemented.
The answers to our water crisis range from the traditional (think reservoirs) to the innovative (think desalination).
Texas lawmakers are expected to pledge billions of dollars to the state's water supply this spring. However, there is a big debate on which strategies to invest in. Do we invest more into creating new water supplies or repairing old, leaking pipes statewide?
[Texas is running out of water. Here's why and what state leaders plan to do about it.]
The Texas Water Development Board has recommended more than 2,400 water management strategy projects to increase water supply. The cost to implement those strategies is estimated to be $80 billion (in 2018 dollars) by 2070, not including inflation. No single solution can meet all of Texas' water needs. And it will not be cheap. Water experts say policymakers must invest wisely, ensuring the most cost-effective and sustainable solutions are prioritized.
Here's a look at some of the solutions and their pitfalls.
Many water experts say that conservation is the first line of defense. Cyrus Reed, a longtime environmental lobbyist at the Texas Capitol and conservation director for the state's Sierra Club, called conservation 'the most conservative and lowest cost approach' to meet our water needs.
Conservation means using less water and using it more efficiently. That could look like reducing household and business water consumption through incentives, leak detection, and water-efficient appliances, improving irrigation techniques to minimize water loss, or encouraging industries to recycle water and reduce overall use.
[Want to understand Texas' water crisis? Start with the guide to water terms.]
One example is in El Paso. Since the 1990s, the city has had a toilet rebate program that has helped residents conserve water and save money on monthly water bills. The program offers a $50 rebate for customers who purchase water-efficient toilets that use 1.28 gallons per flush, as opposed to older toilets that use as much as six gallons per flush.
So far, they've given 54,000 rebates to their 220,000 customers, which includes homes, businesses and government agencies.
'Conservation is often underutilized due to the need for behavior change and the lack of regulatory enforcement,' said Temple McKinnon, a director of water supply planning at the water board.
Each of Texas' 16 regional water plans includes conservation strategies.
One of the obvious solutions — at least to water experts — is to fix the state's aging water infrastructure. Leaking pipes and deteriorating treatment plants have led to billions of water being lost. In 2023 alone, 88 billion gallons of water were lost in Texas' most populous cities, according to self-reported water loss audits submitted to the Texas Water Development Board.
'The most efficient water source that we have is the water that we already have,' said John Dupnik, a deputy executive administrator at the Texas Water Development Board.
Jennifer Walker, director for the Texas Coast and Water program with the National Wildlife Federation, said that fixing the infrastructure creates new water supplies because it's water that wouldn't be delivered to Texans otherwise.
'Anything that we can do to reduce waste is new water,' Walker said.
The Texas section of the American Society of Civil Engineers released their infrastructure report card last month. Texas received a D+ for drinking water, with the report emphasizing the role of aging infrastructure and the need for funding for infrastructure operation and maintenance.
One reason why the state's water systems have fallen behind is costs. Most water systems are run by cities or local agencies, which have tried to keep water rates and other local taxes low. This is particularly true in rural Texas communities that have smaller populations and tax bases. Texas 2036 has estimated the state's water agencies need nearly $154 billion by 2050 for water infrastructure.
State Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, has proposed a bill that could dedicate millions for new water projects. His emphasis is on what water experts call 'new water supplies.' One example is removing salt from seawater or brackish groundwater through a process called desalination, which makes water drinkable.
Most communities need to increase their water supply, especially as existing supply may be dwindling or face uncertainty, said Shane Walker, a professor at Texas Tech University who serves as the director of the Water and the Environment Research Center.
Desalination is one of the most promising solutions, Walker said. Texas is rich in both seawater along the Gulf Coast, and brackish groundwater, with underground reserves of salty water.
He said cities and towns shouldn't wait to tap into desalination until there are no options. 'Start now before you're in a jam,' Walker said.
Coastal cities like Corpus Christi are turning to seawater desalination as a drought-proof water source. While desalination plants are expensive to build and operate, the gulf region provides a large supply of water. By 2030, Texas is recommended to produce 179,000 acre-feet of desalinated seawater annually, increasing to 192,000 acre-feet by 2070, according to the latest state water plan. That's enough water to support about 1.1 million Texans for one year.
Texas also has vast reserves of brackish water underground, and cities like El Paso have already pioneered its use. The Kay Bailey Hutchison Desalination Plant is the largest inland desalination plant in the world. At max capacity, it can produce 27.5 million gallons of drinking water daily from brackish groundwater in the Hueco Bolson Aquifer. It also produces 3 million gallons of concentrate, which is the leftover water containing all the salt and impurities that was filtered out. A pipeline sends the concentrate more than 20 miles from the plant where it is injected underground.
However, desalination comes with challenges: First, the process requires large amounts of energy to push water through membranes that separate salt and impurities, which is expensive. Then there's the disposal of concentrated brine, a highly salty liquid that's a byproduct of desalination. It must be carefully managed to avoid harming marine ecosystems or the environment.
'It'll always come back to the concentrate disposal,' said Art Ruiz, chief plant manager for El Paso Water and the former manager of the city's desalination plant. 'No matter how small or how big [the plant], you're going to create a byproduct.
Recycling every drop of water is another solution. Water reuse allows treated wastewater to be reclaimed for various purposes, from irrigation to industrial cooling.
One way of reusing water is direct potable reuse, which involves treating wastewater to drinking-water standards and either reintroducing it directly into the water supply or blending it with other sources before further treatment. Indirect potable reuse follows a similar process, but first releases treated water into a natural reservoir or aquifer before being re-extracted for use.
Lubbock has recently started this practice with Leprino Foods, the world's largest mozzarella cheese producer. The company opened an 850,000-square-foot facility in January and will produce 1.5 million pounds of cheese a day. In return for the water the company uses, Leprino will return around 2 million gallons of clean water to Lubbock every day. This accounts for about 6.25% of Lubbock's daily water use.
Leprino said they installed substantial capacity for water storage so the company could recover and store more water from the manufacturing process before it is cleaned.
'In Lubbock, we've designed and constructed the facility with water stewardship in mind from day one,' Leprino said in a statement.
El Paso is leading the way with its Pure Water Center Facility, which recently started construction. It will purify already treated wastewater for people to drink and deliver 10 million gallons daily. When it's operating in 2028, it will be the first direct-to-distribution reuse facility in the country. While the concept, 'toilet-to-tap' might seem unappealing at first, water utility experts say the advanced treatment process ensures the water is clean and safe.
San Antonio has embraced reuse for non-drinking water, sending treated wastewater from the city's Steven M. Clouse Water Recycling Center back into the city and its rivers. Purple-marked pipes carry recycled water to irrigate golf courses, cool industrial towers, and sustain the downtown River Walk. Some is diverted to an energy plant, while the rest flows to the gulf. In dry times, this steady outflow keeps the San Antonio River running.
Aquifer storage and recovery is exactly what it sounds like. A water utility can store excess water underground during wet periods, allowing it to be withdrawn during droughts.
El Paso has a program that injects treated water into the Hueco Bolson aquifer for future use. San Antonio stores excess Edwards Aquifer water in a certain site within the Carrizo Aquifer during wet periods, then recovers it during droughts. This method reduces evaporation losses compared to above-ground reservoirs and provides a reliable emergency water supply.
However, this process requires specific geological conditions to be effective, and not all areas of Texas have suitable aquifers for storage. In some cases, it can also take a long time to move water through all the levels underground to reach the aquifer.
One method being explored is creating and using playa lakes to recharge aquifers. Playas are shallow lakes that form in arid, flat regions and catch rainwater runoff. They are dry more often than wet, which is how they function — the water seeps through cracks in the dry soil of the playa's basin.
'Every time a playa dries out and we get a rain event, that's when recharge happens,' said Heather Johnson with Texas Parks and Wildlife in Lubbock. 'You'll get about three inches of rainwater infiltration into the playa basin annually.'
Johnson said for every four acres of playa basin, approximately one acre-foot of water is recharged — about 326,000 gallons of water. That's enough water to cover a football field with nine inches of water.
Ducks Unlimited, a nonprofit national organization that manages wetlands and habitat conservations, is working with Texas Parks and Wildlife in the High Plains to recharge the Ogallala Aquifer. Tavin Dotson, the first regional biologist in the region for Ducks Unlimited, said playa lakes store a seed bank and when playas fill, plants begin to grow. This creates a grassy buffer around the playa — which acts as a natural filter to wash out contaminants before water reaches the playa basin and aquifers.
Most of the Ducks Unlimited work in Texas is in the coastal areas. However, Dotson said there is a push to get the practice going even more in the High Plains, where the Ogallala Aquifer is facing declining levels.
One of the practices involves filling pits and ditches that disrupt how playas function. Filling the pits allows playas to properly retain and filter water. Johnson said the High Plains contains more than 23,000 playa basins.
Rain harvesting — capturing and storing rainwater for later use — is another way of conserving. This technique provides a decentralized water source for irrigation and livestock. While rainwater harvesting is an effective conservation tool, it is limited by Texas' variable rainfall patterns. It rains more in East Texas as opposed to the West. Still, some Texas groundwater districts actively promote rainwater harvesting to reduce reliance on municipal supplies.
High Plains Underground Water Conservation District in Lubbock — the first groundwater district created in Texas — monitors water use and levels in the Ogallala, Edwards-Trinity and Dockum/Santa Rosa Aquifers. The organization also encourages ways to conserve water, including rainwater harvesting. In recent years, the water district has helped raise awareness of the practice in the region.The district gave away ten rain barrels and 12 rain chains in 2023.
Most recently, the district sponsored several rainwater harvesting projects at the Lubbock Memorial Arboretum. Jason Coleman, general manager for the water district, said there are swales, or shallow areas, that catch rainwater.
'They are constructed in the landscape to help mitigate some of the runoff that was occurring at the arboretum,' Coleman said. 'They're nicely constructed. There's cobblestones and other nice features to make it a nice looking part of the landscape.'
Historically, Texas has relied on reservoirs to store and manage water — a solution that boomed after a devastating drought that lasted seven years in the 1950s.
There are more than 180 across the state. However, building new reservoirs has become increasingly difficult due to land constraints, environmental concerns, and the high costs of construction.
Despite these challenges, regional water planning groups proposed 23 new major reservoirs in the 2022 state water plan. However, new laws now require realistic development timelines and feasibility studies, meaning that reservoirs may not be seen as the go-to solution they once were.
Matt Phillips, the deputy general manager for the Brazos River Authority, told lawmakers during a House committee meeting that the population for the basin will double by 2080. The river authority serves Waco, Georgetown, Round Rock, College Station and other cities. Phillips said they would need an additional 500,000 acre-feet of water to meet those demands.
'All the cheap water is gone,' Phillips said. 'Every drop of water we develop from here on is going to be exponentially more expensive than anything we've seen in the past, so we're going to need help to get there.'
State Rep. Cody Harris, R-Palestine, filed legislation that would promote reservoir projects. Perry's Senate bill mirrors the proposal for reservoirs. In both, the water development board would be able to use money from the Texas Water Fund to encourage regional and interregional project developments. This includes the construction of reservoirs and stormwater retention basins for water supply, flood protection and groundwater recharge.
Disclosure: Ducks Unlimited, Texas 2036 and Texas Tech University have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
We can't wait to welcome you to the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Step inside the conversations shaping the future of education, the economy, health care, energy, technology, public safety, culture, the arts and so much more.
Hear from our CEO, Sonal Shah, on TribFest 2025.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It could soon become easier to build in Louisiana wetlands
It could soon become easier to build in Louisiana wetlands

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

It could soon become easier to build in Louisiana wetlands

Photo of cypress trees in the Atchafalaya River Basin. Environmental groups like the Atchafalaya Basinkeeper and Sierra Club worry a new bill will make it easier to develop in isolated wetland areas. (Elise Plunk/Louisiana Illuminator) In a stretch of wild land in Iberville Parish, a small dirt dam built across an out-of-the-way bayou is at the center of a lawsuit. Environmental advocates fear cases like this could become more common if a Louisiana proposal to redefine its wetlands becomes law. Opponents say this proposed change doesn't just open doors for mixed legal interpretations; it could also make it easier to erase valuable wetland habitat and build in flood-prone areas. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana in Baton Rouge two years ago by the environmental group Atchafalaya Basinkeeper and the Louisiana Crawfish Producers Association-West. They allege Benjamin Miller of Miller Hunting Club in Eunice illegally dammed Pat's Throat Bayou in 2021 to access hunting grounds on the other bank. The hunting club didn't get a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers before Miller built the dam, according to the lawsuit. Instead, the plaintiffs claim the USACE granted a permit after the dam was illegally built. If the Louisiana Legislature approves a proposed update to its wetlands laws, environmentalists fear property owners and developers will argue that wetlands like these – illegally dammed off from a navigable body of water – shouldn't be protected under state or federal law. 'There will be lawsuits,' said Margie Vicknair-Pray, conservation coordinator for the Sierra Club Delta chapter. 'They're changing the definition, but that doesn't change reality.' Mirroring Sackett Pat's Throat Bayou is a window into how a national policy shift could affect Louisiana. A 2023 Supreme Court decision, Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, narrowed federal protection for wetlands. The case arose from an Idaho family who backfilled their property, which the EPA later determined to be protected wetlands. The Sacketts challenged that determination, arguing successfully their land did not connect to a navigable water body – known in federal law as Waters of the United States (WOTUS). Before Sackett, developers needed a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers to dredge or fill a wetland area protected under the federal Clean Water Act. The Sackett ruling also left uncertainty as to where navigable channels under WOTUS begin and end when it comes to wetlands, according to Mark Davis, director of the Tulane Center for Environmental Law. 'They didn't define exactly how that's going to play out … and people will agree and disagree where those lines are drawn,' Davis said. This means owners and developers might not need permits from the USACE to build in isolated wetland areas. The grey area has prompted states to step in and try to fill the regulatory gap with their own wetlands laws. Louisiana state Sen. 'Big Mike' Fesi, R-Houma, has sponsored Senate Bill 94 in response to the Sackett decision. His bill looks to redefine wetlands cut off by levees that break their connection to navigable water bodies as 'fastlands,' disqualifying them from federal protection. Fesi said in an interview his bill is meant to bring Louisiana law in line with the Sackett decision. 'We try calling everything wetlands just because it has a little water in it,' Fesi said. 'It's gotten way out of hand.' The Sackett ruling does not affect wetlands connected to navigable bodies of water, such as the Mississippi River, or tidal wetlands along Louisiana's coast. They would still have federal protection under the Clean Water Act. Wetlands with levees, either through 'current or future lawful construction,' are left more vulnerable in Fesi's proposal. The senator did not give a conclusive answer when asked what will happen to current wetlands cut off by future levees, saying his bill was intended to invite room for individual interpretation 'One size doesn't fit all,' he said. That's exactly the issue wetlands advocates have with Senate Bill 94 – the room for interperetation it leaves for how wetlands are defined. In the case of Pat's Throat Bayou, the argument was over whether wetlands connected to the navigable bayou were cut off legally or illegally when Miller built a dam, said Brennan Spoor, a member of Atchafalaya Basinkeepers. The group's mission is to protect and restore the swamps and waterways of the basin. 'The bill applies to all [levees and dams] that are currently existing or future ones that are lawfully constructed,' Spoor said. 'You could argue that the dam was lawfully constructed, and therefore the wetlands that they have destroyed since they built the dam were never wetlands at all,' he added, explaining that the bill tries to eliminate the need for a federal permit if the property owners want to dredge or fill the landscape. The exact language of the bill is also concerning to legal experts for the confusion they say it will create in the law. Fesi's bill changes the definition of wetlands under the Louisiana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, the program that regulates contamination released into surface waters. But Louisiana still needs to follow federal law for pollutants. 'The notion of a continuous surface connection is not really part of the rule for what a pollution discharge covers,' Davis said. 'If anything, it creates deeper confusion rather than clarification.' The Louisiana Senate approved Fesi's bill Tuesday in a 35-1 vote. It heads next to the governor for his signature. Flood concerns As legal arguments mount, environmental advocates say the stakes are high for Louisiana. Building in wetland areas eliminates valuable habitat and increases the risk of flooding in nearby communities, Vicknair-Pray said. 'People just want to build where they want to build, and they don't want to think of the long-term consequences' like habitat loss and flooding, she said. 'That water has to go somewhere. We need wetlands for that water to back up into.' When asked about flood concerns, Fesi said he thinks his bill would make it easier to construct and repair levees, aiding with much-needed flood control in some areas and 'promoting individual property rights' for those wanting to build in previously defined wetlands. 'Those aren't wetlands,' Fesi said, speaking about wetland areas surrounded by levees or cut off from bodies of water. The 2023 Louisiana Coastal Master Plan, a document outlining various coastal restoration and flood protection projects, recommends a combination of wetland resources and manmade levees for flood control. The same document also warns that overengineering rivers like the Mississippi can 'impact coastal wetlands and undermine their ability to replenish naturally.' 'The marsh behind a levee is going to die,' Vicknair-Pray said. Aside from just diminished natural flood control, she worries wildlife living in isolated wetland areas, including migrating ducks and native reptiles, will be put at risk with development encouraged under Fesi's legislation. 'We used to consider this Sportsman's Paradise,' she said. 'I don't think we can say that anymore.'

Feds remove 18 regulations that hurt energy production and mining
Feds remove 18 regulations that hurt energy production and mining

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Feds remove 18 regulations that hurt energy production and mining

June 3 (UPI) -- The Interior Department has eliminated 18 outdated or redundant Bureau of Land Management regulations that the Trump administration says stymied energy production on public lands. The rescinded regulations include those regarding prospecting for mineral resources, mining claims, oil shale placer claims, and geothermal leases and drilling, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said on Tuesday in a news release. Other rescinded regulations include those for public lands hearings, annual fees for oil placer mining claims, surface management plans for mining, and hardrock mineral processing and milling. "This effort embodies our dedication to removing bureaucratic red tape that hinders American innovation and energy production," Burgum said. "By rescinding these outdated regulations, we are not only reducing costs and streamlining processes but also reinforcing our commitment to energy independence and national prosperity." Burgum said that commitment won't stop the Interior Department from "maintaining the highest standards of environmental stewardship." At least one environmental group disagrees. Removing the regulations also removes federal oversight of geothermal energy projects and mineral mining on public lands and in federally managed wilderness areas, officials with the Sierra Club said on Tuesday in a news release. The changes were made without any public input, the Sierra Club said. "Cutting the public out of a major policy change is a sign the policy isn't good for the public," said Athan Manuel, director of the Sierra Club's Lands Protection Program. "Rather than give the American people a chance to check their work, the Trump administration is forcing through changes that make it easier for corporate polluters to profit off the public lands that are held in trust for the American people," Manuel said. "It's just one more indication that [President] Donald Trump and his cabinet will stop at nothing to sell out our public lands to their billionaire buddies." The Sierra Club said the regulatory changes also fast-track "corporate extraction, like drilling, mining and logging, on public lands." It did not indicate whether or not a federal court challenge would be filed in the matter.

Feds remove 18 regulations that hurt energy production and mining
Feds remove 18 regulations that hurt energy production and mining

UPI

time19 hours ago

  • UPI

Feds remove 18 regulations that hurt energy production and mining

June 3 (UPI) -- The Interior Department has eliminated 18 outdated or redundant Bureau of Land Management regulations that the Trump administration says stymied energy production on public lands. The rescinded regulations include those regarding prospecting for mineral resources, mining claims, oil shale placer claims, and geothermal leases and drilling, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said on Tuesday in a news release. Other rescinded regulations include those for public lands hearings, annual fees for oil placer mining claims, surface management plans for mining, and hardrock mineral processing and milling. "This effort embodies our dedication to removing bureaucratic red tape that hinders American innovation and energy production," Burgum said. "By rescinding these outdated regulations, we are not only reducing costs and streamlining processes but also reinforcing our commitment to energy independence and national prosperity." Burgum said that commitment won't stop the Interior Department from "maintaining the highest standards of environmental stewardship." At least one environmental group disagrees. Removing the regulations also removes federal oversight of geothermal energy projects and mineral mining on public lands and in federally managed wilderness areas, officials with the Sierra Club said on Tuesday in a news release. The changes were made without any public input, the Sierra Club said. "Cutting the public out of a major policy change is a sign the policy isn't good for the public," said Athan Manuel, director of the Sierra Club's Lands Protection Program. "Rather than give the American people a chance to check their work, the Trump administration is forcing through changes that make it easier for corporate polluters to profit off the public lands that are held in trust for the American people," Manuel said. "It's just one more indication that [President] Donald Trump and his cabinet will stop at nothing to sell out our public lands to their billionaire buddies." The Sierra Club said the regulatory changes also fast-track "corporate extraction, like drilling, mining and logging, on public lands." It did not indicate whether or not a federal court challenge would be filed in the matter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store